Bush says U.S. 'does not torture people' [Of course not since the term was changed]



 Religions > Atheism > Bush says U.S. 'does not torture people' [Of course not since the term was changed]

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "stoney"
Date: 05 Oct 2007 12:08:34 PM
Object: Bush says U.S. 'does not torture people' [Of course not since the term was changed]
This stupid fucker gets more clueless every day [if that was possible]
Then again, Rethugs make their own reality.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21148801/
Bush says U.S. 'does not torture people'
President responds to report that 2005 memo relaxed interrogation
rules
Updated: 10:25 a.m. ET Oct. 5, 2007
WASHINGTON - President Bush defended his administration’s detention
and interrogation policies for terrorism suspects on Friday, saying
they are both successful and lawful.
“When we find somebody who may have information regarding a potential
attack on America, you bet we’re going to detain them, and you bet
we’re going to question them,” he said during a hastily called
appearance in the Oval Office. “The American people expect us to find
out information, actionable intelligence so we can help protect them.
That’s our job.”
Bush was referring to a report on two secret memos in 2005 that
authorized extreme interrogation tactics against terror suspects.
“This government does not torture people,” the president said.
/excerpt
Of course not. They're 'extreme interrogation tactics.' EIT isn't
torture. If you look the t-o-r-t-c-h-u-r letter string doesn't exist
in extreme interrogation tactics. See? No tortchur.
article:
The two Justice Department legal opinions were disclosed in Thursday’s
editions of The New York Times, which reported that the first 2005
legal opinion authorized the use of head slaps, freezing temperatures
and simulated drownings, known as waterboarding, while interrogating
terror suspects, and was issued shortly after then-Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales took over the Justice Department.
That secret opinion, which explicitly allowed using the painful
methods in combination, came months after a December 2004 opinion in
which the Justice Department publicly declared torture “abhorrent” and
the administration seemed to back away from claiming authority for
such practices.
A second Justice opinion was issued later in 2005, just as Congress
was working on an anti-torture bill. That opinion declared that none
of the CIA’s interrogation practices would violate the rules in the
legislation banning “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment of
detainees, The Times said, citing interviews with unnamed current and
former officials.
“We stick to U.S. law and international obligations,” the president
said, without taking questions afterward. /quote
Too bad this turkey and its minions aren't 'Pinocchio.'
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Bush says U.S. 'does not torture people' [Of course not since the term was changed]
Kicking Yang's ***** Snorting Fairy ***** ==> Edwards Says He Does not Want to Be VP
Edwards Says He Does not Want to Be VP! Liberals Hate America!!
Edwards Says He Does not Want to Be VP. Liberals Are Stupid!
Study Says Death Does Not Take a Holiday
Edwards Says He Does not Want to Be VP
OT: 'Rendition' does not involve torture, says Rice
Military Service Does Not Equal Patriotism.
Time does not exist then god dos not exist.
Heaven does not exist
What is it with this IPU stuff? IPU does not exist, but PU does! A Humorous trip into the world of ontology
What does the xian bible really say, not much it appears
The man in the flight-suit did not qualify then and he does not qualify now
The Atheist Does Not See Things That Are Not There
Coward Earl Weber (duke) Does Not Trust His Own Priest (Where's My $500, *****?)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER