Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran



 Religions > Atheism > Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 14 Aug 2005 01:07:57 PM
Object: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran
http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html
August 1, 2005 Issue
The American Conservative
Deep Background
In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President
***** Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command
(STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in
response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States.
The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both
conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more
than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected
nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are
hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by
conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq,
the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the
act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air
Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the
implications of what they are doing-that Iran is being set up for an
unprovoked nuclear attack-but no one is prepared to damage his career
by posing any objections.
* * *
A CIA internal review of the agency's performance prior to 9/11 is
harshly critical of former CIA Director George Tenet, former Director
of Operations James Pavitt, and the former chief of the
Counterterrorist Center, Cofer Black, for not doing everything possible
to confront terrorism. Pavitt, who was reluctant to take on risky
missions against bin Laden encouraged by the National Security Council
during the second term of President Bill Clinton, is particularly
criticized. The report, completed by CIA Inspector General John
Helgerson, is especially acerbic regarding the failure of the agency to
stop two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar,
as they entered the United States. Black did not share information on
the two men with the FBI agents assigned to the Counterterrorist Center
at the CIA and also turned down a request for a formal memorandum to be
sent to FBI Headquarters. The report will be finalized and given to
Congress after those criticized in it add their own comments. Pavitt,
as head of the Operations Directorate, has publicly accepted full
responsibility for the agency's failure, but Black has not
acknowledged any deficiencies in his performance. Tenet has not yet
responded.
* * *
There is increasing evidence that the Iraqi police forces, now under
Shi'ite control, are carrying out systematic revenge killings against
Sunnis in Baghdad. The bodies now showing up at the morgue have obvious
signs of handcuffing and blindfolding and evidence of being tortured
before death. U.S. sources indicate that the suspicious killings have
reached the rate of almost 700 per month. The police are supervised by
the Shi'ite-run Ministry of Interior, which claims that the killings
are being carried out by insurgents wearing stolen police uniforms. But
American intelligence sources disagree, noting that many of the killers
appear to be actual policemen carrying the expensive standard-issue
Glock automatics and driving official Toyota Land Cruisers.
_____________________________________________________
Philip Giraldi, a former CIA Officer, is a partner in Cannistraro
Associates.
.

User: "JTEM"

Title: Bad News 14 Aug 2005 11:26:31 PM
<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote

In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.

Sorry. You're wrong on this one.
In the first place, I find it very hard to believe that Bush will go into
Iran. The GOP and the Iranians have been all kissy-face for more than
two decades now. In case anyone has forgotten: The Republicans
were arming Iran during the Iran/Iraq war.
Yes they also armed Iraq rather overtly, but they were secretly arming
Iran.
Remember the "Iran-Contra" scandal?
Anyhow, pretty much everything Bush said of Iraq -- all the lies, all
the feeble excuses for invading -- were true for Iran.
Iran really did try to by yellow cake from Nigeria.
Iran does have Al Qaida ties, as well as close ties to numerous other
terrorist groups.
Iran was aiding (to the point of granting sanctuary) the Islamic
militants in Iraq, the ones with Al Qaida ties. Those militants
were fighting to over throw Saddam and set up an Iranian-modeled
Islamic state, just as they are now doing in opposition to U.S.
forces.
Iran not only was shopping for parts to build a nuclear Centrifuge,
but they bought a complete working model as well as the blueprints
for building their own.
Iran really does have a secret nuclear program. U.N. inspectors
reported that test swabs at an Iranian nuclear site revealed materials
that Iran not only had never identified, but has yet to report. The
Iranians won't even reveal it's present location.
Everything Bush said of Iraq is true for Iran.
So why would Bush have said it unless to pre-poison the idea of
war with Iran?
"Uranium from Nigeria? Oh, sure, like we haven't heard that
one before.... SHEESH!"
And we have heard it before. And it was a lie when we heard it
before. So when we hear the exact same thing in the case of Iran,
the natural impulse is to doubt. All the EXACT SAME arguments
apply against Iran -- there's nothing new -- but we heard them all
before and they were lies back then.
Bush is protecting Iran. Iran is a threat. Iran is a terrorist
supporting state. Iran does have a nuclear program, including
a "Secret" program where the existence of materials are
denied (despite the physical evidence). Bush is protecting Iran.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Bad News 15 Aug 2005 06:37:50 AM
In episode <H7WdnS_mwdy8ip3eRVn-iQ@comcast.com>, JTEM burst into the room
and exclaimed:

<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote

In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for
Iran.


Sorry. You're wrong on this one.

In the first place, I find it very hard to believe that Bush will go into
Iran. The GOP and the Iranians have been all kissy-face for more than two
decades now. In case anyone has forgotten: The Republicans were arming
Iran during the Iran/Iraq war.

Hussein was an ally of ours for years, particularly when Rummy and Cheney
were last seen around the White House. But we attacked him anyway.
The neocons do want Iran. Take a look at a map and you can easily see why.
We have them "bracketed" right now, being in Afghanistan and Iraq. Taking
Iran would give us a solid block in the ME.
Of course, now, they did expect things to go better in Iraq than they are...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
User: "Toby"

Title: Re: Bad News 16 Aug 2005 06:37:02 AM


The neocons do want Iran. Take a look at a map and you can easily see why.
We have them "bracketed" right now, being in Afghanistan and Iraq. Taking
Iran would give us a solid block in the ME.

Kind of like big-stakes Monopoly...
Toby
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Bad News 15 Aug 2005 10:36:39 AM
JTEM wrote:

<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote

In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.


Sorry. You're wrong on this one.

I don't think so. Relations between Iran and the House of Saud
remain strained at best. The Saudis do not want their radicals
to be receiving support and inspiration from a nearby theocracy.
Sauid Arabia has more petrolueum than Iran.


In the first place, I find it very hard to believe that Bush will go into
Iran. The GOP and the Iranians have been all kissy-face for more than
two decades now. In case anyone has forgotten: The Republicans
were arming Iran during the Iran/Iraq war.

Yes they also armed Iraq rather overtly, but they were secretly arming
Iran.

Remember the "Iran-Contra" scandal?

Yes. Arms were sold to Iran to persuade the Iranians to exert
pressure on Hezbollah (or a similarly Iranian supported paramilitary
group) to release American Hostages. After two American Hostages were
released, two more were kidnapped. Gee, they didn't see that coming?
I think that pretty much killed the enthusiasm for further covert
cooperation with Iran. That, and their counterfeiting of US currency.


Anyhow, pretty much everything Bush said of Iraq -- all the lies, all
the feeble excuses for invading -- were true for Iran.

Iran really did try to by yellow cake from Nigeria.

Where did Nigeria get the yellowcake? BTW, Like Iraq, Iran has its
own domestic Uranium mine. ISTR Iran is using its own Uranium.
I suppose Iraq bought yellowcake from Portugal and Niger (in the
1980's) becuase it was more expedient than mining and refining
their own.


Iran does have Al Qaida ties, as well as close ties to numerous other
terrorist groups.

Most notably Hezbollah. After September 11, 2001 and on through
the Afghanistan Campaign Iran arrested and held persons associated
with Al Quaida. I doubt if they do that any more.


...

Iran not only was shopping for parts to build a nuclear Centrifuge,
but they bought a complete working model as well as the blueprints
for building their own.

And built their own.


Iran really does have a secret nuclear program. U.N. inspectors
reported that test swabs at an Iranian nuclear site revealed materials
that Iran not only had never identified, but has yet to report. The
Iranians won't even reveal it's present location.

Did have. The IAEA still suspects there is more that has not
been declared. AFAIK, the test swab results have been explained
as contamination from Pakistan.


Everything Bush said of Iraq is true for Iran.

So why would Bush have said it unless to pre-poison the idea of
war with Iran?

People who lack character and have no personal sense of morality
are quick to tell any expedient lie that they think they can
get away with.


"Uranium from Nigeria? Oh, sure, like we haven't heard that
one before.... SHEESH!"

I haven't. Can you provide a reference for Iran importing
yellowcake from anywhere?


And we have heard it before. And it was a lie when we heard it
before. So when we hear the exact same thing in the case of Iran,
the natural impulse is to doubt. All the EXACT SAME arguments
apply against Iran -- there's nothing new -- but we heard them all
before and they were lies back then.

The boy who cried wolf.


Bush is protecting Iran. Iran is a threat. Iran is a terrorist
supporting state. Iran does have a nuclear program, including
a "Secret" program where the existence of materials are
denied (despite the physical evidence). Bush is protecting Iran.

Iran is now surounded on all sides by nations that are open to the
US military.
An invasion of Iran by the US is unlikely for a number of reasons
two of them being that the US doesn't have a spare army with which
to invade, and the Iranians can be expected to a better job of
defending
their country than Iraq.
A bombardment campaign is a possibility that could become a reality,
and could _really_ become necessary.
--
FF
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Bad News 15 Aug 2005 12:35:30 PM
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote

I don't think so. Relations between Iran and the House
of Saud remain strained at best.

The relations between the United States and the Saudi
despots should be strained, to say the least.

The Saudis do not want their radicals to be receiving
support and inspiration from a nearby theocracy.
Sauid Arabia has more petrolueum than Iran.

The crown pimp....errr... "Prince" of Saudi Arabia is
something of a radical himself. Quite frankly, Saudi
Arabia is of more than one mind.

Yes. Arms were sold to Iran to persuade the Iranians to
exert pressure on Hezbollah (or a similarly Iranian
supported paramilitary group) to release American Hostages.

That is the story of Ollie North and the Iran-Contra scandal.
But it didn't begin with Ollie North & the Iran-Contra scandal.
That was only the form the operation took after congress
stopped all funding for the RNC to wage a secret war in
central America.

Anyhow, pretty much everything Bush said of Iraq -- all the lies, all
the feeble excuses for invading -- were true for Iran.

Iran really did try to by yellow cake from Nigeria.


Where did Nigeria get the yellowcake?

They have one of the largest uranium deposits in the world.

Iran really does have a secret nuclear program. U.N. inspectors
reported that test swabs at an Iranian nuclear site revealed materials
that Iran not only had never identified, but has yet to report. The
Iranians won't even reveal it's present location.

Did have. The IAEA still suspects there is more that has not
been declared. AFAIK, the test swab results have been explained
as contamination from Pakistan.

There's more. Iran destroyed an entire nuclear site, leveled it, in a
attempt to keep it a secret. They haven't exactly been open.

"Uranium from Nigeria? Oh, sure, like we haven't heard that
one before.... SHEESH!"


I haven't. Can you provide a reference for Iran importing
yellowcake from anywhere?

Sorry?
I'm pointing out that the EXACT SAME arguments -- word for word --
that Bush used to justify war with Iraq could be applied to Iran, only
they wouldn't be lies in the case of Iran.
According to Bush's fantasy story concerning Iraq, they never bought
nuclear material from Nigeria. Saddam tried to buy large quantities --
according to Bush -- there by proving his nuclear intentions, but he
failed.
But it wasn't Saddam Hussein, it wasn't Iraq. It was Iran. They didn't
buy it -- just like in Bush's Iraqi fantasy -- but they most certainly
tried to.

And we have heard it before. And it was a lie when we heard it
before. So when we hear the exact same thing in the case of Iran,
the natural impulse is to doubt. All the EXACT SAME arguments
apply against Iran -- there's nothing new -- but we heard them all
before and they were lies back then.

The boy who cried wolf.

Exactly. And it wasn't an accident. The only conclusion here is that
Bush is actively protecting Iran.

A bombardment campaign is a possibility that could become a
reality, and could _really_ become necessary.

What is a possibility (and really a necessity) is the E.U.
They are not tied down. Their militaries are free. They have the
huge advantage of the U.S. controlled areas in Iraq & Afghanistan.
And most importantly....
The E.U. has to establish itself as a super power, and quickly.
If Bush is to engineer a Soviet-Style collapse of the United States,
someone has to be ready to rush in & fill the vacuum. That someone
is the E.U. In order to do that the E.U. must demonstrate not only it's
capability of enforcing it's will in some other region of the world,
but it's willingness to do so.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Bad News 15 Aug 2005 10:54:33 AM
wrote:

...
Iran is now surounded on all sides by nations that are open to the
US military.
...

Not Iraq, it seems.
.



User: "Lacrobat"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 19 Aug 2005 07:31:00 AM
<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.

You say it like its a bad thing...
.
User: "G*rd*n"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 19 Aug 2005 08:36:27 AM
<zathras10@lycos.com>:

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.

"L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>:

You say it like its a bad thing...

Depends on your tastes. You may delight in carnage. Everyone
doesn't, however, especially when they themselves or their
relatives, friends or neighbors may get caught up in it or
have to pay for it.
You could always watch old war movies instead.
.

User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 19 Aug 2005 07:58:15 AM
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:31:00 GMT, "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>
wrote:


<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.


You say it like its a bad thing...

Well, I wouldn't call it a good thing.....unless you want to see what little
credibility we have left go right down the tubes.


.
User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 19 Aug 2005 08:26:57 AM
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:58:15 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:31:00 GMT, "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>
wrote:


<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.


You say it like its a bad thing...


Well, I wouldn't call it a good thing.....unless you want to see what little
credibility we have left go right down the tubes.

They know that the rest of the world hates these weapons - it's a way
of putting the rest of the world in its place. They don't care about
the consequences.
.
User: "G*rd*n"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 19 Aug 2005 10:52:39 AM
<zathras10@lycos.com>:

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background
In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran. ....

"L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>:

You say it like its a bad thing...

John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net>:

Well, I wouldn't call it a good thing.....unless you want to see what little
credibility we have left go right down the tubes.

Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net>:

They know that the rest of the world hates these weapons - it's a way
of putting the rest of the world in its place. They don't care about
the consequences.

"Oderint dum metuant" -- a favorite saying of Caligula.
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 24 Aug 2005 12:08:36 PM
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:26:57 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:58:15 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:31:00 GMT, "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>
wrote:


<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.


You say it like its a bad thing...


Well, I wouldn't call it a good thing.....unless you want to see what little
credibility we have left go right down the tubes.


They know that the rest of the world hates these weapons - it's a way
of putting the rest of the world in its place. They don't care about
the consequences.

Such would require a hint of ethics and humanity.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.


User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 23 Aug 2005 10:22:48 AM
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:58:15 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:31:00 GMT, "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com>
wrote:


<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background


In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran.


You say it like its a bad thing...


Well, I wouldn't call it a good thing.....unless you want to see what little
credibility we have left go right down the tubes.

What 'credibility?'
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.



User: "gab"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 14 Aug 2005 06:09:12 PM
<zathras10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1124042876.995081.81860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background
THIS IS A SPECIAL CONFIDENTIAL REPORT ON THE SECRET SPECIAL REPORT
DISCLOSED PUBLICLY ONLY ON THE NEWS SHEETS SUPERVISED BY CHENEY AND OTHERS
LIKE THE FBI, SSS, JJJ AND OTHER SECRET ORGANIZATIONS.

In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President
***** Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command
(STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in
response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States.
The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both
conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more
than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected
nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are
hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by
conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq,
the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the
act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air
Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the
implications of what they are doing-that Iran is being set up for an
unprovoked nuclear attack-but no one is prepared to damage his career
by posing any objections.

* * *

A CIA internal review of the agency's performance prior to 9/11 is
harshly critical of former CIA Director George Tenet, former Director
of Operations James Pavitt, and the former chief of the
Counterterrorist Center, Cofer Black, for not doing everything possible
to confront terrorism. Pavitt, who was reluctant to take on risky
missions against bin Laden encouraged by the National Security Council
during the second term of President Bill Clinton, is particularly
criticized. The report, completed by CIA Inspector General John
Helgerson, is especially acerbic regarding the failure of the agency to
stop two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar,
as they entered the United States. Black did not share information on
the two men with the FBI agents assigned to the Counterterrorist Center
at the CIA and also turned down a request for a formal memorandum to be
sent to FBI Headquarters. The report will be finalized and given to
Congress after those criticized in it add their own comments. Pavitt,
as head of the Operations Directorate, has publicly accepted full
responsibility for the agency's failure, but Black has not
acknowledged any deficiencies in his performance. Tenet has not yet
responded.

* * *

There is increasing evidence that the Iraqi police forces, now under
Shi'ite control, are carrying out systematic revenge killings against
Sunnis in Baghdad. The bodies now showing up at the morgue have obvious
signs of handcuffing and blindfolding and evidence of being tortured
before death. U.S. sources indicate that the suspicious killings have
reached the rate of almost 700 per month. The police are supervised by
the Shi'ite-run Ministry of Interior, which claims that the killings
are being carried out by insurgents wearing stolen police uniforms. But
American intelligence sources disagree, noting that many of the killers
appear to be actual policemen carrying the expensive standard-issue
Glock automatics and driving official Toyota Land Cruisers.

_____________________________________________________



Philip Giraldi, a former CIA Officer, is a partner in Cannistraro
Associates.

.

User: "A9RBH"

Title: Re: Cheney Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran 22 Aug 2005 01:30:43 AM
The Chinese and the Russians and probably most of Europe would love to
see us blunder like this. I think it would tear the United States apart and
make
Vietnam look like a pic nic.
KLM
zathras10@lycos.com wrote:

http://amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

August 1, 2005 Issue

The American Conservative

Deep Background

In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around
the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same
for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President
***** Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command
(STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in
response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States.
The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both
conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more
than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected
nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are
hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by
conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq,
the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the
act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air
Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the
implications of what they are doing-that Iran is being set up for an
unprovoked nuclear attack-but no one is prepared to damage his career
by posing any objections.

* * *

A CIA internal review of the agency's performance prior to 9/11 is
harshly critical of former CIA Director George Tenet, former Director
of Operations James Pavitt, and the former chief of the
Counterterrorist Center, Cofer Black, for not doing everything possible
to confront terrorism. Pavitt, who was reluctant to take on risky
missions against bin Laden encouraged by the National Security Council
during the second term of President Bill Clinton, is particularly
criticized. The report, completed by CIA Inspector General John
Helgerson, is especially acerbic regarding the failure of the agency to
stop two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar,
as they entered the United States. Black did not share information on
the two men with the FBI agents assigned to the Counterterrorist Center
at the CIA and also turned down a request for a formal memorandum to be
sent to FBI Headquarters. The report will be finalized and given to
Congress after those criticized in it add their own comments. Pavitt,
as head of the Operations Directorate, has publicly accepted full
responsibility for the agency's failure, but Black has not
acknowledged any deficiencies in his performance. Tenet has not yet
responded.

* * *

There is increasing evidence that the Iraqi police forces, now under
Shi'ite control, are carrying out systematic revenge killings against
Sunnis in Baghdad. The bodies now showing up at the morgue have obvious
signs of handcuffing and blindfolding and evidence of being tortured
before death. U.S. sources indicate that the suspicious killings have
reached the rate of almost 700 per month. The police are supervised by
the Shi'ite-run Ministry of Interior, which claims that the killings
are being carried out by insurgents wearing stolen police uniforms. But
American intelligence sources disagree, noting that many of the killers
appear to be actual policemen carrying the expensive standard-issue
Glock automatics and driving official Toyota Land Cruisers.

_____________________________________________________

Philip Giraldi, a former CIA Officer, is a partner in Cannistraro
Associates.

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
OT: Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran
OT: Colombia Plans to Ease Penalties for Right-Wing Death Squads
OT: U.N. Official Plans to Urge U.S. to Reconsider Its Food Policies
OT: Bush Advisers, With Eye on Dean, Formulate '04 Plans
The Cleric Spoiling U.S. Plans
OT: OPEC Plans Million-Barrel Cut in Output
OT: GOP Plans Votes to Put Democrats on the Spot
Re: NASA Plans To Fly Jet 5,000 MPH
OT: Kerry Plans Early Veep Pick
Re : : Can't Get Your UN Plans through? Infiltrate the Party with the Most Resistance
Hanoi John's Frightening Plans to End the War!! LIBERALS HATE AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re : : Dendrite news - Bush plans to shrink us all
Town (read: Christofascists) angry about plans to open Bad ***** Coffee
OT: More Aggressive Congress Could Hinder Bush's Plans
Bush Social Security Plans A Big Flop
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER