Challenge for atheists



 Religions > Atheism > Challenge for atheists

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 13

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "protestanterrors.com"
Date: 30 Dec 2005 09:24:37 PM
Object: Challenge for atheists
Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:
http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm
BH
.

User: "navi-gater"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 10:06:33 AM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2006.01.01.03.57.59.265813@protestanterrors.com:

Then your research is lacking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy#Natural_mummies


Your link provides information on mummies which I know about. If you
read on the subject you will see mummies are always distorted,
foul-smelling and not life-like. Incorruptibles are just the opposite;
lifelike, sweet smelling, even with flowing blood. The proof is there
for you.

If indeed you know about those, then your answer is delivered.
I have demonstrated that natural processes can preserve a corpse - no
deity required. You should research Paramahansa Yogananda whose body
also had a sweet smell as did many buddhist monks.
So you now present your cult figures' preserved corpses and expect those
who are not in the cult to agree it must be supernatural. The fact is,
preservation happens naturally as has been demonstrated. Why mostly
catlicks? Because catlicks like to dig up their dead, while other
religions (and atheists) don't.
The burden is now on you to *prove* your saints have been preserved in
some unnatural way (and I don't mean the embalming performed by catlicks
which is commonplace).
Until you provide more specific proof of a deity involved, I'm afraid
you'll continue to be laughed at by skeptics who, after all, have
*evidence* of natural corpse preservation from non-catlick sources.

I'm not looking the other way. I've pointed out this phenomenon is
not limited to catlicks and in fact can be rather easily explained.


You clearly do not know the difference between accidental
mummification, intentional mummification, and incorruptibles. My site
explains it and plenty of documentation exists explaining the
differences.

Of course I know the difference. Natural Mummification is a proven fact
with known causes. Religious "incorruptibles" are the *same* process
(where deliberate hoaxing is not involved) with some religious
significance applied by the worshippers.
Until you provide some more concrete proof of supernatural involvement
there is nothing more to it. The burden of proof is with you to
demonstrate that something more than natural preservation took place.

And? South American bodies have been found perfectly intact after
centuries. Those being Inca bodies btw no catlicking involved. The
soubiros con required waxing to *preserve* the cadaver.


My same comment above applies here; you are clearly not familiar with
the differences. And wax does not preserve a body....go ahead and try
and put wax on a dead person, they will still decay. St. Soubirous,
when examined has NO embalming and is still very lifelike. You can
continue to try and make excuses from your computer chair but it will
not change the facts that exist for all to see in Italy.

If a real god was involved would any wax need to be used? Besides which
it is common for catlicks to use a "preservative" while the body is
lying in state. These are hardly untouched bodies....
If a god was involved no assistance would be necessary.
I rest my case.

So now it has to be the "same exact" incorruption. Well you're
changing your goal now - orginally it just had to be explained -
that's been done. But the answer irritates you, so you want more...


I chose poor wording here. Learn about what makes the incorrupt
phenomenom different than mummification, then show me an example of
ANY non-Catholic that falls under the incorrupt category. You will not
find one.

See above for non-catlick preservation.
Natural mummification is a factual observed phenomenon - I have
deomnstrated that preservation happens to non-catlick corpses. The
burden is on *you* to explain why it is neceesary to have a supernatural
agent involved.

1) There *are* examples of bodies preserved without the unnatural
aids the catlicks apply to their saints.


Examples?

I think you need search outside the catlick sources you have.



2) The catlick saints themselves are not *exactly* the same, each
displaying various levels of decay...

In fact one Shuster (perhaps that's shyster) was preserved nicely too. A
*nice* guy, shuster was a facist and supporter of Mussolini.

Seeing them firsthand and reading documentation from non-religous
people is not enough for you huh?

Seeing them first hand is irrelevant. I can go to a wax work and see
images of dead folk.
The question is whether these incorrupt bodies can/did occur due to
supernatural involvement.
The answer is clearly no, since I have demonstrated that non-catlick
individuals have been so preserved.
The burden remains on you to demonstrate that a deity is required. A
question you wish to dodge.....
gater.
.

User: "655321"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 01:50:20 PM
In article <Xns973DCB6E4617thegatenet@207.69.189.191>,
"navi-gater" <gater@the-gate.net> wrote:

Wait a moment - you *do* claim to have the answer. You want to attribute
it to a supwernatural cause like a deity.

Much more than that... he/she/it wants to prove that Catholics are right
about the whole God®/Jesus®/Bible nonsense.
655321
.

User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 06:25:28 PM
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:51:38 -0500, "protestanterrors.com"
<bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote:



http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm



Well let's have a look at this shall we ..... ahh a catlick website.....

So

1) Only devout catlicks are incorrupt.

FALSE - there are examples who were not 'lickers e.g. Paramahansa
Yogananda, a Hindu.


Please provide proof and I will gladly read it. No one has done so yet.

You've been given Lenin as an example, moron.
.

User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 30 Dec 2005 09:54:14 PM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm

I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will have
some reason to believe this ever happened.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
"That was amazing! Did you have to swear a circus oath to never reveal the
source of your clown powers?"
*The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius
.
User: "protestanterrors.com"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 06:01:23 PM
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:54:14 +0000, Enkidu wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.

Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look it
up.
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 06:16:54 PM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2006.01.01.00.01.21.688044@protestanterrors.com:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:54:14 +0000, Enkidu wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be
anything other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I
will have some reason to believe this ever happened.


Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go
look it up.

Put up or shut up. It's your claim. It's your evidence that's required
to support your claim.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
"If you pray for rain long enough, it eventually does fall. If you pray
for floodwaters to abate, they eventually do. The same happens in the
absence of prayers."
-James A. Haught
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 01:47:27 PM
"THEE" *ELECT* "ONE" *WROTE*:
*THE* "EVIDENCE" *IS* "IN" *YOUR* "ABILITY" *TO* "THINK" *AND*
"FUNCTION" *AND* "ALL" *YOU* "NEED" *TO* "DO" *IS* "RECOGNIZE" *THAT*
"YOUR" *THOUGHTS* "ARE" *THE* "CONTROLLING" *ASPECT* "OF" *YOUR* "LIFE"
*AND* "THOSE" *WHO* "INFLUENCE" *YOUR* "THOUGHTS" *ARE* "ALSO" *THOSE*
"YOU" *REFLECT* "UPON" *WHEN* "YOUR" *SEARCHING* "YOUR" *MIND* "FOR"
*INFORMATION* "ON" *THIS* "SUBJECT" *MATTER* "OR" *THAT* "SUBJECT"
*MATTER*!!!
*IF* "YOU" *USE* "YOUR" *THOUGHTS* "TO" *INFLUENCE* "THE" *LIFE* "OF"
*SOMEONE* "ELSE" *THE* "THOUGHTS" *YOU* "USE" *WILL* "BE" *BASED*
"LARGELY" *IN* "PART" *ON* "THE" *THOUGHTS* "OF" *SOMEONE* "ELSE" *AS*
"THEIR" *THOUGHTS* "WERE" *GATHERED* "AND" *SHARED* "FROM" *THOSE*
"WHO" *WERE* "SHARING" *THEIR* "THOUGHTS" *WITH* "THEM"!!!
*CAN* "YOU" *GET* "THE" *ESSENCE* "OF" *WHY* "THOSE" *WHO* "SHARE"
*THOUGHTS* "AND" *BELIEFS* "ABOUT" *THINGS* "THAT" *ARE* "IMPORTANT"
*TO* "LIFE" "ARE" *IN* "DIRECT" *REFLECTION* "TO" *HOW* "YOU" *AS* "A"
*PERSON* "EXPERIENCE" *LIFE*??? *YES*, "THEY" *MAY* "HAVE" *TAUGHT*
"YOUR" *LIFE* "THAT" *GOD* "DOES" *NOT* "EXIST" *AND* "THEY" *MAY*
"HAVE" *EVEN* "CONVINCED" *YOUR* "BELIEFS" *THAT* "GOD" *DOES* "NOT"
*EXIST* "YET" *THEY* "FORGOT" *TO* "TELL" *YOU* "THAT" *EVENTUALLY*
"YOUR" *LIFE* "WILL" *LEAVE* "THE" *PHYSICAL* "LIFE" *OF* "THE" *FLESH*
"AND" *DEPART* "FOR" *THE* "SPIRITUAL" *LIFE* "OF" *THE* "SPIRIT"
*WHERE* "IT" *WILL* "BE" *PROVEN* "TO" *ALL* "LIVES" *THAT*... "GOD"
*DOES* "LIVE" *IN* "LIFE"!!!
*I* "AM" *CONSIDERED* "BLESSED" *BY* "SOME" *IN* "THIS" *LIFE* "TO"
*UNDERSTAND* "THE" *IMPORTANCE* "OF" *RESPECTING* "THE" *GOD* "GIVEN"
*QUALITIES* "FOR" *RELATING* "WITH" *THOSE* "I" *SHARE* "IN" *LIFE*
"WITH" *AND* "THOSE" *WHO* "WILL" *NOT* "RESPECT" *THIS* "BLESSING"
*ARE* "SIMPLY" *NOT* "ALLOWING" *THEIR* "LIVES" *TO* "EXPERIENCE" *THE*
"TRUEST" *GIFTS* "TO" *LIFE* "THAT" *CAN* "BE" *LIVED* "AND"
*EXPERIENCED* "BY" *ALL* "PEOPLE" *NO* "MATTER" *WHAT* "THEIR" *SKIN*
"COLOR"!!!
*WHEN* "I" *WAS* "DOWN" *SICK* "WITH" *DISEASE* "FROM" *THE* "MAN"
*MADE* "POLLUTANTS" *BEING* "CREATED" *AND* "SPREAD" *AROUND* "IN"
*LIFE* "MY" *LIFE* "BECAME" *AWARE* "OF" *HOW* "MUCH" *THE* "SPIRIT"
*OF* "LIFE" *WAS* "NEEDED" *FOR* "ME" *TO* "BE" *ABLE* "TO" *CONTINUE*
"TO" *LIVE* "IN" *LIFE* "AND" *WITHOUT* "THE" *SPIRIT* "OF" *LIFE*
"THERE" *SIMPLY* "IS" *NO* "LIFE"!!! "OUR" *LIVES* "DEPENDS" *ON*
"THE" *SPIRIT* "OF" *LIFE* "REMAINING" *WITHIN* "US" *IN* "ORDER" *FOR*
"US" *TO* "ACHIEVE" *THE* "REWARDS" *OF* "SPIRITUAL" *REUNION* "WITH"
*OUR* "FAMILY", *FRIENDS*, "AND" *NEIGHBORS*!!!
*WITHOUT* "THE" *REWARD* "OF" *HEAVEN* "FOR" *THE* "PEOPLE" *LIVING*
"ON" *THE* "EARTH" *THERE* "SIMPLY" *WOULD* "BE" *NO* "POINT" *IN*
"ANY" *PEOPLE* "LIVING" *A* "LIFE" *ON* "EARTH" *AS* "THE" *EARTH*
"WILL" *EVENTUALLY* "BE" *USED* "UP" *OF* "ALL" *THE* "RESOURCES"
*NEEDED* "TO" *SUSTAIN* "LIFE" *AND* "THE" *PEOPLE* "WILL" *THEN*
"UNDERSTAND" *THAT* "GOD" *PROVIDED* "THE" *RESOURCES* "THEY" *USED*
"UP" *AND* "GOD" *WILL* "BE" *LOOKING* "TO" *THEM* "TO" *SHOW* "WHAT"
*THEY* "DID" *WITH* "THOSE" *RESOURCES* "IN" *RELATIONSHIP* "WITH"
*HELPING* "THE" *LIVES* "OF" *THE* "PEOPLE"!!!
*LET* "THERE" *BE* "NO" *MISTAKE* "THOSE" *WHO* "LIE" *AND* "SAY"
*THAT* "THERE" *IS* "NO" *GOD* "ARE" *ALSO* "THE" *SAME* "ONES"
*SPREADING* "MANY" *DESTRUCTIVE* "WAYS" *AROUND* "THE" *EARTH* "AND"
*THEY* "WILL" *HAVE* "A" *SITUATION* "PRESENTED" *TO* "THEM" *THAT*
"WILL" *DETERMINE* "WHETHER" *THEY* "ARE" *SOMEONE* "TO" *LIFE* "THAT"
*GOD* "FINDS" *WORTHY* "OF" *SHARING* "IN" *THE* "WORLD" *GOD*
"CREATED* "OR" *WHETHER* "THEY" *WILL* "BE" *GIVEN* "A" *DIFFERENT*
"WAY" *OF* "RELATING" *TO* "THE" *WORLD* "GOD" *CREATED*!!!
"SO" *BEFORE* "ANY" *OF* "YOU" *ATHEIST* "GO" *PLACING* "YOUR" *LIFE*
"ON" *THE* "BELIEFS" *OF* "LYING" *CRIMINALS* "YOU" *SHOULD* "CONSIDER"
*YOUR* "LIFE" *IS* "THE" *ONLY* "LIFE" *YOU* "HAVE" *AND* "YOUR" *LIFE*
"IS" *NOT* "GOING" *TO* "BE" *A* "GRANTED" *EXISTENCE* "IN" *THE*
"WORLD" *GOD* "CREATED" *FOR* "LONG" *IF* "YOU" *ARE* "HELPING" *THE*
"LYING" *CRIMINALS* "ACHIEVE" *THEIR* "AIM" *OF* "DOMINATING" *THE*
"LIVES" *OF* "THE" *PEOPLE*!!!
*IF* "THERE" *EVER* "WAS" *ANY* "FORM" *OF* "SENSE" *IN* "YOUR" *HEADS*
"IT" *WOULD* "BE" *TRULY* "WISE" *TO* "CONSIDER" *THAT* "THIS" *LIFE*
"IS" *NOT* "A" *FLUKE* "AND" *THIS* "LIFE" *IS* "HERE" *BECAUSE* "GOD"
*WANTS* "THIS" *LIFE* "TO" *BE* "HERE" *AND* "THERE" *IS* "NO" *OTHER*
"WAY" *OF* "RELATING" *THIS* "TRUTH" *TO* "THE" *PEOPLE*!!! *THE*
"ABILITIES" *WE* "ALL" *SHARE* "IN" *TOGETHER* "NO" *MATTER* "WHAT"
*THE* "SKIN" *COLOR* "ARE" *ALL* "QUALITIES" *GIVEN* "TO" *LIFE* "BY"
*GOD* "AND" *THAT* "MAKES" *THE* "POINT" *OF* "THIS" *WHOLE*
"DISCUSSION" *CLEAR*... "GOD" *LIVES* "AND" *WE* "AS" *LIFE* "TO" *THE*
"WORLD" *GOD* "CREATED" *ARE* "PROOF" *THAT* "GOD" *LIVES* "BY" *OUR*
"OWN" *EXISTENCE* "THRU" *THE* "NEED" *TO* "BE" *ABLE* "TO" *FEEL*,
"THINK", *SEE*, "TASTE", *SMELL*, "AND" *DO* "MANY" *OTHER* "THINGS"
*WITH* "OUR" *BODIES* "THAT" *WE* "COULD" *NOT* "DO" *WITHOUT* "GOD"
*CREATING* "THESE" *QUALITIES* "FOR" *US* "TO" *USE*!!!
"IF" *I* "WERE" *TO* "SAY" *HAVE* "A" *NICE* "DAY" *IT* "MEANS" *YOU*
"AS" *A* "PERSON" *MUST* "SHARE" *IN* "THE" *QUALITY* "OF" *BEING*
"NICE" *ALONG* "WITH" *YOUR* "NEIGHBORS" *IN* "ORDER" *FOR* "YOUR"
*DAY* "TO" *BE* "NICE" *AND* "YOUR" *NEIGHBORS* "DAY" *TO* "BE"
*EXPERIENCED* "AS" *NICE*!!! *IF* "PEOPLE" *ARE* "SHARING" *IN* "THE"
*QUALITIES* "OF" *ANGER*, "LIES", *PAIN*, "SORROWS" *THEN* "THESE"
*ARE* "THE" *QUALITIES* "THE" *PEOPLE* "WILL" *BE* "SHARING" *IN*
"TOGETHER" *AND* "NOT" *IN* "THE" *QUALITIES* "OF" *BEING* "NICE",
*FRIENDLY*, "HELPFUL", *CARING*, "GIVING", "ETC"...
*THIS* "WORLD" *WAS* "ESTABLISHED" *ON* "LOVE" *AND* "THIS" *WORLD*
"IS" *EXPERIENCING* "A" *SPIRITUAL* "DRAINAGE" *TO* "THE" *LOVE*
"ACCOUNT" *BECAUSE* "THE" *PEOPLE* "ARE" *DEBITING* "THE" *LOVE*
"ACCOUNT" *AND* "CREDITING" *THE* "HATE" *ACCOUNT* "AND" *SUBSEQUENTLY*
"PLACING" *THEIR* "OWN" *LIVES* "INTO" *THE* "BALANCE" *OF* "HOW"
*MUCH* "THEY" *WERE* "TAKING" *FROM* "THE" *LOVE* "ACCOUNT" *AND*
"GIVING" *TO* "THE" *HATE* "ACCOUNT"!!! "THERE" *IS* "ALWAYS" *AN*
"OFFSETTING" *REACTION* "TO" *AN* "ACTION" *AND* "THE" *RESULTS* "WILL"
*BE* "EXPERIENCED" *IN* "ACCORDANCE" *WITH* "THE" *QUALITIES* "SHARED"
*BY* "ALL" *PEOPLE* "IN" *LIFE*!!!
*HAVE* "A" *NICE* "DAY"...
"THEE" *ELECT* "ONE"
.
User: "kathryn"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 04:01:53 PM
would it kill you to type like a normal person so that people will actually
bother to read what you've taken the trouble to post?
and then insult you.
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 04:16:54 PM
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in
news:dpc7sh$31i$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com:

would it kill you to type like a normal person so that people will
actually bother to read what you've taken the trouble to post?


and then insult you.

I ignore the idiot. He wastes his time deliberately obfuscating his
message.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
And if you believe in that supreme power, you have to believe that *it*
came from nothing? Which is harder: to believe that a super-simple
universe, emergent from nothing, iterating simple algorithms billions of
times, brought about all the wonderful complexity you see around you, or
that a super-complicated and mightily all-powerful God built a simple and
undignified little universe of pain and sorrow, leaving no coherent
explanation whatsoever?

-- Elf M. Sternberg
.
User: "kathryn"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 05:21:56 PM
"Enkidu" <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns973F9154B849255229@130.133.1.4...

"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in
news:dpc7sh$31i$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com:

would it kill you to type like a normal person so that people will
actually bother to read what you've taken the trouble to post?


and then insult you.


I ignore the idiot. He wastes his time deliberately obfuscating his
message.


I thought I had him kill filed to be honest
.





User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 06:29:09 PM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.01.00.01.21.688044@protestanterrors.com...

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:54:14 +0000, Enkidu wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.


Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look it
up.

You made the assertion - You look it up and post it.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 10:52:35 PM
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:01:23 -0500, "protestanterrors.com"
<bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:54:14 +0000, Enkidu wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.


Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look it
up.

*****.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 06:49:50 PM
protestanterrors.com wrote:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:54:14 +0000, Enkidu wrote:


"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:



Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.



Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look it
up.

It would be greatly appreciated if *you*, who apparently already knows
what this documentation contains, where it is, who wrote it and how one
can access it, would provide this information to *us*, who did not ask
*you* to come here in order to challenge *us* to disprove *his* claims.
If nothing else, one would consider it a courtesy, considering that you
initiated this discussion. In a scientific environment one would
consider the withholding of information *while* claiming it is available
unethical.
Hint: When providing us with this information, as you are surely going
to do, publicly accessible[1], peer-reviewed journals[2] would rank on
top of the list of credible sources of documentation. Documents under
lock and seal in the Vatican and claimed to contain evidence are missing
credibility because one can not access them, just to give an example of
what you don't need to provide.
j.m.
#1491
[1] Many people here have access to digital libraries of most scientific
journals, even if it is on a site requiring user fees. Also, for many
people it is a short walk to a classical library to look up a certain
book. Don't worry, you give a citation, someone will be able to look it up.
[2] You posted this to alt.atheism. Please don't expect us to be experts
on forensic science, medicine, history etc. People here are known not to
believe in god/s, not to be experts on any arbitrary scientific
field[3]. Hence it would be helpful to know that a piece of information
has been reviewed by true *experts* of the field. Don't you agree?
[3] This statement does not imply that, by pure coincidence, you might
find an expert here.
.
User: "protestanterrors.com"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 10:13:10 PM
O

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.



Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look
it up.


It would be greatly appreciated if *you*, who apparently already knows
what this documentation contains, where it is, who wrote it and how one
can access it, would provide this information to *us*, who did not ask
*you* to come here in order to challenge *us* to disprove *his* claims.

If nothing else, one would consider it a courtesy, considering that you
initiated this discussion. In a scientific environment one would consider
the withholding of information *while* claiming it is available unethical.

Hint: When providing us with this information, as you are surely going to
do, publicly accessible[1], peer-reviewed journals[2] would rank on top of
the list of credible sources of documentation. Documents under lock and
seal in the Vatican and claimed to contain evidence are missing
credibility because one can not access them, just to give an example of
what you don't need to provide.

j.m.
#1491

[1] Many people here have access to digital libraries of most scientific
journals, even if it is on a site requiring user fees. Also, for many
people it is a short walk to a classical library to look up a certain
book. Don't worry, you give a citation, someone will be able to look it
up.

[2] You posted this to alt.atheism. Please don't expect us to be experts
on forensic science, medicine, history etc. People here are known not to
believe in god/s, not to be experts on any arbitrary scientific field[3].
Hence it would be helpful to know that a piece of information has been
reviewed by true *experts* of the field. Don't you agree?

[3] This statement does not imply that, by pure coincidence, you might
find an expert here.

You are the first one to speak in a normal tone to me without insults. I
appreciate that.
You can start by googling for "incorrupt bodies". This will start you on
your way to more information you could ever want. Then add "books" to the
same search and you will still be overwhelmed with information on books on
the subject. A good book to start with; Joan Carroll Cruz's "The
Incorruptibles" which reviews each incorrupt body found, the year, and
it's present display location in Europe. Great start. Documentation can
then be gotten at the Cathedrals themselves, and in libraries there. Just
what I've given you here will give you more than you could ever want on
the subject. I haven't even seen all the documentation and books, there is
just too much. Seeing them first hand is the best thing to do.
Hope that helps....
BH
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 10:21:38 PM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.01.04.13.09.570955@protestanterrors.com...

O

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.



Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look
it up.


It would be greatly appreciated if *you*, who apparently already knows
what this documentation contains, where it is, who wrote it and how one
can access it, would provide this information to *us*, who did not ask
*you* to come here in order to challenge *us* to disprove *his* claims.

If nothing else, one would consider it a courtesy, considering that you
initiated this discussion. In a scientific environment one would consider
the withholding of information *while* claiming it is available
unethical.

Hint: When providing us with this information, as you are surely going to
do, publicly accessible[1], peer-reviewed journals[2] would rank on top
of
the list of credible sources of documentation. Documents under lock and
seal in the Vatican and claimed to contain evidence are missing
credibility because one can not access them, just to give an example of
what you don't need to provide.

j.m.
#1491

[1] Many people here have access to digital libraries of most scientific
journals, even if it is on a site requiring user fees. Also, for many
people it is a short walk to a classical library to look up a certain
book. Don't worry, you give a citation, someone will be able to look it
up.

[2] You posted this to alt.atheism. Please don't expect us to be experts
on forensic science, medicine, history etc. People here are known not to
believe in god/s, not to be experts on any arbitrary scientific field[3].
Hence it would be helpful to know that a piece of information has been
reviewed by true *experts* of the field. Don't you agree?

[3] This statement does not imply that, by pure coincidence, you might
find an expert here.


You are the first one to speak in a normal tone to me without insults. I
appreciate that.
You can start by googling for "incorrupt bodies".

No, you can start by posting the "evidence"
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
User: "Omicron Machine"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 12:38:19 AM
Doesn't a debate typically run by
i) Group A makes an assertion then,
=>i/a) produces their relevant information, particularly the unbiased
portions, and then,
=>i/b) based only on the evidence they have found and provided,
presents a series of points in their favour.
ii) Group B states their refute for the original assertion, then
=>ii/a) refutes the evidence and series of points made by Group A in
i/b, and
=>ii/b) produces the evidence to back up their claim, and drawing from
that evidence, their own set of counter-points.
iii) Group A rebuts the points drawn by Group B, using evidence
provided, and
=>iii/a) using strengths in the evidence for their assertion and
weaknesses in the evidence against, presents their next set of points
to build on the points made by both sides.
iv) Group B rebuts the points drawn by Group A using the evidence
currently at their disposal, then
=>iv/a) builds up new points on their side of the arguement, citing
passages in the reference materials.
And so forth down the line untill one side or the other has run out of
solid arguements to make, without degenerating into insults and ad
hominem attacks. Thus far, all I've seen is parts i, a very
half-hearted attempt at i/a, the second half of i/b, ii, ii/a, and as
much of ii/b as can be done without the first half of i/b, and very
little following that. Essentially, Group A made a claim, Group B said
"No, 'cuz...", Group A said "Uh huh!", Group B said "Nuh uh!" Group A
said "Uh huh!" and told Group B to produce Group A's information, to
which Group B replied "Nuh uh! Find it yerself!" to which Group A
replied "Uh huh!" and told Group A to take a European vacation. Let's
try and fill in the gaps, what-say?
.
User: "wbarwell"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 03:21:47 AM
Omicron Machine wrote:

Doesn't a debate typically run by

i) Group A makes an assertion then,
=>i/a) produces their relevant information, particularly the unbiased
portions, and then,
=>i/b) based only on the evidence they have found and provided,
presents a series of points in their favour.

A presents facts and show logically position X is false.
B...
1. Runs away
2. Attacks A
3. Absolutely refuses to use logic or be rational.
4. 2 and 3. Then 1.
--
Happy Hogmanay!
Cheerful Charlie
.



User: "Boony"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 11:38:15 PM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.01.04.13.09.570955@protestanterrors.com...

O

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.



Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look
it up.


It would be greatly appreciated if *you*, who apparently already knows
what this documentation contains, where it is, who wrote it and how one
can access it, would provide this information to *us*, who did not ask
*you* to come here in order to challenge *us* to disprove *his* claims.

If nothing else, one would consider it a courtesy, considering that you
initiated this discussion. In a scientific environment one would consider
the withholding of information *while* claiming it is available
unethical.

Hint: When providing us with this information, as you are surely going to
do, publicly accessible[1], peer-reviewed journals[2] would rank on top
of
the list of credible sources of documentation. Documents under lock and
seal in the Vatican and claimed to contain evidence are missing
credibility because one can not access them, just to give an example of
what you don't need to provide.

j.m.
#1491

[1] Many people here have access to digital libraries of most scientific
journals, even if it is on a site requiring user fees. Also, for many
people it is a short walk to a classical library to look up a certain
book. Don't worry, you give a citation, someone will be able to look it
up.

[2] You posted this to alt.atheism. Please don't expect us to be experts
on forensic science, medicine, history etc. People here are known not to
believe in god/s, not to be experts on any arbitrary scientific field[3].
Hence it would be helpful to know that a piece of information has been
reviewed by true *experts* of the field. Don't you agree?

[3] This statement does not imply that, by pure coincidence, you might
find an expert here.


You are the first one to speak in a normal tone to me without insults. I
appreciate that.
You can start by googling for "incorrupt bodies". This will start you on
your way to more information you could ever want. Then add "books" to the
same search and you will still be overwhelmed with information on books on
the subject. A good book to start with; Joan Carroll Cruz's "The
Incorruptibles" which reviews each incorrupt body found, the year, and
it's present display location in Europe. Great start. Documentation can
then be gotten at the Cathedrals themselves, and in libraries there. Just
what I've given you here will give you more than you could ever want on
the subject. I haven't even seen all the documentation and books, there is
just too much. Seeing them first hand is the best thing to do.
Hope that helps....

BH


I searched using Google for "incorrupt bodies".
I came across those well known "peer reviewed" sites:
www.marypages.com
www.orthodoxinfo.com
www.overcomeproblems.com
www.livingmiracles.net
www.secondexodus.com
There were a few sceptic sites amongst them.
Not one peer reviewed site to be found.
Why am I not suprised.
Boony
aa #1444
.
User: "Boony"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 31 Dec 2005 11:53:04 PM
"Boony" <winpro@nospam.internode.on.net> wrote in message
news:43b76ac8$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.01.04.13.09.570955@protestanterrors.com...

O

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm


I call it crap. Find a reference in a peer reviewed journal so I will
have some reason to believe this ever happened.



Documentation is available, especially in Europe if you want to go look
it up.


It would be greatly appreciated if *you*, who apparently already knows
what this documentation contains, where it is, who wrote it and how one
can access it, would provide this information to *us*, who did not ask
*you* to come here in order to challenge *us* to disprove *his* claims.

If nothing else, one would consider it a courtesy, considering that you
initiated this discussion. In a scientific environment one would
consider
the withholding of information *while* claiming it is available
unethical.

Hint: When providing us with this information, as you are surely going
to
do, publicly accessible[1], peer-reviewed journals[2] would rank on top
of
the list of credible sources of documentation. Documents under lock and
seal in the Vatican and claimed to contain evidence are missing
credibility because one can not access them, just to give an example of
what you don't need to provide.

j.m.
#1491

[1] Many people here have access to digital libraries of most scientific
journals, even if it is on a site requiring user fees. Also, for many
people it is a short walk to a classical library to look up a certain
book. Don't worry, you give a citation, someone will be able to look it
up.

[2] You posted this to alt.atheism. Please don't expect us to be experts
on forensic science, medicine, history etc. People here are known not to
believe in god/s, not to be experts on any arbitrary scientific
field[3].
Hence it would be helpful to know that a piece of information has been
reviewed by true *experts* of the field. Don't you agree?

[3] This statement does not imply that, by pure coincidence, you might
find an expert here.


You are the first one to speak in a normal tone to me without insults. I
appreciate that.
You can start by googling for "incorrupt bodies". This will start you on
your way to more information you could ever want. Then add "books" to the
same search and you will still be overwhelmed with information on books
on
the subject. A good book to start with; Joan Carroll Cruz's "The
Incorruptibles" which reviews each incorrupt body found, the year, and
it's present display location in Europe. Great start. Documentation can
then be gotten at the Cathedrals themselves, and in libraries there. Just
what I've given you here will give you more than you could ever want on
the subject. I haven't even seen all the documentation and books, there
is
just too much. Seeing them first hand is the best thing to do.
Hope that helps....

BH



I searched using Google for "incorrupt bodies".

I came across those well known "peer reviewed" sites:

www.marypages.com
www.orthodoxinfo.com
www.overcomeproblems.com
www.livingmiracles.net
www.secondexodus.com

There were a few sceptic sites amongst them.

Not one peer reviewed site to be found.

Why am I not suprised.

Boony
aa #1444

This site (although a bit strange) gives a rational expanation for the
incorrupt bodies.
http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html
Boony
aa #1444
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 02:40:09 AM
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:23:04 +1030, "Boony"
<winpro@nospam.internode.on.net> wrote:
:

This site (although a bit strange) gives a rational expanation for the
incorrupt bodies.

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html

The summary is rather telling:
"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."
.
User: "protestanterrors.com"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 11:59:48 PM
This is an article in opposition to the phenomenom. Of course you will
find this in an article like this.

This site (although a bit strange) gives a rational expanation for the
incorrupt bodies.

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html


The summary is rather telling:

"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."

.




User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 02:38:01 PM
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet protestanterrors.com
(bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic blood
served on Sunday mass.
To assert that a god is involved is as much a lie as the bible is.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
-----
Only the atheist realizes how morally objectionable it is for survivors of
a catastrophe to believe themselves spared by a loving God while this same
God drowned infants in their cribs. - Sam Harris
.
User: "protestanterrors.com"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 11:53:07 PM


I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic blood
served on Sunday mass.

Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.
.
User: "Honus"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 12:38:42 AM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.02.05.53.07.783127@protestanterrors.com...



I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic

blood

served on Sunday mass.


Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.

There's your problem. If your mental capacities preclude the ability to
imagine any other possible cause, you fill the hole with "God did it". Allow
me to dissuade you of that notion. Your premise of "how nature chose to do
it" is flawed, and fatally at that. Natural explanations exist, as well as
pious fraud. Personally, I've always gotten a kick out of a peculiarity of
stigmatics. I'm told that the stigmata in the hands in particular always
appeared in the center of the hands themselves. But when it was finally
realized that a crucified body wouldn't be supported by nails through the
hands but would be if it were nailed through the wrists, well...guess where
the stigmata showed up on the bodies of the true believers after that?
That's hearsay; if anyone out there has any further info on that I'd sure
like to hear about.
.
User: "Steve O"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 02:44:18 PM
Honus wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.02.05.53.07.783127@protestanterrors.com...

I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic


blood

served on Sunday mass.


Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.



There's your problem. If your mental capacities preclude the ability to
imagine any other possible cause, you fill the hole with "God did it". Allow
me to dissuade you of that notion. Your premise of "how nature chose to do
it" is flawed, and fatally at that. Natural explanations exist, as well as
pious fraud. Personally, I've always gotten a kick out of a peculiarity of
stigmatics. I'm told that the stigmata in the hands in particular always
appeared in the center of the hands themselves. But when it was finally
realized that a crucified body wouldn't be supported by nails through the
hands but would be if it were nailed through the wrists, well...guess where
the stigmata showed up on the bodies of the true believers after that?
That's hearsay; if anyone out there has any further info on that I'd sure
like to hear about.


I read soemewhere about "invisible stigmata", which was once taken as
evidence of a person's sainthood.
"Look! You can't see the holes! Then you mustn't have enough faith,
brother!"
.
User: "Honus"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 06:58:48 PM
"Steve O" <stoboyle@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41thl3F1gddj7U2@individual.net...

Honus wrote:

There's your problem. If your mental capacities preclude the ability to
imagine any other possible cause, you fill the hole with "God did it".

Allow

me to dissuade you of that notion. Your premise of "how nature chose to

do

it" is flawed, and fatally at that. Natural explanations exist, as well

as

pious fraud. Personally, I've always gotten a kick out of a peculiarity

of

stigmatics. I'm told that the stigmata in the hands in particular always
appeared in the center of the hands themselves. But when it was finally
realized that a crucified body wouldn't be supported by nails through

the

hands but would be if it were nailed through the wrists, well...guess

where

the stigmata showed up on the bodies of the true believers after that?
That's hearsay; if anyone out there has any further info on that I'd

sure

like to hear about.


I read soemewhere about "invisible stigmata", which was once taken as
evidence of a person's sainthood.
"Look! You can't see the holes! Then you mustn't have enough faith,
brother!"

Oh, man...I'm going to be using that one in the future! ;)
.



User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 06:53:22 AM
"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.01.02.05.53.07.783127@protestanterrors.com...



I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic blood
served on Sunday mass.


Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.

In your mind, anyway.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 02 Jan 2006 01:53:47 AM
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:53:07 -0500, "protestanterrors.com"
<bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote:



I just read about something along these lines in a book. The book was a
novel, however, but that shows the idea is not new. New or old, I still
have a problem with the god connection. The only corrolation I can draw
from your assertion that only Catholic bodies can be incorruptible could
have something to do with the Jesus crackers or strangely alcoholic blood
served on Sunday mass.


Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.

That is by far and away, the very LEAST logical answer.
The most logical answer is that you are being conned.
Nice and simple.
No miracles required.
By the way, I have the deeds to Brooklyn Bridge that I might be
willing to sell to you.
How much money do you have in your bank account?
.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 03 Jan 2006 03:49:33 AM
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:53:07 -0500, "protestanterrors.com"
<bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> wrote:

Well when this happens to Catholics repeatedly century after century, but
not to others, along with other phenomena like the stigmata and healings
at Lourdes, you have to ask yourself how nature chose to do these things
to just this class of people. The only logical answer is a God.

I'm terribly sorry, but you are wrong. Utterly wrong.
Non rotting corpse scams are old hat. Very popular in most any
religion. Why don't you come to Bangkok, and I show you a few?
==========================================================
Jos Flachs in: Krungthep Mahanakhon Bovorn Rattanakorsin Mahinthara
Ayutthaya Mahadilokpop Noparat Ratchathani Burirom
Udom Ratchanivej Mahasathan Amornpiman Avatarnsathit
Sakkathattiya A-visnukarmpasit
also known as: Bangkok, Thailand
==========================================================
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Challenge for atheists 01 Jan 2006 10:57:52 AM
protestanterrors.com wrote:
<snip>
Not much time now, just a few things:
I couldn't find even one peer reviewed paper from the book author you
mentioned. And I tried the usuall sites, like ISI. Are there none, or am
I unable to find them?
If the book she wrote is any good, and it claims to have evaluated the
"scientific evidence" as well as the religious, then there are
references in this book to peer reviewed journal papers (I know how
scientists work, see. They publish papers like, well, scientists.) It
would be helpfull if you could provide some. (My university library is
closed for a few more days. Holidays, see? But digital libraries are
open around the clock.) I'd love to see a paper from an expert in
forensic science on this subject. Pick any saint you like.
This Google search produces hundreds of hits, but mainly juast to sites
claiming what you said, without providing information on who, when and
with what methods the bodies where investigated. And to be honest, I
have a little more to do with my time than to search 600 plus websites
for something you claimed to have seen somewhere.
Also, websites are not known for their peer review process. Look, the
moon is made of cheese: http://moon.google.com/ Zoom in, you'll see.
Have you ever tried to add the word vampire to the Google search string
you recommended?
j.m.
#1491
.






  Page 2 of 13

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3801     pg.2109     pg.1169     pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER