CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES



 Religions > Atheism > CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"
Date: 09 Jun 2005 01:30:45 AM
Object: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES
Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.
It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.
The incident has raised the question in some circles
whether parents have the right to deny their children
blood transfusions that go against their religious
beliefs even when life is at stake. In Korea, children do
not come of age until they reach 20, and parents have
full control until then.
But legal discussions on the issue have been almost
nonexistent since doctors usually go along with the
decision of parents who reject transfusion for a child.
A group of Jehovah's Witnesses hold a service in western
Seoul. [The Korea Herald]
Under existing law, parents who do not provide medical
treatment for their children face up to five years in
prison and 15 million won in fines. However, lawyers and
Jehovah's Witnesses debate whether the law is applicable
since other methods of medical treatment besides blood
transfusions are used.
"I repeatedly suggested transfusions to Yoon and his
parents, but they didn't accept it," his physician, Kim
Jun-hui, at the Inje University Paik Hospital, central
Seoul, said. "I feel sorry because there is a high
possibility that leukemia, when found at an early stage,
can be completely cured with transfusions."
Yoon's leukemia was believed cured in 2003, but it
reoccurred when he was studying in Canada in February.
In many other countries doctors push for treatment which
they think is necessary and the issue has landed before
the courts. For example, a Canadian court last month
ruled doctors could force a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness
to undergo transfusion despite her protests if they
deemed it medically necessary.
There has been only one related ruling in a Korean court.
In 1980 the mother of a 10-year-old girl was imprisoned
for rejecting blood transfusions for her daughter, who
died from intestinal hemorrhaging.
"Even though she is a mother, she does not have rights to
refuse transfusion which a doctor suggested and to lead
her (daughter) to die without getting necessary medical
treatment," the written judgment said.
There are some 90,000 Jehovah's Witness members in Korea
and hospitals estimate there are about 100 cases of
treatment at bloodless medical treatment facilities per
month.
Lawyer Kang Ji-won said the courts should cut across the
parental rights of Jehovah's Witness members in urgent
cases since children can be misled by their parents.
"At their age, their religious belief is easily hammered
(into them) by their parents. It may not be their real
intention," said Kang, a well-known juvenile advocate.
But believers say it is hard to find the third person who
can take responsibility of the child.
"Who's going to take accountability if the child is dead
even after undergoing a transfusion? A doctor? A judge?"
Choi Yong-muk, a Jehovah's Witness who deals with the
faith's medical affairs here, asked rhetorically.
"It is easy to say that a third party should represent
the endangered child, but there is no alternative," said
Choi, president of a high-profile English home schooling
company.
Adherents also say they have obligations to protect their
children not only physically but also spiritually.
"Parents should lead their children in a good direction
when they have little ability to make a decision," said
Im Jong-in, a lawyer who is a believer.
"Let's suppose our child goes through a transfusion. What
if the child grows up and deeply regrets the experience
which contradicts with his belief?"
But many people outside the faith feel the right to live
transcends religious belief.
"In the United States, even religious freedom of minors
is restricted when their life is endangered," said Kim
Chong-suh, a professor of religious studies at Seoul
National University.
Kim Jong-seo, a 25-year-old university student, said,
"(Jehovah's) Witnesses say human rights and their
conscience are precious and thus reject obeying the
draft, but I can't understand why they neglect the right
to live."
Jehovah's Witnesses refuse this nation's mandatory
military service, citing their religious precept that
forbids taking up weapons. Instead, they choose to stay
in jail for more than one year and face disadvantages in
seeking jobs.
Members say not accepting blood transfusions does not
always mean a child is going to die, noting there are
alternatives to transfusions. There is bloodless medical
treatment which takes aggressive steps to stop bleeding
and uses liquid solutions to replace lost blood.
Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."
About 20 hospitals nationwide have bloodless medical
treatment facilities, with patients who are mainly
Jehovah's Witnesses.
The facilities are increasingly popular with the non-
Witness public which wishes to avoid the use of donor
blood to minimize the risk of blood-borne infections,
hospital officials said.
Choi said he obtained signatures from more than 5,000
doctors from general hospitals saying they can perform
surgery without blood transfusions.
Kim Mun-seol, chief doctor at the bloodless surgery
center at Baik Hospital, said, "I will not let my child
have a transfusion. It is no good having another person's
blood." Kim is not a Jehovah's Witness.
But many medical experts say bloodless medical treatment
cannot fully take the place of a transfusion.
"Bloodless transfusion works in some cases, but people
need to undergo surgery with blood transfusion when
they're bleeding to death and in other cases," said
anatomical pathologist Nam Hae-joo, a Catholic. "They
just say it to rationalize their religious precept."
Nam said, however, that what a doctor can do is very
limited and a broad discussion on the pros and cons is
needed.
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/09/200506090037.asp
- - - - - - -
Posted on 6/08/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by Crackingham
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
.

User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 08:28:42 AM
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:neoYA1330oNGyo@ZwoEe...

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.

<snip to>
Well, this sixteen year old is old enough to make his own decisions about
this matter. That said, perhaps you should have asked a Jehovah's Witness
whether or not he thinks of himself as a 'Christian' before you titled the
thread. From their own website, I get the idea that he might not have done
so.
Or rather, that he would have said either they (meaning the rest of
Christendom) is Christian or he was, but not both.
Not that it makes much difference from outside looking in, but I tend to
take the word of the believer as to whether he is Christian or not.
......................................................I'm just sayin'..
.
User: "Sasha"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 08:45:52 AM
One less Christian who will miss the rapture. *Sarcastic chuckle*
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 02:13:26 PM
In article <1118324752.670367.313610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> posted:

One less Christian who will miss the rapture. *Sarcastic chuckle*

Rapture crapture nothing, he may come back as
a blood-sucking vampire in a future birth.
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

.



User: "D-word"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 11:59:16 AM
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.
Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."

Of all the faiths, Witnesses have to be the most ignorant. Progressive
"doctors"...what a concept. They haven't progressed out of the dark
ages. "It's crazy talk, it's crazy I tell you." You can't fight Leukemia
by thumping a bible.
The downside of Darwin's theories here is that while being a Witness is
clearly not a useful adaptation, that alone isn't enough to kill them.
We still need fortuitous circumstance, and not even their own stupidity
can prevent them from spreading their mind-crap to others.
.
User: "Katt"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 03:42:35 PM
"D-word" <yank_ees_suck@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6NCdnSyldOP66DXfRVn-vw@


The downside of Darwin's theories here is that while being a Witness is
clearly not a useful adaptation, that alone isn't enough to kill them. We
still need fortuitous circumstance, and not even their own stupidity can
prevent them from spreading their mind-crap to others.

Ummmm, you are being too pessimistic, mon brave.
Re-read the story.
This one *died at 16*: he *didn't reproduce*.
In Darwinist terms, that's called a *RESULT*....!
Katt.
.
User: "D-word"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 07:13:30 PM
Katt wrote:

"D-word" <yank_ees_suck@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6NCdnSyldOP66DXfRVn-vw@


The downside of Darwin's theories here is that while being a Witness is
clearly not a useful adaptation, that alone isn't enough to kill them. We
still need fortuitous circumstance, and not even their own stupidity can
prevent them from spreading their mind-crap to others.


Ummmm, you are being too pessimistic, mon brave.

Re-read the story.

This one *died at 16*: he *didn't reproduce*.

In Darwinist terms, that's called a *RESULT*....!

Katt.

Darwin's theory suggests that adaptations are the result of genetic
mutation. However, what I find interesting here is there is another
modality playing out, one where nurture alone can lead to useful on
not-so-useful behavior, independent of genetics. Belief-based,
behavioral Darwinism.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 11 Jun 2005 02:35:51 AM
D-word wrote:

Katt wrote:

"D-word" <yank_ees_suck@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6NCdnSyldOP66DXfRVn-vw@


The downside of Darwin's theories here is that while being a Witness is
clearly not a useful adaptation, that alone is n't enough to kill them. We
still need fortuitous circumstance, and not even their own stupidity can
prevent them from spreading their mind-crap to others.


Ummmm, you are being too pessimistic, mon brave.

Re-read the story.

This one *died at 16*: he *didn't reproduce*.

In Darwinist terms, that's called a *RESULT*....!

Katt.




Darwin's theory suggests that adaptations are the result of genetic
mutation.

Well no. Adaptation is the result of natural selection.
However, what I find interesting here is there is another

modality playing out, one where nurture alone can lead to useful on
not-so-useful behavior, independent of genetics. Belief-based,
behavioral Darwinism.

If it isn't genetic it isn't evolution.
.


User: "D-word"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 07:16:04 PM
Katt wrote:

"D-word" <yank_ees_suck@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6NCdnSyldOP66DXfRVn-vw@


The downside of Darwin's theories here is that while being a Witness is
clearly not a useful adaptation, that alone isn't enough to kill them. We
still need fortuitous circumstance, and not even their own stupidity can
prevent them from spreading their mind-crap to others.


Ummmm, you are being too pessimistic, mon brave.

Re-read the story.

This one *died at 16*: he *didn't reproduce*.

In Darwinist terms, that's called a *RESULT*....!

Katt.

Darwin's theory suggests that adaptations are the result of genetic
mutation. However, what I find interesting here is there is another
modality playing out, one where nurture alone can lead to useful on
not-so-useful behavior, independent of genetics. Belief-based,
behavioral Darwinism.
.
User: "Katt"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 10:30:29 PM
"D-word" <yank_ees_suck@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118448964.598647.274130@g47g2000cwa.


Darwin's theory suggests that adaptations are the result of genetic
mutation. However, what I find interesting here is there is another
modality playing out, one where nurture alone can lead to useful on
not-so-useful behavior, independent of genetics. Belief-based,
behavioral Darwinism.

Yes! Genes have a 'psychological analogue' in the form of what are now
called 'memes' (ideas which are replicators). In other words, any idea (or
theory, or attitude, or skill etc.) which is passed from one person to
another through behaviour (i.e. not by genes) is a meme. Feel free to have a
look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memes if you've not come across this
before!
Katt.
.




User: "harmony"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 09:36:45 AM
don't kirastanis drink blood of christ every day?
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:neoYA1330oNGyo@ZwoEe...

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.

The incident has raised the question in some circles
whether parents have the right to deny their children
blood transfusions that go against their religious
beliefs even when life is at stake. In Korea, children do
not come of age until they reach 20, and parents have
full control until then.

But legal discussions on the issue have been almost
nonexistent since doctors usually go along with the
decision of parents who reject transfusion for a child.

A group of Jehovah's Witnesses hold a service in western
Seoul. [The Korea Herald]

Under existing law, parents who do not provide medical
treatment for their children face up to five years in
prison and 15 million won in fines. However, lawyers and
Jehovah's Witnesses debate whether the law is applicable
since other methods of medical treatment besides blood
transfusions are used.

"I repeatedly suggested transfusions to Yoon and his
parents, but they didn't accept it," his physician, Kim
Jun-hui, at the Inje University Paik Hospital, central
Seoul, said. "I feel sorry because there is a high
possibility that leukemia, when found at an early stage,
can be completely cured with transfusions."

Yoon's leukemia was believed cured in 2003, but it
reoccurred when he was studying in Canada in February.

In many other countries doctors push for treatment which
they think is necessary and the issue has landed before
the courts. For example, a Canadian court last month
ruled doctors could force a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness
to undergo transfusion despite her protests if they
deemed it medically necessary.

There has been only one related ruling in a Korean court.
In 1980 the mother of a 10-year-old girl was imprisoned
for rejecting blood transfusions for her daughter, who
died from intestinal hemorrhaging.

"Even though she is a mother, she does not have rights to
refuse transfusion which a doctor suggested and to lead
her (daughter) to die without getting necessary medical
treatment," the written judgment said.

There are some 90,000 Jehovah's Witness members in Korea
and hospitals estimate there are about 100 cases of
treatment at bloodless medical treatment facilities per
month.

Lawyer Kang Ji-won said the courts should cut across the
parental rights of Jehovah's Witness members in urgent
cases since children can be misled by their parents.

"At their age, their religious belief is easily hammered
(into them) by their parents. It may not be their real
intention," said Kang, a well-known juvenile advocate.

But believers say it is hard to find the third person who
can take responsibility of the child.

"Who's going to take accountability if the child is dead
even after undergoing a transfusion? A doctor? A judge?"
Choi Yong-muk, a Jehovah's Witness who deals with the
faith's medical affairs here, asked rhetorically.

"It is easy to say that a third party should represent
the endangered child, but there is no alternative," said
Choi, president of a high-profile English home schooling
company.

Adherents also say they have obligations to protect their
children not only physically but also spiritually.

"Parents should lead their children in a good direction
when they have little ability to make a decision," said
Im Jong-in, a lawyer who is a believer.

"Let's suppose our child goes through a transfusion. What
if the child grows up and deeply regrets the experience
which contradicts with his belief?"

But many people outside the faith feel the right to live
transcends religious belief.

"In the United States, even religious freedom of minors
is restricted when their life is endangered," said Kim
Chong-suh, a professor of religious studies at Seoul
National University.

Kim Jong-seo, a 25-year-old university student, said,
"(Jehovah's) Witnesses say human rights and their
conscience are precious and thus reject obeying the
draft, but I can't understand why they neglect the right
to live."

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse this nation's mandatory
military service, citing their religious precept that
forbids taking up weapons. Instead, they choose to stay
in jail for more than one year and face disadvantages in
seeking jobs.

Members say not accepting blood transfusions does not
always mean a child is going to die, noting there are
alternatives to transfusions. There is bloodless medical
treatment which takes aggressive steps to stop bleeding
and uses liquid solutions to replace lost blood.

Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."

About 20 hospitals nationwide have bloodless medical
treatment facilities, with patients who are mainly
Jehovah's Witnesses.

The facilities are increasingly popular with the non-
Witness public which wishes to avoid the use of donor
blood to minimize the risk of blood-borne infections,
hospital officials said.

Choi said he obtained signatures from more than 5,000
doctors from general hospitals saying they can perform
surgery without blood transfusions.

Kim Mun-seol, chief doctor at the bloodless surgery
center at Baik Hospital, said, "I will not let my child
have a transfusion. It is no good having another person's
blood." Kim is not a Jehovah's Witness.

But many medical experts say bloodless medical treatment
cannot fully take the place of a transfusion.

"Bloodless transfusion works in some cases, but people
need to undergo surgery with blood transfusion when
they're bleeding to death and in other cases," said
anatomical pathologist Nam Hae-joo, a Catholic. "They
just say it to rationalize their religious precept."

Nam said, however, that what a doctor can do is very
limited and a broad discussion on the pros and cons is
needed.


http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/09/200506090037.asp


- - - - - - -

Posted on 6/08/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by Crackingham

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 02:11:35 PM
Don't they do so in their churches -- in the form
of rotting juice of grapes?
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <TnYpe.7617$oK.4567@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:


don't kirastanis drink blood of christ every day?


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.

The incident has raised the question in some circles
whether parents have the right to deny their children
blood transfusions that go against their religious
beliefs even when life is at stake. In Korea, children do
not come of age until they reach 20, and parents have
full control until then.

But legal discussions on the issue have been almost
nonexistent since doctors usually go along with the
decision of parents who reject transfusion for a child.

A group of Jehovah's Witnesses hold a service in western
Seoul. [The Korea Herald]

Under existing law, parents who do not provide medical
treatment for their children face up to five years in
prison and 15 million won in fines. However, lawyers and
Jehovah's Witnesses debate whether the law is applicable
since other methods of medical treatment besides blood
transfusions are used.

"I repeatedly suggested transfusions to Yoon and his
parents, but they didn't accept it," his physician, Kim
Jun-hui, at the Inje University Paik Hospital, central
Seoul, said. "I feel sorry because there is a high
possibility that leukemia, when found at an early stage,
can be completely cured with transfusions."

Yoon's leukemia was believed cured in 2003, but it
reoccurred when he was studying in Canada in February.

In many other countries doctors push for treatment which
they think is necessary and the issue has landed before
the courts. For example, a Canadian court last month
ruled doctors could force a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness
to undergo transfusion despite her protests if they
deemed it medically necessary.

There has been only one related ruling in a Korean court.
In 1980 the mother of a 10-year-old girl was imprisoned
for rejecting blood transfusions for her daughter, who
died from intestinal hemorrhaging.

"Even though she is a mother, she does not have rights to
refuse transfusion which a doctor suggested and to lead
her (daughter) to die without getting necessary medical
treatment," the written judgment said.

There are some 90,000 Jehovah's Witness members in Korea
and hospitals estimate there are about 100 cases of
treatment at bloodless medical treatment facilities per
month.

Lawyer Kang Ji-won said the courts should cut across the
parental rights of Jehovah's Witness members in urgent
cases since children can be misled by their parents.

"At their age, their religious belief is easily hammered
(into them) by their parents. It may not be their real
intention," said Kang, a well-known juvenile advocate.

But believers say it is hard to find the third person who
can take responsibility of the child.

"Who's going to take accountability if the child is dead
even after undergoing a transfusion? A doctor? A judge?"
Choi Yong-muk, a Jehovah's Witness who deals with the
faith's medical affairs here, asked rhetorically.

"It is easy to say that a third party should represent
the endangered child, but there is no alternative," said
Choi, president of a high-profile English home schooling
company.

Adherents also say they have obligations to protect their
children not only physically but also spiritually.

"Parents should lead their children in a good direction
when they have little ability to make a decision," said
Im Jong-in, a lawyer who is a believer.

"Let's suppose our child goes through a transfusion. What
if the child grows up and deeply regrets the experience
which contradicts with his belief?"

But many people outside the faith feel the right to live
transcends religious belief.

"In the United States, even religious freedom of minors
is restricted when their life is endangered," said Kim
Chong-suh, a professor of religious studies at Seoul
National University.

Kim Jong-seo, a 25-year-old university student, said,
"(Jehovah's) Witnesses say human rights and their
conscience are precious and thus reject obeying the
draft, but I can't understand why they neglect the right
to live."

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse this nation's mandatory
military service, citing their religious precept that
forbids taking up weapons. Instead, they choose to stay
in jail for more than one year and face disadvantages in
seeking jobs.

Members say not accepting blood transfusions does not
always mean a child is going to die, noting there are
alternatives to transfusions. There is bloodless medical
treatment which takes aggressive steps to stop bleeding
and uses liquid solutions to replace lost blood.

Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."

About 20 hospitals nationwide have bloodless medical
treatment facilities, with patients who are mainly
Jehovah's Witnesses.

The facilities are increasingly popular with the non-
Witness public which wishes to avoid the use of donor
blood to minimize the risk of blood-borne infections,
hospital officials said.

Choi said he obtained signatures from more than 5,000
doctors from general hospitals saying they can perform
surgery without blood transfusions.

Kim Mun-seol, chief doctor at the bloodless surgery
center at Baik Hospital, said, "I will not let my child
have a transfusion. It is no good having another person's
blood." Kim is not a Jehovah's Witness.

But many medical experts say bloodless medical treatment
cannot fully take the place of a transfusion.

"Bloodless transfusion works in some cases, but people
need to undergo surgery with blood transfusion when
they're bleeding to death and in other cases," said
anatomical pathologist Nam Hae-joo, a Catholic. "They
just say it to rationalize their religious precept."

Nam said, however, that what a doctor can do is very
limited and a broad discussion on the pros and cons is
needed.


http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/09/200506090037.asp


- - - - - - -

Posted on 6/08/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by Crackingham

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.



.
User: ""

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 06:17:10 AM
Christian's take communion together. It is a shared representation of
Christ's life and sacrifice on the cross for us, a representation of
the living example for our daily lives. It strengthens our faith,
healing, hope and love for each other, and it helps to keep us
spiritually alive in Him.
"I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of
this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is
my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. This is the
bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and
not die." KJ John 6:50-51
"When the hour had come, He sat down, and the twelve apostles with Him.
Then He said to them, "With fervent desire I have desired to eat this
Passover with you before I suffer; Then He took the cup, and gave
thanks, and said, "Take this and divide it among yourselves; for I say
to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of
God comes."And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to
them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in
remembrance of Me." Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying,
"This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you. "
Luke 22:15-20
Look to your lips and thoughts, all of you, there are men who feast and
dine daily on the words of those with evil thoughts in their hearts.
These people will bring about your destruction if you try to lead them
as their god because your thoughts are not leaning towards goodness,
but The Word of God will continue to reign over this earth and bring
men to righteousness.
Sinners will still seek their saviour's light and they will be driven
to the Lord God in sorrow and shame of themselves by the thoughts and
deeds of those who sought power for themselves.
Could you drink from the Christ's cup, do you know His wisdom to bring
about His sacrifice for us? Is your heart, mind and soul strengthened
in the love of God through salvation?
In Christ's love
Carol T
.
User: "skyeyes"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 01:48:47 PM
wrote:
<Snip canned sermon>
Proseltyzing on alt.atheism is contrary to our charter. Please cease
and desist posting this crap to our news group.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
.


User: "harmony"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 09 Jun 2005 10:41:10 PM
yeah. frankly i don't get it. they receive daily transfusion of blood in
church (which is not licensed to practise medicine), and refuse it in
hospital (which is licensed).
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:MAerO4122oMLzo@YfuIn...

Don't they do so in their churches -- in the form
of rotting juice of grapes?

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

In article <TnYpe.7617$oK.4567@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:


don't kirastanis drink blood of christ every day?


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.

The incident has raised the question in some circles
whether parents have the right to deny their children
blood transfusions that go against their religious
beliefs even when life is at stake. In Korea, children do
not come of age until they reach 20, and parents have
full control until then.

But legal discussions on the issue have been almost
nonexistent since doctors usually go along with the
decision of parents who reject transfusion for a child.

A group of Jehovah's Witnesses hold a service in western
Seoul. [The Korea Herald]

Under existing law, parents who do not provide medical
treatment for their children face up to five years in
prison and 15 million won in fines. However, lawyers and
Jehovah's Witnesses debate whether the law is applicable
since other methods of medical treatment besides blood
transfusions are used.

"I repeatedly suggested transfusions to Yoon and his
parents, but they didn't accept it," his physician, Kim
Jun-hui, at the Inje University Paik Hospital, central
Seoul, said. "I feel sorry because there is a high
possibility that leukemia, when found at an early stage,
can be completely cured with transfusions."

Yoon's leukemia was believed cured in 2003, but it
reoccurred when he was studying in Canada in February.

In many other countries doctors push for treatment which
they think is necessary and the issue has landed before
the courts. For example, a Canadian court last month
ruled doctors could force a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness
to undergo transfusion despite her protests if they
deemed it medically necessary.

There has been only one related ruling in a Korean court.
In 1980 the mother of a 10-year-old girl was imprisoned
for rejecting blood transfusions for her daughter, who
died from intestinal hemorrhaging.

"Even though she is a mother, she does not have rights to
refuse transfusion which a doctor suggested and to lead
her (daughter) to die without getting necessary medical
treatment," the written judgment said.

There are some 90,000 Jehovah's Witness members in Korea
and hospitals estimate there are about 100 cases of
treatment at bloodless medical treatment facilities per
month.

Lawyer Kang Ji-won said the courts should cut across the
parental rights of Jehovah's Witness members in urgent
cases since children can be misled by their parents.

"At their age, their religious belief is easily hammered
(into them) by their parents. It may not be their real
intention," said Kang, a well-known juvenile advocate.

But believers say it is hard to find the third person who
can take responsibility of the child.

"Who's going to take accountability if the child is dead
even after undergoing a transfusion? A doctor? A judge?"
Choi Yong-muk, a Jehovah's Witness who deals with the
faith's medical affairs here, asked rhetorically.

"It is easy to say that a third party should represent
the endangered child, but there is no alternative," said
Choi, president of a high-profile English home schooling
company.

Adherents also say they have obligations to protect their
children not only physically but also spiritually.

"Parents should lead their children in a good direction
when they have little ability to make a decision," said
Im Jong-in, a lawyer who is a believer.

"Let's suppose our child goes through a transfusion. What
if the child grows up and deeply regrets the experience
which contradicts with his belief?"

But many people outside the faith feel the right to live
transcends religious belief.

"In the United States, even religious freedom of minors
is restricted when their life is endangered," said Kim
Chong-suh, a professor of religious studies at Seoul
National University.

Kim Jong-seo, a 25-year-old university student, said,
"(Jehovah's) Witnesses say human rights and their
conscience are precious and thus reject obeying the
draft, but I can't understand why they neglect the right
to live."

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse this nation's mandatory
military service, citing their religious precept that
forbids taking up weapons. Instead, they choose to stay
in jail for more than one year and face disadvantages in
seeking jobs.

Members say not accepting blood transfusions does not
always mean a child is going to die, noting there are
alternatives to transfusions. There is bloodless medical
treatment which takes aggressive steps to stop bleeding
and uses liquid solutions to replace lost blood.

Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."

About 20 hospitals nationwide have bloodless medical
treatment facilities, with patients who are mainly
Jehovah's Witnesses.

The facilities are increasingly popular with the non-
Witness public which wishes to avoid the use of donor
blood to minimize the risk of blood-borne infections,
hospital officials said.

Choi said he obtained signatures from more than 5,000
doctors from general hospitals saying they can perform
surgery without blood transfusions.

Kim Mun-seol, chief doctor at the bloodless surgery
center at Baik Hospital, said, "I will not let my child
have a transfusion. It is no good having another person's
blood." Kim is not a Jehovah's Witness.

But many medical experts say bloodless medical treatment
cannot fully take the place of a transfusion.

"Bloodless transfusion works in some cases, but people
need to undergo surgery with blood transfusion when
they're bleeding to death and in other cases," said
anatomical pathologist Nam Hae-joo, a Catholic. "They
just say it to rationalize their religious precept."

Nam said, however, that what a doctor can do is very
limited and a broad discussion on the pros and cons is
needed.



http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/09/200506090037.asp


- - - - - - -

Posted on 6/08/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by Crackingham

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so

send

peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and

the

daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her

mother in

law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post

may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of

the

poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption

for

fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by

others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use

of

which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the

copyright

owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is

believed

that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance

with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed

without

profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes

by

subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes

of

your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from

the

copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.



.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 01:30:54 PM
Reject Christianity.
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <hT7qe.8990$oK.8342@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:

yeah. frankly i don't get it. they receive daily transfusion of blood in
church (which is not licensed to practise medicine), and refuse it in
hospital (which is licensed).


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

Don't they do so in their churches -- in the form
of rotting juice of grapes?

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

In article <TnYpe.7617$oK.4567@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:


don't kirastanis drink blood of christ every day?


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

Does religous belief transcend life?

By Jin Hyun-joo
The Korea Herald
Wednesday, June 8, 2005

A 16-year-old male student, identified only by his family
name Yoon, died of leukemia in April while refusing a
blood transfusion that possibly could have saved his
life.

It's not the first case of its kind nor the last because
Yoon was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith which
follows strict beliefs that blood should not be misused
or tampered with under any circumstances.

The incident has raised the question in some circles
whether parents have the right to deny their children
blood transfusions that go against their religious
beliefs even when life is at stake. In Korea, children do
not come of age until they reach 20, and parents have
full control until then.

But legal discussions on the issue have been almost
nonexistent since doctors usually go along with the
decision of parents who reject transfusion for a child.

A group of Jehovah's Witnesses hold a service in western
Seoul. [The Korea Herald]

Under existing law, parents who do not provide medical
treatment for their children face up to five years in
prison and 15 million won in fines. However, lawyers and
Jehovah's Witnesses debate whether the law is applicable
since other methods of medical treatment besides blood
transfusions are used.

"I repeatedly suggested transfusions to Yoon and his
parents, but they didn't accept it," his physician, Kim
Jun-hui, at the Inje University Paik Hospital, central
Seoul, said. "I feel sorry because there is a high
possibility that leukemia, when found at an early stage,
can be completely cured with transfusions."

Yoon's leukemia was believed cured in 2003, but it
reoccurred when he was studying in Canada in February.

In many other countries doctors push for treatment which
they think is necessary and the issue has landed before
the courts. For example, a Canadian court last month
ruled doctors could force a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness
to undergo transfusion despite her protests if they
deemed it medically necessary.

There has been only one related ruling in a Korean court.
In 1980 the mother of a 10-year-old girl was imprisoned
for rejecting blood transfusions for her daughter, who
died from intestinal hemorrhaging.

"Even though she is a mother, she does not have rights to
refuse transfusion which a doctor suggested and to lead
her (daughter) to die without getting necessary medical
treatment," the written judgment said.

There are some 90,000 Jehovah's Witness members in Korea
and hospitals estimate there are about 100 cases of
treatment at bloodless medical treatment facilities per
month.

Lawyer Kang Ji-won said the courts should cut across the
parental rights of Jehovah's Witness members in urgent
cases since children can be misled by their parents.

"At their age, their religious belief is easily hammered
(into them) by their parents. It may not be their real
intention," said Kang, a well-known juvenile advocate.

But believers say it is hard to find the third person who
can take responsibility of the child.

"Who's going to take accountability if the child is dead
even after undergoing a transfusion? A doctor? A judge?"
Choi Yong-muk, a Jehovah's Witness who deals with the
faith's medical affairs here, asked rhetorically.

"It is easy to say that a third party should represent
the endangered child, but there is no alternative," said
Choi, president of a high-profile English home schooling
company.

Adherents also say they have obligations to protect their
children not only physically but also spiritually.

"Parents should lead their children in a good direction
when they have little ability to make a decision," said
Im Jong-in, a lawyer who is a believer.

"Let's suppose our child goes through a transfusion. What
if the child grows up and deeply regrets the experience
which contradicts with his belief?"

But many people outside the faith feel the right to live
transcends religious belief.

"In the United States, even religious freedom of minors
is restricted when their life is endangered," said Kim
Chong-suh, a professor of religious studies at Seoul
National University.

Kim Jong-seo, a 25-year-old university student, said,
"(Jehovah's) Witnesses say human rights and their
conscience are precious and thus reject obeying the
draft, but I can't understand why they neglect the right
to live."

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse this nation's mandatory
military service, citing their religious precept that
forbids taking up weapons. Instead, they choose to stay
in jail for more than one year and face disadvantages in
seeking jobs.

Members say not accepting blood transfusions does not
always mean a child is going to die, noting there are
alternatives to transfusions. There is bloodless medical
treatment which takes aggressive steps to stop bleeding
and uses liquid solutions to replace lost blood.

Choi cited medical journals which demonstrate bloodless
treatments are effective. "People think we're fanatic
because we refuse transfusion. Some even think we lead
our children to die a martyr's death. But in the eyes of
progressive doctors, transfusion is a crazy thing."

About 20 hospitals nationwide have bloodless medical
treatment facilities, with patients who are mainly
Jehovah's Witnesses.

The facilities are increasingly popular with the non-
Witness public which wishes to avoid the use of donor
blood to minimize the risk of blood-borne infections,
hospital officials said.

Choi said he obtained signatures from more than 5,000
doctors from general hospitals saying they can perform
surgery without blood transfusions.

Kim Mun-seol, chief doctor at the bloodless surgery
center at Baik Hospital, said, "I will not let my child
have a transfusion. It is no good having another person's
blood." Kim is not a Jehovah's Witness.

But many medical experts say bloodless medical treatment
cannot fully take the place of a transfusion.

"Bloodless transfusion works in some cases, but people
need to undergo surgery with blood transfusion when
they're bleeding to death and in other cases," said
anatomical pathologist Nam Hae-joo, a Catholic. "They
just say it to rationalize their religious precept."

Nam said, however, that what a doctor can do is very
limited and a broad discussion on the pros and cons is
needed.



http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/09/200506090037.asp


- - - - - - -

Posted on 6/08/2005 10:19:11 PM PDT by Crackingham

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so

send

peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and

the

daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her

mother in

law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post

may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of

the

poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption

for

fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by

others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use

of

which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the

copyright

owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is

believed

that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance

with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed

without

profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes

by

subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes

of

your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from

the

copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.





.
User: "iceman"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 01:47:13 PM
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:

Reject Christianity.

This is pretty funny, coming from a toad licker like you.
Village marries off toads in bid for rains
Mon Jun 6, 9:23 AM ET
Two giants toads were married in a traditional Hindu ceremony in
eastern
India at the weekend by villagers hoping to propitiate the rain gods
and end
a dry spell.
Some 400 people cheered and blew conches as women put streaks of
vermilion
on the female toad's head while a band played music and priests
solemnized
the marriage to the chanting of Hindu hymns.
The toads were picked up from separate ponds, dressed in bright red
clothes
and brought to the marriage venue in a decorated palanquin in
Khochakandar
village in West Bengal state late Sunday.
The married toads were released into a pond after the ceremony in the
village about 365 km (225 miles) north of the state capital, Calcutta.
"Our forefathers used to organize marriages of toads to get sufficient
rain
for cultivation. We hope rain will be coming very soon," said Konica
Mandal,
one of the organizers of the wedding.
The village has been reeling under a severe heat wave with temperatures
touching 44 degrees Celsius, drying up ponds and creating problems for
farmers and their crops.
The southwest monsoon hit India's southern coast Sunday, about four
days
later than normal, but it will be some time before the rains wind their
way
to the rest of the country.
A heat wave sweeping India, Bangladesh and Nepal has killed nearly 100
people over the past two weeks.
.
User: "wcb"

Title: Re: CHRISTIAN REFUSES BLOOD TRANSFUSION, DIES 10 Jun 2005 05:22:12 PM
iceman wrote:



Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:

Reject Christianity.



This is pretty funny, coming from a toad licker like you.

Village marries off toads in bid for rains
Mon Jun 6, 9:23 AM ET


Two giants toads were married in a traditional Hindu ceremony in
eastern
India at the weekend by villagers hoping to propitiate the rain gods
and end
a dry spell.

Makes a good break from Tom "Space Cooty" Cruise and
Katy Holmes. Hopefully the rain bit works out.
The toads are probably smarter too.


Some 400 people cheered and blew conches as women put streaks of
vermilion
on the female toad's head while a band played music and priests
solemnized
the marriage to the chanting of Hindu hymns.


The toads were picked up from separate ponds, dressed in bright red
clothes
and brought to the marriage venue in a decorated palanquin in
Khochakandar
village in West Bengal state late Sunday.


The married toads were released into a pond after the ceremony in the
village about 365 km (225 miles) north of the state capital, Calcutta.


"Our forefathers used to organize marriages of toads to get sufficient
rain
for cultivation. We hope rain will be coming very soon," said Konica
Mandal,
one of the organizers of the wedding.


The village has been reeling under a severe heat wave with temperatures

touching 44 degrees Celsius, drying up ponds and creating problems for
farmers and their crops.


The southwest monsoon hit India's southern coast Sunday, about four
days
later than normal, but it will be some time before the rains wind their
way
to the rest of the country.


A heat wave sweeping India, Bangladesh and Nepal has killed nearly 100
people over the past two weeks.

--
When I shake my killfile, I can hear them buzzing!
Cheerful Charlie
.







  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
UK: Jehovah's Witness mother dies after refusing blood transfusion
Re: Teen Girl Refuses Blood Transfusion
Hospital Save JW Baby's Life With Blood Transfusion (Jehovah Witless, a Death Cult)
Boy dies after refusing transfusion over religion
Re: Ruling sought on transfusion for baby of Jehovah's Witness
Jabriol JW Intellect: JW Dies Due To Refusal to Accept Transfusion
People don't choose their blood group
[OT] First "blood for oil", now it's "bleed the public"
FL: Homosexual 'Partiers' Bound Young Victims, Injected Them WithTainted Blood
Re: [FICTION] Blood of Heroes, Part I
Pundits have blood feast on shrubco
OT: Colombia's oil pipeline is paid for in blood and dollars
The blood of the virgin birth and of the power in the name of Jesus Christ
News: Is blood donation info too explicit?
Bring me the blood of a young virgin
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER