Christians Arrested at Gay Rally



 Religions > Atheism > Christians Arrested at Gay Rally

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 6 of 10

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Jason Gastrich"
Date: 06 Jan 2005 01:04:28 PM
Object: Christians Arrested at Gay Rally
You may already be familiar with this situation. If not, please take a
read.
Do you agree with these Christians being jailed? Or do you think that the
City of Philadelphia has gone to far? Why or why not?
Free the Philadelphia 4
December 20, 2004
by Joseph Farah
I'm amazed when seemingly intelligent people tell me they still think the
American Civil Liberties Union is a group that fights for First Amendment
freedoms no matter whose ox is being gored.
If that's the case, why is the ACLU not filing amicus briefs in Philadelphia
where four Christians are facing 47 years in jail for expressing their
free-speech rights?
That's right. Four Christians are facing 47 years in prison for peacefully
quoting the Bible, an action an unglued local prosecutor determined to be
"fighting words" when cited among homosexual activists.
It all started Oct. 10, when a total of 11 members of Repent America
attended a homosexual street festival called "Outfest."
The group, ranging in age from 17 to 72, was surrounded at times by the
organizers' security force, known as the "Pink Angels."
Videotapes and still photos taken at the event show the Pink Angels blocking
the path of the Repent America members, shouting at them, blowing whistles
and so forth. The Christians remain peaceful and calm at all times, despite
what appears to be extraordinary provocation, intimidation and harassment.
Guess who was arrested?
That's right. The Christians.
And they've been charged with a long list of felonies and hate crimes that
would make the Founding Fathers spin in their graves.
Repent America director Michael Marcavage is charged with three felonies -
criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation and riot. (If you're wondering what
"ethnic intimidation" means at a homosexual event, you have to understand
the city of Philadelphia has extended hate crime laws to protect the
sexually aberrant as well as racial minorities.) He was also hit with five
misdemeanors for walking on the city sidewalks and quoting Holy Scriptures.
Mark Diener and James Cruse are charged with criminal conspiracy, failure to
disperse, disorderly conduct and obstructing highways. Dennis Green is
charged with criminal conspiracy, disorderly conduct and obstructing
highways. The criminal conspiracy charge links all the defendants together
so that Marcavage's "ethnic intimidation" hate-crime charge will apply to
all of them.
This is one of the most brazen, frontal attacks on religious freedom and
free speech I have seen in my lifetime. If these charges stand, Christians
across America will soon be hunted down like dogs as they are in many parts
of the world today as the most persecuted religious group on the planet.
It's ironic that this persecution would take place in Philadelphia, the
so-called "City of Brotherly Love."
Of course, Philadelphia wasn't always so inhospitable to Christians.
It's worth remembering the very first legislative act in Pennsylvania, April
25, 1682. It was called the Great Law of Pennsylvania - and great it was.
"Whereas the glory of Almighty God and the good of mankind is the reason and
the end of government, and, therefore government itself is a venerable
ordinance of God ... [there shall be established] laws as shall best
preserve true Christian and civil liberty, in opposition to all unchristian,
licentious, and unjust practices, whereby God may have his due, and Caesar
his due, and the people their due, from tyranny and oppression."
If indeed the Philadelphia 4 are convicted and sentenced to hard time,
Christians need to march on the Philadelphia courthouse, encircle it, blow
the trumpets and prepare to watch God work a miracle like He did at Jericho.
We should do this not just for the injustice to the four Philadelphia
Christians, but because no one in America - not Christians or
non-Christians, not black or white, not homosexual or heterosexual - will
truly be free. We will be living in a country where people can be imprisoned
arbitrarily for breaking no law other than the law of "political
correctness."
If we're going to save freedom in America, it's going to take a miracle.
Will you come to Philadelphia?
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted: December 20, 2004
--
--------
Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
http://www.jcsm.org
Over 60,000 web pages!
John 8:36 reads, "Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free
indeed."
Galatians 5:1 reads, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ
has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage."
ICQ#: 20731140
AIM: MrJasonGastrich
YIM: Jesus_Saved_Jason
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 08 Jan 2005 09:11:51 PM
In our last episode <34bih2F48rnm1U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:r8SdnU9Y_qw9E33cRVn-uA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bfb2F49l0i3U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>,
George Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify
a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I would, but my brain just exploded and is now dripping out of my left
ear..........................gah.


I ain't moppin' that up...


No need - The witchling's evil little black cat lapped it
up...............blblblblblblblblblblbl...........

Wait, I thought witches *liked black cats.
Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 08 Jan 2005 09:24:08 PM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:x8CdnRfVmu95An3cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bih2F48rnm1U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:r8SdnU9Y_qw9E33cRVn-uA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bfb2F49l0i3U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>,
George Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify
a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I would, but my brain just exploded and is now dripping out of my left
ear..........................gah.


I ain't moppin' that up...


No need - The witchling's evil little black cat lapped it
up...............blblblblblblblblblblbl...........


Wait, I thought witches *liked black cats.

Oh, but I do! I actually picked her out - Spotted her the minute I walked
into the shelter and thought "She's mine! I mean, ours! Um, I mean, my
daughter's" :)


Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...

Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 09 Jan 2005 08:48:22 AM
In our last episode <34bmemF47ib3sU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:x8CdnRfVmu95An3cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bih2F48rnm1U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:r8SdnU9Y_qw9E33cRVn-uA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bfb2F49l0i3U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>,
George Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the
Bible is infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not
talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after
all, his creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I would, but my brain just exploded and is now dripping out of my
left ear..........................gah.


I ain't moppin' that up...


No need - The witchling's evil little black cat lapped it
up...............blblblblblblblblblblbl...........


Wait, I thought witches *liked black cats.


Oh, but I do! I actually picked her out - Spotted her the minute I walked
into the shelter and thought "She's mine! I mean, ours! Um, I mean, my
daughter's" :)

Ah, you're one a them "it's for the kids!" types huh? <g>

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)

I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed it. I
put it back already!!!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 09 Jan 2005 09:22:23 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Kuqdnb0xNdy_3nzcRVn-qg@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bmemF47ib3sU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:x8CdnRfVmu95An3cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bih2F48rnm1U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:r8SdnU9Y_qw9E33cRVn-uA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bfb2F49l0i3U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>,
George Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the
Bible is infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not
talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after
all, his creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I would, but my brain just exploded and is now dripping out of my
left ear..........................gah.


I ain't moppin' that up...


No need - The witchling's evil little black cat lapped it
up...............blblblblblblblblblblbl...........


Wait, I thought witches *liked black cats.


Oh, but I do! I actually picked her out - Spotted her the minute I walked
into the shelter and thought "She's mine! I mean, ours! Um, I mean, my
daughter's" :)


Ah, you're one a them "it's for the kids!" types huh? <g>

Well, sorta. I must admit that getting the kitten was MY idea :)

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)


I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed it. I
put it back already!!!

Is THAT was that was! :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 10 Jan 2005 08:31:27 AM
In our last episode <34d0hcF42mf5vU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Kuqdnb0xNdy_3nzcRVn-qg@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bmemF47ib3sU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:x8CdnRfVmu95An3cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bih2F48rnm1U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:r8SdnU9Y_qw9E33cRVn-uA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34bfb2F49l0i3U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff
lept out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>,
George Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com>
wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats
don't have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that
the Bible is infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not
talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is,
after all, his creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I would, but my brain just exploded and is now dripping out of my
left ear..........................gah.


I ain't moppin' that up...


No need - The witchling's evil little black cat lapped it
up...............blblblblblblblblblblbl...........


Wait, I thought witches *liked black cats.


Oh, but I do! I actually picked her out - Spotted her the minute I
walked into the shelter and thought "She's mine! I mean, ours! Um, I
mean, my daughter's" :)


Ah, you're one a them "it's for the kids!" types huh? <g>


Well, sorta. I must admit that getting the kitten was MY idea :)

Uh huh. <G>
But who could resist a black kitten? Saw one once at a pet store, black as
midnight little thing. Just gorgeous. I'm just not a cat person though.
Don't hate them. Just rather lukewarm about them. Kittens are great but
they do grow up (and I despise people that get a "pet" when they're young
because they're "cute" then lose interest in them when the poor animal
forgets to not grow up).
Besides, the dogs think cats are toys.

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)


I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed it.
I put it back already!!!


Is THAT was that was! :)

No it wasn't! It was definitely not a THAT. Maybe a those or a that over
there but not a THAT.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 10 Jan 2005 08:33:47 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:joOdncWjMPo1DX_cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34d0hcF42mf5vU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Kuqdnb0xNdy_3nzcRVn-qg@megapath.net...

snip

Ah, you're one a them "it's for the kids!" types huh? <g>


Well, sorta. I must admit that getting the kitten was MY idea :)


Uh huh. <G>

But who could resist a black kitten?

How true. As soon as I walked into the pet store (these animals were
actually from a shelter and were bought to this particular PetCo for
adoption) and saw that little sucker, I went right over and stuck my fingers
through the cage. She immediately started purring and rubbing her face on
my hand. I was lost from that second on :)
Saw one once at a pet store, black as

midnight little thing. Just gorgeous. I'm just not a cat person though.
Don't hate them. Just rather lukewarm about them. Kittens are great but
they do grow up (and I despise people that get a "pet" when they're young
because they're "cute" then lose interest in them when the poor animal
forgets to not grow up).

LOL, I don't think this cat is going to EVER grow up. She's currently
harassing me right now to play fetch. Oy. I think she's one of those cats
that remains stuck in kittenhood until they're about ten :)

Besides, the dogs think cats are toys.

Oh my. Should try to avoid that!

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)


I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed it.
I put it back already!!!


Is THAT was that was! :)


No it wasn't! It was definitely not a THAT. Maybe a those or a that over
there but not a THAT.

Okay, now I'm totally confused which seems to be the norm these days :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 10 Jan 2005 10:13:06 AM
In our last episode <34fi28F4bl5d4U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:joOdncWjMPo1DX_cRVn-1Q@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34d0hcF42mf5vU1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept
out of the bushes shouting:


"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Kuqdnb0xNdy_3nzcRVn-qg@megapath.net...


snip

Ah, you're one a them "it's for the kids!" types huh? <g>


Well, sorta. I must admit that getting the kitten was MY idea :)


Uh huh. <G>

But who could resist a black kitten?


How true. As soon as I walked into the pet store (these animals were
actually from a shelter and were bought to this particular PetCo for
adoption) and saw that little sucker, I went right over and stuck my
fingers through the cage. She immediately started purring and rubbing her
face on my hand. I was lost from that second on :)

She's a WIIIIIIIIIIIITCH!!!!!!!!
(Hey, she witched a witch din't she?)

Saw one once at a pet store, black as

midnight little thing. Just gorgeous. I'm just not a cat person though.
Don't hate them. Just rather lukewarm about them. Kittens are great but
they do grow up (and I despise people that get a "pet" when they're
young because they're "cute" then lose interest in them when the poor
animal forgets to not grow up).


LOL, I don't think this cat is going to EVER grow up. She's currently
harassing me right now to play fetch. Oy. I think she's one of those
cats that remains stuck in kittenhood until they're about ten :)

That wouldn't be so bad. The older, lay around all day, finicky eater, "I
demand to worshipped now how dare you touch me!" kinda cats really annoy
me.
You know, like this:
http://www.rottweiler-dog.fsworld.co.uk/cat_sex.jpg
(On the other hand, if they want in your lap, at least they don't weigh
70+ pounds)

Besides, the dogs think cats are toys.


Oh my. Should try to avoid that!

It's not so much a problem out here. People in this area are dog people.
Not so many cats.
Rabbits though. Which have discovered that the neighbor's rottweiler is on
a chain so they sit in the yard, up close to the house, *right in the
light, and nibble away, driving the dog to utter distraction.
(Or discover that on *some nights, he's free... oops!)

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)


I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed
it. I put it back already!!!


Is THAT was that was! :)


No it wasn't! It was definitely not a THAT. Maybe a those or a that over
there but not a THAT.


Okay, now I'm totally confused which seems to be the norm these days :)

<G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 10 Jan 2005 10:53:34 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:N8OdnZ3x4tjnNX_cRVn-tA@megapath.net...

In our last episode <34fi28F4bl5d4U1@individual.net>, Robibnikoff lept out
of the bushes shouting:

snip

How true. As soon as I walked into the pet store (these animals were
actually from a shelter and were bought to this particular PetCo for
adoption) and saw that little sucker, I went right over and stuck my
fingers through the cage. She immediately started purring and rubbing
her
face on my hand. I was lost from that second on :)


She's a WIIIIIIIIIIIITCH!!!!!!!!

Um, you rang?

(Hey, she witched a witch din't she?)

Yes, indeedy :)

Saw one once at a pet store, black as

midnight little thing. Just gorgeous. I'm just not a cat person though.
Don't hate them. Just rather lukewarm about them. Kittens are great but
they do grow up (and I despise people that get a "pet" when they're
young because they're "cute" then lose interest in them when the poor
animal forgets to not grow up).


LOL, I don't think this cat is going to EVER grow up. She's currently
harassing me right now to play fetch. Oy. I think she's one of those
cats that remains stuck in kittenhood until they're about ten :)


That wouldn't be so bad. The older, lay around all day, finicky eater, "I
demand to worshipped now how dare you touch me!" kinda cats really annoy
me.

The elder feline is a bit like that (VERY moody), but not so much. She's
still quite a cuddle bug when she wants to be.

You know, like this:

http://www.rottweiler-dog.fsworld.co.uk/cat_sex.jpg

Whoa! That's a fat cat!

(On the other hand, if they want in your lap, at least they don't weigh
70+ pounds)

The elder cat, Kenya, is closer to about 13 pounds, but very long. She can
basically cover the majority of my body with hers if she stretches out - And
it's a really pain when the little black cat wants to cuddle up as well.
That usually results in them quarreling at which point, I yell "Fine, NO ONE
gets the lap" and pop out of the chair.

Besides, the dogs think cats are toys.


Oh my. Should try to avoid that!


It's not so much a problem out here. People in this area are dog people.
Not so many cats.

Rabbits though. Which have discovered that the neighbor's rottweiler is on
a chain so they sit in the yard, up close to the house, *right in the
light, and nibble away, driving the dog to utter distraction.

LOL, I could only imagine :)

(Or discover that on *some nights, he's free... oops!)

NO! Any fatalities?

Oh, wait, you *did say "evil" approvingly...


Coming from me, how could you possibly take it any other way? :)


I din't take anything! Who told you that?!? Anyway, I just borrowed
it. I put it back already!!!


Is THAT was that was! :)


No it wasn't! It was definitely not a THAT. Maybe a those or a that over
there but not a THAT.


Okay, now I'm totally confused which seems to be the norm these days :)


<G>

Booga, booga! :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.








User: "lizzard woman"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 08 Jan 2005 10:43:00 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:tMidnYTFDe3KnH3cRVn-3g@megapath.net...
| In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>, George
| Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:
|
| > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:
| >
| >>Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't have
| >>feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible is
| >>infallible.
|
| Nominated part:
|
| > I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about
| > mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
| > bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
| > creation.
|
| End nominated part
|
| Seconds anybody?
I'll second that.
I don't think these guys realize that they are advocating rather than
rationally discussing the topics at hand.
--
sharon, aa #2153
"(of creationism) ... Only apocryphal tales told by goat herders around the
campfire after it became too dark to continue to molest their charges." --
TvG (Rec.Equestrian, 2003)
"Easy -- he's the Right Reverend Admiral Jason Gastrich, BSc, MSc, DVM, ThD,
PhD, MD, JD, Esq, US Navy (Ret). If the bible happened to put things in the
wrong order, well, our boy the Doctor will just fix it right up there!" --
Rightshu (IIDB, 2004)
.

User: ""

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 08 Jan 2005 03:21:51 PM
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:55:21 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>, George
Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't have
feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible is
infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?

I think it's already been nominated and seconded.
atheist@home#1554
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 08 Jan 2005 05:10:08 PM
In our last episode <g6k0u01qs8hv47t5nr9s8npp6022o1iebe@4ax.com>, atheist
lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:55:21 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>, George
Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible is
infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after
all, his creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


I think it's already been nominated and seconded.

Yeah, Liz beat me to it. Didn't see that until after I posted...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.


User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 10 Jan 2005 09:17:34 AM
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:55:21 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>, George
Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't have
feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible is
infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?

Seconded. A more elegant example of willful ignorance would be hard to
find.
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: TQOTM Nomination (was: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL!) 13 Jan 2005 05:02:33 AM
In article <o875u09djf2sc57f2vghs1mm8ge0m3g0d5@4ax.com>,
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:55:21 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In our last episode <eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com>, George
Peatty lept out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't have
feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible is
infallible.


Nominated part:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his
creation.


End nominated part

Seconds anybody?


Seconded. A more elegant example of willful ignorance would be hard to
find.



Recorded.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.


User: "Liz"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 07:14:08 PM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

It must be very comforting to you to have faith like that, George.
Liz #658 BAAWA
Noone can break my faith, if the bible said
that the sky was greenish pink, then i would look up
and see greenish pink. - anonymous Christian
.
User: "Uncle Davey"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 08 Jan 2005 05:08:01 AM
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:1adut0pqt9unolnclvobtcas9k9u7kc7ni@4ax.com...

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking

about

mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a

bat

as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.



It must be very comforting to you to have faith like that, George.

It is required.
Uncle Davey
.


User: "Liz"

Title: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 07:17:34 PM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:
I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

May I have a second?
Liz #658 BAAWA
Liz, you like most people do not want to have faith in
things which have no basis in reality. -- josalt
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 09:24:43 PM
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:a6dut0peit5pgp4bc9rpgod2b5ddmat0ni@4ax.com...

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.



May I have a second?

Can you wait until I'm done puking from the pure idiocy of the remark?
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
User: "Liz"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 09:34:25 PM
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:24:43 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> in news message
<34923qF48i1arU1@individual.net> wrote:


"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:a6dut0peit5pgp4bc9rpgod2b5ddmat0ni@4ax.com...

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a
bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.



May I have a second?


Can you wait until I'm done puking from the pure idiocy of the remark?

We ain't got time to puke.
Überwench #658 Now a *real* atheist!
Dame Liz the Undaunted Ath.D BAAWA
Charter Member of SMASH
and Queen of the known universe
.


User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 08 Jan 2005 10:03:08 AM
In our last episode <a6dut0peit5pgp4bc9rpgod2b5ddmat0ni@4ax.com>, Liz lept
out of the bushes shouting:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all,
his creation.



May I have a second?

You beat me to it.
Second.
(Third, fourth, two hundred sixty-third?)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.

User: "Doc Smartass"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 07:24:00 PM
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in
news:a6dut0peit5pgp4bc9rpgod2b5ddmat0ni@4ax.com:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking
about mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to
classify a bat as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after
all, his creation.



May I have a second?

Seconded.
--
Dr. Smartass -- BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
Hurl, hurl, door gong's oil hair!
Wart inhale dough way cur?
Wart inhale dough way cur?
Hurl, hurl, door gong's oil hair!
Wart inhale dough way cur, nor?
.

User: ""

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 09:08:31 PM
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:17:34 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird,

I don't know what Bible he's talking about but every one I ever read
claims that Adam, not God named all the beasties.
atheist@home#1554

I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.



May I have a second?



Liz #658 BAAWA

Liz, you like most people do not want to have faith in
things which have no basis in reality. -- josalt

.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 09 Jan 2005 10:14:58 PM
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:08:31 GMT,
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:17:34 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird,


I don't know what Bible he's talking about but every one I ever read
claims that Adam, not God named all the beasties.

He's never read the bible.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.


User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: TQotM Nomination Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 08 Jan 2005 03:54:58 AM
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:17:34 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> in news message
<eebut01e5djgaacrv0die9rnd8nbte01po@4ax.com> wrote:


I nominate the following in the blind faith category:

I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.



May I have a second?

You may. Here's my vote.
.


User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 09 Jan 2005 10:13:48 PM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

Congradulations on demonstrating your abject and deliberate ignorance,
oh mental toddler.
/me pisses on George's imaginary buddy.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.

User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 08:30:59 PM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

He also created a dumbass like you, right?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec aka

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1349 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 08 Jan 2005 03:54:56 AM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:50:06 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a bat
as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

Well, in that case we can classify you as a chimp. Or perhaps as a
cockroach. After all, since bats are birds...
.

User: "towelie"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 08:08:30 PM
TV's George Peatty wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a

bat

as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.

So much for Biblical literalism.
--
"Shake says that books are from the devil, and that TV is twice as fast" -
Meatwad
"The Constitution was written on reefer by dudes with wooden teeth" - OG Loc
aa #2133
ap #19
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 09 Jan 2005 10:15:38 PM
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:08:30 -0600, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:

TV's George Peatty wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible.


I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but you're not talking about
mine. God is not bound by your taxonomy, and if he wants to classify a

bat

as a bird, I got no problem with that. It is, after all, his creation.


So much for Biblical literalism.

So much for any signs of intelligence.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.


User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 07:31:15 AM
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:22:17 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:02:12 -0600, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
in news message <3478hbF44mjqoU1@individual.net> wrote:

TV's Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

Ha Ha Ha...

Fucking moron.

http://www.durangobill.com/JasonGastrich.html

"The river doesn't just meander, it flows uphill. "
"Dr" Jason Gastrich, on the Colorado River's Impact on the
Grand Canyon.


Well, in Jason Ostrich's bizarro-world, up is down, love is hate, and right
is left. In Gastric-speak, he's technically correct. He's also a "Doctor,"
which roughly translates to "beedledick" in English.



He also stated that bat have feathers just a week ago. In defense of
the Bible, he stated, "The Hebrew word "oph" that is used in Leviticus
to describe the bat simply means feathered animal that flies. It
accurately describes the bat."

Message-ID: <9GoBd.36853$nP1.28625@twister.socal.rr.com>

Later he thanked several people for "reminding him" that bats don't
have feathers, which of course destroyed his argument that the Bible
is infallible. Of course, he didn't recognize that aspect of his
ignorance. He is quite hilarious and his own worst enemy.

Like the rest of the brainwashed god-bots he has no attention span.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Jason Gastrich: Water Flows UPHILL! 07 Jan 2005 04:11:41 AM
Yang, you are a fucking moron. Go find a priest, that fucked you in da
*****.
.

User: "Don Kresch"

Title: Re: Christians Arrested at Gay Rally 06 Jan 2005 05:16:49 PM
In alt.atheism on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:04:28 GMT, "Jason Gastrich"
<usenetspam1@yahoo.com> let us all know that:
Who gives a *****, Jason?
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.

User: "chibiabos"

Title: Re: Christians Arrested at Gay Rally 07 Jan 2005 05:30:00 PM
In article <0ZfDd.62244$gd.11405@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason Gastrich
<usenetspam1@yahoo.com> wrote:

If we're going to save freedom in America, it's going to take a miracle.

Well, I agree with this part, anyway.
-chib
--
Member of SMASH
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
(email: change out to in)
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Christians Arrested at Gay Rally 06 Jan 2005 03:17:55 PM
In our last episode <0ZfDd.62244$gd.11405@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason
Gastrich lept out of the bushes shouting:

Do you agree with these Christians being jailed? Or do you think that the
City of Philadelphia has gone to far? Why or why not?

Michael Marcavage and his ilk deliberately provoke these situations so
they can look like they're being "persecuted" and so they can file
lawsuits. They're also affiliated with the "reconstructionists" who
essentially seek the overthrow of the United States government.
I don't support terrorists and I don't the ACLU should.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Christians Arrested at Gay Rally 06 Jan 2005 03:43:01 PM
In our last episode <0ZfDd.62244$gd.11405@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason
Gastrich lept out of the bushes shouting:

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted: December 20, 2004

By the way, Mister Defender of Copyright, you do have explicit permission
from the copyright holder to redistribute this article don't you?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.


  Page 6 of 10

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 


Related Articles
God-Fearing Christians Kill 3 Men For Being Gay in Jamaica
Anti-Gay Christians Outraged Over Fake Onion Article About Gays
Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob
Another homophobic Christians exposed as gay
Bush Christians and gay homosexual torture
Gay Activist Says To Christians: We Will BURY You
Re: Jews (and Christians) Slam Jerusalem Gay Fest
Sound of Trumpet Christian Morality: Catholic Church To Help Gays Against Anti-Gay Christians
Why Aren't You Gay-Hating Christians Celebrating THIS Gay Murder? (One Less Gay! Praise Jesus! Immoral! Unatural! Kill Them All!)
Anti-Gay Christians Protest at Coretta King's Funeral
Study: Youth see Christians as judgmental, anti-gay
Re: Gotta love those christians....
What will Christians do once they get to heaven?
Re: Christians Really *ARE* Nazis (was Re: The really remarkable thing about the definition of intolerant is that those who say we Christians are intolerant and should not express our religious beliefs are the ones who actually fit the definition.
The Christians and the French
 

NEWER

pg.3805     pg.2113