| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"George" |
| Date: |
25 Oct 2005 05:09:14 PM |
| Object: |
Bush would lose for the third time. |
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
A majority of those questioned felt the Democrats could do a better job
than Republicans at handling health care (59 percent to 30 percent),
Social Security (56 percent to 33 percent), gasoline prices (51 percent
to 31 percent) and the economy (50 percent to 38 percent).
Forty-six percent also believed Democrats could do better at handling
Iraq, while 40 percent said the GOP would do better.
.
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 11:56:12 AM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really happy about
this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt *possibly* be as bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 12:18:22 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
27 Oct 2005 12:36:02 PM |
|
|
"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:9gevl1hvm4mjdege8l2f1iobjbg44ng887@4ax.com...
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
I don't know that it's humanly possible
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 01:40:30 PM |
|
|
Jafo wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
Only if it's Jeb
.
|
|
|
| User: "mr_antone mr_antone@" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 02:09:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:40:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Jafo wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
Only if it's Jeb
Or Schwarzenegger.
Anything is possible with Bush, Inc
mr_antone
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 06:13:02 PM |
|
|
mr_antone wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:40:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Jafo wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
Only if it's Jeb
Or Schwarzenegger.
Anything is possible with Bush, Inc
The Constitution would have to amended and since the governator's losing
his ***** in CA it ain't gonna happen. He would be worse than W, but only
marginally :)
mr_antone
.
|
|
|
| User: "mr_antone mr_antone@" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
27 Oct 2005 07:38:34 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:13:02 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
mr_antone wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:40:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Jafo wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
Only if it's Jeb
Or Schwarzenegger.
Anything is possible with Bush, Inc
The Constitution would have to amended and since the governator's losing
his ***** in CA it ain't gonna happen. He would be worse than W, but only
marginally :)
That's correct. I keep forgetting about that pesky Constitution.
Need to remove my Bush, Inc hat before replying. ;-)>
mr_antone
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
27 Oct 2005 09:11:26 AM |
|
|
mr_antone wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:13:02 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
mr_antone wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:40:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> wrote:
Jafo wrote:
As viewed from alt.california, kathryn wrote:
"George" wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an
election were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really
happy about this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt
*possibly* be as bad.
Sure they could.
--
Jafo
Only if it's Jeb
Or Schwarzenegger.
Anything is possible with Bush, Inc
The Constitution would have to amended and since the governator's losing
his ***** in CA it ain't gonna happen. He would be worse than W, but only
marginally :)
That's correct. I keep forgetting about that pesky Constitution.
Need to remove my Bush, Inc hat before replying. ;-)>
mr_antone
:)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 01:39:54 PM |
|
|
kathryn wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really happy about
this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt *possibly* be as bad.
It's a real irony that REPUGNANTcons pushed that amendment through to
keep Truman from getting more than two terms and yet let's see who it
actually impacted:
Eisenhower
Reagan
Clinton
Bush II
3 REPUGNANTcons and *ONE* Democrat. :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 10:01:16 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Mimi Cohen wrote:
It's a real irony that REPUGNANTcons pushed that amendment through to
keep Truman from getting more than two terms and yet let's see who it
actually impacted:
Eisenhower
Reagan
Clinton
Bush II
3 REPUGNANTcons and *ONE* Democrat. :)
Eight years is enough for anybody, Mimi.
Hell, *Washington* knew that.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "chris.holt" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 12:46:19 PM |
|
|
kathryn wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
(However, the USSC would probably appoint him once again.)
I don't know about the rest of the world but I am really really happy about
this 2 term limit thing. The next person couldnt *possibly* be as bad.
I agree about the term limits; but I fear you're lacking in
imagination when thinking about the next person. I'm talking
early Roman empire here.
--
chris.holt@ncl.ac.uk http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/chris.holt
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 07:03:27 PM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
Well, yeah -- but only if they decide to *count the votes*...
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 08:25:02 PM |
|
|
Katt wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/25/poll.bush/index.html
A majority would vote for a Democrat over President Bush if an election
were held this year.
Well, yeah -- but only if they decide to *count the votes*...
Katt.
ZING!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 05:40:36 PM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 09:06:30 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Republicans? An ethnic?
Well, I suppose they'd only have to eat about 20 years worth
of words from denouncing every Italian Democrat as "Mob
related."
Funny thing is, Guilliani's man, the one they wanted to tap
for the Homeland "Security" gig, DOES have undeniable
ties to organized crime.
So after spending decades smearing Democrats like Mario
Cuomo with whispered mafia ties, they're going to nominate
someone who a whole one-degree of separation from
organized crime?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 09:36:48 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Republicans? An ethnic?
Well, I suppose they'd only have to eat about 20 years worth
of words from denouncing every Italian Democrat as "Mob
related."
Funny thing is, Guilliani's man, the one they wanted to tap
for the Homeland "Security" gig, DOES have undeniable
ties to organized crime.
So after spending decades smearing Democrats like Mario
Cuomo with whispered mafia ties, they're going to nominate
someone who a whole one-degree of separation from
organized crime?
Of course, everyone knows the REPUGNANTcons are liars, they can't help
it; it's all they have.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 10:36:24 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Why don't you practice saying "Bernie Kerik."
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 05:44:35 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through the
Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which considering
his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is unlikely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 06:32:02 PM |
|
|
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through the
Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which considering
his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his
"first lady" in NYC?
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 07:05:45 PM |
|
|
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Rfz7f.11114$gj1.5995@fed1read05...
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through the
Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which
considering his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is
unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his "first
lady" in NYC?
Why should you care? After all, isn't it the driberals who don't think a
persons sex life is an important issue?
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
25 Oct 2005 07:22:41 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:KOOdndvr-N6oWsPeRVn-vA@comcast.com...
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Rfz7f.11114$gj1.5995@fed1read05...
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through
the Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which
considering his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is
unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his "first
lady" in NYC?
Why should you care? After all, isn't it the driberals who don't think a
persons sex life is an important issue?
But Republicans DO CARE! Which means Giuliani is disqualified!
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 07:31:34 AM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:l%z7f.9138$Zv5.2370@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:KOOdndvr-N6oWsPeRVn-vA@comcast.com...
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Rfz7f.11114$gj1.5995@fed1read05...
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through
the Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which
considering his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is
unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his
"first lady" in NYC?
Why should you care? After all, isn't it the driberals who don't think a
persons sex life is an important issue?
But Republicans DO CARE! Which means Giuliani is disqualified!
But Driberals don't..so it's not an issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 10:55:27 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:-aidndaDjPJD6MLeRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:l%z7f.9138$Zv5.2370@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:KOOdndvr-N6oWsPeRVn-vA@comcast.com...
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Rfz7f.11114$gj1.5995@fed1read05...
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through
the Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which
considering his rather socially liberal views and philandering past is
unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his
"first lady" in NYC?
Why should you care? After all, isn't it the driberals who don't think
a persons sex life is an important issue?
But Republicans DO CARE! Which means Giuliani is disqualified!
But Driberals don't..so it's not an issue.
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to get
nominated by the Republicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 11:32:28 AM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:PFN7f.7104$tV6.1498@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:-aidndaDjPJD6MLeRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:l%z7f.9138$Zv5.2370@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:KOOdndvr-N6oWsPeRVn-vA@comcast.com...
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Rfz7f.11114$gj1.5995@fed1read05...
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:B7adncI2HrbKLsPeRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005102515091450073%ggains@waddfredu...
According to the latest poll,
<snip>
Practice saying President Rudolph Guilliani
Will he be a Republican President? Otherwise he needs to get through
the Republican purity tests to win the Republican nomination. Which
considering his rather socially liberal views and philandering past
is unlikely.
Can you imagine these prudes electing a man whose mistress was his
"first lady" in NYC?
Why should you care? After all, isn't it the driberals who don't think
a persons sex life is an important issue?
But Republicans DO CARE! Which means Giuliani is disqualified!
But Driberals don't..so it's not an issue.
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to get
nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach that
their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all. Don't be such
a hypocrite.
Sen. Packwood..Driberals had a COW.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 01:21:12 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to get
nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach that
their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications, however I won't be voting in ANY Republican primary. Well
then don't hold Republicans to a different standard than Democrats. If
having a sexual affair is inappropriate for a Democrat then it's also
inapropriate for a Republican. If the Republicans went after Clinton
because of an affair then why would you guys predict Guiliani, who also had
a long time mistress, to get the Republican nomination let alone win the
Presidency?
Don't be such a hypocrite.
Indeed, don't be a hypocrite. If it was wrong for Clinton then it's wrong
for Giuliani!
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 05:53:19 PM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:sOP7f.18866$6e1.16127@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to get
nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach that
their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications,
<snip>
alright then..it's not an issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 06:25:33 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:18adnT1N1I1Umv3eRVn-sg@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:sOP7f.18866$6e1.16127@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to
get nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach that
their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications,
<snip>
alright then..it's not an issue.
Not to me, but it IS to Republicans. Especially during the primaries!
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 07:03:55 PM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:NfU7f.7058$q%.5524@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:18adnT1N1I1Umv3eRVn-sg@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:sOP7f.18866$6e1.16127@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to
get nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach that
their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications,
<snip>
alright then..it's not an issue.
Not to me,
Alright then...what's with you making it an issue then?
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
26 Oct 2005 10:17:12 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:2-ydnYsNOazfhf3eRVn-qw@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:NfU7f.7058$q%.5524@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:18adnT1N1I1Umv3eRVn-sg@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:sOP7f.18866$6e1.16127@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to
get nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach
that their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications,
<snip>
alright then..it's not an issue.
Not to me,
Alright then...what's with you making it an issue then?
Because I'm not the one who will be voting in a Republican primary!
You clipped this part:
"It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications, however I won't be voting in ANY Republican primary. Well
then don't hold Republicans to a different standard than Democrats. If
having a sexual affair is inappropriate for a Democrat then it's also
inapropriate for a Republican. If the Republicans went after Clinton
because of an affair then why would you guys predict Guiliani, who also had
a long time mistress, to get the Republican nomination let alone win the
Presidency?"
Why do you continually ignore that?
Nevermind.....<plonk>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush would lose for the third time. |
27 Oct 2005 10:19:19 AM |
|
|
qwerty wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:2-ydnYsNOazfhf3eRVn-qw@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:NfU7f.7058$q%.5524@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:18adnT1N1I1Umv3eRVn-sg@comcast.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:sOP7f.18866$6e1.16127@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:zrKdneDOSeT9M8LeRVn-tw@comcast.com...
Will they be voting in the Republican primaries? It IS important to
get nominated by the Republicans.
Dont' worry about it..if you are one of those driberals who preach
that their sex lives are not an issue..don't talk about it at all.
It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications,
<snip>
alright then..it's not an issue.
Not to me,
Alright then...what's with you making it an issue then?
Because I'm not the one who will be voting in a Republican primary!
You clipped this part:
"It makes little difference to me when looking at a candidates
qualifications, however I won't be voting in ANY Republican primary. Well
then don't hold Republicans to a different standard than Democrats. If
having a sexual affair is inappropriate for a Democrat then it's also
inapropriate for a Republican. If the Republicans went after Clinton
because of an affair
Paula Jones and Janet Reno went after Clinton for having an affair. The
Republicans went after Clinton for lying and obstruction.
then why would you guys predict Guiliani, who also had
a long time mistress, to get the Republican nomination let alone win the
Presidency?"
Why do you continually ignore that?
Nevermind.....<plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
