Religions > Atheism > Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
02 Aug 2004 08:38:55 PM |
| Object: |
Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A25986-2004Jul29?language=printer
Even after 9/11, some senior Bush officials didn't seem to get it.
Another of those little-noticed footnotes [in the 911 Commission
Report] describes a Sept. 20, 2001 memo prepared by undersecretary of
defense Douglas J. Feith, apparently for his boss, Donald Rumsfeld.
According to the commission, "the author expressed disappointment at
the limited options immediately available in Afghanistan and the lack
of ground options. The author suggested instead hitting terrorists
outside the Middle East in the initial offensive, perhaps deliberately
selecting a non-al Qaeda target like Iraq. Since U.S. attacks were
expected in Afghanistan, an American attack in South America or
Southeast Asia might be a surprise to the terrorists." If Feith really
wrote such a memo, how is it possible that he is still in his job?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -912 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
02 Aug 2004 10:48:51 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote
If Feith really wrote such a memo, how is it possible
that he is still in his job?
In case anyone in the Bush administration wants to boil water.
Apparently Feith is the only one who knows the recipe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lee Marston" |
|
| Title: Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see one)! |
02 Aug 2004 11:14:46 PM |
|
|
Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see
one)
This is starting to become too easy
The official website of the U. S. Communist Party is listing "Top Ten
Reasons to Defeat Bush," all of which are right out of the
Kerry/Edwards campaign playbook.
The Communist party urges communist readers to buy ad space in their
local papers and publish the list in an attempt to help the Kerry
campaign defeat President Bush.
The Democratic party-Proudly Celebrating 60 Years of Aid & Comfort for
America's Enemies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see one)! |
02 Aug 2004 11:49:49 PM |
|
|
"Lee Marston" <lemstn386@G00DSTUFF.0RG> wrote in message
news:f54ug0llu3a0hj4m8h2qii9nuq5unh7rnb@4ax.com...
Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see
one)
Jesus, buddy! Get with the program.
The commies were the boogyman 30 years ago.
It's the Arabs now. Try to keep up.
--
RB
.
|
|
|
| User: "james dorfu" |
|
| Title: Re: Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see one)! |
03 Aug 2004 12:25:04 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 04:49:49 +0000, Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Lee Marston" <lemstn386@G00DSTUFF.0RG> wrote in message
news:f54ug0llu3a0hj4m8h2qii9nuq5unh7rnb@4ax.com...
Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see
one)
Jesus, buddy! Get with the program.
The commies were the boogyman 30 years ago.
It's the Arabs now. Try to keep up.
But Kerry is still living "30 years ago" as are bunches of the Dem
biggies. These jerk-city-rambits pull down the shades on the campaign bus,
and chant their old Ho Ho nonsense.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james dorfu" |
|
| Title: Re: Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see one)! |
02 Aug 2004 11:20:38 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:14:46 -0400, Lee Marston wrote:
Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see
one)
This is starting to become too easy
The official website of the U. S. Communist Party is listing "Top Ten
Reasons to Defeat Bush," all of which are right out of the
Kerry/Edwards campaign playbook.
The Communist party urges communist readers to buy ad space in their
local papers and publish the list in an attempt to help the Kerry
campaign defeat President Bush.
The Democratic party-Proudly Celebrating 60 Years of Aid & Comfort for
America's Enemies.
Yep. Them slimy little commies will do everything they can to get Kerry
elected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Communist Party Helping Kerry (Commies know a Marxist when they see one)! |
03 Aug 2004 01:29:07 PM |
|
|
"james dorfu" <dorf@edu.nospam.msu> wrote
Yep. Them slimy little commies will do everything
they can to get Kerry elected.
....anything except the one thing that would help
Kerry. That is to say, endorsing Bush.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Middleton" |
|
| Title: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 12:16:36 AM |
|
|
Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers.
Associated Press
Aug. 31, 2000
BOSTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union will represent a group
that advocates sex between men and boys in a lawsuit brought by the
family of a slain 10-year-old.
The family of Jeffrey Curley of Cambridge said the North American
Man/Boy Love Association and its web site which is now off-line
incited the attempted molestation and murder of the boy on Oct. 1,
1997.
One of two men convicted in the killing, Charles Jaynes, 25,
reportedly viewed the group's web site shortly before the killing, and
also had in his possession some of NAMBLA's publications. Also
convicted in the killing was 24-year-old Salvatore Sicari.
The ACLU said the case, filed in federal court in mid-May, involves
issues of freedom of speech and association.
"For us, it is a fundamental First Amendment case," John Roberts,
executive director of the Massachusetts branch of the ACLU, told
Boston Globe Wednesday. "It has to do with communications on a web
site, and
material that does not promote any kind of criminal behavior
whatsoever."
ACLU officials said NAMBLA members deny encouraging coercion, rape or
violence.
Attorney Lawrence Frisoli, who represents the Curleys, said he is glad
the ACLU is defending NAMBLA, because he has had trouble locating the
group's members.
Harvey Silverglate, an ACLU board member, said Wednesday that the
group's attorneys will try to block any attempt by the Curleys to get
NAMBLA's membership lists, or other materials identifying members.
The ACLU also will act as a surrogate for NAMBLA, allowing its members
to defend themselves in court while remaining anonymous.
According to the Globe, NAMBLA officials in the past have said their
main goal is the abolition of age-of-consent laws that classify sex
with children as rape.
At two separate trials last year, prosecutors said Jaynes and Sicari
were sexually obsessed with the boy, lured him from his Cambridge
neighborhood with the promise of a new bike, and then smothered him
with a
gasoline-soaked rag when he resisted their sexual advances. They then
stuffed him into a concrete-filled container and dumped it into a
Maine river.
Sicari, convicted of first-degree murder, is serving a life sentence
without the possibility of parole. Jaynes' second-degree murder and
kidnapping convictions enable him to seek parole in 23 years.
The Curleys last week were awarded $328 million by a superior court
jury in a civil suit against Jaynes and Sicari
--
Liberal Neo-Coms are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, selfish, intolerant,
bigoted and racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Pepke" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 12:09:18 PM |
|
|
Dave Middleton <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message news:<es7ug059n03ff09gvt01kak5dgcimuql01@4ax.com>...
Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers.
Good for them.
I personally would be much happier if all the members of
NAMBLA would just ***** and die.
But we have this thing called the Constitution, which
apparently no non-liberals have ever heard of, unless
they think it's a brand of toilet paper, which has
been interpreted to guarantee the rights of the accused
to representation. Good that somebody is doing it.
I don't like Nazis either, but the ACLU was right to
defend them.
There's a line from Ayn Rand's _Atlas Shrugged_. "I
don't expect you to understand this, but Rearden metal
is good." I don't expect non-liberals to understand
that defending the rights of the accused is good, either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james dorfu" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 01:19:51 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:09:18 -0700, Eric Pepke wrote:
Dave Middleton <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message news:<es7ug059n03ff09gvt01kak5dgcimuql01@4ax.com>...
Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers.
Good for them.
I personally would be much happier if all the members of
NAMBLA would just ***** and die.
But we have this thing called the Constitution,
The Constitution loses its effectiveness when the citizens lose their
appetite for a reasonable number of lynchings.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 05:32:40 PM |
|
|
"james dorfu" <dorf@edu.nospam.msu> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.08.03.18.19.49.272489@edu.nospam.msu...
The Constitution loses its effectiveness when the citizens lose their
appetite for a reasonable number of lynchings.
It sounds like your volunteering for the next lynching.
As hangee.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 06:26:39 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 01:16:36 -0400, Dave Middleton
<dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote:
Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers.
That's a GOOD thing.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alcar" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 09:55:19 AM |
|
|
this is a freedom of speech issue, and the ACLU is right
the killers are the guilty parties. it's called personal responsibility
something REAL conservatives believe in.
NAMBLA is reprehensible. but they are also exercising their rights to
advocate a political position
whit
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:es7ug059n03ff09gvt01kak5dgcimuql01@4ax.com...
Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers.
Associated Press
Aug. 31, 2000
BOSTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union will represent a group
that advocates sex between men and boys in a lawsuit brought by the
family of a slain 10-year-old.
The family of Jeffrey Curley of Cambridge said the North American
Man/Boy Love Association and its web site which is now off-line
incited the attempted molestation and murder of the boy on Oct. 1,
1997.
One of two men convicted in the killing, Charles Jaynes, 25,
reportedly viewed the group's web site shortly before the killing, and
also had in his possession some of NAMBLA's publications. Also
convicted in the killing was 24-year-old Salvatore Sicari.
The ACLU said the case, filed in federal court in mid-May, involves
issues of freedom of speech and association.
"For us, it is a fundamental First Amendment case," John Roberts,
executive director of the Massachusetts branch of the ACLU, told
Boston Globe Wednesday. "It has to do with communications on a web
site, and
material that does not promote any kind of criminal behavior
whatsoever."
ACLU officials said NAMBLA members deny encouraging coercion, rape or
violence.
Attorney Lawrence Frisoli, who represents the Curleys, said he is glad
the ACLU is defending NAMBLA, because he has had trouble locating the
group's members.
Harvey Silverglate, an ACLU board member, said Wednesday that the
group's attorneys will try to block any attempt by the Curleys to get
NAMBLA's membership lists, or other materials identifying members.
The ACLU also will act as a surrogate for NAMBLA, allowing its members
to defend themselves in court while remaining anonymous.
According to the Globe, NAMBLA officials in the past have said their
main goal is the abolition of age-of-consent laws that classify sex
with children as rape.
At two separate trials last year, prosecutors said Jaynes and Sicari
were sexually obsessed with the boy, lured him from his Cambridge
neighborhood with the promise of a new bike, and then smothered him
with a
gasoline-soaked rag when he resisted their sexual advances. They then
stuffed him into a concrete-filled container and dumped it into a
Maine river.
Sicari, convicted of first-degree murder, is serving a life sentence
without the possibility of parole. Jaynes' second-degree murder and
kidnapping convictions enable him to seek parole in 23 years.
The Curleys last week were awarded $328 million by a superior court
jury in a civil suit against Jaynes and Sicari
--
Liberal Neo-Coms are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, selfish, intolerant,
bigoted and racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal ACLU to Defend NAMBLA Child Molesters/killers. |
03 Aug 2004 11:54:43 AM |
|
|
"Alcar" <alcar@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:2n9ndbFu3aplU1@uni-berlin.de...
this is a freedom of speech issue, and the ACLU is right
the killers are the guilty parties. it's called personal responsibility
something REAL conservatives believe in.
NAMBLA is reprehensible. but they are also exercising their rights to
advocate a political position
whit
Well put.
It the government can run make this group give up its membership list, then
it can do so to any organization. Should the US government turn sour, and
good people join an organization to make it better, then the gov't would
have a precedent to allow it to track down all of its opponents, and from
there, prosecute 'em for being a public menace, or traitors, or whatever.
On the other hand, the guys who killed the kid, ya, they should be fried.
-Tock
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Middleton" |
|
| Title: Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101 |
02 Aug 2004 09:16:03 PM |
|
|
Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101
By Tatiana Menaker
February 23, 2004
While Americans and Iraqis cheered when Saddam Hussein was dragged
from his spider hole in December, there were, obviously, a few notable
exceptions. While Saddam loyalists and anti-American Arabs pouted in
gloom and doom, back in the U.S. an anti-American poetry hit parade,
entitled “My America,” was held shortly after Saddam’s capture. It was
the grand finale of San Francisco State University’s fall semester.
Even as TV screens showed the captured Hitler of the Middle East in
all his pathetic, unkempt glory, the anti-war show on campus
continued. As a part of the Creative Writing Department curriculum,
more than a hundred and fifty SFSU students were forced to attend this
collective primary delusion presented as a poetry reading.
Unfortunately, the weakness of the poets’ political intellect was
matched by the weakness of their writing. From the lighted stage of
the huge auditorium they groaned about American ‘war atrocities’:
“‘Shock and Awe’ is to say: In forty-eight hours, several thousand
dead, battered, incinerated, shattered…”
They also wailed about an American fighter plane downed only in their
sick imaginations:
“Strewn across the desert: some boots, a medal, a map of Iraq…”
American soldiers were declared to be gleeful murderers and trigger
pullers:
“This is your brain on trigger.
Trigger.
Happy, happy trigger
Pull. Pull.
Thank you, Mr. Bush, for my new arms.
Death bubbles.”
And exulted in a full-blown parade of anti-American delirium:
“When we know someone is suffering somewhere just so we can be relaxed
and tranquil in America, Bully of Planet Earth, Superpower.”
In addition, environmental Green and anti-Globalization rhetoric was
served behind the mask of poetry:
“Do you see a Statue of Liberty or do you see a toxic waste dump?”
Actually, some individual confessions were not so bad. Listening to
this poetry, who would doubt that:
“My mom was a beatnik, therefore crazy.
My father was absent in the neck of a bottle.”
Or:
“I’m a little pissed at America right now…”
Clearly understanding that I was heading toward an F in this class, I
took off on a suicide mission. I approached the lit stage where these
“poets” sat warmed by applause and proudly waiting for more
compliments.
“Don’t you think,” I asked, “it is pathetic to perform in this
anti-war circus now that Saddam has been captured? How do you feel
about his capture?”
“It’s great that they got him,” one of the guys on the stage answered.
“But how,” I asked, “could it have happened without a war?”
The instructor flew at me like a vulture, “Tatiana! Stop this
immediately!”
He already knew my ways; I had had a few words with him regarding his
anti-American attitude.
“Don’t try to shut me up! You guys are such conformists. No courage to
be dissidents even for a change. Go and study accounting! Your poetry
sucks!”
Later, registering for the spring semester, I realized that almost all
the “poets” on the auditorium stage were the Creative Writing
department’s poetry teachers. While nothing at SFSU surprises me
anymore, I exploded, and I need to explain why. The “My [Hate For]
America” poetry parade overcame my ability to restrain myself.
Throughout the fall semester the “Writers on Writing” class desecrated
two things I hold dear: literature and America. It was a constant
assault on my dedication to literature and my literary taste, and an
insult to my love for this country. Not only were we forced to buy a
bag of crappy books (except a few) with a price tag of around $200,
but almost all these “writers” and “poets” presented on the lighted
stage of the huge auditorium week after week used the opportunity to
express their hate and contempt for America. Throughout the semester
only a few talented exceptions abstained from expressing their
political opinions.
If I have expertise in anything in this life, it is literature. I came
from the Soviet Union, where literature, especially poetry, was a
serious and deadly business. The second national prize for poetry in
the USSR was five years in prison. The first prize was a death
sentence, as seen by the fates of Nikolai Gumilev (execution by firing
squad) and Osip Mandelshtam (a hungry death in the Gulag).
Night after night we typed for Samizdat (underground press) on
primitive typewriters the smuggled poems of my friend Igor Guberman,
who had been sentenced to five years in a prison camp. Kneeling on all
fours (I was so pregnant at the time that I couldn’t sit), I read a
book by Nadezhda Mandelshtam-the widow of the executed poet-that was
brought into the country as contraband by some brave foreign visitors.
The possession of this book was an offense punishable by law. The
hostess begged me to leave, scared that I would go into labor right
there in her apartment, but I finished that book understanding that
this was my only chance to touch this dangerous copy.
My Leningrad neighbor Joseph Brodsky, a literary genius and one of the
best Russian poets of the 20th century, was, like Solzhenitsyn, thrown
out of the country. At the age of 33, Brodsky came to the US,
struggling with every English sentence he attempted to write. But by
1987, after only fifteen years in the US, he had been awarded the
Nobel Prize in Literature for his essays in English. He also served as
Poet Laureate of the United States in 1991 and 1992. When I asked him
about the tragedy of the émigré writer who is deprived of his mother
tongue, he answered acidly, “Who told you that you can write only in
Cyrillic?”
Brodsky died a premature death a few years ago. His heart just gave
up: while living in the US, he still was tortured by the KGB, who made
him helpless to prevent the suffering of his elderly parents left
behind in
Russia. The Soviet government took away their meager pensions, earned
by forty years of work. Then the officials sadistically announced that
his parents would never see their only son again. The Soviets kept
their word and Brodsky started to hate even the Russian language
because it became the language in which his parents had been subjected
to persecution.
Joseph Brodsky knew the value of freedom as only a former slave could.
Brodsky’s Nobel-winning essays, “In a Room and a Half” and “On
Tyranny,” included in the book dedicated to his mother and father,
should be required reading in all university creative writing classes,
so that future writers will see the price people paid for the luxury
to write and read in other countries and will appreciate their
creative freedom and America itself.
There were so many talented writers and poets imprisoned and murdered
in the Soviet Union that it is easier to count those who by some
miracle were able to remain alive and well. Through his own life and
prison camp experience, as through the experiences of his friends,
Brodsky learned a lot about evil.
In a commencement address given by Brodsky in 1984 at Williams
College, he pronounced:
“No matter how daring or cautious you may choose to be in the course
of your life you are bound to come into direct physical contact with
what’s known as Evil…For the most interesting thing about Evil is that
it is wholly human. To put it mildly, nothing can be turned and worn
inside out with greater ease than one’s notion of social justice,
civic conscience, a better future, etc.”
This country gave him refuge and freedom, as it did for many less
talented people, including me. For people like us, the name of America
is sacred.
In those dark Soviet decades, cramped in the dusty communal
apartments, surrounded by distorted mirrors of socialist propaganda,
we knew that America existed. The smuggled pair of American jeans or
the Simon and Garfunkel record was, for us, a symbol of civilization
and freedom. We would go to suburban forests to listen to the “Voice
of America” on short wave radios. The Soviets jammed it in the cities
and spent more money on suppressing American radio than they spent on
all their own broadcasting.
The mere existence of America gave us the courage to fight. Some
people who just wanted to leave the Soviet Union paid with prison
sentences just for declaring a desire to leave the paradise surrounded
by barbed wire and armed guards shooting escapees in the back. The
escapees didn’t want to take anything with them. They just dreamed of
departing, even naked, with their children on their shoulders. They
hijacked airplanes, invented air balloons which evaded radar, swam at
night from the beaches of the Black Sea or jumped from the stage
during concert tours as Baryshnikov and Makarova did. The Socialist
empire didn’t want to lose its main property: its slaves. (Listen, you
“poets,” dreaming about socialism!)
Finally, it was America that paid our way out. The Jackson-Vanik
amendment forced the Soviets to allow some groups to emigrate in
exchange for a cheap grain trade agreement. Jews were the bargaining
chip when the USSR was on the edge of starvation.
Divided by the number of people they finally let go, how many kilos of
grain were paid for me? Or my mother? What was the price in grain for
the Moscow boy who became a student at Stanford and invented Google?
Or another boy, who became the managing editor of this magazine? Or
for the Russian taxi
driver? Or for the elderly Jew, who worked all his life for the
Soviets and was allowed, like everyone else, to take with him only $90
after paying five months’ salary for renouncing his Soviet
citizenship?
America, this great and generous country not only gave all of us
refuge; it even paid to buy us out of slavery.
When I see these Lilliputians attacking the noble and generous
Gulliver called America, I lose my breath with fury. The attacks of
these literary dwarfs on this country feel personal, against me and my
safety. It was not without reason that the great American actress
Bette Davis, upon being asked for major life advice, spat the answer,
“Beware of Lilliputians!” She knew what they were capable of.
“If a poet has any obligation toward society, it is to write well”
stated Joseph Brodsky. He started his Nobel Lecture with the words:
“[I]t is better to be a total failure in a democracy than a martyr, or
la crème de la crème in a tyranny.” Our university poetry teachers
don’t understand how lucky they are to be failures in a democracy.
They have failed in their main obligation to write well. In the Soviet
Union they wouldn’t receive even one week in prison.
At least once a year every immigrant from the Soviet Union has the
same nightmare: he or she is trapped back in the old country and can’t
escape. Ironically enough, mine takes place at San Francisco State. I
am walking down the empty hall of the Humanities building. The doors
of the stuffy rooms are open, and from all the classes, the same words
can be heard:
“Colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, exploitation of the working
class.”
And again:
“Colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, exploitation of the working
class.”
I see the trusting faces of the young students.
“What class is this?” I ask.
“Philosophy,” they answer.
Please, tell me I am not back in the Soviet Union again and this is
just a nightmare!
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, closed-minded,
selfish, intolerant, bigoted and racist.
Liberals HATE America!
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101 |
02 Aug 2004 10:41:15 PM |
|
|
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:7attg09rfg4t9vd1gl6p3nta47nqlsfoj7@4ax.com...
Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101
Are you really a fucking moron, or do you just play one on Usenet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101 |
04 Aug 2004 09:29:01 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:7attg09rfg4t9vd1gl6p3nta47nqlsfoj7@4ax.com...
Liberal Hate America Poetry Class 101
Are you really a fucking moron, or do you just play one on Usenet?
Yes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barry OGrady" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
03 Aug 2004 06:28:00 AM |
|
|
What is a 9/20/2001? Obviously its not a date since there is no 20th month.
-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puck Greenman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
03 Aug 2004 06:06:39 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:28:00 +1000, Barry OGrady
<god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> with calm deliberation, and malace
aforethought, wrote:
What is a 9/20/2001? Obviously its not a date since there is no 20th month.
It is September the 20th 2001; What does it look like?
--
Puck Greenman
#162
BAAWA Knight.
Blesed is the self righteous xtian,
for his is the sure and certain knowledge
that no matter what load of tripe he
comes out with:
God told him to say it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
03 Aug 2004 06:15:51 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:06:39 +0100 in episode
<fh60h0pgaseuhh14ss3iq6kf2nveughq3h@4ax.com> we saw our hero Puck Greenman
<puck@pooks.hill.fey>:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:28:00 +1000, Barry OGrady
<god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> with calm deliberation, and malace
aforethought, wrote:
What is a 9/20/2001? Obviously its not a date since there is no 20th
month.
It is September the 20th 2001; What does it look like?
Depends on which side of the Atlantic you're on...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush on 9/20/2001: Let's Bomb Brazil To Teach Osama a Lesson! (re: Why Are NeoCons So incompetent?) |
03 Aug 2004 09:20:41 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:28:00 +1000, Barry OGrady
<god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote:
What is a 9/20/2001? Obviously its not a date since there is no 20th month.
In the US, the convention is MMDDYYYY.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -913 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
