|
|
| User: "pluther" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
03 Feb 2005 06:45:53 PM |
|
|
"The Democrat Party is a joke."
A bunch of spineless cowards. Of course, only six democrats voted for
Gonzales - 36 voted against him. All Republicans, of course, voted for
him.
For a man who has spoken in favor of torture. For a man who stood in
front of the senate and refused to answer their questions, or provide
any of the material they demanded. But they voted for him anyway.
Because they're a bunch of useless spineless cowards: Lieberman,
Salazar, Landrieu, Nelson and Pryor. If I lived in one of those
states, I would vote third party and allow a Republican to take the
seat before I would ever vote for any of them for re-election.
"But we must work together with the President". *****. When the
president is condoning torture, you must work against him. Shame on
all of you, the six spineless coward democrats, and the 54 republicans
who also voted for this criminal because The Leader told them to.
Oh, yeah, and for those counting, our next National Security adviser,
Rice's replacement, is yet another convicted criminal from Iran-Contra,
which I believe brings the total up to 4 convicted and pardoned by the
father serving the son's administration.
-Pat
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
03 Feb 2005 06:09:56 PM |
|
|
IF Bush won the election......
______________________________________________________________________________
[a]
He won by the smallest margin for a wartime president in the history of America.
[b]
Both of his elections were won with a level of fraud and deceit never before seen in America.
______________________________________________________________________________
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gactimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
04 Feb 2005 01:35:03 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:17f501h476j84etsnkgjkeh576f1sbrbvf@4ax.com:
IF Bush won the election......
_________________________________________________________________________
[a]
He won by the smallest margin for a wartime president in the history of
America.
Bush won a majority of the votes for the first time since 1988 and only
three Democratic presidents have gotten a higher percentage of the votes
than Bush.
[b]
Both of his elections were won with a level of fraud and deceit never
before seen in America.
"We really won but the Republicans stole it."
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Is that the new excuse for when the left loses elections
from now on?
I see your backside is still stinging from your humiliating defeat in
November and in your defeat on Sunday when Iraqis had free elections.
But it's good that you think that Americans really voted for the Democrats
and Republicans only win by stealing elections. It means that Democrats
will keep doing what they do that loses them elections and the Democratic
Party's demise will come that much sooner.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
03 Feb 2005 06:21:19 PM |
|
|
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't been
done in years.
[a]
He won by the smallest margin for a wartime president in the history
of America.
[b]
Both of his elections were won with a level of fraud and deceit never
before seen in America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chance Hopkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
03 Feb 2005 08:21:20 PM |
|
|
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107476479.350276.296070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't been
done in years.
See Gore got the majority in 2000, it was in the news a bit since it was a
REAL BIG DEAL. You might have missed it. Do a google search and catch up.
Here are some others from an article (I sniped it a lot, cause I know you
have trouble reading and comprehending).
Not since 1888 has a candidate received the most votes yet lost the
election. But there have been some close calls - all attributable to the
Electoral College.
In 1800, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr had an equal number of electoral
votes and the House decided for Jefferson.
In 1824, there were four strong candidates and no one
achieved a majority. The House voted
for John Quincy Adams even though Andrew Jackson had more
electoral and popular votes.
Jackson easily was elected in 1828.
In 1876, Democrat Samuel Tilden received about 250,000 more
votes than Republican
Rutherford B. Hayes. But three divided states with a total
of 20 electoral votes sent in two
sets of votes, one for each candidate. Tilden needed just
one of the 20 to win. The House
established a special commission to choose between the
competing state votes, and in each
case the commission decided by one vote for Hayes.
In 1888, Democrat Grover Cleveland beat Benjamin Harrison
by 110,000 votes, but lost the
electoral vote. This happened because Cleveland won huge
victories in several of the 18
states that supported him, especially in the South, while
Harrison won far more narrowly in
some big states, such as New York.
[a]
He won by the smallest margin for a wartime president in the history
of America.
[b]
Both of his elections were won with a level of fraud and deceit never
before seen in America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
03 Feb 2005 10:53:03 PM |
|
|
"Chance Hopkins" <chance_hopkins@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:A_AMd.895$h06.191094@monger.newsread.com...
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107476479.350276.296070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't been
done in years.
See Gore got the majority in 2000, it was in the news a bit since it was a
REAL BIG DEAL. You might have missed it. Do a google search and catch up.
Here are some others from an article (I sniped it a lot, cause I know you
have trouble reading and comprehending).
Gore did not get the majority, You might have missed it, do a 2nd grade math
class and catch up. (Here are some hits for you, cause I know you have
trouble adding and comprehending).
ma·jor·i·ty number more than half of the total.
Gore 48.38%
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
04 Feb 2005 12:12:49 AM |
|
|
In article <SaDMd.28744$xt.24031@fed1read07>,
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote:
"Chance Hopkins" <chance_hopkins@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:A_AMd.895$h06.191094@monger.newsread.com...
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107476479.350276.296070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't been
done in years.
See Gore got the majority in 2000, it was in the news a bit since it was a
REAL BIG DEAL. You might have missed it. Do a google search and catch up.
Here are some others from an article (I sniped it a lot, cause I know you
have trouble reading and comprehending).
Gore did not get the majority, You might have missed it, do a 2nd grade math
class and catch up. (Here are some hits for you, cause I know you have
trouble adding and comprehending).
ma·jor·i·ty number more than half of the total.
Gore 48.38%
Gore got the plurality ahead of Dubya, And it is still not clear that
Dubya got Florida's electoral votees honestly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
04 Feb 2005 06:36:12 AM |
|
|
Virgil wrote:
In article <SaDMd.28744$xt.24031@fed1read07>,
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote:
"Chance Hopkins" <chance_hopkins@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:A_AMd.895$h06.191094@monger.newsread.com...
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107476479.350276.296070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't
been
done in years.
See Gore got the majority in 2000, it was in the news a bit since
it was a
REAL BIG DEAL. You might have missed it. Do a google search and
catch up.
Here are some others from an article (I sniped it a lot, cause I
know you
have trouble reading and comprehending).
Gore did not get the majority, You might have missed it, do a 2nd
grade math
class and catch up. (Here are some hits for you, cause I know you
have
trouble adding and comprehending).
ma=B7jor=B7i=B7ty number more than half of the total.
Gore 48.38%
Gore got the plurality ahead of Dubya, And it is still not clear that
Dubya got Florida's electoral votees honestly.
Yes it is clear, Bush won the count, the recount and the re-re-count.
Every count he won. Get over it. Do you want to challenge the most
recent election? What you're doing is digging up a dead horse, beating
it some more, burying it again, and repeating the same process. Let it
go, the 2000 election is ancient history.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
06 Feb 2005 10:29:33 PM |
|
|
On 4 Feb 2005 04:36:12 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Yes it is clear, Bush won the count, the recount and the re-re-count.
Every count he won. Get over it. Do you want to challenge the most
recent election? What you're doing is digging up a dead horse, beating
it some more, burying it again, and repeating the same process. Let it
go, the 2000 election is ancient history.
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
--
"So much blood has been shed by the Church because of an omission from the Gospel: "Ye
shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor's religion is." Not merely tolerant of it,
but indifferent to it. Divinity is claimed for many religions; but no religion is great
enough or divine enough to add that new law to its code."
- Mark Twain, a Biography
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 08:29:28 AM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Lister" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 08:01:09 PM |
|
|
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in news:1107786568.342877.281260
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
You are responsible for the rise in global stupidity.
--
Bush is not my President.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
10 Feb 2005 04:55:57 PM |
|
|
Dave Lister wrote:
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in
news:1107786568.342877.281260
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans
can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end
of
story.
You are responsible for the rise in global stupidity.
Yet another dumb post that cannot address a previous post with anything
substantive, so he responds with *****, because that is the best
he's got. There's nothing more than a few talking points with the
wacko left, and beyond that, there's no real content.
I can prove that Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global
terrorism, amd you just hate it that you can't retort effectively. I'm
not surprised, because facts cannot be disputed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Lister" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
10 Feb 2005 07:31:55 PM |
|
|
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in news:1108076157.045554.78780
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Lister wrote:
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in
news:1107786568.342877.281260
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans
can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end
of
story.
You are responsible for the rise in global stupidity.
Yet another dumb post that cannot address a previous post with anything
substantive, so he responds with *****, because that is the best
he's got. There's nothing more than a few talking points with the
wacko left, and beyond that, there's no real content.
No moron, it's all the response your babble requires.
I can prove that Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global
terrorism, amd you just hate it that you can't retort effectively. I'm
not surprised, because facts cannot be disputed.
I can prove that you are responsible for a drop in the global average IQ,
moron.
--
Bush is not my President.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
10 Feb 2005 07:03:36 PM |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2005 14:55:57 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
said in alt.atheism:
I can prove that Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global
terrorism
Assertion isn't proof.
I'm not surprised, because facts cannot be disputed.
And assertions don't have to be disputed.
--
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds
are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her
tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the
existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 05:53:24 PM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 06:29:28 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
Gee, that's funny, that's not what bin Laden says. And, being a
terrorist, he should know his motivations better than you do.
--
"Creationists are the best evidence we have that there is no intelligent design."
-Josef Balluch
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 07:20:02 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:dqvf01hijp5dpeqdd3qsom9hvqnj2rv2o6@4ax.com...
On 7 Feb 2005 06:29:28 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
Gee, that's funny, that's not what bin Laden says. And, being a
terrorist, he should know his motivations better than you do.
Are you sure about that?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
In the first part of this interview which occurred in May 1998, a little
over two months before the U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania,
Osama bin Laden answers questions posed to him by some of his followers at
his mountaintop camp in southern Afghanistan. In the latter part of the
interview, ABC reporter John Miller is asking the questions.
The American people, by and large, do not know the name bin Laden, but they
soon likely will. Do you have a message for the American people?
I say to them that they have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal
government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration ... . We
believe that this administration represents Israel inside America. Take the
sensitive ministries such as the Ministry of Exterior and the Ministry of
Defense and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the upper hand in
them. They make use of America to further their plans for the world,
especially the Islamic world. American presence in the Gulf provides support
to the Jews and protects their rear. And while millions of Americans are
homeless and destitute and live in abject poverty, their government is busy
occupying our land and building new settlements and helping Israel build new
settlements in the point of departure for our Prophet's midnight journey to
the seven heavens. America throws her own sons in the land of the two Holy
Mosques for the sake of protecting Jewish interests. ...
The American government is leading the country towards hell. ... We say to
the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives
and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic
government that caters to their interests not the interests of the Jews. If
the present injustice continues with the wave of national consciousness, it
will inevitably move the battle to American soil, just as Ramzi Yousef and
others have done. This is my message to the American people. I urge them to
find a serious administration that acts in their interest and does not
attack people and violate their honor and pilfer their wealth. ...
--
"Creationists are the best evidence we have that there is no intelligent
design."
-Josef Balluch
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 08:43:53 PM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 06:29:28 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
You forgot to mention the budget deficit, global heating and receiving
head.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie Clifford Barney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 10:16:07 AM |
|
|
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
I just saw a detailed report on the flourishing of terrorist acts
against Americans and America during the Reagan administration. WOnder
how Clinton engineered those?
--
"Woman's Need calls me as Woman's Need made me. Her Need I will answer
as my maker bade me."
Lady Kethryveris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 05:55:21 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:16:07 GMT, Natalie Clifford Barney
<NCBarney@LesbianSalonHostess.20RueJacob.fr> said in alt.atheism:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
I just saw a detailed report on the flourishing of terrorist acts
against Americans and America during the Reagan administration. WOnder
how Clinton engineered those?
He developed a time machine while he was in England smoking pot
(without inhaling) and dodging the draft.
</NeoCon rant>
--
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 08:43:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:16:07 GMT, Natalie Clifford Barney
<NCBarney@LesbianSalonHostess.20RueJacob.fr> wrote:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
I just saw a detailed report on the flourishing of terrorist acts
against Americans and America during the Reagan administration. WOnder
how Clinton engineered those?
He was planning it, from his evil head <snicker> quarters in Arkansas!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 11:14:01 AM |
|
|
al Qaida came to be in the 90's, not in the 80's. Bill Clinton never
had capability to deal with terrorism against the US. His solution to
it was to hide under his desk and hope the nightmare would go away.
Natalie Clifford Barney wrote:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans
can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end
of
story.
I just saw a detailed report on the flourishing of terrorist acts
against Americans and America during the Reagan administration.
WOnder
how Clinton engineered those?
--
"Woman's Need calls me as Woman's Need made me. Her Need I will
answer
as my maker bade me."
Lady Kethryveris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 11:23:09 AM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 09:14:01 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
al Qaida came to be in the 90's, not in the 80's.
Because everyone knows that there were no terrorist groups anywhere
before al Qaida.
Bill Clinton never
had capability to deal with terrorism against the US. His solution to
it was to hide under his desk and hope the nightmare would go away.
Apart from handing Bush a plan based on what had already been done - a
plan that Bush threw away and look where it's got him now....
Natalie Clifford Barney wrote:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans
can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end
of
story.
I just saw a detailed report on the flourishing of terrorist acts
against Americans and America during the Reagan administration.
WOnder
how Clinton engineered those?
--
"Woman's Need calls me as Woman's Need made me. Her Need I will
answer
as my maker bade me."
Lady Kethryveris
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 12:35:39 PM |
|
|
Adam H. wrote:
On 7 Feb 2005 09:14:01 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
al Qaida came to be in the 90's, not in the 80's.
Because everyone knows that there were no terrorist groups anywhere
before al Qaida.
You only partially right. There were no international, semi-autonomous
terror groups before al Qaida. All of the other ones: IRA, Hezbollah,
etc. were all regional in nature.
If Billy J Clitring had stomped all over al Qaida when they first
started to appear, all this mess today might have been avoided.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 01:20:18 PM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 10:35:39 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
Adam H. wrote:
On 7 Feb 2005 09:14:01 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
al Qaida came to be in the 90's, not in the 80's.
Because everyone knows that there were no terrorist groups anywhere
before al Qaida.
You only partially right. There were no international, semi-autonomous
terror groups before al Qaida. All of the other ones: IRA, Hezbollah,
etc. were all regional in nature.
Uh, no. Abu Nidal operated over the Middle East, Europe, Africa.
Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya has a worldwide presence. Hizbollah established
cells in Europe, Africa, South and North America and Asia. The JRA
staged attacks all over the world in the 70s.
If Billy J Clitring had stomped all over al Qaida when they first
started to appear, all this mess today might have been avoided.
There is no way to 'stomp all over' a terrorist group.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 11:12:07 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:20:18 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> said
in alt.atheism:
On 7 Feb 2005 10:35:39 -0800, "The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
If Billy J Clitring had stomped all over al Qaida when they first
started to appear, all this mess today might have been avoided.
There is no way to 'stomp all over' a terrorist group.
Sure there is - turn the entire world into a military dictatorship.
Haven't you been briefed?
--
"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education and social
ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he
had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
-Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 12:38:56 PM |
|
|
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
al Qaida came to be in the 90's, not in the 80's. Bill Clinton never
had capability to deal with terrorism against the US. His solution to
it was to hide under his desk and hope the nightmare would go away.
No that was Bush, under school desks.
-- Fritz ...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 12:37:00 PM |
|
|
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
The Clinton years are even MORE ancient, but the RepugLIEcans can't
seem to let them go.
Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in global terrorism, end of
story.
No, not end of story. I couldn't find a decent sex partner
this week end, problem traceable directly to Clinton administration.
I think he's also responsible for the patches in my back yard,
where the grass stopped growing.
-- Fritz ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
07 Feb 2005 08:16:27 PM |
|
|
Fritz wrote:
No, not end of story. I couldn't find a decent sex partner
this week end, problem traceable directly to Clinton administration.
I think he's also responsible for the patches in my back yard,
where the grass stopped growing.
-- Fritz ...
Finally you admit it!!!!! This is real progress!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's so-called "slim majority" |
04 Feb 2005 10:21:43 AM |
|
|
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
Virgil wrote:
In article <SaDMd.28744$xt.24031@fed1read07>,
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote:
"Chance Hopkins" <chance_hopkins@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:A_AMd.895$h06.191094@monger.newsread.com...
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107476479.350276.296070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sore Loser:
He received the majority of votes in 2000, something that hasn't
been
done in years.
See Gore got the majority in 2000, it was in the news a bit since
it was a
REAL BIG DEAL. You might have missed it. Do a google search and
catch up.
Here are some others from an article (I sniped it a lot, cause I
know you
have trouble reading and comprehending).
Gore did not get the majority, You might have missed it, do a 2nd
grade math
class and catch up. (Here are some hits for you, cause I know you
have
trouble adding and comprehending).
ma·jor·i·ty number more than half of the total.
Gore 48.38%
Gore got the plurality ahead of Dubya, And it is still not clear that
Dubya got Florida's electoral votees honestly.
Yes it is clear, Bush won the count, the recount and the re-re-count.
Every count he won. Get over it. Do you want to challenge the most
recent election? What you're doing is digging up a dead horse, beating
it some more, burying it again, and repeating the same process. Let it
go, the 2000 election is ancient history.
Yes like the Clinton haters did.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = tyranny.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
