| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Paul Abeles" |
| Date: |
06 Feb 2004 05:43:13 AM |
| Object: |
Circumcising still born babies |
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
.
|
|
| User: "amigocabal" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 07:12:51 AM |
|
|
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
JEWS HAVE GONE BERSERK!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "IlanAvraham" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 03:50:13 PM |
|
|
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
07 Feb 2004 01:13:02 AM |
|
|
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract.
http://www.shemayisrael.co.il/dafyomi2/azarah/insites/az-dt-42.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
07 Feb 2004 08:25:54 PM |
|
|
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it up and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a dead
baby son (G-d forbid). He woul be my baby, a Jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of the larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird things othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 12:35:05 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it up and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of the larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird things othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Norma" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 06:19:39 AM |
|
|
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote in message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it up and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises me. But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both are such
strange concepts. Norma
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 08:10:06 AM |
|
|
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote in
message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society
of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep
the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the
latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures
to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it up
and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a
dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises me.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both are such
strange concepts. Norma
I posted the link about the nefel,Norma.
Catholics baptizing the dead? I haven't heard of that being official
doctrine. I did baptize my dog as a child. Alive of course.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Norma" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 08:47:47 AM |
|
|
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2rrVb.48098$Wa.39806@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote in
message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs
of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be
an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the "Society
of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched
it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they keep
the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the
latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take pictures
to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you
just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it up
and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a
dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises me.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both are
such
strange concepts. Norma
I posted the link about the nefel,Norma.
Yes,thanks.
Catholics baptizing the dead? I haven't heard of that being official
doctrine. I did baptize my dog as a child. Alive of course.
It is done here all the time. Norma
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 09:20:58 AM |
|
|
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102cj06qnsdhmc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2rrVb.48098$Wa.39806@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote in
message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and
wrongs
of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could
be
an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud
that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the
"Society
of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched
it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they
keep
the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want
ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the
latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take
pictures
to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you
just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it
up
and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a
dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of
the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird
things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises
me.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both are
such
strange concepts. Norma
I posted the link about the nefel,Norma.
Yes,thanks.
Catholics baptizing the dead? I haven't heard of that being official
doctrine. I did baptize my dog as a child. Alive of course.
It is done here all the time. Norma
Got a link?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 05:44:29 PM |
|
|
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<utsVb.48124$Wa.43671@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102cj06qnsdhmc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2rrVb.48098$Wa.39806@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote in
message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and
wrongs
of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could
be
an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud
that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the
"Society
of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull" snatched
it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they
keep
the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want
ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its the
latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take
pictures
to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont you
just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing it
up
and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from circumcising a
dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead of
the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird
things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises
me.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both are
such
strange concepts. Norma
I posted the link about the nefel,Norma.
Yes,thanks.
Catholics baptizing the dead? I haven't heard of that being official
doctrine. I did baptize my dog as a child. Alive of course.
It is done here all the time. Norma
Got a link?
I don't need one. I know too many families who did/do this. Norma
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 06:33:42 PM |
|
|
<norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:9abc4e06.0402081544.51625275@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<utsVb.48124$Wa.43671@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102cj06qnsdhmc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2rrVb.48098$Wa.39806@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
"The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" <rennagade@anglican.org> wrote
in
message
news:4025d779.9162218@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 02:25:54 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"IlanAvraham" <iab123@excite.com> wrote in message
news:11b375b5.0402061350.53429eab@posting.google.com...
"Paul Abeles" <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<l5LUb.44640$Wa.11962@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
I just read this interesting article about the rights and
wrongs
of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it
could
be
an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
I think you must have been reading Amigocabulls secret Talmud
that
only he has seen and had a copy of until the Rabbis of the
"Society
of
Secrets Talmuds That No One Has Seen Except Amigocabull"
snatched
it
away and got him committed to the same crazy house where they
keep
the
Philadelphia Experiment survivors locked up.
So either cite a source or retract. And if you really want
ghoulish
things then do a search on stillborn babies and photos. Its
the
latest
rage among the death worshiping Goy society where they take
their
stillborn children, dress them up in baby clothes and take
pictures
to
keep as a way of consolation for their cause.
Hell stinking perverse Goyim, why stop at pictures, why dont
you
just
stuff and mount your stillborn kids as a conversation piece.
I couldn't say what I would do if a baby of mine died.
I certainly can't bring myself to condemn someone for dressing
it
up
and
take a picture - nor do I think I might refrain from
circumcising a
dead
baby son (G-d forbid).
You may as well castrate him as well, Suzy.
He woul be my baby, a Jew.
No he wouldn't. He would be a dead baby half-jew.
But the fact that people still scream at Jews for this instead
of
the
larger
practitioners of circumcision - or don;t evenmention the weird
things
othe
people do - just hows where the real htred is.
Suzy
Who else circumcises dead people, Suzy?
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it
surprises
me.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die? Both
are
such
strange concepts. Norma
I posted the link about the nefel,Norma.
Yes,thanks.
Catholics baptizing the dead? I haven't heard of that being
official
doctrine. I did baptize my dog as a child. Alive of course.
It is done here all the time. Norma
Got a link?
I don't need one. I know too many families who did/do this. Norma
You must be confused with Mormons. Here is a Catholic critique.
http://www.catholic.com/library/Mormonism_Baptism_for_the_Dead.asp
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies - more Jew hatred |
08 Feb 2004 05:42:40 PM |
|
|
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:102caae5h71tg53@corp.supernews.com...
I have never heard of circumsizing dead baby boys, and it surprises me.
Me, either.
But
is it like Baptizing someone to be Catholic after they die?
I'm pretty sure not, because a bris doesn't make someone Jewish, it only
marks them as such.
Baptism is what makes someone a Catholic & I don't think they do it to the
dead.
Susan
Both are such
strange concepts. Norma
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "spakka" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
08 Feb 2004 06:42:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:43:13 +0000, Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
How do you circumcise a leg?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
08 Feb 2004 08:10:59 AM |
|
|
"spakka" <usenet_spam@m16.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.02.08.13.45.22.855638@m16.demon.co.uk...
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:43:13 +0000, Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
How do you circumcise a leg?
An amputated limb is a nefel.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 07:41:26 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:43:13 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> thought hard and said:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
Well, at least this time the baby will not feel any pain!
Wow, that was harsh.
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 15 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Madly Insane EAC Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 06:08:03 AM |
|
|
Paul Abeles <nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
Sounds as freaky as in-uteran baptism to me. I can't understand
what makes people do such things. The only answer I can come up
with seems to be superstition.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Smol" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 09:07:47 AM |
|
|
Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
That is just sick...
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
|
|
|
| User: "Norma" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 10:05:40 AM |
|
|
"Richard Smol" <jazzcat_nospam_@dds.nl> wrote in message
news:4023adc3$1_2@127.0.0.1...
Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
That is just sick...
It's certainly is a surprise, as it is usually done after 8 days of
"living". Norma
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
=---
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 01:46:25 PM |
|
|
"Norma" <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1027eqcs59kqa02@corp.supernews.com...
"Richard Smol" <jazzcat_nospam_@dds.nl> wrote in message
news:4023adc3$1_2@127.0.0.1...
Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
That is just sick...
It's certainly is a surprise, as it is usually done after 8 days of
"living". Norma
Read this Norma.
http://www.shemayisrael.co.il/dafyomi2/azarah/insites/az-dt-42.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 10:53:44 AM |
|
|
Norma <norma2339@charter.net> wrote in alt.atheism
Richard Smol <jazzcat_nospam_@dds.nl> wrote in message
Paul Abeles wrote:
I just read this interesting article about the rights and wrongs of
circumcising nefels [dead babies in this instance or it could be an
amputated leg]
What do you think?
That is just sick...
It's certainly is a surprise, as it is usually done after 8 days of
"living". Norma
Many circumcisions in ancient Egypt were done as a rite of puberty or
adulthood, or as some initiation into the priesthood, from what I've
read. That means at least 12 or 13 years old, or some "age of
puberty," from what I can tell.
At that age, a child is supposed to be capable of making their own
choices, similar to the Jewish idea of a "son" or "daughter" of the
"rules or laws" of some creed or mitzvah, if they choose to follow it,
of their own free will, at that time.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong about that. Jewish parents don't
actually force their children to have a bar or bat mitzvah, do they?
From:
http://www.jewfaq.org/barmitz.htm
"A Jewish boy automatically becomes a Bar Mitzvah upon reaching the
age of 13 years. No ceremony is needed to confer these rights and
obligations. The popular bar mitzvah ceremony is not required, and
does not fulfill any commandment. It is a relatively modern
innovation, not mentioned in the Talmud, and the elaborate ceremonies
and receptions that are commonplace today were unheard of as recently
as a century ago."
Hmm... Looks like the male Jews don't even have a choice in the
matter, just like not having a choice to have part of their penises
chopped off before they even know what a penis is for.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Goodness Godless" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
06 Feb 2004 02:03:40 PM |
|
|
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:8cf7205vf8unbf3sf10ia2o1vhjrjokcng@4ax.com...
<snip>
Hmm... Looks like the male Jews don't even have a choice in the
matter, just like not having a choice to have part of their penises
chopped off before they even know what a penis is for.
And all Islamics.
And for medical reasons (of course):
80% USians
50% Ausies
50% Canadians
Funny old world!
--
Goodness Godless
My Nation is Planet Earth because my
Passport is my Education - anon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diederik" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
08 Feb 2004 10:26:03 PM |
|
|
"Goodness Godless" <goodness@godless.net> wrote in message news:<1076101817.856050@athnrd02.forthnet.gr>...
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:8cf7205vf8unbf3sf10ia2o1vhjrjokcng@4ax.com...
<snip>
Hmm... Looks like the male Jews don't even have a choice in the
matter, just like not having a choice to have part of their penises
chopped off before they even know what a penis is for.
And all Islamics.
And for medical reasons (of course):
80% USians
50% Ausies
50% Canadians
Funny old world!
Yah, that's somthing I'd like to see change. If I ever have sons,
they won't be circumcised, that's for sure. Barbaric practice.
Diederik
.
|
|
|
| User: "cindys" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
08 Feb 2004 10:43:54 PM |
|
|
"Diederik" <diederik_b@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a012326d.0402082026.2dd34ef8@posting.google.com...
"Goodness Godless" <goodness@godless.net> wrote in message
news:<1076101817.856050@athnrd02.forthnet.gr>...
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:8cf7205vf8unbf3sf10ia2o1vhjrjokcng@4ax.com...
<snip>
Hmm... Looks like the male Jews don't even have a choice in the
matter, just like not having a choice to have part of their penises
chopped off before they even know what a penis is for.
And all Islamics.
And for medical reasons (of course):
80% USians
50% Ausies
50% Canadians
Funny old world!
Yah, that's somthing I'd like to see change. If I ever have sons,
they won't be circumcised, that's for sure. Barbaric practice.
------------
Good for you.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Abeles" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising still born babies |
08 Feb 2004 11:21:27 PM |
|
|
"cindys" <cstein1@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:eeEVb.8712$um1.8237@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"Diederik" <diederik_b@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a012326d.0402082026.2dd34ef8@posting.google.com...
"Goodness Godless" <goodness@godless.net> wrote in message
news:<1076101817.856050@athnrd02.forthnet.gr>...
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:8cf7205vf8unbf3sf10ia2o1vhjrjokcng@4ax.com...
<snip>
Hmm... Looks like the male Jews don't even have a choice in the
matter, just like not having a choice to have part of their penises
chopped off before they even know what a penis is for.
And all Islamics.
And for medical reasons (of course):
80% USians
50% Ausies
50% Canadians
Funny old world!
Yah, that's somthing I'd like to see change. If I ever have sons,
they won't be circumcised, that's for sure. Barbaric practice.
------------
Good for you.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: FORGERY: Circumcising still born babies |
09 Feb 2004 12:50:55 AM |
|
|
The Phony Rev wrote in message news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Goodness Godless" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising in general |
09 Feb 2004 01:51:35 PM |
|
|
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:j5GVb.752$6i.294@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
The Phony Rev wrote in message news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
Now Susan, if you had not snipped the thread, you know
we were talking about willy snipping in general, not just
Jewish willy snipping.
--
Goodness Godless
When I was young there was no respect for the young, and now that I am old
there is no respect for the old. I missed out coming and going.
J.B. Priestley
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising in general |
09 Feb 2004 11:08:22 PM |
|
|
"Goodness Godless" <goodness@godless.net> wrote in message
news:1076356559.439454@athnrd02.forthnet.gr...
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:j5GVb.752$6i.294@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
The Phony Rev wrote in message
news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
Now Susan, if you had not snipped the thread, you know
we were talking about willy snipping in general, not just
Jewish willy snipping.
And if you would have bothered to read anything in my post, you would have
noticed that I was addressing the specific lie told by the idiot pretending
to be an Anglican minister. It was he & the other bigot who preceded him who
took the thread off-topic.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe" |
|
| Title: Re: Circumcising in general |
10 Feb 2004 12:11:26 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 05:08:22 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
<flavia13@verizon.net> wrote:
"Goodness Godless" <goodness@godless.net> wrote in message
news:1076356559.439454@athnrd02.forthnet.gr...
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:j5GVb.752$6i.294@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
The Phony Rev wrote in message
news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
Now Susan, if you had not snipped the thread, you know
we were talking about willy snipping in general, not just
Jewish willy snipping.
And if you would have bothered to read anything in my post, you would have
noticed that I was addressing the specific lie told by the idiot pretending
to be an Anglican minister. It was he & the other bigot who preceded him who
took the thread off-topic.
Suzy
How is the jew habit of circumcising women "off topic" to a thread
entitled "Circumcision in general", Suzy?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cindys" |
|
| Title: Re: FORGERY: Circumcising still born babies |
09 Feb 2004 07:17:18 AM |
|
|
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:j5GVb.752$6i.294@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
The Phony Rev wrote in message news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
------------
If he wants to forge "Abeles," he can be my guest on that one.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: FORGERY: Circumcising still born babies |
09 Feb 2004 10:32:54 PM |
|
|
"cindys" <cstein1@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yLLVb.8731$um1.1369@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:j5GVb.752$6i.294@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
The Phony Rev wrote in message
news:40271911.6854493@news.tiscali.co.uk...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:21:27 GMT, "Paul Abeles"
<nospampaabeles@hotmail.com> wrote:
I believe in equality so I had my daughter done as well.
Why? You're not Jewish.
& the phony rev knows that Jewish women aren't circumcised.
He's just being his usual useless self.
------------
If he wants to forge "Abeles," he can be my guest on that one.
Why not? Abeles has been known to forge himself, sort of.
Susan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
