How pathetically childish and cowardly that you open this thread
without saying a word to me outside of the threads in which we've been
interacting to accuse me of running away. It wasn't until today that
I even found your cowardly little aside, and then it was jsut by
accident.
So let me present you with this, and then please do let's "discuss"
who is running away:
On September 11th in thread, "Questions That Duke Can't Answer"
(http://tinyurl.com/6dzy4), I asked you ten simple questions relating
to demonstrating some sort of evidence for the reality of your
apparently blind belief system. They turned out to be questions that
you can't answer. You ran away. There are six unanswered messages
from me to you in that thread.
On September 16th, at your own request, I opened thread, "Duke: Global
Flood Challenge" (http://tinyurl.com/52pbv) and presented evidence
that the Genesis flood story was a myth that made no sense as written,
that the geology of Earth refutes the Noahic flood, and that such a
flood defies the laws of physics. Because you continually ran away
from actually responding to the questions I ask, I'm forced to
assemble and number them just to keep track of what you're fleeing
like a scared rabbit. There were some 14 points of geologic and other
evidence refuting a world-wide flood, and a similar number of Bible
issues. It turns out that you were out of his depth in the Noahic
flood. There is more than a dozen unanswered messages from me to you
in that thread.
On September 27th, again in response to something you said, I opened
thread, "Running Scriptural Circles Around Duke"
(http://tinyurl.com/4ok8a) and ran scriptural circles around you.
There are four unanswered messages
from me to you in that thread.
On October 27th in thread, "Why Puke is Such a Pathological,
Unregenerate, Cowardly, Lying, Hypocritical *****"
(http://tinyurl.com/3sld9), I asked, "Why is Puke such a pathological,
unregenerate, cowardly, lying, hypocritical *****?" It was
hilarious when you decided to actually own up to your description and
post in that thread, but once again, when it came down to the serious
challenges, you ran away, proving yourself to be a pathological,
unregenerate, cowardly, lying, hypocritical *****! There are some
20 unanswered messages from me to you in that thread.
Now you were saying something about "running away so soon?" I believe?
I gather it's not fun when you can't just fire some
questions from a book of questions
I made those questions up using information from the public domain and
the hard work of scientists over the last couple of hundred years.
Rest assured, the text is all mine. You won't find those questions in
any book, pamplet, flyer, email, web site, journal or magazine. I
cannot pretend to have originated the geologic record, however, from
which many of the questions were derived.
and actually are requested to participate in a discussion.
For us to have had a discussion would require that you lose your
pathological habit of running away every time you're asked a question,
that oyu make a serious attemot to answer the question as asked and
supprot your response where necessary. It also requires that you do
not get yourself into discussion where you don't have the first clue
as to what's under discussion. You know, like not trying to discuss
geology when you're completely ignorant about the topic.
Why, you'd actually have to know something to be capable of discussion.
Precisely, so why do you pretend you can have such a discussion when
all evidence demonstrates conclusively that you do not have the
intellectual wherewithal and maturity to actually conduct one?
Your claims of forgetting more about the bible than
I know was a stupid statement on your part all along,
That sounds like something you would say. Do you have a URL where I
said this? No! Of course you don't - because you cannot support a
single assertion you've ever made on Usenet! In other words, this is
another lie!
I never said it, Puke. What I did say was that "The fact is that I've
forgotten more about god than you seem to have ever grasped"
(http://tinyurl.com/55rcp), which is a different proposition entirely
and more evidence of how thoroughly incompetent and inadequate your
"scholarship" truly is.
Hey, I'm still here, and still waiting for
your discussion just like I agreed.
4 threads, forty messages waiting for you to "discuss" you lying,
cowardly bypocrite.
All you need to do in provide your own position for discussion
on the first 10 or so questions that I already answered,
First it was 7-9, then 7-11, here it's "10 or so"? Clearly you're
lying when you cannot specify precisely how many you've supposedly
responded to. But the fact is that the exact number is zero, as I've
proven. In fact, I've been fruitlessly trying to get you to respond
since September 16th, 2004. I've repeatedly asked you for the URL to
where you supposedly gave these supported rebuttals and rather than
"discuss" that, you ran away.
You lose.
Everybody knows it.
Deal with it, you cowardly hypocrite.
Budikka
.
|
