Religions > Atheism > Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
08 Aug 2006 11:48:28 PM |
| Object: |
Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly from
within.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2486.html
London, England (LifeNews.com) -- Women from around the world are traveling
to clinics in various locations that are now offering face lifts and
cosmetic surgery using tissue from babies who have been killed by abortions.
Pro-life advocates are strongly condemning the practice and saying the
taking of human life is never warranted -- especially for such a
self-serving purpose.
Women like Susan Barrington, a 52-year-old housewife from England, are
heading to places such as Barbados, the Dominican Republic, Moscow and
Rotterdam to obtain the treatments.
She has been given the final go-ahead form a local clinic to travel abroad
for the treatment that promises to make her look 10 years younger and
doesn't mind that lives have been sacrificed to enhance her beauty.
To produce the treatments, clinics are using tissue from babies killed in
abortions from 6 to 12 weeks into pregnancy and stem cells obtained from
destroying human embryos to inject into a client's face. The fetal cells
then begin a supposed rejuvenation process that makes the skin look younger.
To obtain the cells, women in underdeveloped nations are paid up to $200
dollars to carry a baby up to the optimum eight to 12 week period when the
fetuses are "harvested" for their stem cells which are then sold to
exclusive cosmetic clinics.
Both pro-life advocates and scientists who favor stem cell research are
upset by the promotion of these injections.
UK stem-cell researcher Colin Blakemore told the London Daily Mail newspaper
that the therapies are "highly experimental" and risk damaging the
reputation of legitimate stem cell researchers.
He also complained that these clinics were located in tourist destinations
and unregulated by any international body.
"And if anything goes wrong afterwards, it is hushed up to prevent damage to
the business," he told the newspaper.
In a statement given to LifeNews.com, Concerned Women for America condemned
scientists for using tissue from abortions and embryonic stem cells for the
treatments.
"This fad illustrates the extremes to which embryonic stem cell use can
lead," CWA senior fellow, Dr. Janice Shaw Crouse, said. "It is hard to
believe that such atrocities are going on today."
"The ethical and moral ramifications of such treatments are staggering; the
experimental aspects are equally troubling," Crouse explained.
"Not only is the origin of the fetuses immoral and inhumane; there are
medical problems and complications associated with the injections," Crouse
concluded. "This savage and repulsive 'brave new world' of human sacrifices
in the quest for eternal youth is a prime example of the end results when
all moral boundaries are destroyed."
Some of the clinics include the Institute for Regenerative Medicine in
Barbados where injections are done using tissue from aborted babies. The
clinic is located in the luxurious Villa Nova hotel, where American and
Russian scientists have targeted upper class British and American women.
More than 50 clinics exist in Moscow, the Russian capital, including the
Cellulite Clinic. There, cells from a wide range of sources including
aborted babies and human embryos are used.
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions (Pro-lie sleaze) |
09 Aug 2006 03:28:04 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
Jon Young spews his hatred of women yet again.
Nobody is surprised.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 12:32:57 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly from
within.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2486.html
Well, IBen, you obviously have no shame, since Lifenews has a track record of
making things up and trying to pass them off as legitimate news. It's just an
average day in your life of making sure you get attention.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hotel Charlie One" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 07:37:34 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
news:VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Pro-life advocates are strongly condemning the practice and saying
the taking of human life is never warranted -- especially for such a
self-serving purpose.
You mean like Fearless Leader making his legacy in Iraq? Not putting
enough boots on the ground and allowing the Iraqis to pick off our
troops one and two at a time, that is tantamount to murder (and in my
opinion, treason).
--
The actions of the disgraceful Clinton and Bush administrations
make it possible for me to say without shame that I deeply regret
the day I put the uniform of my country. The freedoms that I was
willing to protect with my life are being lost. The America of
our founders is dead. All we are waiting for now is rigor mortis.
HotelCharlieOne
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 01:24:50 AM |
|
|
a =E9crit :
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency?
Why do you insist in using a word you obviously don't understand?
At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this?
So, you also oppose science?
No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly f=
rom
within.
Just like you.
Please try next time to come with more credible sources than
"lifenews".
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2486.html
London, England (LifeNews.com) -- Women from around the world are traveli=
ng
to clinics in various locations that are now offering face lifts and
cosmetic surgery using tissue from babies who have been killed by abortio=
ns.
Pro-life advocates are strongly condemning the practice and saying the
taking of human life is never warranted -- especially for such a
self-serving purpose.
Women like Susan Barrington, a 52-year-old housewife from England, are
heading to places such as Barbados, the Dominican Republic, Moscow and
Rotterdam to obtain the treatments.
She has been given the final go-ahead form a local clinic to travel abroad
for the treatment that promises to make her look 10 years younger and
doesn't mind that lives have been sacrificed to enhance her beauty.
To produce the treatments, clinics are using tissue from babies killed in
abortions from 6 to 12 weeks into pregnancy and stem cells obtained from
destroying human embryos to inject into a client's face. The fetal cells
then begin a supposed rejuvenation process that makes the skin look young=
er.
To obtain the cells, women in underdeveloped nations are paid up to $200
dollars to carry a baby up to the optimum eight to 12 week period when the
fetuses are "harvested" for their stem cells which are then sold to
exclusive cosmetic clinics.
Both pro-life advocates and scientists who favor stem cell research are
upset by the promotion of these injections.
UK stem-cell researcher Colin Blakemore told the London Daily Mail newspa=
per
that the therapies are "highly experimental" and risk damaging the
reputation of legitimate stem cell researchers.
He also complained that these clinics were located in tourist destinations
and unregulated by any international body.
"And if anything goes wrong afterwards, it is hushed up to prevent damage=
to
the business," he told the newspaper.
In a statement given to LifeNews.com, Concerned Women for America condemn=
ed
scientists for using tissue from abortions and embryonic stem cells for t=
he
treatments.
"This fad illustrates the extremes to which embryonic stem cell use can
lead," CWA senior fellow, Dr. Janice Shaw Crouse, said. "It is hard to
believe that such atrocities are going on today."
"The ethical and moral ramifications of such treatments are staggering; t=
he
experimental aspects are equally troubling," Crouse explained.
"Not only is the origin of the fetuses immoral and inhumane; there are
medical problems and complications associated with the injections," Crouse
concluded. "This savage and repulsive 'brave new world' of human sacrific=
es
in the quest for eternal youth is a prime example of the end results when
all moral boundaries are destroyed."
Some of the clinics include the Institute for Regenerative Medicine in
Barbados where injections are done using tissue from aborted babies. The
clinic is located in the luxurious Villa Nova hotel, where American and
Russian scientists have targeted upper class British and American women.
More than 50 clinics exist in Moscow, the Russian capital, including the
Cellulite Clinic. There, cells from a wide range of sources including
aborted babies and human embryos are used.
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
--=20
----------
=20
J Y=F6ung
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 08:22:11 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:48:28 -0400, youngopinions in
<VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency?
What would you know about that?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Help to make the USA Bigotry-FREE!" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 12:43:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:48:28 -0400,
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions...
Hey! RETARD!!!
NO *baby* has EVER been killed in an abortion.
Any more than any oak tree has EVER been felled by squirrels
because they harvested and polished off acorns.
But keep right on making such a total fool of yourself, Loser.
Laughingstock Status is the last one before extinction.
As the segregationists found out the hard way about *their*
EQUALLY-loathsome agenda. ANTI-Choice will soon be remem-
bered with the same level of derision.
So keep right on helping to drive nails into the coffin lid of
your worthless, ignorant, and sociopathic agenda, since TWO
factors *hasten* the day when Anti-Choice will be only a
memory: (1) ALL relevant FACTS (see sig; NO Anti-Choice
loser has *ever* been able to disprove ANY of it. And (2)
Losers like you who constantly remind everyone that Anti-
Choice is nothing but a hateful, bigoted, and sick joke.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness*
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
* (AFTER the 7th month of gestation begins, conscious
awareness may be possible, but all the other of the above-
listed attributes still apply.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, BIRTHrights. and first-BORNS.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 01:53:23 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Help to make the USA Bigotry-FREE!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote in message
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness*
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
Give 'em some time and a political victory or two. They'll be outlawing
rubbers next, like they did before decent liberal people fixed the problem.
Curt
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 07:37:55 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:48:28 -0400, <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly from
within.
Imbecilic troll J. Young once again proves there's no lie so
outrageous that he won't believe it - or so evil and despicable that
he won't tell it..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 10:58:25 AM |
|
|
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle!
They could also feed them to inmates.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 08:33:37 AM |
|
|
Shamelessly indecent troll <> wrote in message
news:VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly
from within.
If "J" had his wish, women wouldn't have any rights whatsoever:
"At the risk of tarnishing my reputation as an egalitarian, I state
unequivocally; women are an absolute terror on the road and should be
banned from driving in metropolitan areas...women cannot handle driving
inside city limits, and should be confined to driving in rural and suburban
areas."
From: (J Young)
Newsgroups: houston.general,tx.genPublic transportation is always a
viable, reliable option for the ladies to get about town."
eral,alt.abortion,soc.men,alt.feminism
Subject: Women drivers
Date: 19 Sep 2004 21:26:09 -0700
Message-ID: <9c2d0f9a.0409192026.24f0cc96@posting.google.com>
"My experience with most women is that they cannot drive... if any other
mode of transport is possible ladies, use it."
From: "J Young" <>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.atheism,alt.california,alt.feminism,alt.politics.bush,soc.men
Subject: Women drivers 'miss warning signs'
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 15:54:33 -0500
Message-ID: <X5Wdnfc3hb4GPJHZRVn-qw@giganews.com>
LC~ J Yo's irrational hatred of women begs some interesting questions...
"a woman with some common sense;a very rare commodity indeed."
From: (Jon Young)
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0404130836.f6fa868@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tak_a#344" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 10:38:40 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:33:37 -0500, "LC" <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
Shamelessly indecent troll <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments are
made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be ugly
from within.
If "J" had his wish, women wouldn't have any rights whatsoever:
The sure sign of a man who has never gotten laid. He hates all women
and all women must be punished.
Tak
a#344
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 10:58:46 AM |
|
|
"Tak_a#344" <not@anadressyouass.com> wrote in message
news:8b0kd2laj86u7igkg4bl9r361vkf1p60gi@4ax.com...
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:33:37 -0500, "LC" <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
Shamelessly indecent troll <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments
are made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be
ugly from within.
If "J" had his wish, women wouldn't have any rights whatsoever:
The sure sign of a man who has never gotten laid. He hates all women
and all women must be punished.
And he admits it:
"I didn't mean all women were sluts, just the ones who dismiss
abstinence"
From: "J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com>, abstinent for life.
Message-ID: <1103695184.184146.108650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Tak
a#344
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinics Use Tissue From Babies Killed in Abortions for Cosmetic Injections |
09 Aug 2006 01:43:41 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:38:40 +0000, Tak_a#344 in
<8b0kd2laj86u7igkg4bl9r361vkf1p60gi@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:33:37 -0500, "LC" <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
Shamelessly indecent troll <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:VN2dnf2LcOfM9ETZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Have these vain women any shame? Do any of them possess even a shred of
decency? At least some 'scientists' pretend that their research is for
humanitarian reasons, but this? No matter how many ghoulish treatments
are made in the name of 'cosmetic surgery', these women will always be
ugly from within.
If "J" had his wish, women wouldn't have any rights whatsoever:
The sure sign of a man who has never gotten laid. He hates all women
and all women must be punished.
He sounds like a few closet cases I've run into...
(And will somebody please lock the closet door?)
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
