| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2008 03:29:40 PM |
| Object: |
Chart highlights White House e-mail gap |
If these e-mails are ever found, a lot of bigwig Republicans
will be wearing orange pajamas.
Chart highlights White House e-mail gap
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer 51 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A White House chart indicates no e-mail was archived on 473
days for various units of the Executive Office of the President, a House
committee chairman says.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., says a White House spokesman's comments
suggesting no e-mail had disappeared conflicted with what congressional
staffers were told in September.
On Thursday night, Waxman said he was scheduling a hearing for Feb. 15 and
challenged the White House to explain spokesman Tony Fratto's remark that
"we have absolutely no reason to believe that any e-mails are missing."
Fratto based his comment on the contents of a White House declaration filed
in federal court casting doubt on the accuracy of a chart created by a
former White House employee that points to a large volume of e-mail gone
from White House servers.
In a letter announcing the hearing, Waxman cites the chart and its list of
12 days of unarchived e-mail from the White House Office and 16 days of no
archived e-mail for the office of Vice President ***** Cheney.
Waxman said the White House officials took the chart with them after
briefing Waxman's investigators and that the officials indicated the White
House was doing more analysis to determine whether the chart's information
was accurate.
On Friday, Ann Weismann, chief counsel for one of the private groups suing
the White House over the e-mail controversy, said her sources tell her the
chart the White House is now contesting the accuracy of was the product not
of one person as the White House suggests but rather represents the work of
three teams of information technology specialists.
"In addition, my sources tell me that there are periods of time for which
the volume of e-mail is significantly lower than is typically the case,"
said Weismann of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
For example, Weismann said, the expected e-mail volume for the White House
Office in the EOP is 60,000 to 100,000 daily, yet there are days for which
the total volume was "as low as five daily e-mails."
Waxman called the hearing after Fratto tried to tamp down the growing e-mail
controversy.
Fratto's comments shifted away from White House statements last spring that
expressed uncertainty over whether the allegations were true or not.
"We tried to reconstruct some of the work" in the chart and "could not
authenticate the correctness of the data," said Fratto. "We have no evidence
and we have no way of showing that any e-mail at all are missing."
The existence of the chart surfaced Tuesday night in the White House
declaration filed in lawsuits brought by Citizens for Responsibility and
Ethics in Washington and the private National Security Archive.
The declaration, which the White House was forced to file pursuant to court
order, disclosed that before October 2003, the White House recycled computer
backup tapes containing e-mail. Such a process would overwrite large numbers
of e-mails. The White House said it began preserving backup tapes in October
2003, but had recycled them before then.
If the chart of e-mail missing from archives turns out to be accurate, the
backup tapes should contain substantially all e-mails sent or received in
the 2003-2005 time period, the White House court declaration said.
"We have no reason to believe that there is any data missing at all" from
White House computer servers, said Fratto. "And we've certainly found no
evidence of any data missing."
The court declaration said the White House was undertaking an independent
assessment of a chart to determine whether any e-mail is missing.
The White House's latest statements represent a shift from what it was
saying last spring when it seemed uncertain whether e-mail was missing from
the archives or not. The latest statements also represent a shift from what
the White House apparently told prosecutors over two years ago in the probe
into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name.
In January 2006, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald reported that "we have
learned that not all e-mail of the Office of Vice President and the
Executive Office of the President for certain time periods in 2003 was
preserved through the normal archiving process on the White House computer
system."
The White House says the e-mail matter arose in October 2005 in connection
with the Justice Department's CIA leak probe. Fitzgerald revealed it to the
public three months later in preparations for the trial of Cheney's former
chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who was later convicted of four
felonies in the Plame affair. President Bush commuted Libby's 30-month
prison term
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Chart highlights White House e-mail gap |
19 Jan 2008 02:55:15 AM |
|
|
In article <daadndCDfvCrhwzanZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
If these e-mails are ever found, a lot of bigwig Republicans
will be wearing orange pajamas.
Chart highlights White House e-mail gap
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer 51 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A White House chart indicates no e-mail was archived on 473
days for various units of the Executive Office of the President, a House
committee chairman says.
Rose Mary Woods was a piker.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., says a White House spokesman's comments
suggesting no e-mail had disappeared conflicted with what congressional
staffers were told in September.
On Thursday night, Waxman said he was scheduling a hearing for Feb. 15 and
challenged the White House to explain spokesman Tony Fratto's remark that
"we have absolutely no reason to believe that any e-mails are missing."
Yeah. They just can't find them. Barney ate them.
--
John #1782
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
