Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney



 Religions > Atheism > Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Michelle Malkin"
Date: 23 Jun 2007 10:13:54 PM
Object: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,863839.story?coll=la-home-center
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney 24 Jun 2007 01:56:26 AM
In article <l4idnbpaE7v1fODbnZ2dnUVZ_ruknZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,863839.st
ory?coll=la-home-center

So now he refuses to obey a law that he signed himself. Preposterous.
Why doesn't he just put a crown on his head and be done with it?
IMPEACH THE BUMS NOW!!!
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney 24 Jun 2007 07:04:48 PM
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:56:26 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In article <l4idnbpaE7v1fODbnZ2dnUVZ_ruknZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,863839.st
ory?coll=la-home-center


So now he refuses to obey a law that he signed himself. Preposterous.

Why doesn't he just put a crown on his head and be done with it?

He couldn't even do that in most of the remaining monarchies. Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait and Brunei come to mind as exceptions.
In the UK two kings were deposed for going far beyond what the
monarchy was allowed to do, one being beheaded.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney 24 Jun 2007 11:41:28 PM
In article <ni0u73pcmh9jtbvbkv23lu1i4bdiq8kp5s@4ax.com>,
Christopher A.Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:56:26 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In article <l4idnbpaE7v1fODbnZ2dnUVZ_ruknZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,863839
.st
ory?coll=la-home-center


So now he refuses to obey a law that he signed himself. Preposterous.

Why doesn't he just put a crown on his head and be done with it?


He couldn't even do that in most of the remaining monarchies. Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait and Brunei come to mind as exceptions.

I was thinking more of Napoleon who put the crown on his own head.


In the UK two kings were deposed for going far beyond what the
monarchy was allowed to do, one being beheaded.

One beheaded. Hmmmmm.........
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.



User: "Budikka666"

Title: Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney 24 Jun 2007 06:53:01 PM
On Jun 23, 10:13 pm, "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,...

I love that last sentence in the article. You can make it mean
anything:
"The administration is exempt from telling the truth because the
president intended it to be. "
etc.!
Budikka
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney 09 Jul 2007 08:41:22 PM
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:13:54 -0400, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in alt.atheism



http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,863839.story?coll=la-home-center

That's been apparent starting a few days after his first usurption of
office. He's not going to get busted, nor is Cheney, so for all
practical purposes they are.
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Bush Claims Dictatorial Rights For Himself and Cheney
Scalia recuses himself from pledge case.
Did Jesus really sacrifice himself to save us?
Jesus refused to save Himself, but died to give us life.
Why God had to come down and kill himself ?
OT: A Young American Outsources Himself to India
Bush Now Calls Himself the "Peace President" (Twice the Doublethink In Half The Time!)
BUSH COMPARES WAR ON TERROR TO WWII!!!! John Kerry compares Vietnam to playing with himself!!!!!!
AWOL: Can't Eat Pretzels Correctly, Can't Ride a Bike Without Falling Of, Can't Sapeak Without Making a Fool of Himself Etc.
Petition: Scalia Must Recuse Himself From Church-State Cases Due to Bias
DeLay Calls for Greater Humility, Declares Himself a Sinner
Re: LIBERALS PROVE THAT THEY ARE INSANE IDIOTS ==> The Insanity of the INTERNET "SEX-OFFNEDER" LISTS...Man considers himself a hero for murdering total strangers... they did their time even if they were not guilty
College Republican Questions Marines "Loyalty" Because He Votes Against Bush (But is Too ***** to Enlist Himself)
OT: The next phase of Sharonism might have defeated Sharon himself
John Travolta outs himself (Fascist)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER