Cats and gods.



 Religions > Atheism > Cats and gods.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "David Canzi -- non-mailable"
Date: 29 May 2006 07:28:56 PM
Object: Cats and gods.
What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name? Any other sequence of
phonemes or (pronounceable) sequence of letters could have been
used for the purpose of naming the animal and it would have made no
difference, They could just as well have been called gorns or zeems.
We are not born knowing what words mean: the meanings of words
must be learned. This necessity imposes several requirements: (1)
The word, whether in the form of sounds, shapes printed on paper,
smoke signals, etc., must be fairly reliably distinguishable
from other words and from the absence of words. (2) The thing
the word describes must be fairly reliably distinguishable from
things that the word does not describe. (3) The presence of the
thing the word describes must be fairly reliably distinguishable
from its absence.
In order for a word to denote a referent, ie. to actually be the
name of something, there is one more requirement: (4) At least
one example of what the word describes must exist.
We can learn to recognize the word "cat" reliably, and distinguish
it from similar words like "tat" or "cad". We can learn, either
from pictures or actual sightings, what cats look like. We can
distinguish the presence of a cat from its absence. And so,
we can learn to associate the word "cat" with the animal that
word names. So the word "cat" is meaningful. And most of us are
aware of one or more examples, so the word "cat" is known to have
one or more referents.
We can learn to recognize the word "unicorn" reliably. We can
learn, from pictures, what a unicorn looks like -- how to
distinguish it from any other animal, and how to distinguish the
presence of a unicorn from its absence. So the word "unicorn"
is meaningful. We lack actual examples of unicorns, and so
(so far) the word "unicorn" has no referents.
We can learn to recognize the word "god". Most religions insist
that "god" cannot be detected or observed and must be taken
on faith. We cannot distinguish what we cannot observe from
other things. We cannot distinguish the presence of something
unobservable from its absence. And so, any word claimed to be
the name of something that can't be observed is meaningless.
The word "god" fails more of the conditions required for having
a referent tban the word "unicorn" fails.
Now, the reason I posted this is that somebody, by bringing
up the idea that words and statements can be meaningless, has
irritated an old itch I've long wanted to scratch in public.
The claim is made that, if the word "god" is meaningless,
then the claim that there is no god is also meaningless, and
so strong atheism is not a supportable position. The position
that can be supported is that the word "god", being meaningless,
is not capable of denoting any referent. This conclusion is not
identical to strong atheism, but it differs from strong atheism so
little and so subtly that theists, if they managed to understand
it, would be unable to take any comfort from it.
--
David Canzi Division of explanatory labour: Science explains the
evidence; religion explains the lack of evidence.
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 30 May 2006 02:39:41 PM
"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?

I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 30 May 2006 04:10:33 PM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.

Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 05:29:17 AM
<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata

What the hell are you asking ME for?!?
I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 07:27:32 AM
In <4e59fvF1d5hkdU1@individual.net>, on 05/31/06
at 06:29 AM, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> said:

<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata

What the hell are you asking ME for?!?
I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;) --

Becuse many of them get broad across the ***** when they age or give birth?
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=broad&searchmode=none
broad
O.E. brad, from P.Gmc. *braithaz (cf. O.Fris. bred, O.N. breišr, Du. breed, Ger. breit, Goth. broužs), of unknown origin. Not found outside Gmc. languages. Slang extension to meaning "woman" (1911) may be suggestive of broad hips, but it also may trace to Amer.Eng. abroadwife, for a woman away from her husband, often a slave. Earliest use suggests immorality or coarse, low-class women. Because of this negative association, and the rise of women in athletics, the track and field broad jump was changed to the long jump c. 1967. Broadside (nautical), 1591, "the side of a ship above the water, between the bow and the quarter." Broadcast, originally "scattering seed" (1767), applied to radio waves 1921. Broadsword is O.E. brad swurd. There was a street named Broadway in many towns; the allusive use for "New York theater district" is first recorded 1881.
walksalone who is temporarily on vacation, in Alpha Centuri. On second thought, I think I will visit the restaurant, on the other side of the edge of the universe.
--
Death and flitting are hard on housekeeping.
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 08:43:23 AM
<walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap> wrote in message
news:447d8cb9$1$jnyxfnybar$mr2ice@127.0.0.1...

In <4e59fvF1d5hkdU1@individual.net>, on 05/31/06
at 06:29 AM, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> said:




<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?


I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;) --


Becuse many of them get broad across the ***** when they age or give birth?

HEY!!

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=broad&searchmode=none
broad
O.E. brad, from P.Gmc. *braithaz (cf. O.Fris. bred, O.N. breišr, Du.
breed, Ger. breit, Goth. broužs), of unknown origin. Not found outside
Gmc. languages. Slang extension to meaning "woman" (1911) may be
suggestive of broad hips, but it also may trace to Amer.Eng. abroadwife,
for a woman away from her husband, often a slave. Earliest use suggests
immorality or coarse, low-class women. Because of this negative
association, and the rise of women in athletics, the track and field broad
jump was changed to the long jump c. 1967. Broadside (nautical), 1591,
"the side of a ship above the water, between the bow and the quarter."
Broadcast, originally "scattering seed" (1767), applied to radio waves
1921. Broadsword is O.E. brad swurd. There was a street named Broadway in
many towns; the allusive use for "New York theater district" is first
recorded 1881.

Very interesting - Thanks for posting this :)
Well, if women are referred to as "broads" as in broad hips, shall we refer
to men as "beer bellies"? :)

walksalone who is temporarily on vacation, in Alpha Centuri. On second
thought, I think I will visit the restaurant, on the other side of the
edge of the universe.

Cool - Has an Astro Burger on me :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 02 Jun 2006 10:32:54 PM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 09:43:23 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism


<walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap> wrote in message
news:447d8cb9$1$jnyxfnybar$mr2ice@127.0.0.1...

In <4e59fvF1d5hkdU1@individual.net>, on 05/31/06
at 06:29 AM, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> said:




<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?


I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;) --


Becuse many of them get broad across the ***** when they age or give birth?


HEY!!

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=broad&searchmode=none
broad
O.E. brad, from P.Gmc. *braithaz (cf. O.Fris. bred, O.N. breišr, Du.
breed, Ger. breit, Goth. broužs), of unknown origin. Not found outside
Gmc. languages. Slang extension to meaning "woman" (1911) may be
suggestive of broad hips, but it also may trace to Amer.Eng. abroadwife,
for a woman away from her husband, often a slave. Earliest use suggests
immorality or coarse, low-class women. Because of this negative
association, and the rise of women in athletics, the track and field broad
jump was changed to the long jump c. 1967. Broadside (nautical), 1591,
"the side of a ship above the water, between the bow and the quarter."
Broadcast, originally "scattering seed" (1767), applied to radio waves
1921. Broadsword is O.E. brad swurd. There was a street named Broadway in
many towns; the allusive use for "New York theater district" is first
recorded 1881.


Very interesting - Thanks for posting this :)

Well, if women are referred to as "broads" as in broad hips, shall we refer
to men as "beer bellies"? :)

Pauncherello's.......

walksalone who is temporarily on vacation, in Alpha Centuri. On second
thought, I think I will visit the restaurant, on the other side of the
edge of the universe.


Cool - Has an Astro Burger on me :)

You've definately got the buns..... [eyes twinkle]
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.



User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 02 Jun 2006 10:31:01 PM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)

Their arses spread....... [VEG!]
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 06:34:31 AM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4e59fvF1d5hkdU1@individual.net>


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)

I could go a broad, I think.
--
Michael Gray.
Founding Member and Doorman,
Earthquack's 666 Club.
EAC Apprentice Thumbscrew Oiler.
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 08:41:12 AM
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:lpvq721se3m8etojaedgeo8vfp2lchk7ak@4ax.com...

On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4e59fvF1d5hkdU1@individual.net>


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)


I could go a broad, I think.

I bet you could! :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 04:10:04 PM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)

I talk in jest but I thought you'd have some type of answer, sarcasm,
wit or something. Just chatting..
As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)
C'est la pee pee.
Que sera sera.
ETC
And so on.
Sunyata
.
User: "Tabula Rasa"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 01 Jun 2006 12:26:35 PM
<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:f41s729ck2o6vqv6sqvvjga52uo535jupq@4ax.com...

On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?

Handled properly it will purr...
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 01 Jun 2006 09:13:58 AM
<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:f41s729ck2o6vqv6sqvvjga52uo535jupq@4ax.com...

On Wed, 31 May 2006 06:29:17 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata


What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)


I talk in jest but I thought you'd have some type of answer, sarcasm,
wit or something. Just chatting..

LOL - Sorry, couldn't think of anything on the sperm of the moment ;)

As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)

Thank goodness for that! For me, anyway ;)

C'est la pee pee.

Que sera sera.

ETC

Indeed! :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 01 Jun 2006 06:37:50 PM
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:13:58 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> typed furiously:

As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)


Thank goodness for that! For me, anyway ;)

Child-bearing hips.
--
David
At the bottom of the application where it says
"sign here". I put "Sagittarius"
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 02 Jun 2006 09:44:33 AM
"David" <farookdas@picknowl.com.au> wrote in message
news:shuu72p4pn36bni21qp45chqn706igbce2@4ax.com...

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:13:58 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> typed furiously:

As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)


Thank goodness for that! For me, anyway ;)


Child-bearing hips.

Oy vey! <rolls eyes> ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 01 Jun 2006 09:59:09 PM
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:07:50 +0930, David <farookdas@picknowl.com.au>
wrote:
- Refer: <shuu72p4pn36bni21qp45chqn706igbce2@4ax.com>

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:13:58 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> typed furiously:

As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)


Thank goodness for that! For me, anyway ;)


Child-bearing hips.

Ball bearing lips.
--
Michael Gray.
Founding Member and Doorman,
Earthquack's 666 Club.
EAC Apprentice Thumbscrew Oiler.
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 02 Jun 2006 09:44:47 AM
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:kbav72ts0nhassmsd3t28emtnknqjdagl8@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:07:50 +0930, David <farookdas@picknowl.com.au>
wrote:
- Refer: <shuu72p4pn36bni21qp45chqn706igbce2@4ax.com>

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:13:58 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> typed furiously:

As to "broads", I can only guess it's because an adult womans hips
are, in most cases, broader than the rest of her. I don't know why
that turns a heterosexual man on but it sure does. :)


Thank goodness for that! For me, anyway ;)


Child-bearing hips.


Ball bearing lips.

I don't think so!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.





User: "Tim McGaughy"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 06:42:42 PM
Robibnikoff wrote:

<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata



What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)

Me too.
Cuz I know chicks hate that sort of thing.
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 01 Jun 2006 09:14:33 AM
"Tim McGaughy" <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote in message
news:e5l9lk01uir@enews1.newsguy.com...

Robibnikoff wrote:

<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote
in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata



What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)


Me too.

Cuz I know chicks hate that sort of thing.

True, dames ain't too fond of it neither ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 31 May 2006 10:30:23 PM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:42:42 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <e5l9lk01uir@enews1.newsguy.com>

Robibnikoff wrote:

<Sunyata@wastherain.net> wrote in message
news:64dp72dk33acag4efv9eh2a71a7s6000ed@4ax.com...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata



What the hell are you asking ME for?!?

I'm still trying to figure out why men call women "broads"! ;)


Me too.

Cuz I know chicks hate that sort of thing.

I think it's because most men are "broad" minded.
--
Michael Gray.
Founding Member and Doorman,
Earthquack's 666 Club.
EAC Apprentice Thumbscrew Oiler.
.



User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 02 Jun 2006 10:30:32 PM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 17:10:33 -0400,
wrote in
alt.atheism

On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"David Canzi -- non-mailable" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in
message news:e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca...

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name?


I'm sorry, but I have better things to do then ponder this nonsense.


Why is slang for Vagina "*****" when it's *nothing* like a cat?
Sunyata

They're both hairy and they purr.....
[running very fast and not in a straight line] ;)
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.



User: "Frank Mayhar"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 29 May 2006 10:34:51 PM
Oh, you're treading on thin ice here!
Cats _are_ gods.
Just ask one.
:-)
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Cats and gods. 30 May 2006 05:11:00 AM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 00:28:56 +0000 (UTC),
dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable) wrote:
- Refer: <e5g3k8$plp$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>

What is the nature of the relationship between the word "cat" and
the type of animal we denote by that name? Any other sequence of
phonemes or (pronounceable) sequence of letters could have been
used for the purpose of naming the animal and it would have made no
difference, They could just as well have been called gorns or zeems.

We are not born knowing what words mean: the meanings of words
must be learned. This necessity imposes several requirements: (1)
The word, whether in the form of sounds, shapes printed on paper,
smoke signals, etc., must be fairly reliably distinguishable
from other words and from the absence of words. (2) The thing
the word describes must be fairly reliably distinguishable from
things that the word does not describe. (3) The presence of the
thing the word describes must be fairly reliably distinguishable
from its absence.

In order for a word to denote a referent, ie. to actually be the
name of something, there is one more requirement: (4) At least
one example of what the word describes must exist.

We can learn to recognize the word "cat" reliably, and distinguish
it from similar words like "tat" or "cad". We can learn, either
from pictures or actual sightings, what cats look like. We can
distinguish the presence of a cat from its absence. And so,
we can learn to associate the word "cat" with the animal that
word names. So the word "cat" is meaningful. And most of us are
aware of one or more examples, so the word "cat" is known to have
one or more referents.

We can learn to recognize the word "unicorn" reliably. We can
learn, from pictures, what a unicorn looks like -- how to
distinguish it from any other animal, and how to distinguish the
presence of a unicorn from its absence. So the word "unicorn"
is meaningful. We lack actual examples of unicorns, and so
(so far) the word "unicorn" has no referents.

We can learn to recognize the word "god". Most religions insist
that "god" cannot be detected or observed and must be taken
on faith. We cannot distinguish what we cannot observe from
other things. We cannot distinguish the presence of something
unobservable from its absence. And so, any word claimed to be
the name of something that can't be observed is meaningless.
The word "god" fails more of the conditions required for having
a referent tban the word "unicorn" fails.

Now, the reason I posted this is that somebody, by bringing
up the idea that words and statements can be meaningless, has
irritated an old itch I've long wanted to scratch in public.

The claim is made that, if the word "god" is meaningless,
then the claim that there is no god is also meaningless, and
so strong atheism is not a supportable position. The position
that can be supported is that the word "god", being meaningless,
is not capable of denoting any referent. This conclusion is not
identical to strong atheism, but it differs from strong atheism so
little and so subtly that theists, if they managed to understand
it, would be unable to take any comfort from it.

The label "cats" distinctly and definably refers to entities that
exist.
If the label "gods" references anything at all, it has not been
defined to me even vaguely as to what.
--
Michael Gray.
Founding Member and Doorman,
Earthquack's 666 Club.
EAC Rack Monitor, Chamber 5B
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER