| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"stoney" |
| Date: |
19 Jan 2006 04:01:03 PM |
| Object: |
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
Fr Maurice Dillane, a curate in the Woodford-Looscaun parish in east Co
Galway quit the Clonfert diocese after he was confronted by his bishop.
The 73-year-old cleric is believed to have had a two-year relationship
with a Dublin-based teacher, 31 whom he first met in a previous parish
in the Co Galway area.
The child was born at the end of last year.
Broadcaster Fr Brian D’Arcy and well-known Manchester priest Fr Denis
Maher today both backed Fr Dillane and warned the Catholic Church that
it was losing its best priests because they weren’t allowed to marry.
“The compulsory celibacy issue has to be addressed. I’m not saying what
the conclusions will be but at least it is time that we discussed it,”
Fr D’Arcy said.
“I really think that some of the absolute cream of the priesthood have
been lost and I think it’s one of the reasons we are in the huge mess
we’re in at the moment,” he noted.
He estimated that over 110,000 priests have left around the world, of
which 70,000 would have been leaders in the Catholic Church today.
Fr Maher, who rose to media prominence in 1998 during the police
investigation into the Dr Harold Shipman murders in his Manchester
parish, also supported Fr Dillane.
“Any priest who doesn’t fall in love is only half a priest,” he said.
The Tipperary-born cleric said he had 14 married priests in his parish
who were very successful in their jobs.
He also revealed that he once fell in love with a woman but overcame it
to continue as a priest.
“We remain the best of friends. It’s a very nice relationship. There’s
nothing bad taking place,” he told Liveline.
The Bishop of Clonfert, Dr John Kirby earlier confirmed in a statement
that a priest had admitted to him on January 6 that he had recently
fathered a baby.
Fr Dillane’s parish priest Fr Pat Naughten was unavailable for comment
today.
Fr D’Arcy said he hoped mother and baby were healthy and Fr Dillane was
happy.
“I hope they’re given room to enjoy the joy of parenthood because we
have to assume that it is a loving relationship in a good context and if
both of them are happy about it, who are we to make a judgment about
it?”
“The man has given over 40 years to the priesthood and if he wants to
move in different directions, then that’s okay with me.
“It is breaking the rules, but that doesn’t mean that everything about
it is bad and sinful and dirty and tainted.
“I would like to think that somebody, whatever age they are, if they
fall in love with somebody who falls in love with them, and they want to
have a relationship, I would not stand in the way of that.”
Chairman of Fr Dillane’s local pastoral council, Justin O’Byrne said
rumours about the baby had been circulating for a few days when he
brought the matter to parish priest Fr Naughten last Friday afternoon.
Mr O’Byrne believed the incident wasn’t as shocking as the revelations
involving Bishop Eamon Casey and his secret teenage son in 1992.
“I’m quite happy that the diocese and the bishop are dealing with it in
an understanding and caring fashion. It is not being swept under the
carpet or ignored or denied by anybody,” Mr O’Byrne added.
Dr Kirby said in a statement that he hoped the priest would be given
time and space to plan for the future of the baby and mother.
He said: “On 6th January a priest on loan to the Clonfert Diocese
confirmed to me that he had recently fathered a baby with an adult
woman.
“Since then, I have met both the priest and the mother.
“I hope that the priest, who has ceased to work in the diocese, the
mother, and all those involved, be given appropriate time and space to
plan for their respective futures.
“I consider this to be a private matter and as such I will make no
further comment.”
© Thomas Crosbie Media, 2006.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
19 Jan 2006 08:10:10 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <4r20t11m242ct1pcbkr99j6qj4c5m912ce@4ax.com>
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
:
A frank admission that it's "best priests" are randy little fuckers
who can't live up to their promises.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
22 Jan 2006 01:49:49 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:40:10 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <4r20t11m242ct1pcbkr99j6qj4c5m912ce@4ax.com>
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
A frank admission that it's "best priests" are randy little fuckers
who can't live up to their promises.
Neither does 'Jesus.' They're following the set example.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
19 Jan 2006 05:59:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
22 Jan 2006 12:55:09 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
23 Jan 2006 04:33:02 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
23 Jan 2006 11:18:14 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
23 Jan 2006 09:45:48 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
24 Jan 2006 12:10:30 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
24 Jan 2006 08:52:30 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can’t get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 AM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Khubla" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 10:40:41 AM |
|
|
As long as the Catholic church maintains this stupid celibacy rule it will
only harm itself and, hopefully one day, into oblivion.
Khubla
..
..
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net...
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=103105870
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 09:49:23 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:40:41 -0500, "Khubla" <khubla@adelphia.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <6aednXuWx8CYN0reRVn-jQ@adelphia.com>
As long as the Catholic church maintains this stupid celibacy rule it will
only harm itself and, hopefully one day, into oblivion.
Khubla
:
You are only trying drag this perfectly silly thread back on topic.
I can spot your devious game!
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 11:16:45 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:19:23 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:40:41 -0500, "Khubla" <khubla@adelphia.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <6aednXuWx8CYN0reRVn-jQ@adelphia.com>
As long as the Catholic church maintains this stupid celibacy rule it will
only harm itself and, hopefully one day, into oblivion.
Khubla
:
You are only trying drag this perfectly silly thread back on topic.
I can spot your devious game!
"De Fame! De Fame!"
{shades of De Plane De Plane}
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 10:24:32 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=10310587
0
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
³Pain is not evil, pain is the idiot light on the dash board of the human
body.³ - Karl E. Taylor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 10:36:23 AM |
|
|
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=10310587
0
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering
a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications
and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 09:47:39 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:23 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43pnl7F1oud94U1@individual.net>
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=10310587
0
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after fathering
a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications
and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
Repetition!
You lose.
Jump overbard, or walk the plank.
It's your choice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 11:18:38 AM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:phhgt11l5cvo8odkr54bb488akj108c9eq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:23 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43pnl7F1oud94U1@individual.net>
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:18:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <nt3at1hmkbfs6e28ddi5mjm1qqcrp4c2cv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:03:02 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:55:09 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <3tk7t1dgfltp1k04t3hma8gvm27dt9mma2@4ax.com>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:59:06 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote
in
alt.atheism
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:03 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net>
wrote:
http://212.2.162.45/news/story.asp?j=103105431&p=yx3yx586x&n=10310587
0
Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest
18/01/2006 - 16:56:39
The Catholic Church is losing its best priests because they
can't
get
married, supporters of a cleric forced to retire after
fathering
a
child
today claimed.
We are?? Wow, didn't know that.
This priest broke the faith, and "HE" says we are wrong?
Believe it, or not, I agree with you. He did break the faith. I
don't
see anything which said the Church was wrong. I see him
indicating
the
ramifications and reprecussions of Church policy is causing hefty
problems. I also understand why the celibacy policy was crafted
in
the
first place.
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications
and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
Repetition!
Damnit!
You lose.
Just like when I play this game at home with the husband and child. Crap!
Jump overbard, or walk the plank.
It's your choice.
Overbard? Okay, where's Shakespear? ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 11:15:52 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:17:39 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:23 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43pnl7F1oud94U1@individual.net>
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
[]
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
Repetition!
You lose.
Jump overbard, or walk the plank.
It's your choice.
Overbard? But what if she only makes it 1/2way?....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 08:25:28 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:15:52 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <2t0it1lbbibq3qv3rks9mpdgb1934nfptp@4ax.com>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:17:39 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:23 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43pnl7F1oud94U1@individual.net>
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
[]
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
Repetition!
You lose.
Jump overbard, or walk the plank.
It's your choice.
Overbard? But what if she only makes it 1/2way?....
Then she'll be part way through Shakespeare.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 10:18:28 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:55:28 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:15:52 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <2t0it1lbbibq3qv3rks9mpdgb1934nfptp@4ax.com>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:17:39 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:23 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43pnl7F1oud94U1@individual.net>
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFFD0260005C6578F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:30:57 -0600, Robibnikoff wrote
(in article <43pjqhF1oikrcU1@individual.net>):
[]
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
Repetition!
You lose.
Jump overbard, or walk the plank.
It's your choice.
Overbard? But what if she only makes it 1/2way?....
Then she'll be part way through Shakespeare.
Shucky darns she says....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
25 Jan 2006 01:08:39 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
You seem to be gone, without a trace.
Watch it, buddy! I have Mace!
While that may be the case,
we only notice the lace,
and see that it is mostly space...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 11:14:32 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:30:57 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 11:19:11 AM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:4q0it1p8aka9d8gh7s3fmkguec9gis780t@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:30:57 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 10:21:01 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:19:11 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:4q0it1p8aka9d8gh7s3fmkguec9gis780t@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:30:57 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
[]
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touché, with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
/struggling
must keep eyes on her face....... :D
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
26 Jan 2006 08:27:36 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:19:11 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <43seheF1pcs9fU1@individual.net>
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:4q0it1p8aka9d8gh7s3fmkguec9gis780t@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:30:57 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:1ppdt1lov24evutmgjtv395g8on1p76dfc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <7crct1p4o7lfsfik3a6qrkj3pe53p8p771@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:15:48 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Either saying with or changing the policy has it's ramifications and
reprecussions.
That's two of us now who've agreed with him.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH OUR DUKE? You heartless fiend!
eyes glow read....you just noticed? ;)
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your direction,
oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 02:27:39 AM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
And I, in order to save our sanity gave her, an orange.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 10:54:36 AM |
|
|
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:%PkCf.16734$Jd.11827@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
Michael Gray wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
And I, in order to save our sanity gave her, an orange.
*****! ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 04:05:45 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:27:39 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
- Refer: <%PkCf.16734$Jd.11827@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
Michael Gray wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
And I, in order to save our sanity gave her, an orange.
Well, that's that rhyme up the chimney...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 07:11:52 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:17:45 -0600, Michael Gray wrote
(in article <23sjt1l66pnjbn3h6u7r3tap0p93sipi13@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:27:39 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
- Refer: <%PkCf.16734$Jd.11827@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
Michael Gray wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
And I, in order to save our sanity gave her, an orange.
Well, that's that rhyme up the chimney...
Jumping Jimminy! Can't you guys get back in hominy?
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
³Not to mention hemorrhoids are trick of the devil! It just couldn't be true
we're still adapting to walking upright. That just *can't be the explanation!
God, after all, makes perfect assholes...³ - Mark K. Bilbo
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Celibacy rule must go, claim supporters of priest |
27 Jan 2006 10:22:34 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:11:52 -0600, Harry F. Leopold
<hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:17:45 -0600, Michael Gray wrote
(in article <23sjt1l66pnjbn3h6u7r3tap0p93sipi13@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:27:39 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
- Refer: <%PkCf.16734$Jd.11827@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
Michael Gray wrote:
I bet when he got "taken", he did not expect to go in your
direction, oh mighty Prince of Darkness!
Did one of your demons manage to get a photo of the look on his
face?
It was captured on a mace....
Touch?with a change of pace!
Why do I suddenly feel out of place?
Because you're wearing nothing but lace?
Forgive me, your Grace ;)
Stoney, she dealt you an ace!
And I, in order to save our sanity gave her, an orange.
Well, that's that rhyme up the chimney...
Jumping Jimminy! Can't you guys get back in hominy?
GRITS!
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
