Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough



 Religions > Atheism > Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "maff"
Date: 17 Oct 2005 04:48:49 AM
Object: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html
Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian
Scientists have perfected a way of making embryonic stem cells without
destroying the embryos from which they derive, a breakthrough that will
challenge George Bush's opposition to the research.
The discovery of a technique to extract stem cells without impairing
the embryos could remove a major hurdle facing scientists who are
trying to develop treatments for diseases such as diabetes and motor
neurone disease. Religious and rightwing groups claim embryonic stem
cell research is unethical because the cells are produced by creating
embryos which are later destroyed.
Stem cells
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/bd98dcae31a61a18
.

User: "miedvied"

Title: Re: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough 18 Oct 2005 06:51:28 PM
maff wrote:

Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html

Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian


Scientists have perfected a way of making embryonic stem cells without
destroying the embryos from which they derive, a breakthrough that will
challenge George Bush's opposition to the research.

"Perfected"? I understand that they can turn adult cells into stem cells
through fusion, and have successfully turned the resultant tetraploid
cells into diploid cells again, but this is the first time I've seen any
article refer to this process as "perfected" - I'm fairly confident the
scientists in question are still emphatically saying that they don't
know if the resultant stem cells are "normal" stem cells yet.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough 19 Oct 2005 06:24:11 AM
miedvied wrote:

maff wrote:

Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html

Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian


Scientists have perfected a way of making embryonic stem cells without
destroying the embryos from which they derive, a breakthrough that will
challenge George Bush's opposition to the research.



"Perfected"? I understand that they can turn adult cells into stem cells
through fusion, and have successfully turned the resultant tetraploid
cells into diploid cells again, but this is the first time I've seen any
article refer to this process as "perfected" - I'm fairly confident the
scientists in question are still emphatically saying that they don't
know if the resultant stem cells are "normal" stem cells yet.

This isn't that process. This one, they take an embryo of 8 cells - 3
divisions after fertilisation - and they pick one cell off. They
culture the one cell, and meanwhile they use the 7 cell embryo in in
vitro fertilisation. So no abortion and they get embryo cells to use.
This is with mice at present, you understand.
But what if they pick off the one cell that contains the soul?? :-)
.
User: "Darrell Stec"

Title: Re: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough 19 Oct 2005 01:17:16 PM
After serious contemplation, on or about Wednesday 19 October 2005 7:24 am
rja.carnegie@excite.com wrote:


miedvied wrote:

maff wrote:

Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html

Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian


Scientists have perfected a way of making embryonic stem cells without
destroying the embryos from which they derive, a breakthrough that will
challenge George Bush's opposition to the research.



"Perfected"? I understand that they can turn adult cells into stem cells
through fusion, and have successfully turned the resultant tetraploid
cells into diploid cells again, but this is the first time I've seen any
article refer to this process as "perfected" - I'm fairly confident the
scientists in question are still emphatically saying that they don't
know if the resultant stem cells are "normal" stem cells yet.


This isn't that process. This one, they take an embryo of 8 cells - 3
divisions after fertilisation - and they pick one cell off. They
culture the one cell, and meanwhile they use the 7 cell embryo in in
vitro fertilisation. So no abortion and they get embryo cells to use.
This is with mice at present, you understand.

But what if they pick off the one cell that contains the soul?? :-)

That shouldn't be a problem. There is a scientific way to determine that.
Remember the "scientist" that claimed to have measured the weight of the
soul by weighing bodies just prior to and right after death?
In solution the heavier cell (containing the soul) would revolve and point
to the bottom of the petri dish. IIRC, baby souls and adult souls weighed
the same in his study.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec

Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough 17 Oct 2005 06:40:11 PM
maff wrote:

Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html

Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian


Scientists have perfected a way of making embryonic stem cells without
destroying the embryos from which they derive, a breakthrough that will
challenge George Bush's opposition to the research.

I've read the story and that's ludicrous, principally in the word
"perfected" applied to the prcesss described. But in any case, he'll
still be against it. He'll be against anything that gets around his
being against something else.
I thought it was going to be the one where they find the foetus's cells
in the mother's bloodstream. Logically, they could collect those
cells. I figure he's going to be against that too.
By the way, what does this have to do with any newsgroup touched?
.
User: "Jesus H Christ"

Title: Re: Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough 18 Oct 2005 01:25:45 AM
"rja.carnegie@excite.com" <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
news:1129592411.232619.239260@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

maff wrote:

Challenge to Bush in new stem cell breakthrough
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1593849,00.html

Ian Sample, science correspondent in Montreal
Monday October 17, 2005
The Guardian

By the way, what does this have to do with any newsgroup touched?

Yeah, tenuous connections at best; religious/origins based objections to
stem cell research.
But the baby Jesus is forgiving. Besides, he needs a beer.
Jesus!
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Stem Cell Research
Limits on Stem-Cell Research Re-emerge as a Political Issue
July 29, 2004 words from Uncle Jerry Falwell -- Stem Cell Research
Medical Advances Held Back by Embryonic Stem Cell Ban?
California PROP 71 Stem Cell Initiative Attracts Backers
Cloning and Stem Cell Research - Down The Slippery Slope From Contraception
Paralyzed S. Korean Woman Walks Again Thanks to Stem Cell Therapy (Look Ma, No Prayers!)
Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus
South Korea Makes Advances in Stem Cell Research, While USA Lags Farther Behind....
Re: Bush says he'll veto stem cell measure
The President's Stem Cell Theology
Beware of Stem Cell Theology
S. Korean Scientist on Bush's "peculiar" Stem Cell Policy
Embryonic stem cell public research starts in Spain
Stem-Cell Research: Pro-Cure vs Anti-Cure
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER