Religions > Atheism > Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
31 Aug 2007 02:26:37 AM |
| Object: |
Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR2007083000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 03:25:52 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR20070
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of "progress
toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the grading in that GAO
report is not appropriate.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” - George
Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 03:57:59 PM |
|
|
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR20070
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of "progress
toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the grading in that GAO
report is not appropriate.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it." - George
Orwell
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench marks
work then you must be glad you have a job.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 04:05:56 PM |
|
|
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless the
Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench marks
work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are, Katie. I know what moving the goalposts is
too.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
04 Sep 2007 10:04:26 AM |
|
|
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless the
Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench marks
work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
04 Sep 2007 11:03:30 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ttsqd3lijnu9kt0g4ivvko80c2d3srbdfv@4ax.com:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless
the Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
They didn't fail, Chicken Yang. That GAO report is ***** squared.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
You want to cut them off *NOW* so they can't possibly succeed.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench
marks work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
Still zero, Yangie-poo.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
05 Sep 2007 12:25:19 AM |
|
|
On 04 Sep 2007 16:03:30 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ttsqd3lijnu9kt0g4ivvko80c2d3srbdfv@4ax.com:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless
the Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
They didn't fail, Chicken Yang. That GAO report is ***** squared.
Is that why all those Benchmarks were agreed upon by Republicans and
Bush, loser Fred?
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
You want to cut them off *NOW* so they can't possibly succeed.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench
marks work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
Still zero, Yangie-poo.
zero is the level of your credibility, chicken Fred.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
05 Sep 2007 07:57:14 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:fdfsd3t9lags6532o5g5j6n0dab279k5jh@4ax.com:
On 04 Sep 2007 16:03:30 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ttsqd3lijnu9kt0g4ivvko80c2d3srbdfv@4ax.com:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades
to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless
the Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
They didn't fail, Chicken Yang. That GAO report is ***** squared.
Is that why all those Benchmarks were agreed upon by Republicans and
Bush, loser Fred?
Yes, Yangie-poo, the Republicans and Bush agreed on them *BEFORE* the
Democrats moved them for the GAO report.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
You want to cut them off *NOW* so they can't possibly succeed.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench
marks work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
Still zero, Yangie-poo.
zero is the level of your credibility, chicken Fred.
Your ad-hominems don't mean a thing, Yangie-poo. And that's ChickenHAWK
Fred, you chicken liberal coward Yangie-poo.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
05 Sep 2007 09:26:13 AM |
|
|
On 05 Sep 2007 12:57:14 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:fdfsd3t9lags6532o5g5j6n0dab279k5jh@4ax.com:
On 04 Sep 2007 16:03:30 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ttsqd3lijnu9kt0g4ivvko80c2d3srbdfv@4ax.com:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades
to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless
the Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
They didn't fail, Chicken Yang. That GAO report is ***** squared.
Is that why all those Benchmarks were agreed upon by Republicans and
Bush, loser Fred?
Yes, Yangie-poo, the Republicans and Bush agreed on them *BEFORE* the
Democrats moved them for the GAO report.
BZZZ. It is you and your GOP cowards who moved the goal post, and you
still failed.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
You want to cut them off *NOW* so they can't possibly succeed.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench
marks work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
Still zero, Yangie-poo.
zero is the level of your credibility, chicken Fred.
Your ad-hominems don't mean a thing, Yangie-poo. And that's ChickenHAWK
Fred, you chicken liberal coward Yangie-poo.
Oh look, another non sequitur from Kentucky Fred Chicken.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
05 Sep 2007 02:29:47 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:g3ftd3l0csu979vkdvjvf2g5kddrdu8gfi@4ax.com:
On 05 Sep 2007 12:57:14 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:fdfsd3t9lags6532o5g5j6n0dab279k5jh@4ax.com:
On 04 Sep 2007 16:03:30 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:ttsqd3lijnu9kt0g4ivvko80c2d3srbdfv@4ax.com:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades
to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes,
the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts,
unless
the Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now
you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
They didn't fail, Chicken Yang. That GAO report is ***** squared.
Is that why all those Benchmarks were agreed upon by Republicans and
Bush, loser Fred?
Yes, Yangie-poo, the Republicans and Bush agreed on them *BEFORE* the
Democrats moved them for the GAO report.
BZZZ. It is you and your GOP cowards who moved the goal post, and you
still failed.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more
you
traitors can fail.
You want to cut them off *NOW* so they can't possibly succeed.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench
marks work then you must be glad you have a job.
I know what benchmarks are
Like how many American you GOP traitors have killed.
Still zero, Yangie-poo.
zero is the level of your credibility, chicken Fred.
Your ad-hominems don't mean a thing, Yangie-poo. And that's
ChickenHAWK
Fred, you chicken liberal coward Yangie-poo.
Oh look, another non sequitur from Kentucky Fred Chicken.
Oh, look, more dial-a-fallacy from chicken coward Yangie-poo.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
04 Sep 2007 04:31:50 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:04:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On 31 Aug 2007 21:05:56 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in
news:1188593879.608729.251480@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 31, 1:25 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
innews:ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200
70
83000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to
each benchmark."
When the benchmarks are supposed to be graded on the basis of
"progress toward a goal" instead of "goal acheived" then yes, the
grading in that GAO report is not appropriate.
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
LOL yourself, Kate. What's the point of moving the goalposts, unless the
Democrats *WANT* to report failure?
LOL! Talk about projection. You failed your own benchmarks, now you
think it's unfair to be judged on it.
Let me guess you want another Friedman Unit to see how much more you
traitors can fail.
He wants Petraeus to convince Congress to do nothing for another 6
months. At which time, Chimpy will have another scapegoat telling
Congress to delay for another 6 months. After another delay we'll get
to December, 2008, and the Rethugs won't care what Congress says,
because Chimpy will just ignore them for a month.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 10:48:00 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:57:59 -0700, Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com>
wrote:
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench marks
work then you must be glad you have a job.
10% of the people do 90% of the work. 10% of the people don't know
what the work is.
Guess which group Phred falls into? (Hint - it's not the first one.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
01 Sep 2007 09:51:40 AM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:c5ohd39ppfmfv3pnt991ssd1avnbbfairf@4ax.com:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:57:59 -0700, Kate <Kate@twoangryliberals.com>
wrote:
LOL Fred. What's the point of a bench mark, if it doesn't mark
anything.
I thought you said you were in IT. If you don't know how bench marks
work then you must be glad you have a job.
10% of the people do 90% of the work. 10% of the people don't know
what the work is.
Guess which group Phred falls into? (Hint - it's not the first one.)
Hint: yes it is.
Another 10% of the people complain about the first 10% of the people who
do the work. That's the group Al's in.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
02 Sep 2007 01:51:45 AM |
|
|
In article <ijgfd35akvh5nlhk605fvqrqknamh2ad64@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200708300009
8.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
What? They should have marked it on a curve?
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 11:13:28 AM |
|
|
On Aug 31, 3:26 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR200...
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
"Grades are only fair if you get a good one"
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Officials: It's Unfair to Judge Iraq Using Agreed-Upon Benchmarks |
31 Aug 2007 10:45:04 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:26:37 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
That GOP personal responsibility strikes again
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR2007083000098.html?hpid=sec-politics
"Administration officials also said the draft report is
unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each
benchmark."
It also confuses feckless leader - there are TWO possibilities.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
