Religions > Atheism > Bush Administration: Grand Canyon Developed by Noah's flood
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Thomas Curmudgeon" |
| Date: |
24 Oct 2004 11:43:53 AM |
| Object: |
Bush Administration: Grand Canyon Developed by Noah's flood |
Faith-Based Parks?
http://www.peer.org/press/524.html
PARK SERVICE STICKS WITH BIBLICAL EXPLANATION FOR GRAND CANYON
Promised Legal Review on Creationist Book Is Shelved
Washington, DC — The Bush Administration has decided that it will stand
by its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by
Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, according to internal
documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER).
Despite telling members of Congress and the public that the legality and
appropriateness of the National Park Service offering a creationist book
for sale at Grand Canyon museums and bookstores was “under review at the
national level by several offices,” no such review took place, according
to materials obtained by PEER under the Freedom of Information Act.
Instead, the real agency position was expressed by NPS spokesperson
Elaine Sevy as quoted in the Baptist Press News:
“Now that the book has become quite popular, we don’t want to
remove it.”
In August of 2003, Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Joe Alston
attempted to block the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View, by Tom
Vail, a book explaining how the park’s central feature developed on a
biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS Headquarters,
however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor,
NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters that there would
be a high-level policy review, distributing talking points stating: “We
hope to have a final decision in February [2004].” In fact, the promised
review never occurred –
* In late February, Barna crafted a draft letter to concerned
members of Congress stating: “We hope to have a final decision on the
book in March 2004.” That draft was rewritten in June and finally sent
out to Congressional representatives with no completion date for the
review at all;
* NPS Headquarters did not respond to a January 25th memo from its
own top geologists charging that sale of the book violated agency
policies and undercut its scientific education programs;
* The Park Service ignored a letter of protest signed by the
presidents of seven scientific societies on December 16, 2003.
“Promoting creationism in our national parks is just as wrong as
promoting it in our public schools,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff
Ruch, “If the Bush Administration is using public resources for
pandering to Christian fundamentalists, it should at least have the
decency to tell the truth about it.”
The creationist book is not the only religious controversy at Grand
Canyon National Park. One week prior to the approved sale of Grand
Canyon: A Different View, NPS Deputy Director Donald Murphy ordered that
bronze plaques bearing Psalm verses be returned and reinstalled at
canyon overlooks. Superintendent Alston had removed the bronze plaques
on legal advice from Interior Department solicitors. Murphy also wrote a
letter of apology to the plaques’ sponsors, the Evangelical Sisterhood
of Mary. PEER has collected other instances of what it calls the Bush
Administration’s “Faith-Based Parks” agenda.
.
|
|
| User: "Cdn" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Administration: Grand Canyon Developed by Noah's flood |
24 Oct 2004 12:03:46 PM |
|
|
"Thomas Curmudgeon" <eat@spam.yum> wrote in message
news:1YQed.158713$a85.66429@fed1read04...
Faith-Based Parks?
http://www.peer.org/press/524.html
PARK SERVICE STICKS WITH BIBLICAL EXPLANATION FOR GRAND CANYON
Promised Legal Review on Creationist Book Is Shelved
Washington, DC — The Bush Administration has decided that it will stand
by its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by
Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, according to internal
documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER).
Despite telling members of Congress and the public that the legality and
appropriateness of the National Park Service offering a creationist book
for sale at Grand Canyon museums and bookstores was “under review at the
national level by several offices,” no such review took place, according
to materials obtained by PEER under the Freedom of Information Act.
Instead, the real agency position was expressed by NPS spokesperson
Elaine Sevy as quoted in the Baptist Press News:
“Now that the book has become quite popular, we don’t want to
remove it.”
In August of 2003, Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Joe Alston
attempted to block the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View, by Tom
Vail, a book explaining how the park’s central feature developed on a
biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS Headquarters,
however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor,
NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters that there would
be a high-level policy review, distributing talking points stating: “We
hope to have a final decision in February [2004].” In fact, the promised
review never occurred –
* In late February, Barna crafted a draft letter to concerned
members of Congress stating: “We hope to have a final decision on the
book in March 2004.” That draft was rewritten in June and finally sent
out to Congressional representatives with no completion date for the
review at all;
* NPS Headquarters did not respond to a January 25th memo from its
own top geologists charging that sale of the book violated agency
policies and undercut its scientific education programs;
* The Park Service ignored a letter of protest signed by the
presidents of seven scientific societies on December 16, 2003.
“Promoting creationism in our national parks is just as wrong as
promoting it in our public schools,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff
Ruch, “If the Bush Administration is using public resources for
pandering to Christian fundamentalists, it should at least have the
decency to tell the truth about it.”
The creationist book is not the only religious controversy at Grand
Canyon National Park. One week prior to the approved sale of Grand
Canyon: A Different View, NPS Deputy Director Donald Murphy ordered that
bronze plaques bearing Psalm verses be returned and reinstalled at
canyon overlooks. Superintendent Alston had removed the bronze plaques
on legal advice from Interior Department solicitors. Murphy also wrote a
letter of apology to the plaques’ sponsors, the Evangelical Sisterhood
of Mary. PEER has collected other instances of what it calls the Bush
Administration’s “Faith-Based Parks” agenda.
Holy ***** and they accuse democrats of smoking too much weed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kurttrail" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Administration: Grand Canyon Developed by Noah's flood |
24 Oct 2004 12:27:14 PM |
|
|
Cdn wrote:
"Thomas Curmudgeon" <eat@spam.yum> wrote in message
news:1YQed.158713$a85.66429@fed1read04...
Faith-Based Parks?
http://www.peer.org/press/524.html
PARK SERVICE STICKS WITH BIBLICAL EXPLANATION FOR GRAND CANYON
Promised Legal Review on Creationist Book Is Shelved
Washington, DC — The Bush Administration has decided that it will
stand by its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was
created by Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, according to
internal documents released today by Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
Despite telling members of Congress and the public that the legality
and appropriateness of the National Park Service offering a
creationist book for sale at Grand Canyon museums and bookstores was
“under review at the national level by several offices,” no such
review took place, according to materials obtained by PEER under the
Freedom of Information Act. Instead, the real agency position was
expressed by NPS spokesperson Elaine Sevy as quoted in the Baptist
Press News:
“Now that the book has become quite popular, we don’t want to
remove it.”
In August of 2003, Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Joe
Alston attempted to block the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different
View, by Tom Vail, a book explaining how the park’s central feature
developed on a biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS
Headquarters, however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the
resulting furor, NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told
reporters that there would be a high-level policy review,
distributing talking points stating: “We hope to have a final
decision in February [2004].” In fact, the promised review never
occurred –
* In late February, Barna crafted a draft letter to concerned
members of Congress stating: “We hope to have a final decision on the
book in March 2004.” That draft was rewritten in June and finally
sent out to Congressional representatives with no completion date
for the review at all;
* NPS Headquarters did not respond to a January 25th memo from
its own top geologists charging that sale of the book violated agency
policies and undercut its scientific education programs;
* The Park Service ignored a letter of protest signed by the
presidents of seven scientific societies on December 16, 2003.
“Promoting creationism in our national parks is just as wrong as
promoting it in our public schools,” stated PEER Executive Director
Jeff Ruch, “If the Bush Administration is using public resources for
pandering to Christian fundamentalists, it should at least have the
decency to tell the truth about it.”
The creationist book is not the only religious controversy at Grand
Canyon National Park. One week prior to the approved sale of Grand
Canyon: A Different View, NPS Deputy Director Donald Murphy ordered
that bronze plaques bearing Psalm verses be returned and reinstalled
at canyon overlooks. Superintendent Alston had removed the bronze
plaques on legal advice from Interior Department solicitors. Murphy
also wrote a letter of apology to the plaques’ sponsors, the
Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary. PEER has collected other instances
of what it calls the Bush Administration’s “Faith-Based Parks”
agenda.
Holy ***** and they accuse democrats of smoking too much weed.
Faith is a much strong drug. Pot may blur your vision. Faith makes you
blind to reason.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry Fatwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Administration: Grand Canyon Developed by Noah's flood |
24 Oct 2004 01:15:19 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:43:53 -0700, Thomas Curmudgeon <eat@spam.yum>
wrote:
Washington, DC - The Bush Administration has decided that it will stand
by its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by
Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, according to internal
documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER).
Like global warming and climate change, geology is too imprecise.
"The jury is still out." The flood, on the other hand, is in the
Bible - the Word of God, as declared by a bunch of long-dead guys a
millenium or two ago.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|