| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
16 Feb 2006 05:10:17 PM |
| Object: |
Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Blasted By Harvard U. |
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/16/bush.education.reut/index.html
This is no surprise. The so-called president claims he wants uniformly
high standards, then says he thinks there's nothing wrong in teaching
about so-called intelligent so-called design, then says he wants to
improve math and science, then cuts the education budget.
What's puzzling is not that his favorite playground ride is the
see-saw, but why so many people were clueless enough to get on it with
him.
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Blasted By Harvard U. |
16 Feb 2006 06:57:32 PM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in news:1140131417.509778.89400
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/16/bush.education.reut/index.html
This is no surprise. The so-called president claims he wants uniformly
high standards, then says he thinks there's nothing wrong in teaching
about so-called intelligent so-called design, then says he wants to
improve math and science, then cuts the education budget.
What cuts? Where? Show us the cuts, Bud.
Lay them out for us.
Explain for us, please, where the education budget actually goes down.
What's puzzling is not that his favorite playground ride is the
see-saw, but why so many people were clueless enough to get on it with
him.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Presidents don't make jobs, rich people make jobs" - Anon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Blasted By Harvard U. |
16 Feb 2006 09:21:26 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in news:Xns976CCB0D4ED9Ffstone69@
81.174.50.80:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in
news:1140131417.509778.89400
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/16/bush.education.reut/index.html
This is no surprise. The so-called president claims he wants uniformly
high standards, then says he thinks there's nothing wrong in teaching
about so-called intelligent so-called design, then says he wants to
improve math and science, then cuts the education budget.
What cuts? Where? Show us the cuts, Bud.
Lay them out for us.
Explain for us, please, where the education budget actually goes down.
What's puzzling is not that his favorite playground ride is the
see-saw, but why so many people were clueless enough to get on it with
him.
Please show where more money improves students' performance as well.
pierce
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Blasted By Harvard U. |
17 Feb 2006 04:55:38 PM |
|
|
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in news:Xns976CCB0D4ED9Ffstone69@
81.174.50.80:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in
news:1140131417.509778.89400
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/16/bush.education.reut/index.html
This is no surprise. The so-called president claims he wants uniformly
high standards, then says he thinks there's nothing wrong in teaching
about so-called intelligent so-called design, then says he wants to
improve math and science, then cuts the education budget.
What cuts? Where? Show us the cuts, Bud.
Lay them out for us.
Explain for us, please, where the education budget actually goes down.
What's puzzling is not that his favorite playground ride is the
see-saw, but why so many people were clueless enough to get on it with
him.
Please show where more money improves students' performance as well.
Why would I have to show that? Did I claim that dollars=performance or
did I simply say cuts? Right! I simply said cuts. So please,
dispense with the straw men and deal with the facts.
And if you don't think a cut of ~$12 billion in higher education
funding is going to impact someone's performance in actually *getting*
a higher education, then you're not thinking at all.
And if you think that putting obstacles in the way of people getting
higher education is not going to impact this *country*'s perfirmance
then, again, you're simply not thinking.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Blasted By Harvard U. |
18 Feb 2006 10:29:00 AM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in
news:1140216938.731488.74910@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns976CCB0D4ED9Ffstone69@ 81.174.50.80:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in
news:1140131417.509778.89400
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/16/bush.education.reut/index.h
tml
This is no surprise. The so-called president claims he wants
uniformly high standards, then says he thinks there's nothing
wrong in teaching about so-called intelligent so-called design,
then says he wants to improve math and science, then cuts the
education budget.
What cuts? Where? Show us the cuts, Bud.
Lay them out for us.
Explain for us, please, where the education budget actually goes
down.
What's puzzling is not that his favorite playground ride is the
see-saw, but why so many people were clueless enough to get on it
with him.
Please show where more money improves students' performance as well.
Why would I have to show that? Did I claim that dollars=performance
or did I simply say cuts? Right! I simply said cuts. So please,
dispense with the straw men and deal with the facts.
Ah, so more money doesn't necessarily equal better performance. Gotcha.
And if you don't think a cut of ~$12 billion in higher education
funding is going to impact someone's performance in actually *getting*
a higher education, then you're not thinking at all.
Cut from where? Be specific. Show which part of the budget actually goes
down.
And if you think that putting obstacles in the way of people getting
higher education is not going to impact this *country*'s perfirmance
then, again, you're simply not thinking.
I know one way to remove most of the obstacles to higher education:
disband the NEA.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Considering 28 of the 31 Democrats have received Abramoff-affiliated
funds themselves, it appears their hypocrisy has exceeded even their
partisanship," - Tracey Schmitt, Republican National Committee.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
