Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm

"What is most astounding of all is the fact that for each incorrupt body
discovered, after research has been done to determine who the person was,
it has always been determined that the person was an extremely devout
Catholic. This inevitably leads to the question, How can the process of
decay, which has no intelligence, choose which bodies to devour and not
to
devour, and why do they happen to be devout Catholics? This phenomena is
simply miraculous"

ASTOUNDING!!! Catholics and murkles!!!! Who woulda thunk it? That link is
overwhelming proof that you're a fucking mental cripple that would grasp
at any fucking straw to mould facts around your precious fiction to make
it seem real to any fucking retard as gullible as you.

***** and get some REAL evidence, dipshit!

I always get such hostility from atheists when you are faced with
plain facts that you can't explain.

they are there for the public to see and are a $200 plane ticket away. Let
me guess, will you look the other way for this phenomena too?

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm

"What is most astounding of all is the fact that for each incorrupt body
discovered, after research has been done to determine who the person was,
it has always been determined that the person was an extremely devout
Catholic. This inevitably leads to the question, How can the process of
decay, which has no intelligence, choose which bodies to devour and not to
devour, and why do they happen to be devout Catholics? This phenomena is
simply miraculous"

ASTOUNDING!!! Catholics and murkles!!!! Who woulda thunk it? That link is
overwhelming proof that you're a fucking mental cripple that would grasp
at any fucking straw to mould facts around your precious fiction to make
it seem real to any fucking retard as gullible as you.

***** and get some REAL evidence, dipshit!

I always get such hostility from atheists when you are faced with
plain facts that you can't explain. I provided locations all over Europe,
they are there for the public to see and are a $200 plane ticket away. Let
me guess, will you look the other way for this phenomena too?

BH

I always get such hostility from atheists when you are faced with
plain facts that you can't explain. I provided locations all over Europe,
they are there for the public to see and are a $200 plane ticket away. Let
me guess, will you look the other way for this phenomena too?

***** and get some REAL evidence, dipshit!

I always get such hostility from atheists when you are faced with
plain facts that you can't explain. I provided locations all over Europe,
they are there for the public to see and are a $200 plane ticket away. Let
me guess, will you look the other way for this phenomena too?

BH

and are a $200 plane ticket away.

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:59:17 GMT, "Lörd Phÿltêr"
<phylter@hsotmail.com> wrote:

"protestanterrors.com" <bhlincoln@protestanterrors.com> had me ROTFL with:
news:pan.2005.12.31.03.24.37.624262@protestanterrors.com:

Take a look at this phenomena and let us know how this can be anything
other than supernatural:


http://www.protestanterrors.com/incorruptibles.htm

"What is most astounding of all is the fact that for each incorrupt body
discovered, after research has been done to determine who the person was,
it has always been determined that the person was an extremely devout
Catholic. This inevitably leads to the question, How can the process of
decay, which has no intelligence, choose which bodies to devour and not to
devour, and why do they happen to be devout Catholics? This phenomena is
simply miraculous"

ASTOUNDING!!! Catholics and murkles!!!! Who woulda thunk it? That link is
overwhelming proof that you're a fucking mental cripple that would grasp at
any fucking straw to mould facts around your precious fiction to make it
seem real to any fucking retard as gullible as you.

On his planet Lenin was a Catholic.

3) Saint Soubirous (the most "famous" preserved saint) is
perfectly preserved.

FALSE. This particular "saint" has a nice coat of wax on her and
is kept in an airtight casket... Even I'd look good after death
treated to that make-over.

Not all incorruptibles are perfectly incorrupt. they vary. St.
Soubirous has been on display for close to a century now and has
become slightly discolored, while still remaining intact. They
added wax to keep her appearance presentable but that does not
take away from the fact that she was found incorrupt.

Read the documentation from reputable people for the last 20
centuries, publicly available. And of course the bodies are on
display in Europe for all to see as well

So

1) Only devout catlicks are incorrupt.

FALSE - there are examples who were not 'lickers e.g. Paramahansa
Yogananda, a Hindu.

Please provide proof and I will gladly read it. No one has done so
yet.

2) The majority of catlick saints are preserved

FALSE. In fact very few are so preserved. How do we know? Well for
some reason catlicks enjoy picking over dead folk and making all
sorts of spurious claims about the remains.

I never said the majority are preserved. Only some are and I do not
claim to have an answer as to why some are and some are not.

But I do
claim this phenomenon exists and you can read about it or look the
other way like the others in the forum.

3) Saint Soubirous (the most "famous" preserved saint) is perfectly
preserved.

FALSE. This particular "saint" has a nice coat of wax on her and is
kept in an airtight casket... Even I'd look good after death treated
to that make-over.

Not all incorruptibles are perfectly incorrupt. they vary. St.
Soubirous has been on display for close to a century now and has
become slightly discolored, while still remaining intact. They added
wax to keep her appearance presentable but that does not take away
from the fact that she was found incorrupt.

4) Well these relics are preserved, they're all religous so there
must be something to it.

FALSE. Until you do a bit more grave robbing of jews, muslims and
especially atheists, how can anyone be sure only catlicks are
preserved (in fact we know for a *fact* that catlicks are not the
only examples).

I challenge you or anyone else to find a non-Catholic with the same
exact incorrupt phenomenon. You will not.

5) No one can explain this in any other way

FALSE. Decay is caused by the presence of sufficient air, moisture
and microbes to develop the process. The absence of one or more of
these elements can slow or halt the physical decay process. Since the
environments in the caskets were not measured in any scientific way,
who can say which one(s) of these elements was absent.

You clearly have not read up on this phenomenon. YOu really need to
before you can speak about it.

So we've got a false argument about religion influencing who is
preserved. Given that argument is false, a derivation to some
supernatural being is by extension false.

Unless of course, you have a *proof* to contrary.

Read the documentation from reputable people for the last 20
centuries, publicly available. And of course the bodies are on display
in Europe for all to see as well