Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina



 Religions > Atheism > Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Date: 13 Sep 2005 01:26:48 AM
Object: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina
Fucking man-child moron,,,
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "PagCal"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 05:43:11 PM
His poll numbers show otherwise, so, would you want to be the one to
bring this kind of 'news' to him and get fired?
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


-----

Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka

aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting

Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless

.

User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 03:10:12 AM
In article <55sci19svn7d7ocv94eqn1iq9r8174diuj@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming.
Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."
Yeah, Bush's work on this storm has so far been very out of the norm for
presidents.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "Elf M. Sternberg"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 10:33:45 AM
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> writes:

President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming. Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."

In other words, even *before* he knew that he would need them by
law, he had signed the documents that give extraordinary powers
to... himself. "Extraordinary" isn't the word I'd use. "Power-mad" is
closer to the truth.
Dictators give themselves powers they "might need someday."
Presidents serve people in time of crisis.
Elf
.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 05:18:49 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:10:12 GMT, *nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <55sci19svn7d7ocv94eqn1iq9r8174diuj@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming.
Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."

Yeah, Bush's work on this storm has so far been very out of the norm for
presidents.

Yep, very good in this case.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 09:50:03 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:18:49 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:10:12 GMT, *nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <55sci19svn7d7ocv94eqn1iq9r8174diuj@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming.
Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."

Yeah, Bush's work on this storm has so far been very out of the norm for
presidents.


Yep, very good in this case.

Of course anything is "very good" to a 63 year-old loser who is living
in a university apartment. Any luck with the LSU co-eds?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 05:35:19 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:50:03 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:18:49 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:10:12 GMT, *nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <55sci19svn7d7ocv94eqn1iq9r8174diuj@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming.
Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."

Yeah, Bush's work on this storm has so far been very out of the norm for
presidents.


Yep, very good in this case.



Of course anything is "very good" to a 63 year-old loser who is living
in a university apartment. Any luck with the LSU co-eds?

Good old yang - not a flicker of a light when it comes to public discussion.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: A Psychological Profile of Earl J Weber 13 Sep 2005 11:17:09 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:35:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:50:03 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:18:49 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:10:12 GMT, *nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <55sci19svn7d7ocv94eqn1iq9r8174diuj@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Fucking man-child moron,,,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/12.html#a4927


President Bush was very happy with himself today as he told reporters
that he had pre-signed emergency declarations in anticipation of the big
storm coming.
Bush: "Which is by the way, extraordinary."

Yeah, Bush's work on this storm has so far been very out of the norm for
presidents.


Yep, very good in this case.



Of course anything is "very good" to a 63 year-old loser who is living
in a university apartment. Any luck with the LSU co-eds?


Good old yang - not a flicker of a light when it comes to public discussion.

Just what kind of person would live in a university apartment at age
63? Well, several psychological profile emerges, none of which are
flattering:
A) That of a complete financial loser. When most 63 year-olds are
enjoy the fruits of their career- planning for retirement, having fun
with their grandchildren, lmoving to that lovely villa in Tuscany,
Earl J Weber has to start over and take remedial math 101. This is a
sign of sheer incompetence. This may be why Earl J Weber identifies
with Bush so much.
B) Someone with a massive inferirority complex. Big Man on Campus!
Look! I got an A in freshamn lit, at 63 years-old. Tak that 18 years
olds! For his next act Earl J Weber will dunk on a 6th grader on a
7-foot basketball rim. Of Course, given that Earl J Weber is a
complete biological failure and has gottn laid since the Cuban missile
Crisis, it is hardly surprising he needs this pathetic affrimation of
his non-existent manhood.
C) Creepy cradle-robbing stalker: let me try to score on the Theta
girls! When most 63 year-olds are spending their lives with their
soulmates, Earl J Weber is still buffing up his polyester suit trying
to score himeself a missess. Here's a clue, you're a loser 40 years
ago, you're a loser now.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1894 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: A Psychological Profile of Earl J Weber 14 Sep 2005 06:17:08 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:17:09 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Good old yang - not a flicker of a light when it comes to public discussion.

Just what kind of person would live in a university apartment at age
63?

I wouldn't know.

Well, several psychological profile emerges, none of which are
flattering:


Ok, lets see what you got.

A) That of a complete financial loser. When most 63 year-olds are
enjoy the fruits of their career- planning for retirement, having fun
with their grandchildren, lmoving to that lovely villa in Tuscany,
Earl J Weber has to start over and take remedial math 101. This is a
sign of sheer incompetence. This may be why Earl J Weber identifies
with Bush so much.

I'm retiring in 3 months.

B) Someone with a massive inferirority complex. Big Man on Campus!
Look! I got an A in freshamn lit, at 63 years-old. Tak that 18 years
olds! For his next act Earl J Weber will dunk on a 6th grader on a
7-foot basketball rim. Of Course, given that Earl J Weber is a
complete biological failure and has gottn laid since the Cuban missile
Crisis, it is hardly surprising he needs this pathetic affrimation of
his non-existent manhood.

I don't play basketball. Knees too bad.

C) Creepy cradle-robbing stalker: let me try to score on the Theta
girls! When most 63 year-olds are spending their lives with their
soulmates, Earl J Weber is still buffing up his polyester suit trying
to score himeself a missess. Here's a clue, you're a loser 40 years
ago, you're a loser now.

Haahaahaahaahaahaa.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "towelie"

Title: Re: A Psychological Profile of Earl J Weber 14 Sep 2005 06:42:08 PM
TV's duke wrote:

B) Someone with a massive inferirority complex. Big Man on Campus!
Look! I got an A in freshamn lit, at 63 years-old. Tak that 18 years
olds! For his next act Earl J Weber will dunk on a 6th grader on a
7-foot basketball rim. Of Course, given that Earl J Weber is a
complete biological failure and has gottn laid since the Cuban missile
Crisis, it is hardly surprising he needs this pathetic affrimation of
his non-existent manhood.


I don't play basketball. Knees too bad.

Since you've been on them for the last five years, that is no surprise.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: A Psychological Profile of Earl J Weber 15 Sep 2005 05:29:57 PM
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:42:08 -0500, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

TV's duke wrote:

B) Someone with a massive inferirority complex. Big Man on Campus!
Look! I got an A in freshamn lit, at 63 years-old. Tak that 18 years
olds! For his next act Earl J Weber will dunk on a 6th grader on a
7-foot basketball rim. Of Course, given that Earl J Weber is a
complete biological failure and has gottn laid since the Cuban missile
Crisis, it is hardly surprising he needs this pathetic affrimation of
his non-existent manhood.


I don't play basketball. Knees too bad.

Since you've been on them for the last five years, that is no surprise.

Yep. Golf, tennis, racket ball.
What do you use in exercise if not your knees?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "towelie"

Title: Re: A Psychological Profile of Earl J Weber 15 Sep 2005 06:20:40 PM
TV's duke wrote:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:42:08 -0500, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:

TV's duke wrote:

B) Someone with a massive inferirority complex. Big Man on Campus!
Look! I got an A in freshamn lit, at 63 years-old. Tak that 18 years
olds! For his next act Earl J Weber will dunk on a 6th grader on a
7-foot basketball rim. Of Course, given that Earl J Weber is a
complete biological failure and has gottn laid since the Cuban missile
Crisis, it is hardly surprising he needs this pathetic affrimation of
his non-existent manhood.


I don't play basketball. Knees too bad.


Since you've been on them for the last five years, that is no surprise.


Yep. Golf, tennis, racket ball.

Bobbing on Bush's *****.
.









User: "Niels van der Linden"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 05:52:27 AM
Nonexisting domain
.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 10:44:40 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.
Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 04:16:12 PM
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.

Why not subordinary?
.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 12:56:47 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:16:12 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
<wkHVe.9608$4P5.4804@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Why not subordinary?

Latin extraordinarius, from extra ordinem ‘outside the normal course
of events’.
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 05:41:36 AM
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:h23ii119f8bt156sa3hjf8bgd942enrrcp@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:16:12 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
<wkHVe.9608$4P5.4804@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Why not subordinary?


Latin extraordinarius, from extra ordinem 'outside the normal course
of events'.

WOOOOOSSHHHHH!
.
User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 07:39:26 AM
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:41:36 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:h23ii119f8bt156sa3hjf8bgd942enrrcp@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:16:12 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
<wkHVe.9608$4P5.4804@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Why not subordinary?


Latin extraordinarius, from extra ordinem 'outside the normal course
of events'.


WOOOOOSSHHHHH!

It just blows my mind that these sane people who would think nothing
of saying, "What an extraordinary whosists" (extraordinary now meaning
"super-good) then turn around and do the bait-n-switch so that they
can use it to mean "super-bad." And then these linguistic anarchists
blame people who use the word properly -- both denotatively and
connotatively -- for not kowtowing to their extraordinarily capricious
bastardizations.
.



User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 14 Sep 2005 01:29:33 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:16:12 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Why not subordinary?

Thank you!!!!!
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 14 Sep 2005 05:15:22 AM
"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:hpgfi19hae8hlvnsnol2u32srsocvtrbpu@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:16:12 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:


"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:ftsdi15q3r84jhr7ic2v3nk535ls9g34c6@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Why not subordinary?


Thank you!!!!!

You're welcome.
.



User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 12:28:45 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.

Fallacy of bifurcation.
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 05:46:56 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.

Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...
--
Funny Sister Lurlean quote #38:
"Do you all speak German at home? Do you put on leather boots and kick peoples
butt's at orgy's while you yell dirty German words at them?" --Lurlean makes
suggestions for a porn video featuring the governor of California
.
User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 14 Sep 2005 01:30:38 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...

Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.
.
User: "Clave"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 14 Sep 2005 01:39:25 AM
"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:lqgfi1pagf0hoj5ph2lodvd3d7ahq0ko2s@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...


Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.

That's an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
I hope you took that in a positive way.
Jim
.
User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 14 Sep 2005 07:00:05 AM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:39:25 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:lqgfi1pagf0hoj5ph2lodvd3d7ahq0ko2s@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...


Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.


That's an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.

Thank you for proving my point, albeit in an extraordinarily ignorant
and moronic way.

I hope you took that in a positive way.

In that you are extraordinarily unskilled and uninformed in matters of
your only language, yes.
To illustrate the point which you reinforced so extraordinarily
unwittingly -- when you're trying to process the phrase
"extraordinarily ignorant" for the third time, think of it as "beyond
ignorant," rather than "less than ignorant." Ergo, a positive.
Of course, your being extraordinarily pedestrian will prevent you from
grasping the concept of positive/negative in a
linguistic/syntactical/mechanical sense. Such is the way of the
extraordinarily banal.
(Note proper usages, all positives).
Oh, and your extraordinarily banal attempts at seeming linguistically
informed -- extraordinarily bad.
HTH, HAND, FYVM
.
User: "Clave"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 12:11:44 AM
"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:pm3gi15m98b10u2bs2rsbqogb4qscg7dch@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:39:25 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone>
wrote
in message news:lqgfi1pagf0hoj5ph2lodvd3d7ahq0ko2s@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...


Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.


That's an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.


Thank you for proving my point, albeit in an extraordinarily ignorant
and moronic way.

I hope you took that in a positive way.


In that you are extraordinarily unskilled and uninformed in matters of
your only language, yes...

Heh. Haven't seen a "whoosh" like that in ages.
Congratulations.
Jim
.
User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 08:00:58 AM
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:11:44 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:pm3gi15m98b10u2bs2rsbqogb4qscg7dch@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:39:25 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone>
wrote
in message news:lqgfi1pagf0hoj5ph2lodvd3d7ahq0ko2s@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...


Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.


That's an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.


Thank you for proving my point, albeit in an extraordinarily ignorant
and moronic way.

I hope you took that in a positive way.


In that you are extraordinarily unskilled and uninformed in matters of
your only language, yes...


Heh. Haven't seen a "whoosh" like that in ages.

Then you should strive for comprehension.
.
User: "Clave"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 15 Sep 2005 10:04:00 PM
"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote
in message news:63sii1d9gq3i1nb2ejhuc2i72n6m69ja1a@4ax.com...

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:11:44 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone>
wrote
in message news:pm3gi15m98b10u2bs2rsbqogb4qscg7dch@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:39:25 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:

"maf1029 (©2001-2008)" <saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone>
wrote
in message news:lqgfi1pagf0hoj5ph2lodvd3d7ahq0ko2s@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:56 GMT, Bill Baker
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
news:<v13ei11ggofr5qtfhdvdrhbiofbjalcpmv@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then
it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


Although you could say Bush was an extraordinary failure...


Yes, because the connotation of "extraordinary" is positive, not
negative.


That's an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.


Thank you for proving my point, albeit in an extraordinarily ignorant
and moronic way.

I hope you took that in a positive way.


In that you are extraordinarily unskilled and uninformed in matters of
your only language, yes...


Heh. Haven't seen a "whoosh" like that in ages.


Then you should strive for comprehension.

Good flipping god. You really didn't understand a thing.
Jim
.







User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 12:42:27 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.

No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".
.
User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 12:58:19 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".

No.
.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: Bush thinks he was "Extraordinary" with Katrina 13 Sep 2005 01:17:37 PM
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:19 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote in message
<2p4ei196e1dc69tm5juvod68431v6b1iqf@4ax.com>

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:27 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:28:45 -0700, "maf1029 (©2001-2008)"
<saxophone@saxophone.whereforartthousaxophone> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:44:40 GMT, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:52:27 +0200, "Niels van der Linden"
<n.f.l.vanderlinden@student.utwente.nl> wrote in message
<dg6b0s$7g1$1@netlx020.civ.utwente.nl>

Nonexisting domain

Works for me.

Actually, technically, Bush is correct. If it is not ordinary then it
is by definition extraordinary.


Fallacy of bifurcation.


No. It is a genuine binary - the "extra-" prefix does that: literally
"outside the ordinary".


No.

Apparently extra ordinary means something not ordinary in a
substantial way, and is slightly stronger than not ordinary. It is
more a question of semantics than of logic.
.







  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
OT: Katrina didn't do it, but with a fall in house prices, America could be blown off course
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
OT: Firms with Bush ties snag Katrina deals
Re: Why is everyone so furious with George Bush about Katrina?
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER