| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
25 Feb 2006 01:15:34 PM |
| Object: |
Christian Taliban hate |
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200602\CUL20060223b..html
A Christian hate cult that calls themselves "Family Research Counsil"
told the fascist regime to remove factual information about HIV from
a government web site -- which the Christian Taliban did.
Isn't Christianity lovely?
---
George W. Bush _is_ a Christian. Get over it!
.
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
27 Feb 2006 10:29:46 PM |
|
|
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORG> wrote in message
news:1201b06q4nqqnfb@corp.supernews.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200602\CUL20060223b..html
A Christian hate cult that calls themselves "Family Research Counsil"
told the fascist regime to remove factual information about HIV from
a government web site -- which the Christian Taliban did.
Isn't Christianity lovely?
Isn't the left wing culture of death, which gives us abortion, AIDS and
euthanasia, lovely?
.
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
28 Feb 2006 05:55:13 AM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:5lQMf.48$ld2.30@fed1read11...
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Bwahahaaaa.......... you're fucking looney!!!!
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORG> wrote in message
news:1201b06q4nqqnfb@corp.supernews.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200602\CUL20060223b..html
A Christian hate cult that calls themselves "Family Research Counsil"
told the fascist regime to remove factual information about HIV from
a government web site -- which the Christian Taliban did.
Isn't Christianity lovely?
Isn't the left wing culture of death, which gives us abortion, AIDS and
euthanasia, lovely?
The "culture of death" is the Reich wing Nazi fanatics - such as you and
your deranged "Family Research Council".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
05 Mar 2006 08:32:11 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: "Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com>
Date written: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700
MsgID:<5lQMf.48$ld2.30@fed1read11>
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Where does the Bible say that reusing needles is immoral behavior? Most victims
of AIDs are the poor and uneducated people of Africa. They are getting AIDs due
to unsanitary needles for flu shots, vaccinations, etc. They can't afford
sanitary needles. I'm sure some of the dead among them called themselves
Christian.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
"Little minds are interested in the extraordinary; great
minds in the commonplace"
-- Elbert Hubbard, ROYCROFT DICTIONARY AND BOOK OF EPIGRAMS
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
05 Mar 2006 09:45:30 PM |
|
|
"The_Sage" <The_Sage@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2k7n02dek2ajgj7uhuvclvlsd6e8411g51@4ax.com...
Reply to article by: "Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com>
Date written: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700
MsgID:<5lQMf.48$ld2.30@fed1read11>
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Where does the Bible say that reusing needles is immoral behavior? Most
victims
of AIDs are the poor and uneducated people of Africa. They are getting
AIDs due
to unsanitary needles for flu shots, vaccinations, etc. They can't
afford
sanitary needles. I'm sure some of the dead among them called themselves
Christian.
I made it very clear several times in my posts that I was talking about
the United States.
However, even in Africa AIDS was originally spread via promiscuous sexual
contact. The spread via needle use is the kind of tragic misfortune that
happens when others commit evil acts. There are almost always innocent
victims. That's one of the great theological problems.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
06 Mar 2006 07:58:32 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: "Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com>
Date written: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:45:30 -0700
MsgID:<BfOOf.1066$ld2.438@fed1read11>
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Where does the Bible say that reusing needles is immoral behavior? Most victims
of AIDs are the poor and uneducated people of Africa. They are getting AIDs due
to unsanitary needles for flu shots, vaccinations, etc. They can't afford
sanitary needles. I'm sure some of the dead among them called themselves
Christian.
I made it very clear several times in my posts that I was talking about
the United States.
Then you have nothing to say about it, since AIDs is not just a problem for the
United States and a large number of those caught AIDs because their parents had
AIDs or they caught it from dirty meth/heroin needles.
However, even in Africa AIDS was originally spread via promiscuous sexual
contact.
That's a lie.
The spread via needle use is the kind of tragic misfortune that
happens when others commit evil acts. There are almost always innocent
victims. That's one of the great theological problems.
There is no problem of why would God would allow thousands to die in Africa for
everyone that dies in the United States. It just proves that your God is dead.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
"Little minds are interested in the extraordinary; great
minds in the commonplace"
-- Elbert Hubbard, ROYCROFT DICTIONARY AND BOOK OF EPIGRAMS
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
06 Mar 2006 12:39:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:45:30 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"The_Sage" <The_Sage@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2k7n02dek2ajgj7uhuvclvlsd6e8411g51@4ax.com...
Reply to article by: "Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com>
Date written: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700
MsgID:<5lQMf.48$ld2.30@fed1read11>
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS. Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Where does the Bible say that reusing needles is immoral behavior? Most
victims
of AIDs are the poor and uneducated people of Africa. They are getting
AIDs due
to unsanitary needles for flu shots, vaccinations, etc. They can't
afford
sanitary needles. I'm sure some of the dead among them called themselves
Christian.
I made it very clear several times in my posts that I was talking about
the United States.
However, even in Africa AIDS was originally spread via promiscuous sexual
contact. The spread via needle use is the kind of tragic misfortune that
happens when others commit evil acts.
You must be talking about Christian groups that do their best to
prevent the distribution of accurate information about preventing
infection. I agree they are evil.
There are almost always innocent
victims. That's one of the great theological problems.
Only for the believers, and many of them do not seem disturbed by
their god's immorality; probably because he is a projection of their
own lack of morality.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
28 Feb 2006 01:27:40 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
28 Feb 2006 09:20:51 PM |
|
|
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who thinks sex
education works.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
01 Mar 2006 01:15:35 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:51 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who thinks sex
education works.
Thank you.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
It is? Is that what you talked about at the last meeting?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
02 Mar 2006 12:12:16 AM |
|
|
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:t7sb02hj2vba51vblv9rof3plhfmbs0ig4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:51 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in
the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who thinks
sex
education works.
Thank you.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
It is? Is that what you talked about at the last meeting?
That's what YOU said when YOU said, "Sexual intimacy is not immoral."
I disagree. Any sexual intimacy with a child is immoral. Any sexual
intimacy with someone of the same sex is immoral. Any sexual intimacy
with a person married to someone other than you is immoral. And sexual
intercourse with someone other than your spouse is immoral. So, lots of
sexual intimacy is immoral.
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
02 Mar 2006 01:47:41 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:12:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:t7sb02hj2vba51vblv9rof3plhfmbs0ig4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:51 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in
the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who thinks
sex
education works.
Thank you.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
It is? Is that what you talked about at the last meeting?
That's what YOU said when YOU said, "Sexual intimacy is not immoral."
Yes I did. It is not. The examples you give below do not show it to
be immoral any more than obesity shows eating to be immoral.
I disagree. Any sexual intimacy with a child is immoral.
Obviously child abuse is wrong. That does not make sexual intimacy
itself immoral.
Any sexual
intimacy with someone of the same sex is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
Any sexual intimacy
with a person married to someone other than you is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
And sexual
intercourse with someone other than your spouse is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
So, lots of
sexual intimacy is immoral.
There is nothing inherently wrong with sexual intimacy, just as there
is nothing inherently wrong with eating.
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
Nonsense.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
03 Mar 2006 06:00:28 AM |
|
|
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:108d02d8c4sgnqmao5885ocda57i8t1mcj@4ax.com...
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:12:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:t7sb02hj2vba51vblv9rof3plhfmbs0ig4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:51 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in
the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who
thinks
sex
education works.
Thank you.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual
intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
It is? Is that what you talked about at the last meeting?
That's what YOU said when YOU said, "Sexual intimacy is not immoral."
Yes I did. It is not. The examples you give below do not show it to
be immoral any more than obesity shows eating to be immoral.
I disagree. Any sexual intimacy with a child is immoral.
Obviously child abuse is wrong. That does not make sexual intimacy
itself immoral.
Any sexual
intimacy with someone of the same sex is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
Any sexual intimacy
with a person married to someone other than you is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
And sexual
intercourse with someone other than your spouse is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
So, lots of
sexual intimacy is immoral.
There is nothing inherently wrong with sexual intimacy, just as there
is nothing inherently wrong with eating.
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
Nonsense.
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity? In
fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they not so
outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of them in the
U.S.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
03 Mar 2006 06:15:37 AM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
In fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they
not so outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of
them in the U.S.
The sexual vector is only one vector for the spreading of the HIV
virus that often causes the disease AIDS. Other important vectors are
transfer during pregnancy, blood transfusions, sharing of needles and
so on.
--
Ichimusai http://ichimusai.org/ AA #769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo: Ichimusai
MSN: Ichimusai1972 AOL: Ichimusai1972 IRC: Ichimusai@IRCNet
AI is definitely artificial, but not very intelligent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
04 Mar 2006 04:26:16 PM |
|
|
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhzlo5y.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
In fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they
not so outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of
them in the U.S.
The sexual vector is only one vector for the spreading of the HIV
virus that often causes the disease AIDS. Other important vectors are
transfer during pregnancy, blood transfusions, sharing of needles and
so on.
AIDS is an STD. Although it can be spread other ways, nothing I have ever
read (I spent a fair time at the med school library in the early 80s)
suggested anything other than a sexually transmitted origin. Only after
it became sufficiently prevalent in the population could other vectors
spread it. That's why it started among homosexuals in this country (it
was originally called "GRID" - Gay Related Immune Disease, until political
correctness took over) and only appeared in other groups later. It is
still predominantly a homosexual disease (again, in the U.S.).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
05 Mar 2006 01:12:54 PM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhzlo5y.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
In fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they
not so outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of
them in the U.S.
The sexual vector is only one vector for the spreading of the HIV
virus that often causes the disease AIDS. Other important vectors are
transfer during pregnancy, blood transfusions, sharing of needles and
so on.
AIDS is an STD. Although it can be spread other ways, nothing I have ever
read (I spent a fair time at the med school library in the early
80s)
I think you should try a better library.
suggested anything other than a sexually transmitted origin. Only
after it became sufficiently prevalent in the population could other
vectors spread it. That's why it started among homosexuals in this
country (it was originally called "GRID" - Gay Related Immune
Disease, until political correctness took over) and only appeared in
other groups later. It is still predominantly a homosexual disease
(again, in the U.S.).
But HIV did not originate in the US and most people that suffers from
HIV infection or developed AIDS is _not_ living in the US either. You
are arguing a special case.
--
Ichimusai http://ichimusai.org/ AA #769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo: Ichimusai
MSN: Ichimusai1972 AOL: Ichimusai1972 IRC: Ichimusai@IRCNet
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum
(Don't let the bastards grind you down)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
04 Mar 2006 07:03:15 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 15:26:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhzlo5y.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
In fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they
not so outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of
them in the U.S.
The sexual vector is only one vector for the spreading of the HIV
virus that often causes the disease AIDS. Other important vectors are
transfer during pregnancy, blood transfusions, sharing of needles and
so on.
AIDS is an STD. Although it can be spread other ways, nothing I have ever
read (I spent a fair time at the med school library in the early 80s)
suggested anything other than a sexually transmitted origin.
In that case you read very little.
Only after
it became sufficiently prevalent in the population could other vectors
spread it. That's why it started among homosexuals in this country (it
was originally called "GRID" - Gay Related Immune Disease,
until political
correctness took over) and only appeared in other groups later. It is
still predominantly a homosexual disease (again, in the U.S.).
Apparently you think that there are two kinds of biology, one for the
US and one for the rest of the world. The great majority of people
with AIDS are heterosexuals. The greatest number of new cases in the
US are heterosexuals. Half of homosexuals in the US are not infected
with AIDS. You just make up your nonsense as you go along, right?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
03 Mar 2006 11:19:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:15:37 +0100, Ichimusai <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote
in alt.atheism
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
In fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they
not so outrageously promiscuous. As it was, AIDS hit about half of
them in the U.S.
The sexual vector is only one vector for the spreading of the HIV
virus that often causes the disease AIDS. Other important vectors are
transfer during pregnancy, blood transfusions, sharing of needles and
so on.
It's good to see you, Ichi! :D
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
03 Mar 2006 03:08:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:00:28 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:108d02d8c4sgnqmao5885ocda57i8t1mcj@4ax.com...
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:12:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:t7sb02hj2vba51vblv9rof3plhfmbs0ig4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:51 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:3lu7021psmuc738gpk1g0f6ns9sem29hhe@4ax.com...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:29:46 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
Here's a real FACT:
If people followed the Christian behavior advocated by the Family
Research
Counsel there would be no AIDS.
And, if everyone who has a tooth pulled never sticks his tongue in
the
empty spot, a gold tooth will grow there.
That's just the kind of belief I would expect from someone who
thinks
sex
education works.
Thank you.
Every case of AIDS is the direct or
indirect (sadly, as always there are innocent victims when people
commit
evil acts) result of grossly immoral behavior.
Preventing the distribution of condoms for example. Sexual
intimacy,
on the other hand, is not immoral.
That's what NAMBLA says.
It is? Is that what you talked about at the last meeting?
That's what YOU said when YOU said, "Sexual intimacy is not immoral."
Yes I did. It is not. The examples you give below do not show it to
be immoral any more than obesity shows eating to be immoral.
I disagree. Any sexual intimacy with a child is immoral.
Obviously child abuse is wrong. That does not make sexual intimacy
itself immoral.
Any sexual
intimacy with someone of the same sex is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
Any sexual intimacy
with a person married to someone other than you is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
And sexual
intercourse with someone other than your spouse is immoral.
Not always, and, when it is, it does not make sexual intimacy itself
immoral.
So, lots of
sexual intimacy is immoral.
There is nothing inherently wrong with sexual intimacy, just as there
is nothing inherently wrong with eating.
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
Nonsense.
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
I have no idea how you define "promiscuity". More than one partner?
More than two? Furthermore I do not agree with your view of what is
immoral. I see nothing immoral about sexual intimacy, and any kind
of contact between people exposes them to many different kinds of
infection.
fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they not so
outrageously promiscuous.
Argument by personal definition.
As it was, AIDS hit about half of them in the
U.S.
The above claim is absurd and probably a deliberate lie.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
04 Mar 2006 05:42:22 PM |
|
|
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:9ebh02tfc67gbjuf1nu9freope53qv8626@4ax.com...
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:00:28 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:108d02d8c4sgnqmao5885ocda57i8t1mcj@4ax.com...
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:12:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
Nonsense.
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
I have no idea how you define "promiscuity". More than one partner?
More than one qualifies. Of course, there are degrees.
More than two? Furthermore I do not agree with your view of what is
immoral.
Obviously. And people who agree with you have a far greater chance of
dying a horrible death, 30 years before their time (not to mention all the
other less serious diseases and harm).
I see nothing immoral about sexual intimacy, and any kind
of contact between people exposes them to many different kinds of
infection.
But you certainly are not going to try to claim that all "contact" is of
roughly equal risk?
fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they not so
outrageously promiscuous.
Argument by personal definition.
A fact. If two people are 100% faithful to each other, they cannot - by
definition - introduce any disease into the relationship from sexual
activity. There are other modes of transmission, but the probability is
very low.
As it was, AIDS hit about half of them in the
U.S.
The above claim is absurd and probably a deliberate lie.
The promiscuous ones. And I am gathering the data to justify that
statement in another post.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
05 Mar 2006 04:51:44 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:42:22 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:9ebh02tfc67gbjuf1nu9freope53qv8626@4ax.com...
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:00:28 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:108d02d8c4sgnqmao5885ocda57i8t1mcj@4ax.com...
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:12:16 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
If people engaged only in moral behavior, there would be no AIDS.
Nonsense.
Oh? Please explain how AIDS would have spread without promiscuity?
I have no idea how you define "promiscuity". More than one partner?
More than one qualifies. Of course, there are degrees.
More than two? Furthermore I do not agree with your view of what is
immoral.
Obviously. And people who agree with you have a far greater chance of
dying a horrible death, 30 years before their time (not to mention all the
other less serious diseases and harm).
Baseless and absurd statement. At least you are consistent.
I see nothing immoral about sexual intimacy, and any kind
of contact between people exposes them to many different kinds of
infection.
But you certainly are not going to try to claim that all "contact" is of
roughly equal risk?
I never suggested that at all.
fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they not so
outrageously promiscuous.
Argument by personal definition.
A fact. If two people are 100% faithful to each other, they cannot - by
definition - introduce any disease into the relationship from sexual
activity. There are other modes of transmission, but the probability is
very low.
Now we know your definition of "outrageously promiscuous", i.e. anyone
who has had more than one sexual partner in his life.
As it was, AIDS hit about half of them in the
U.S.
The above claim is absurd and probably a deliberate lie.
The promiscuous ones.
Those who have had more than one sexual contact their entire life?
And I am gathering the data to justify that
statement in another post.
Your claim was that half of homosexuals in the US were infected with
AIDS. Your claim is absurd as are your definitions.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
05 Mar 2006 09:41:13 PM |
|
|
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:odqm02luntvoahp6ovubh84qi3au998tmu@4ax.com...
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:42:22 -0700, "Unpleasant Truth"
<no.one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"thomas p" <tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:9ebh02tfc67gbjuf1nu9freope53qv8626@4ax.com...
I have no idea how you define "promiscuity". More than one partner?
More than one qualifies. Of course, there are degrees.
More than two? Furthermore I do not agree with your view of what is
immoral.
Obviously. And people who agree with you have a far greater chance of
dying a horrible death, 30 years before their time (not to mention all
the
other less serious diseases and harm).
Baseless and absurd statement. At least you are consistent.
You are consistent in being an idiot by denying that promiscuous people
are more likely to die from AIDS than people who are monogamous.
fact, even homosexuals would have been largely spared, were they not
so
outrageously promiscuous.
Argument by personal definition.
A fact. If two people are 100% faithful to each other, they cannot -
by
definition - introduce any disease into the relationship from sexual
activity. There are other modes of transmission, but the probability
is
very low.
Now we know your definition of "outrageously promiscuous", i.e. anyone
who has had more than one sexual partner in his life.
Well, like a good little leftist, you are incapable of reading for
comprehension. See what I wrote above:
I have no idea how you define "promiscuity". More than one partner?
More than one qualifies. Of course, there are degrees.
Now if there are degrees, how can "anyone who has had more than one sexual
partner in his life" be called "outrageously promiscuous?"
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals who
routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several days a week are
"outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new partner ever year or so
are promiscuous, but not outrageously so. Got that?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
06 Mar 2006 12:57:59 PM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals who
routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several days a
week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new partner
ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously so. Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a bath
house or on the beach or on the Internet.
In most of the world where HIV infections are a big problem it is
among the heterosexual population that the infections (and if we don't
find a cure) we will see more or less catastrophic death tolls. In
some villages in Africa the infection rate does come close to 50% and
many, many children are born with it.
--
Ichimusai http://ichimusai.org/ AA #769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo: Ichimusai
MSN: Ichimusai1972 AOL: Ichimusai1972 IRC: Ichimusai@IRCNet
So the old saying is true: Its better to be latent than never.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
06 Mar 2006 11:19:37 PM |
|
|
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals who
routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several days a
week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new partner
ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously so. Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a bath
house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between normal
intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
In most of the world where HIV infections are a big problem it is
among the heterosexual population that the infections (and if we don't
find a cure) we will see more or less catastrophic death tolls. In
some villages in Africa the infection rate does come close to 50% and
many, many children are born with it.
There is no cure. There will not likely be one for a very long time,
certainly not one the third world can afford. However, the disease is
almost 100% preventable by practicing strict monogamy and not reusing
needles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
07 Mar 2006 03:34:47 PM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals
who routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several
days a week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new
partner ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously so.
Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a bath
house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between
normal intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
You are the idiot since you don't seem to realise that there are many
more anal intercourses that happens between heterosexuals (simply
because the heteros seems to outnumber the homos by a rather large
number), than between homosexuals, since you do not seem to realize
this it has been a rather common form of intercourse between man and
woman when they do not wish to risk a pregnancy and quite accepted in
many cultures.
In most of the world where HIV infections are a big problem it is
among the heterosexual population that the infections (and if we
don't find a cure) we will see more or less catastrophic death
tolls. In some villages in Africa the infection rate does come
close to 50% and many, many children are born with it.
There is no cure. There will not likely be one for a very long time,
certainly not one the third world can afford. However, the disease
is almost 100% preventable by practicing strict monogamy and not
reusing needles.
And not being born with it, a rather major factor in some places
unfortunately.
--
Ichimusai http://ichimusai.org/ AA #769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo: Ichimusai
MSN: Ichimusai1972 AOL: Ichimusai1972 IRC: Ichimusai@IRCNet
There are approximately 6.5 billion kinds of people in this world.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
08 Mar 2006 04:02:26 AM |
|
|
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhurlag.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals
who routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several
days a week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new
partner ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously so.
Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a bath
house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between
normal intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
You are the idiot since you don't seem to realise that there are many
more anal intercourses that happens between heterosexuals (simply
because the heteros seems to outnumber the homos by a rather large
number), than between homosexuals, since you do not seem to realize
this it has been a rather common form of intercourse between man and
woman when they do not wish to risk a pregnancy and quite accepted in
many cultures.
Please provide something other than your opinion for that. (And Kinsey
does not count.)
In most of the world where HIV infections are a big problem it is
among the heterosexual population that the infections (and if we
don't find a cure) we will see more or less catastrophic death
tolls. In some villages in Africa the infection rate does come
close to 50% and many, many children are born with it.
There is no cure. There will not likely be one for a very long time,
certainly not one the third world can afford. However, the disease
is almost 100% preventable by practicing strict monogamy and not
reusing needles.
And not being born with it, a rather major factor in some places
unfortunately.
Yes, that is truly tragic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
08 Mar 2006 01:06:55 PM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhurlag.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals
who routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several
days a week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new
partner ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously
so. Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a
bath house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between
normal intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
You are the idiot since you don't seem to realise that there are
many more anal intercourses that happens between heterosexuals
(simply because the heteros seems to outnumber the homos by a
rather large number), than between homosexuals, since you do not
seem to realize this it has been a rather common form of
intercourse between man and woman when they do not wish to risk a
pregnancy and quite accepted in many cultures.
Please provide something other than your opinion for that. (And
Kinsey does not count.)
Certainly. You did not think I was making it up, did you?
I don't know who Kinsey is, so don't worry.
1: 1989, "Nonrandom mixing models of HIV Transmission", Kaplan,
Cramton, Paltiel.
2: 2003-APR-05, Risk Factors for Incident HIV Infection Among
Anonymous HIV Testing Site Clients in Santos, Brazil: 1996-1999,
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,
32(5):551-559, Katia, Shafer, Page, Casiero, Rutherfort et. al.
"[...] The prevalence of anal intercourse among heterosexuals in
Brazil is high and is more commonly reported than in other
countries."
3: 2003, "HIV/AIDS in Latin America - The Challenges Ahead", Anabela
Garcia-Abreu, Isabel Noguer, Karen Cowgill.
There are also numerous on line sources. Cite #3 can be found online
at http://tinyurl.com/grlog check out pp16-ff.
Read #7 under "Epidemiological Evidence" in the following page, one of
many examples: http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/AIDS.htm
In most of the world where HIV infections are a big problem it is
among the heterosexual population that the infections (and if we
don't find a cure) we will see more or less catastrophic death
tolls. In some villages in Africa the infection rate does come
close to 50% and many, many children are born with it.
There is no cure. There will not likely be one for a very long
time, certainly not one the third world can afford. However, the
disease is almost 100% preventable by practicing strict monogamy
and not reusing needles.
And not being born with it, a rather major factor in some places
unfortunately.
Yes, that is truly tragic.
--
http://ichimusai.org/
19:38:00 up 7 days, 5:52, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.14, 0.10
To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows
box, you just need to work on it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
10 Mar 2006 11:51:25 AM |
|
|
Ichimusai wrote:
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhurlag.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals
who routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several
days a week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new
partner ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously
so. Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a
bath house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between
normal intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
You are the idiot since you don't seem to realise that there are
many more anal intercourses that happens between heterosexuals
(simply because the heteros seems to outnumber the homos by a
rather large number), than between homosexuals, since you do not
seem to realize this it has been a rather common form of
intercourse between man and woman when they do not wish to risk a
pregnancy and quite accepted in many cultures.
Please provide something other than your opinion for that. (And
Kinsey does not count.)
Certainly. You did not think I was making it up, did you?
I don't know who Kinsey is, so don't worry.
1: 1989, "Nonrandom mixing models of HIV Transmission", Kaplan,
Cramton, Paltiel.
2: 2003-APR-05, Risk Factors for Incident HIV Infection Among
Anonymous HIV Testing Site Clients in Santos, Brazil: 1996-1999,
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,
32(5):551-559, Katia, Shafer, Page, Casiero, Rutherfort et. al.
"[...] The prevalence of anal intercourse among heterosexuals in
Brazil is high and is more commonly reported than in other
countries."
3: 2003, "HIV/AIDS in Latin America - The Challenges Ahead", Anabela
Garcia-Abreu, Isabel Noguer, Karen Cowgill.
There are also numerous on line sources. Cite #3 can be found online
at http://tinyurl.com/grlog check out pp16-ff.
Read #7 under "Epidemiological Evidence" in the following page, one of
many examples: http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/AIDS.htm
Suddenly it became rather quiet in this thread.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
11 Mar 2006 09:08:54 AM |
|
|
On 10 Mar 2006 09:51:25 -0800, "Ichimusai" <ichimusai@gmail.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
Ichimusai wrote:
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m33bhurlag.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
"Ichimusai" <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote in message
news:m3veurjt8o.fsf@ichimusai.dyndns.org...
"Unpleasant Truth" <no.one@nowhere.com> writes:
Let me try to explain it so even you can understand. Homosexuals
who routinely visit bath houses and have anonymous sex several
days a week are "outrageously promiscuous." Those who have a new
partner ever year or so are promiscuous, but not outrageously
so. Got that?
I think that what you really are referring to is "People who have
several partners every week where they have unprotected sex is at
risk." It does not really factor if they are homo- bi- or
heterosexual, weither they like to pick up their partner in a
bath house or on the beach or on the Internet.
You are an idiot if you think there is no risk difference between
normal intercourse and homosexual (anal) intercourse.
You are the idiot since you don't seem to realise that there are
many more anal intercourses that happens between heterosexuals
(simply because the heteros seems to outnumber the homos by a
rather large number), than between homosexuals, since you do not
seem to realize this it has been a rather common form of
intercourse between man and woman when they do not wish to risk a
pregnancy and quite accepted in many cultures.
Please provide something other than your opinion for that. (And
Kinsey does not count.)
Certainly. You did not think I was making it up, did you?
I don't know who Kinsey is, so don't worry.
1: 1989, "Nonrandom mixing models of HIV Transmission", Kaplan,
Cramton, Paltiel.
2: 2003-APR-05, Risk Factors for Incident HIV Infection Among
Anonymous HIV Testing Site Clients in Santos, Brazil: 1996-1999,
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes,
32(5):551-559, Katia, Shafer, Page, Casiero, Rutherfort et. al.
"[...] The prevalence of anal intercourse among heterosexuals in
Brazil is high and is more commonly reported than in other
countries."
3: 2003, "HIV/AIDS in Latin America - The Challenges Ahead", Anabela
Garcia-Abreu, Isabel Noguer, Karen Cowgill.
There are also numerous on line sources. Cite #3 can be found online
at http://tinyurl.com/grlog check out pp16-ff.
Read #7 under "Epidemiological Evidence" in the following page, one of
many examples: http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/AIDS.htm
Suddenly it became rather quiet in this thread.
Were you surprised at the lack of response from the christian?
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ichimusai" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
11 Mar 2006 06:19:40 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> writes:
[...]
Suddenly it became rather quiet in this thread.
Were you surprised at the lack of response from the christian?
Not really, no. I just hope he went to the library to check out some
of the studies and educate himself.
--
http://ichimusai.org/
01:19:00 up 10 days, 11:33, 2 users, load average: 0.40, 0.15, 0.05
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger."
-- Hermann Goering
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-Christian behavior causes AIDS |
12 Mar 2006 08:59:23 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:19:40 +0100, Ichimusai <ichi@ichimusai.org> wrote
in alt.atheism
stoney <stoney@the.net> writes:
[...]
Suddenly it became rather quiet in this thread.
Were you surprised at the lack of response from the christian?
Not really, no. I just hope he went to the library to check out some
of the studies and educate himself.
Hope forlorn, it's a nick changing cowardly christian.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
