Christmas



 Religions > Atheism > Christmas

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 17

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "maff"
Date: 19 Dec 2004 06:02:42 AM
Object: Christmas
Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&position=
By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.
Christmas Xmas Noel
http://news.google.com/news?q=(christmas%20OR%20xmas%20OR%20noel%20OR%20%7C%20OR%20no%C3%ABl)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wn
http://www.google.com/search?q=(christmas+OR+xmas+OR+noel+OR+%7C+OR+no%C3%ABl)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=(christmas+OR+xmas+OR+noel+OR+%7C+OR+no%C3%ABl)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&output=search&cat=gwd/Top
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=(christmas+OR+Xmas+OR+Noel)&start=0&scoring=d&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&
.

User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 10:54:47 AM
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&position=

By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.

How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting religion?
How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the season
(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?
No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot, even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years' party,
it's still based on religion. Look up the history.
If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a very
real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any of the
other fun things. It's ALL about religion.
Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)
But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 06:34:48 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:rnixd.4678$rL3.4511@trnddc03...


"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&po
sition=


By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.


How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting religion?
How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the

season

(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?

No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot, even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years' party,
it's still based on religion. Look up the history.

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a

very

real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any of

the

other fun things. It's ALL about religion.

Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.

And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it as a
religious holiday.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 08:27:33 PM
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:rnixd.4678$rL3.4511@trnddc03...


"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&po
sition=


By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.


How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting religion?
How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the

season

(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?

No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot,
even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years' party,
it's still based on religion. Look up the history.

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a

very

real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any of

the

other fun things. It's ALL about religion.

Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it as a
religious holiday.

As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve religion
is, well....
not possible.
You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,
because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to celebrate
in the first place.
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 09:47:53 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:pMqxd.2904$tG3.93@trnddc02...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:rnixd.4678$rL3.4511@trnddc03...


"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&po

sition=


By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest

to

be inclusive of all faiths.


How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting

religion?

How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the

season

(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?

No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot,
even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years'

party,

it's still based on religion. Look up the history.

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a

big

party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a

very

real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any

of

the

other fun things. It's ALL about religion.

Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it as a
religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve religion
is, well....

not possible.

Any paid day off from work is a religious occasion as far as I'm concerned.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,

Even I, an atheist, wouldn't dream of throwing all the religion out of
Christmas. The government, on the other hand, can go ***** itself.

because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to celebrate
in the first place.

And were it not for godless socialists there wouldn't be any holidays from
work, but I digress.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 20 Dec 2004 09:46:02 AM
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32n0caF3nf93qU1@individual.net...
<snip to>

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,


Even I, an atheist, wouldn't dream of throwing all the religion out of
Christmas. The government, on the other hand, can go ***** itself.

Ah, but that's what maff was suggesting in the first post...and what I was
responding to. He said the debate was on celebrating Christmas without
promoting religion. My point is simply and only that this is not possible.


because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to
celebrate
in the first place.


And were it not for godless socialists there wouldn't be any holidays from
work, but I digress.

Er, that's not quite true....
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 10:06:22 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:_sCxd.3297$hc7.641@trnddc06...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32n0caF3nf93qU1@individual.net...
<snip to>

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,


Even I, an atheist, wouldn't dream of throwing all the religion out of
Christmas. The government, on the other hand, can go ***** itself.


Ah, but that's what maff was suggesting in the first post...and what I was
responding to. He said the debate was on celebrating Christmas without
promoting religion. My point is simply and only that this is not possible.

It very obviously IS possible, as has been explained to you by several
irreligious people who in fact celebrate Christmas. It's also possible for
a religious person to celebrate a secular holiday, or any secular
accomplishment, without promoting secularism or atheism.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 22 Dec 2004 02:22:08 AM
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32sa6rF3p8av2U1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:_sCxd.3297$hc7.641@trnddc06...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32n0caF3nf93qU1@individual.net...
<snip to>

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,


Even I, an atheist, wouldn't dream of throwing all the religion out of
Christmas. The government, on the other hand, can go ***** itself.


Ah, but that's what maff was suggesting in the first post...and what I
was
responding to. He said the debate was on celebrating Christmas without
promoting religion. My point is simply and only that this is not
possible.


It very obviously IS possible, as has been explained to you by several
irreligious people who in fact celebrate Christmas. It's also possible
for
a religious person to celebrate a secular holiday, or any secular
accomplishment, without promoting secularism or atheism.

No, actually, it isn't. It's not possible to celebrate the Fourth of July,
for instance, without promoting the idea of the existance of the USA. It's
not possible to celebrate any secular accomplishment without promoting that
accomplishment and the people who did it. It's not possible to celebrate,
oh, Memorial Day without promoting the cause of those who lost their lives
in the service of their country.
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 23 Dec 2004 10:13:01 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:Q8ayd.3670$tG3.2677@trnddc02...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32sa6rF3p8av2U1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:_sCxd.3297$hc7.641@trnddc06...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32n0caF3nf93qU1@individual.net...
<snip to>

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that

you

celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out

of

it,


Even I, an atheist, wouldn't dream of throwing all the religion out

of

Christmas. The government, on the other hand, can go ***** itself.


Ah, but that's what maff was suggesting in the first post...and what I
was
responding to. He said the debate was on celebrating Christmas without
promoting religion. My point is simply and only that this is not
possible.


It very obviously IS possible, as has been explained to you by several
irreligious people who in fact celebrate Christmas. It's also possible
for
a religious person to celebrate a secular holiday, or any secular
accomplishment, without promoting secularism or atheism.


No, actually, it isn't. It's not possible to celebrate the Fourth of July,
for instance, without promoting the idea of the existance of the USA. It's
not possible to celebrate any secular accomplishment without promoting

that

accomplishment and the people who did it. It's not possible to celebrate,
oh, Memorial Day without promoting the cause of those who lost their lives
in the service of their country.

You're not answering the point. Are you promoting *secularism* when you
observe these holidays?
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 24 Dec 2004 12:29:38 AM
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:331jbaF3niar7U1@individual.net...
<snip to>

It very obviously IS possible, as has been explained to you by several
irreligious people who in fact celebrate Christmas. It's also possible
for
a religious person to celebrate a secular holiday, or any secular
accomplishment, without promoting secularism or atheism.


No, actually, it isn't. It's not possible to celebrate the Fourth of
July,
for instance, without promoting the idea of the existance of the USA.
It's
not possible to celebrate any secular accomplishment without promoting

that

accomplishment and the people who did it. It's not possible to celebrate,
oh, Memorial Day without promoting the cause of those who lost their
lives
in the service of their country.


You're not answering the point. Are you promoting *secularism* when you
observe these holidays?

Those holidays aren't celebrating 'secularism'. They celebrate the founding
of a nation, the fallen military heros, other accomplishments of whoever is
being honored that day.
Just as Christmas celebrates the birth of Christ, and is timed around, and
has taken the traditions from, a holiday that celebrated the coming back of
the sun and longer days.
If you take religion out of Christmas, what the flip is it you are
celebrating, specifically?
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 25 Dec 2004 06:00:46 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:mHOyd.5517$h.2228@trnddc04...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:331jbaF3niar7U1@individual.net...
<snip to>

It very obviously IS possible, as has been explained to you by

several

irreligious people who in fact celebrate Christmas. It's also

possible

for
a religious person to celebrate a secular holiday, or any secular
accomplishment, without promoting secularism or atheism.


No, actually, it isn't. It's not possible to celebrate the Fourth of
July,
for instance, without promoting the idea of the existance of the USA.
It's
not possible to celebrate any secular accomplishment without promoting

that

accomplishment and the people who did it. It's not possible to

celebrate,

oh, Memorial Day without promoting the cause of those who lost their
lives
in the service of their country.


You're not answering the point. Are you promoting *secularism* when you
observe these holidays?


Those holidays aren't celebrating 'secularism'.

And one is not necessarily "promoting religion" by celebrating Christmas, as
you claimed earlier.

They celebrate the founding
of a nation, the fallen military heros, other accomplishments of whoever

is

being honored that day.

Right, and you aren't necessarily promoting secularism by observing these
holidays with origins in secular events, just as you aren't necessarily
"promoting religion" by observing Christmas.

Just as Christmas celebrates the birth of Christ, and is timed around, and
has taken the traditions from, a holiday that celebrated the coming back

of

the sun and longer days.

Christmas celebrates much more than the birth of Christ, quite obviously.
In fact, the birth of Christ isn't even especially important to the
christian myth. Two of the four Gospels don't even consider it worth
mentioning.

If you take religion out of Christmas, what the flip is it you are
celebrating, specifically?

I think I've already mentioned it. Day off from work, getting together with
my family and exchanging gifts and eating and relaxing, and, most
importantly, a brief interlude of happiness in the darkest and coldest part
of the year. None of these things has anything to do with the Jesus myth,
except gift-giving, and even that in only a very ancillary way.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 26 Dec 2004 12:22:06 AM
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:336dabF3t220pU1@individual.net...
<snip to>
Yes. One is; because Christmas (and the holidays from which it derived) were
always religious in nature. Without religion there would BE no
Christmas/winter solstice celebration.
There would be Fourth of July's, Memorial Days, Labor Days, New Years Days
et. al, because none of those ever celebrated religious things, nor were
they religious in origin. Christmas, however, is. There is no other reason
to celebrate it. None.
I mean, consider; it's the dumbest time of the year there is to 'just have a
party'. One year before the big New Year's Celebration (in the west), at the
beginning of winter, almost immediately after the harvest festivals;
cramming one more party in the middle of others, what IS that?
Wouldn't it be more logical to move the celebration to, say, February or
March, when we sufferers of winter not only need the break more, but are
more rested from earlier celebrations and ready to HAVE one?
But no; y'all have a party on Christmas Day, a day historically important to
nobody at all for anything at all...except religious people.

And one is not necessarily "promoting religion" by celebrating Christmas,
as
you claimed earlier.

Only if you are willing to believe that the Marlboro man on the billboard
isn't promoting smoking...
Or that the movie scene with the characters drinking clearly marked
Starbucks coffee isn't promoting Starbucks, even when the scene itself has
nothing to do with the purchasing, making or even drinking coffee. Starbucks
is aware of this even if you aren't. Companies pay very large bucks to get
'product placement' in movies; a coke can here, a Starbucks there, a brand
new Mustang in that driveway, even if the scene isn't about any of it, the
very fact that they are in the picture promotes them.
And the very fact that you have a celebration on the 25th of December, and
use traditions that were invented, and used for millenia, by religions
promotes religion. IT's not a case of "should it", or 'can it", or "perhaps
we should be careful about promoting religion". You simply do.
However, you have it your way, celebrate it your way, and I hope indeed that
you have had a wonderful Christmas day, however you celebrated it.


They celebrate the founding
of a nation, the fallen military heros, other accomplishments of whoever

is

being honored that day.


Right, and you aren't necessarily promoting secularism by observing these
holidays with origins in secular events, just as you aren't necessarily
"promoting religion" by observing Christmas.

I'm not the one who claimed they WERE promoting secularism. That was you.
I'm the one who claimed that they supported their individual accomplishments
and historical anniversaries.
Christmas...well, that celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ (RELIGIOUS) or
winter solstace celebrations, also religious. There is no non-religious
anniversary or reason to celebrate either. It's only been VERY recently (in
terms of human history) that the solstice was understood as celestial
mechanics unchangable by human action..or inaction. Before that, though very
observent people noticed the day shortening and the turn around 'round about
now, there was no idea that this phenomenon was permanent. In fact, it
scared the snot out of 'em. There was no guarantee that the days would start
lengthening again, y'know, not to them. Thus the winter solstice rituals and
celebrations began; to propitiate the gods into liking them again, and
cajoling them into turning the sun around so that the spring would return.
We have no evidence, none whatsoever, that any celebrations of the winter
solstices were simply mathematical symposia on celestial mechanics followed
by a beer bust. ALL evidence we have, as far back as we can look, in as many
cultures as have been looked at, show that these rituals and celebrations
were religious.


Just as Christmas celebrates the birth of Christ, and is timed around,
and
has taken the traditions from, a holiday that celebrated the coming back

of

the sun and longer days.


Christmas celebrates much more than the birth of Christ, quite obviously.
In fact, the birth of Christ isn't even especially important to the
christian myth. Two of the four Gospels don't even consider it worth
mentioning.

"Christmas" celebrates only the birth of Christ. However, if you have been
paying attention at all, even to the post to which yours is a reply, you
would already know that this holiday is not only about being 'Christmas".
It's only been Christmas for about fifteen hundred years. Before that, and
right along side it, is the winter solstice thing from other faiths. I have
been very clear about where our traditions come from.
But all of the things that Christmas/Winter Solstice is about are religious.
Or, if not treated as such now, certainly owe their very existance to
religion.

If you take religion out of Christmas, what the flip is it you are
celebrating, specifically?


I think I've already mentioned it. Day off from work, getting together
with
my family and exchanging gifts and eating and relaxing, and, most
importantly, a brief interlude of happiness in the darkest and coldest
part
of the year. None of these things has anything to do with the Jesus myth,
except gift-giving, and even that in only a very ancillary way.

But...it's NOT the 'darkest and coldest part of the year". Darkest, perhaps,
I'll give you. But 'coldest'? Hardly. That is reserved for a month or two
from now. December 25th has nothing on the middle of February for sheer
'miserable'. So why not celebrate all this stuff then?
"Day off from work"? Well, you can take a personal day any time you want to
, correct? Vacation, or sick, or just do a weekend? After all, today is
Saturday, you might well have the day off anyway. You have THIS day off from
work because a great many religous people are celebrating the birth of
Christ....or (shrug) winter solstice...and you get some of the benefits of
their celebrations. Well, welcome to them. I hope very much that you have
had a glorious Christmas day.
But you wouldn't HAVE this day, if it weren't for the religious. You'd have
to come up with your own traditions, your own date and day off.
.
User: "sAnToLiNa"

Title: Re: Christmas 26 Dec 2004 07:55:04 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:iMszd.6798$1U6.4313@trnddc09...


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:336dabF3t220pU1@individual.net...
<snip to>

Yes. One is; because Christmas (and the holidays from which it derived)

were

always religious in nature. Without religion there would BE no
Christmas/winter solstice celebration.

And without deism and atheism there wouldn't be a U.S.A. as we know it, yet
I don't claim that you are promoting deism, atheism, or secularism when you
observe the 4th of July. That would be foolish of me.

There would be Fourth of July's, Memorial Days, Labor Days, New Years Days
et. al, because none of those ever celebrated religious things, nor were
they religious in origin. Christmas, however, is. There is no other reason
to celebrate it. None.

I've given you the reasons. Deal with them.

I mean, consider; it's the dumbest time of the year there is to 'just have

a

party'. One year before the big New Year's Celebration (in the west), at

the

beginning of winter, almost immediately after the harvest festivals;
cramming one more party in the middle of others, what IS that?

I'd respond to this if I knew just what in the hell you were babbling about.

Wouldn't it be more logical to move the celebration to, say, February or
March, when we sufferers of winter not only need the break more, but are
more rested from earlier celebrations and ready to HAVE one?

Whoever decided to have Christmas right around the solstice didn't adhere to
your personal logic. Have a chat with that person.

But no; y'all have a party on Christmas Day, a day historically important

to

nobody at all for anything at all...except religious people.

Well, your logic is impeccable. I guess I'm religious after all. Does this
mean I can keep doing what I've been doing with my adult life?

And one is not necessarily "promoting religion" by celebrating

Christmas,

as
you claimed earlier.


Only if you are willing to believe that the Marlboro man on the billboard
isn't promoting smoking...

This is a cracker of an analogy. Save this one.

Or that the movie scene with the characters drinking clearly marked
Starbucks coffee isn't promoting Starbucks, even when the scene itself has
nothing to do with the purchasing, making or even drinking coffee.

Starbucks

is aware of this even if you aren't. Companies pay very large bucks to get
'product placement' in movies; a coke can here, a Starbucks there, a brand
new Mustang in that driveway, even if the scene isn't about any of it, the
very fact that they are in the picture promotes them.

My parents, who are devout christians, will be delighted to learn that I am
promoting their beliefs by having dinner with them on December 25th.
Guess I'd better get busy and paste that "Jesus is the reason for the
season" bumpersticker on my car.

And the very fact that you have a celebration on the 25th of December, and
use traditions that were invented, and used for millenia, by religions
promotes religion. IT's not a case of "should it", or 'can it", or

"perhaps

we should be careful about promoting religion". You simply do.

I hope God has a nice place in Eternity for me, given all the unwitting work
I've done for him.

However, you have it your way, celebrate it your way, and I hope indeed

that

you have had a wonderful Christmas day, however you celebrated it.

Me? I promoted christianity. You said so yourself. And I didn't even have
a choice in the matter, apparently.


They celebrate the founding
of a nation, the fallen military heros, other accomplishments of

whoever

is

being honored that day.


Right, and you aren't necessarily promoting secularism by observing

these

holidays with origins in secular events, just as you aren't necessarily
"promoting religion" by observing Christmas.


I'm not the one who claimed they WERE promoting secularism.

They aren't, brainiac.

That was you.

That was nobody. Try reading it again.

I'm the one who claimed that they supported their individual

accomplishments

and historical anniversaries.

Christmas...well, that celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ

And much more, as has been pointed out to you.

(RELIGIOUS) or
winter solstace celebrations, also religious.

And much more, as has been pointed out to you.

There is no non-religious
anniversary or reason to celebrate either. It's only been VERY recently

(in

terms of human history) that the solstice was understood as celestial
mechanics unchangable by human action..or inaction.

Eh?

Before that, though very
observent people noticed the day shortening and the turn around 'round

about

now, there was no idea that this phenomenon was permanent. In fact, it
scared the snot out of 'em. There was no guarantee that the days would

start

lengthening again, y'know, not to them. Thus the winter solstice rituals

and

celebrations began; to propitiate the gods into liking them again, and
cajoling them into turning the sun around so that the spring would return.

You're making this ***** up.

We have no evidence, none whatsoever, that any celebrations of the winter
solstices were simply mathematical symposia on celestial mechanics

followed

by a beer bust. ALL evidence we have, as far back as we can look, in as

many

cultures as have been looked at, show that these rituals and celebrations
were religious.

Who the ***** cares what the ***** Druids thought of the solstice. We're
talking about what I think of it, and why you think you can tell me what to
think of it.


Just as Christmas celebrates the birth of Christ, and is timed around,
and
has taken the traditions from, a holiday that celebrated the coming

back

of

the sun and longer days.


Christmas celebrates much more than the birth of Christ, quite

obviously.

In fact, the birth of Christ isn't even especially important to the
christian myth. Two of the four Gospels don't even consider it worth
mentioning.


"Christmas" celebrates only the birth of Christ.

Horsefuckingshit. 98% of the rituals surrounding the holiday haven't the
goddamedest thing to do with the Jesus myth.

However, if you have been
paying attention at all, even to the post to which yours is a reply, you
would already know that this holiday is not only about being 'Christmas".
It's only been Christmas for about fifteen hundred years. Before that, and
right along side it, is the winter solstice thing from other faiths. I

have

been very clear about where our traditions come from.

***** the Druids. I don't ***** care.

But all of the things that Christmas/Winter Solstice is about are

religious.
Bullfuckingshit. Don't you even watch "A Charlie Brown Christmas"? Even a
devout christian like Charles Schultz was aghast at the irreligiousness of
the holiday. I hereby claim "A Charlie Brown Christmas" as definitive proof
of my position.

Or, if not treated as such now, certainly owe their very existance to
religion.

You likely owe your very existence to scientific naturalists. Yet, I don't
accuse you of promoting irreligious naturalism by merely existing.

If you take religion out of Christmas, what the flip is it you are
celebrating, specifically?


I think I've already mentioned it. Day off from work, getting together
with
my family and exchanging gifts and eating and relaxing, and, most
importantly, a brief interlude of happiness in the darkest and coldest
part
of the year. None of these things has anything to do with the Jesus

myth,

except gift-giving, and even that in only a very ancillary way.

But...it's NOT the 'darkest and coldest part of the year". Darkest,

perhaps,

I'll give you. But 'coldest'? Hardly. That is reserved for a month or two
from now. December 25th has nothing on the middle of February for sheer
'miserable'. So why not celebrate all this stuff then?

So havin' this lil' party makes no sense to you unless it takes place at the
very end of cold weather. Thanks for the input.

"Day off from work"?

And Scrooge, Marley, & Co even pay me for it.

Well, you can take a personal day any time you want to
, correct? Vacation, or sick, or just do a weekend? After all, today is
Saturday, you might well have the day off anyway. You have THIS day off

from > work because a great many religous people are celebrating the birth
of

Christ

Yeah, God bless 'em, every one.

....or (shrug) winter solstice...and you get some of the benefits of
their celebrations. Well, welcome to them. I hope very much that you have
had a glorious Christmas day.

Thanks, and you're welcome for my unwitting promotion of your belief in 2%
of it.

But you wouldn't HAVE this day, if it weren't for the religious. You'd

have

to come up with your own traditions, your own date and day off.

And allow me to extend the thanks of Bill Gates to you for all you have done
for HIS worldview.
.









User: "jwk"

Title: Re: Christmas 20 Dec 2004 10:28:18 AM
DianaC wrote:

"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message

[snip]

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it

as a

religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve

religion

is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,

because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to

celebrate

in the first place.

There you go again. It is NOT impossible to throw religion out of the
Christmas celebration. I do it ever year. Get over yourself.
jwk
(BTW, the solstice is an astronomical fact. Why do you insist a
religion has to be involved.)
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 20 Dec 2004 09:31:27 PM
"jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103560098.970130.327040@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


DianaC wrote:

"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message

[snip]

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it

as a

religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to


pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve

religion

is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you


celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,

because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to

celebrate

in the first place.


There you go again. It is NOT impossible to throw religion out of the
Christmas celebration. I do it ever year. Get over yourself.

As long as you call it Christmas....you are keeping religion in it. You
know, CHRISTmas?
Or 'Xmas'?
Or Winter Solstice, which only means that a different religion....a great
many of them, actually...are involved?
.
User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 04:41:37 AM
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:31:27 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:


"jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103560098.970130.327040@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


DianaC wrote:

"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message

[snip]

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it

as a

religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to


pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve

religion

is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you


celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,

because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to

celebrate

in the first place.


There you go again. It is NOT impossible to throw religion out of the
Christmas celebration. I do it ever year. Get over yourself.


As long as you call it Christmas....you are keeping religion in it. You
know, CHRISTmas?

Or 'Xmas'?

Or Winter Solstice, which only means that a different religion....a great
many of them, actually...are involved?

This is why people have recently decided, why do we call it
Christs Mass. This is a religuous thing and the religious
Christians, Muslims and Jews obnoxious and a blot on
mankind. Your are revealing your true selves and the decent
majority are beginning to see you lot for what you are and
rejecting everything to do with you. It is always darkest before
the dawn and soon the USA as a whole will wake up rub
their eyes and throw you religion and all its works into
the dustbin with all the other trash. Well, I hope.


--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
User: "Harry F. Leopold"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 09:03:59 AM
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:41:37 -0600, Les Hellawell wrote
(in article <s5vfs0t24sgcqg004nd5evfu2lce9b974v@4ax.com>):
piggy-backing-

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:31:27 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:


"jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103560098.970130.327040@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


DianaC wrote:

"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message

[snip]

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it

as a

religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to


pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve

religion

is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you


celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of

it,

because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to

celebrate

in the first place.


There you go again. It is NOT impossible to throw religion out of the
Christmas celebration. I do it ever year. Get over yourself.


As long as you call it Christmas....you are keeping religion in it. You
know, CHRISTmas?

Or 'Xmas'?

Or Winter Solstice, which only means that a different religion....a great
many of them, actually...are involved?

The winter solstice, please note that it is NOT capitalized, is caused by the
tilt of the Earths' poles. Now please explain to us exactly how this is a
part of any religion. Take all the words you need, but explain in full your
"reasoning" to claim that physical facts of the Earth are a part of any
religion.

This is why people have recently decided, why do we call it
Christs Mass.

I have called it "Christsmash" for decades, it pretty well describes exactly
what the various Christians like to do at this time of the year.

This is a religuous thing and the religious
Christians, Muslims and Jews obnoxious and a blot on
mankind. Your are revealing your true selves and the decent
majority are beginning to see you lot for what you are and
rejecting everything to do with you. It is always darkest before
the dawn and soon the USA as a whole will wake up rub
their eyes and throw you religion and all its works into
the dustbin with all the other trash. Well, I hope.



--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"You think atoms like having a half-life?"
Incenjucar
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 22 Dec 2004 12:36:53 AM
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BDED977F00AD7E90F02845B0@news.central.cox.net...
<snip to>


The winter solstice, please note that it is NOT capitalized, is caused by
the
tilt of the Earths' poles. Now please explain to us exactly how this is a
part of any religion. Take all the words you need, but explain in full
your
"reasoning" to claim that physical facts of the Earth are a part of any
religion.

The event is not religious. The reaction of people to it was. Every single
time. The celebrations of the winter solstice were all religious, either
propitiary or feasts of thanksgiving, and you are raising a very nasty
strawman here.
Next you will be claiming that because the sun actually exists, that nobody
ever believed it was a god.
<snip to end>
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 10:09:49 AM
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BDED977F00AD7E90F02845B0@news.central.cox.net...
snip


I have called it "Christsmash" for decades, it pretty well describes
exactly
what the various Christians like to do at this time of the year.

Sounds like the way I felt after my friend's Christmas party last Friday :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.





User: "Kate "

Title: Re: Christmas 20 Dec 2004 01:35:06 AM
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:27:33 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:


"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:32ml28F3if65lU1@individual.net...


DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:rnixd.4678$rL3.4511@trnddc03...


"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&po
sition=


By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.


How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting religion?
How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the

season

(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?

No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot,
even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years' party,
it's still based on religion. Look up the history.

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a

very

real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any of

the

other fun things. It's ALL about religion.

Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


And we all 100% support your right as an individual to celebrate it as a
religious holiday.


As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve religion
is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,
because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to celebrate
in the first place.

Don't be silly. Time off and fun customs practiced simply because
they are fun is quite possible and we all do it. Even those who
pretend they do it for religous reasons. Just because you think it
somehow must have religous ghosts floating around doesn't mean other
people do.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 20 Dec 2004 09:55:08 AM
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:41cc7fa3.90344187@news-west.newscene.com...
<snip to>

Don't be silly. Time off and fun customs practiced simply because
they are fun is quite possible and we all do it. Even those who
pretend they do it for religous reasons. Just because you think it
somehow must have religous ghosts floating around doesn't mean other
people do.

Kate. You aren't getting the picture.
the first post in the thread was from maff, who posted the following "The
debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion centers on
whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths."
What I said in response is that it is not possible to celebrate Christmas
without promoting religion. It's not.
It doesn't matter WHY you participate in the traditions, whether you believe
in what they stand for or not, anymore than it matters why you wear Levi's
as opposed to another brand of jeans. Simply by wearing them, you are
'promoting' Levi-Straus.
It doesn't matter WHY you decorate a tree or sing Christmas music (or Xmas
music) or give gifts that day or anything else. The simple fact that you DO
it promotes the religion that originated it.
Whether that religion is Christian or Druidic or any other pagan/ancient
religion.
I suggest, humbly, that you simply enjoy the season, do what you want to do,
and not get your knickers in a twist whether someone else actually believes
in the symbolism you are playing with. Have a merry, in other words, and
don't worry about whether or not someone else actually believes...and means
it when they sing "Angels we have heard on high".
I will say that I think it is rather presumptuous of people like maff to
insist that we, who provided this neat holiday (which comes from 'holy day',
by the way) keep OUR religion out of OUR holiday in order to allow him to
participate in it.
.


User: "Paul Erickson"

Title: Re: Christmas 13 Jan 2005 09:50:27 PM
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:27:33 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:

As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve religion
is, well....

not possible.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,
because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to celebrate
in the first place.

I'm sorry, but have you heard of the solstice? Feast festivals are
often to be found around that time, in order to eat up what's not
going to last
Slobbering Skeleton
.
User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Christmas 13 Jan 2005 10:33:10 PM
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 03:50:27 GMT, Paul Erickson
<paul.erickson@softhome.net> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:27:33 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:

As I support your right to celebrate it any way you wish. However, to
pretend that there IS a way to celebrate it that doesn't involve religion
is, well....

not possible.

She's kying again. What a surprise. NOT.

You don't have to BELIEVE in the religion, but the very fact that you
celebrate the day at all makes it impossible to throw religion out of it,
because if it weren't for religion, there would BE no holiday to celebrate
in the first place.


I'm sorry, but have you heard of the solstice? Feast festivals are
often to be found around that time, in order to eat up what's not
going to last


Slobbering Skeleton

.




User: "Sean C"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 09:58:18 PM
In article <rnixd.4678$rL3.4511@trnddc03>, DianaC
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:

"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103457762.431241.298890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Does Christmas Need to Be Saved?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/19/weekinreview/19zern.html?pagewanted=all&po
sition=

By KATE ZERNIKE
The debate over how to celebrate Christmas without promoting religion
centers on whether or not the country has gone too far in its quest to
be inclusive of all faiths.


How in the world can one celebrate CHRISTmas without promoting religion?
How in the world can one celibrate any aspect of Christmas, from the season
(winter solstice) to the traditions without promoting religion?

Ask the Japanese. They are overwhelmingly Buddhist, but they celebrate
Christmas with Santa Claus, elves, creches and all the rest and don't
give a second thought to the religious connotations, or that they're
celebrating a religious holiday. It's just another American cultural
artifact they've adopted; and of course, it's heavily commercialized.

No matter what tradition you turn to, it's ALL about religion. Shoot, even
if you abandon the December 25th part and just go to a New Years' party,
it's still based on religion. Look up the history.

Yes, it's based on pagan religion. We have all kinds of practices that
originate in religion or superstitions of one kind or another.

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents or any of the
myths that go along with it; like Santa Claus (based on St. Nickolas, a very
real bishop who gave away very real stuff) or stocking hanging or any of the
other fun things. It's ALL about religion.

Have a big party, get drunk, hand out party favors. (shrug)

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.

It's only religious if you impart religious significance to it.
Otherwise, it's just cultural, like saying "God bless you" when someone
sneezes.
Sean C
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 03:12:34 PM
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:54:47 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> said in alt.atheism:

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents

Pagan "traditions".

It's ALL about religion.

If your "religion" is belief in spending.

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.

Not any longer.
---
CellPhonesEtc at optonline dot net
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 04:01:39 PM
"Al Klein" <CellPhones@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ejrbs050aisg2m02sbsnl7qkfajhmvsltg@4ax.com...

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:54:47 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> said in alt.atheism:

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents


Pagan "traditions".

It's ALL about religion.


If your "religion" is belief in spending.

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


Not any longer.

Seriously. I've spent that last 43 years celebrating a secular Christmas
and will always continue to do so. It's really quite easy.
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 04:51:26 PM
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:32mc1vF3n1sm9U1@individual.net...


"Al Klein" <CellPhones@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ejrbs050aisg2m02sbsnl7qkfajhmvsltg@4ax.com...

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:54:47 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> said in alt.atheism:

If you want to throw the religion out of the whole thing, then have a big
party some other time of the year, do NOT use any of the traditions of
Christmas, like lights or trees or gaily wrapped presents


Pagan "traditions".

It's ALL about religion.


If your "religion" is belief in spending.

But Christmas is a religious holiday. That's simply what it is.


Not any longer.


Seriously. I've spent that last 43 years celebrating a secular Christmas
and will always continue to do so. It's really quite easy.

What you do is use the traditions as 'fun' things to do. But there isn't one
single one of 'em, not even ONE, that isn't based in religion.
Not. one.
So, if one is truely out to get religion out of Christmas, you have to throw
everything out.
.
User: "jwk"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 05:50:10 PM
DianaC wrote:

What you do is use the traditions as 'fun' things to do. But there

isn't one

single one of 'em, not even ONE, that isn't based in religion.

Not. one.

So, if one is truely out to get religion out of Christmas, you have

to throw

everything out.

Yell and scream all you want *****, you're still not god. I'll
celebrate at this time of year if I want. And I'll keep, or throw out,
what I want. Histronics don't make you boss.
jwk
BAAWA
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Christmas 19 Dec 2004 08:16:07 PM
"jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103500209.981055.109920@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


DianaC wrote:

What you do is use the traditions as 'fun' things to do. But there

isn't one

single one of 'em, not even ONE, that isn't based in religion.

Not. one.

So, if one is truely out to get religion out of Christmas, you have

to throw

everything out.


Yell and scream all you want *****, you're still not god. I'll
celebrate at this time of year if I want. And I'll keep, or throw out,
what I want. Histronics don't make you boss.

I don't recall yelling or screaming here. I'm not the one having hysterics.
HistORics, perhaps...simply pointing out that every single tradition that is
tied to Christmas celebrations have a religious origin, if only by the fact
that they are CHRISTmas traditions. (Or 'Xmas" traditions...which is an
older, more respectful, believe it or not, way of saying Christmas...)
The poster who began this thread seemed to think it is possible to celebrate
Christmas without promoting religion. I find that claim astounding. Whether
you celebrate it with religion in mind or not, the fact that you do
celebrate it keeps the religion it represents in mind...and thus 'promotes'
it.
This would be so if you celebrated a winter solstice rather than a
Christmas, because THAT was religious, too.
So why are your knickers in a twist? You don't like hearing facts pointed
out? You don't like being hypocritical, perhaps? Shoot, you COULD just
switch all the partying, gift giving etc. to New Year's Day, which is NOT
religious. It, after all, is a very arbitrary celebration of an extremely
arbitrary place to mark time passing. (shrug)
But as long as you put up the tree and give the gifts and hang the stockings
and all that other stuff, you ARE, whether you like the concept or not,
participating in a tradition begun by, and steeped in, religious meaning.
.
User: "chibiabos"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 09:33:52 PM
In article <HBqxd.2902$tG3.2103@trnddc02>, DianaC
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:

The poster who began this thread seemed to think it is possible to celebrate
Christmas without promoting religion. I find that claim astounding.

From what religion comes the 23.5 degree tilt of the Earth's axis? Be
specific.
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Christmas 21 Dec 2004 09:41:18 PM
"chibiabos" <chib@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:211220041933521094%chib@nospam.com...

In article <HBqxd.2902$tG3.2103@trnddc02>, DianaC
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:

The poster who began this thread seemed to think it is possible to
celebrate
Christmas without promoting religion. I find that claim astounding.


From what religion comes the 23.5 degree tilt of the Earth's axis? Be
specific.

And who was this original poster?
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.









  Page 1 of 17

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 


Related Articles