| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2005 01:26:48 AM |
| Object: |
Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
Fucking man-child moron,,,
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Joseki" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
13 Sep 2005 01:23:33 PM |
|
|
Boy Toy wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (=A92001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (=A92001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Boy Toy is correct. It is like "special". Being "special" can mean
you are in remedial classes and ride a very small school bus or it can
mean youu are in advanced classes and a high acheiver. Ditto for
extraordinary. It simply means outside of the ordinary. One can be
extraordinarily stupid or extraodinarily bright.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 01:28:33 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:17:37 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Connotations, not semantics.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 07:32:46 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:33 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<lngfi1l2tjog3s9e0t0987h16oniqq04kb@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:17:37 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Connotations, not semantics.
I give up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 09:12:07 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:32:46 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:33 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<lngfi1l2tjog3s9e0t0987h16oniqq04kb@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:17:37 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Connotations, not semantics.
I give up.
I would too, if I had made that gaffe in my native and only language.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 11:25:08 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:12:07 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<22mhi11c8ph52qtb2hrl1kgfdadf069naa@4ax.com>
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:32:46 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:33 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<lngfi1l2tjog3s9e0t0987h16oniqq04kb@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:17:37 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Connotations, not semantics.
I give up.
I would too, if I had made that gaffe in my native and only language.
What's your problem anyway?
You're acting like a *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
15 Sep 2005 08:00:18 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:25:08 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:12:07 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<22mhi11c8ph52qtb2hrl1kgfdadf069naa@4ax.com>
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:32:46 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:33 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<lngfi1l2tjog3s9e0t0987h16oniqq04kb@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:17:37 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
Connotations, not semantics.
I give up.
I would too, if I had made that gaffe in my native and only language.
What's your problem anyway?
You're acting like a *****.
Just following your example.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
13 Sep 2005 01:18:21 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No. The genuine binaries are (usually) generated by prefix that can
only have two binary values. "Extra-" is an example. Like "a-".
.
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 01:28:56 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:18:21 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No.
Thank you for agreeing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 12:13:15 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:56 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:18:21 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No.
Thank you for agreeing.
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary. A thing he learned
from Clinton. Too bad he didn't learn more. What did Clinton do prior
to Hurricane Floyd hitting the Carolinas?
He declared the Carolinas a Federal Disaster Area before Floyd struck,
mobilized the National Guard and military, cut short his working
diplomatic foray, and flew home early to manage the natural disaster
Bush on the other hand. well . . .
----------------
"Should any political party attempt to abolish
social security, unemployment insurance, and
eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would
not hear of that party again in our political
history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course,
that believes you can do these things. Among them
are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an
occasional politician or business man from other
areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54
.
|
|
|
| User: "€€R.L.Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 07:20:12 PM |
|
|
In article <9emgi11ir4pc0j1fipahvkoifipasm9dvj@4ax.com>,
retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:56 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:18:21 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No.
Thank you for agreeing.
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary. A thing he learned
from Clinton. Too bad he didn't learn more. What did Clinton do prior
to Hurricane Floyd hitting the Carolinas?
• First he consulted in depth with Monica.
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 07:27:07 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:20:12 -0700, (€€R.L.Measures)
wrote:
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary. A thing he learned
from Clinton. Too bad he didn't learn more. What did Clinton do prior
to Hurricane Floyd hitting the Carolinas?
• First he consulted in depth with Monica.
PLONK
----------------
"Should any political party attempt to abolish
social security, unemployment insurance, and
eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would
not hear of that party again in our political
history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course,
that believes you can do these things. Among them
are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an
occasional politician or business man from other
areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54
.
|
|
|
| User: "€€R.L.Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
15 Sep 2005 04:09:34 AM |
|
|
In article <lufhi1ltubrftu5rh4s9u22v0f8i1at7ej@4ax.com>,
retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:20:12 -0700, (€€R.L.Measures)
wrote:
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary. A thing he learned
from Clinton. Too bad he didn't learn more. What did Clinton do prior
to Hurricane Floyd hitting the Carolinas?
• First he consulted in depth with Monica.
PLONK
• In the UK "plonking" is a synonym for coitus. Is that what you were
hinting at?
----------------
"Should any political party attempt to abolish
social security, unemployment insurance, and
eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would
not hear of that party again in our political
history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course,
that believes you can do these things. Among them
are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an
occasional politician or business man from other
areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54
• Who would ever have guessed that such people could win the first two
Presidential elections in the next century by making a single-issue
alliance with religious fundamentalists.
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 05:53:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:13:15 -0700, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:56 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:18:21 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>
Nonexisting domain
Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
Fallacy of bifurcation.
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No.
Thank you for agreeing.
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary.
Subordinary. Extraordinary is a positive.
But thank you for exemplifying that, and why sarcasm should be left to
the professionals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "€€R.L.Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
14 Sep 2005 07:22:06 PM |
|
|
In article <7dahi1d3t3okocf7laolb7c4a8bn5sbgeh@4ax.com>, "maf1029
(©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:13:15 -0700, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:28:56 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:
...
No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
No.
No.
Thank you for agreeing.
Yeah Bush's early declaration was extraordinary.
Subordinary. Extraordinary is a positive.
• Not necessarily. One could be extraordinarily dense.
....
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "torresD" |
|
| Title: TO BE A LIBERAL IS TO BE INSANE ==> Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina |
13 Sep 2005 10:20:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:26:48 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Fucking man-child moron,,,
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
