| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"George" |
| Date: |
25 Oct 2005 05:09:14 PM |
| Object: |
Bush would lose for the third time. |
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
A majority of those questioned felt the Democrats could do a better job
than Republicans at handling health care (59 percent to 30 percent),
Social Security (56 percent to 33 percent), gasoline prices (51 percent
to 31 percent) and the economy (50 percent to 38 percent).
Forty-six percent also believed Democrats could do better at handling
Iraq, while 40 percent said the GOP would do better.
.
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 02:17:44 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:13:28 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... the votes were counted, and fairly.
Well, not to anyone who's aware of any facts, anyway ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 02:51:19 PM |
|
|
* US * wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:13:28 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... the votes were counted, and fairly.
Well, not to anyone who's aware of any facts, anyway ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html
These guys don't "do" facts, Ru$h and O'Really won't let them
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
31 Oct 2005 06:55:31 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:51:19 -0800, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
* US * wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:13:28 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... the votes were counted, and fairly.
Well, not to anyone who's aware of any facts, anyway ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html
These guys don't "do" facts, Ru$h and O'Really won't let them
You're right. They're all far-too cowardly to deal with reality.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
02 Nov 2005 05:03:12 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:17:44 -0500, * US * wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:13:28 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... the votes were counted, and fairly.
Well, not to anyone who's aware of any facts, anyway ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html
The cat knew that algore was applying double standards .
They named the cat "chad" didn't they.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
03 Nov 2005 12:29:10 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:03:12 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... applying double standards .
You imagine cheating would be okay
just because your fascist idols do it.
You may not be able to function
adequately enough to reason.
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:13:28 -0600, dupe <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
... the votes were counted, and fairly.
Well, not to anyone who's aware of any facts, anyway ...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 07:23:54 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:1nh9m11o19a1pmdd94futovohnurl9spqm@4ax.com:
On 29 Oct 2005 14:09:16 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
That's just it - the votes were counted, and fairly.
there was no need for you to lie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
02 Nov 2005 05:00:34 AM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2005 13:23:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:1nh9m11o19a1pmdd94futovohnurl9spqm@4ax.com:
On 29 Oct 2005 14:09:16 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
That's just it - the votes were counted, and fairly.
there was no need for you to lie.
I didn't.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
02 Nov 2005 07:58:13 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:a27hm1psbaid9mditpr539g11fpjtijaoh@4ax.com:
On 30 Oct 2005 13:23:54 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:1nh9m11o19a1pmdd94futovohnurl9spqm@4ax.com:
On 29 Oct 2005 14:09:16 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
That's just it - the votes were counted, and fairly.
there was no need for you to lie.
I didn't.
there was no need for you to deny the obvious.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 10:43:38 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:1nh9m11o19a1pmdd94futovohnurl9spqm@4ax.com:
On 29 Oct 2005 14:09:16 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
That's just it - the votes were counted, and fairly.
there was no need for you to lie.
you beat me to that line :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 01:56:01 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference between
a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a "liberal"
running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 02:14:31 PM |
|
|
Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote in news:7BP8f.12298$gj1.4972@fed1read05:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference between
a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a "liberal"
running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
clay needs to use semantics to alter context as one way to bolster his
faulty thinking and failed arguments.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 03:17:00 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote in news:7BP8f.12298$gj1.4972@fed1read05:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Asmodeus <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns96FE65B7373CCbondcrightwingnation@216.196.97.142:
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
glad you agree that votes are no longer counted.
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference between
a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a "liberal"
running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
clay needs to use semantics to alter context as one way to bolster his
faulty thinking and failed arguments.
:)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 07:15:51 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:56:01 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference between
a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a "liberal"
running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
Oh, I can. He name is botox. And he was one of the most liberal of senators,
who traditionally hail from NEngland. Let's see, what state was that - the same
as Killer "who was driving' what's his face, if I remember correctly.
Captain "swift boat".
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 08:27:13 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:5oh9m11k6g34s87ip84ch4vjai6qkb2e1h@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:56:01 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference
between a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a
"liberal" running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
Oh, I can. He name is botox. And he was one of the most liberal of
senators, who traditionally hail from NEngland. Let's see, what state
was that - the same as Killer "who was driving' what's his face, if I
remember correctly.
Captain "swift boat".
are you referring to the decorated war hero who ran against the awol
coward?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 05:58:18 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:5oh9m11k6g34s87ip84ch4vjai6qkb2e1h@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:56:01 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference
between a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a
"liberal" running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
Oh, I can. He name is botox. And he was one of the most liberal of
senators, who traditionally hail from NEngland. Let's see, what state
was that - the same as Killer "who was driving' what's his face, if I
remember correctly.
Captain "swift boat".
are you referring to the decorated war hero who ran against the awol
coward?
No, he is referring to an ***** that colaberated with the enemy in
a
country at war with the US while still a member of the naval reserve.
An ***** that plotted the kidnap and assination of members of the
US
Senate.
An ***** who ran against an honorably discharged Texas Air National
Guard pilot.
He was referring to an *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
31 Oct 2005 09:08:35 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:1130716698.007842.131550
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
are you referring to the decorated war hero who ran against the awol
coward?
No,
oh, i thought he was referring to john kerry.
never mind then
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Asmodeus bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
31 Oct 2005 04:06:15 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:5oh9m11k6g34s87ip84ch4vjai6qkb2e1h@4ax.com:
Captain "swift boat"
Yes, the "war hero" who sponsored the phony Winter Soldier
hearings, and plays on surf boards.
And was owned body and soul by Soros.
--
/"\ ||
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN || Oderint Dum Metuant
X AGAINST HTML MAIL || VRWC Proud Life Member
/ \ AND POSTINGS || http://www.rightwingnation.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
31 Oct 2005 06:02:30 PM |
|
|
"Asmodeus" <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote
Yes,
Bush, the draft-dodger-turned-deserter! The ***** who literally
holds hands with his Saudi despot masters! But he's not gay...
just because he broke government regulations only to allow a
male prostitute into the Whitehouse on fake press credentials.
Republican thinking: Only real men hold hands with Arabs
and hang around with gay prostitutes!
What's it feel like backing a chicken *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Asmodeus bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
01 Nov 2005 01:38:06 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:na2dnQrxGfmTM_veRVn-
qw@comcast.com:
Bush, the draft-dodger-turned-deserter! The ***** who literally
holds hands with his Saudi despot masters! But he's not gay...
just because he broke government regulations only to allow a
male prostitute into the Whitehouse on fake press credentials.
Republican thinking: Only real men hold hands with Arabs
and hang around with gay prostitutes!
You have a real fascination with guys' dicks and butts,
don't you. Seriously, go suck some dicks or something,
get it out of your system, kool-aid drinker.
--
/"\ ||
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN || Oderint Dum Metuant
X AGAINST HTML MAIL || VRWC Proud Life Member
/ \ AND POSTINGS || http://www.rightwingnation.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
01 Nov 2005 03:41:23 PM |
|
|
"Asmodeus" <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote
Republican thinking: Only real men hold hands with Arabs
and hang around with gay prostitutes!
You have a real fascination with guys' dicks and butts,
don't you.
Odd, as I never mentioned either. You did. Or are you saying
that there was *****-play & ***** sucking involved with Bush
and the Arab Despots? Bush and the gay male prostitute he
allowed into the Whitehouse on fake credentials?
Please be more clear.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Asmodeus bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
01 Nov 2005 06:28:11 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:5LqdnTjIedcZQ_reRVn-
tA@comcast.com:
Odd, as I never mentioned either.
Really? So somebody forged your article that went on and
on about gay prostitutes and so forth?
You leftists have real problems. Seek help.
--
/"\ ||
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN || Oderint Dum Metuant
X AGAINST HTML MAIL || VRWC Proud Life Member
/ \ AND POSTINGS || http://www.rightwingnation.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
01 Nov 2005 08:07:07 PM |
|
|
"Asmodeus" <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote
Odd, as I never mentioned either.
Really?
Really. You did, but I didn't.
Is English not your first language?
So somebody forged your article that went on and
on about gay prostitutes and so forth?
Prostitute. Singular. And I was merely stating an established
fact. Try googling "Whitehouse" and "Gannon" in order to
catch yourself up on events.
You're welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
01 Nov 2005 08:53:12 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"Asmodeus" <bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote
Odd, as I never mentioned either.
Really?
Really. You did, but I didn't.
Is English not your first language?
This'll kill you "Asmodeus" *CLAIMS* to have a PhD and worse than that,
he expects us to believe that a moron who can't even read what is
written instead of what he "thinks" you've written. A-fuckin-mazing :)
So somebody forged your article that went on and
on about gay prostitutes and so forth?
Prostitute. Singular. And I was merely stating an established
fact. Try googling "Whitehouse" and "Gannon" in order to
catch yourself up on events.
You're welcome.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
30 Oct 2005 10:54:53 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:56:01 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Even so, he showed yet again that he doesn't know the difference between
a "liberal" and a Democrat. Jog my memory, James, was there a "liberal"
running for President in 2004? I sure can't remember one.
Oh, I can. He name is botox. And he was one of the most liberal of senators,
who traditionally hail from NEngland. Let's see, what state was that - the same
as Killer "who was driving' what's his face, if I remember correctly.
First off, if a person named "botox" was a candidate he wasn't on any
ballots in California also *IF* "botox" were a proper name it would be
capitalized. Your *LIE* about a "liberal" running in the 2004 election
is noted, of course REPUGNANTcons and CONservatives can only spout the
lies spewed by Rush and O'Really because they have no critical (or
anyother kind) "thinking" skills to determine the truth from the lies
spread by RRRists. Secondly, aside from the fact that you killed your
"argument" by disparaging Ted Kennedy without the balls to type his
name, list exactly what "liberal" agenda Ted has backed since becoming a
Senator oh those many long years ago. That gives you 30 some odd years
to find something even *ONE* "liberal" agenda he's pushed. Here's a free
hint; Democrats are generally moderates and there might be 6 in the
federal government. "Liberals" don't join the Democratic Party, they
join parties like the IWW, the Green, the Peace and Freedom, the
American Socialists, the American Communists, etc, they *DON'T* join the
Democrats. Learn to find things out for yourself, stop letting Rush and
O'Really "think" for you.
Captain "swift boat".
Non answer noted
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 01:53:50 PM |
|
|
Asmodeus wrote:
Pauline Barclay <pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> wrote in
news:33r6m1dq7rbo8gth35tbple42tan8grif7@4ax.com:
It's ok for you dweebs to tell the rest of what to do, correct?
Nobody's telling you what you can do -- just what you can't tell
us to do, like your liberal judges waving their magic wands and
discovering "rights" that are nowhere to be found in the Constitution,
and forcing them on the nation, against the will of the voters.
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box. I guess you
have to shove your marxist agenda down our throats somehow. It
won't be the SCOTUS much longer though.
Again you evidence the fact that you're not educated or intelligent.
Educated, intelligent people know the vast oceans of difference between
"liberals" and Democrats.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pauline barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 02:28:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:59:54 -0500, Asmodeus
<bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote:
Pauline Barclay <pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> wrote in
news:33r6m1dq7rbo8gth35tbple42tan8grif7@4ax.com:
It's ok for you dweebs to tell the rest of what to do, correct?
Nobody's telling you what you can do --
<clip>
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
Uh huh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
29 Oct 2005 03:18:54 PM |
|
|
Pauline barclay wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:59:54 -0500, Asmodeus
<bondcATrightwingnationDOTcom> wrote:
Pauline Barclay <pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> wrote in
news:33r6m1dq7rbo8gth35tbple42tan8grif7@4ax.com:
It's ok for you dweebs to tell the rest of what to do, correct?
Nobody's telling you what you can do --
<clip>
Of course, you liberals can't win at the ballot box.
Uh huh.
Not when they don't count all the votes and falsely take the vote away
from legitimate voters :(
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
