Golly...why don't we ask the -religious- examiners instead? They ought

bolster your position. Here's a sniff for you:

"At the Vatican's request, Italian pathologists, chemists, and
radiologists have been poring over the bodies of the ancient men and
women interred in church reliquaries. Charged with gleaning new
information about the lives of the saints and assisting in the
conservation of sacred remains, they have also brought science to the
altars of Europe's cathedrals. Already, they have examined more than two
dozen saints and beati, shedding light on the mystery of their
preservation. While some saints were clearly mummified by their devout
followers, others were protected from decay by environmental conditions,
raising new questions about incorruptibility."

The rest of the article, and fine reading it is, too, can be found at:

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html

And the best bit ia at the end:
"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."

Interesting, you find an article from someone who does not believe in this
phenomenom and now all of a sudden it is automatically fact to you. I

assume you won't be asking the writer to "prove it" because it is right
along with what you believe. This one silly article does not change the
facts of 2000 years of this phenomenom. It simple shows the writer didn't
do her homework. Read some actual cases and you'll see this has zero to do
with environment....it happens in ANY environment. One article with
someone's opinion means nothing.

Golly...why don't we ask the -religious- examiners instead? They ought
to bolster your position. Here's a sniff for you:

"At the Vatican's request, Italian pathologists, chemists, and
radiologists have been poring over the bodies of the ancient men and
women interred in church reliquaries. Charged with gleaning new
information about the lives of the saints and assisting in the
conservation of sacred remains, they have also brought science to the
altars of Europe's cathedrals. Already, they have examined more than two
dozen saints and beati, shedding light on the mystery of their
preservation. While some saints were clearly mummified by their devout
followers, others were protected from decay by environmental conditions,
raising new questions about incorruptibility."

The rest of the article, and fine reading it is, too, can be found at:

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html

And the best bit ia at the end:
"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."

Interesting, you find an article from someone who does not believe in this
phenomenom and now all of a sudden it is automatically fact to you. I
assume you won't be asking the writer to "prove it" because it is right
along with what you believe. This one silly article does not change the
facts of 2000 years of this phenomenom. It simple shows the writer didn't
do her homework. Read some actual cases and you'll see this has zero to do
with environment....it happens in ANY environment. One article with
someone's opinion means nothing.

Golly...why don't we ask the -religious- examiners instead? They ought to
bolster your position. Here's a sniff for you:

"At the Vatican's request, Italian pathologists, chemists, and
radiologists have been poring over the bodies of the ancient men and
women interred in church reliquaries. Charged with gleaning new
information about the lives of the saints and assisting in the
conservation of sacred remains, they have also brought science to the
altars of Europe's cathedrals. Already, they have examined more than two
dozen saints and beati, shedding light on the mystery of their
preservation. While some saints were clearly mummified by their devout
followers, others were protected from decay by environmental conditions,
raising new questions about incorruptibility."

The rest of the article, and fine reading it is, too, can be found at:

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html

And the best bit ia at the end:
"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."

Interesting, you find an article from someone who does not believe in this
phenomenom and now all of a sudden it is automatically fact to you. I
assume you won't be asking the writer to "prove it" because it is right
along with what you believe. This one silly article does not change the
facts of 2000 years of this phenomenom. It simple shows the writer didn't
do her homework. Read some actual cases and you'll see this has zero to do
with environment....it happens in ANY environment. One article with
someone's opinion means nothing.

Golly...why don't we ask the -religious- examiners instead? They ought to
bolster your position. Here's a sniff for you:

"At the Vatican's request, Italian pathologists, chemists, and
radiologists have been poring over the bodies of the ancient men and
women interred in church reliquaries. Charged with gleaning new
information about the lives of the saints and assisting in the
conservation of sacred remains, they have also brought science to the
altars of Europe's cathedrals. Already, they have examined more than two
dozen saints and beati, shedding light on the mystery of their
preservation. While some saints were clearly mummified by their devout
followers, others were protected from decay by environmental conditions,
raising new questions about incorruptibility."

The rest of the article, and fine reading it is, too, can be found at:

http://www.nhne.com/misc/incorruptibles.html

And the best bit ia at the end:
"In the face of science, the roman Catholic Church has now virtually
abandoned the notion of incorruptibility."

Interesting, you find an article from someone who does not believe in this
phenomenom and now all of a sudden it is automatically fact to you. I
assume you won't be asking the writer to "prove it" because it is right
along with what you believe. This one silly article does not change the
facts of 2000 years of this phenomenom. It simple shows the writer didn't
do her homework. Read some actual cases and you'll see this has zero to do
with environment....it happens in ANY environment. One article with
someone's opinion means nothing.