| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Butterfly" |
| Date: |
22 Sep 2003 05:55:48 AM |
| Object: |
Color Blind Negro's |
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
.
|
|
| User: "Dr. DuFonet" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 09:21:50 AM |
|
|
"Butterfly" <butterfly@roadhouse.com> wrote in message
news:ADV6E5EC37886.28875@bogg.dynu.com...
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
If you're White, prove it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 12:56:09 PM |
|
|
"Butterfly" <butterfly@roadhouse.com> wrote in message
news:ADV6E5EC37886.28875@bogg.dynu.com...
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
What exactly does this have to do with atheism?
--
Chris
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Conover" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
26 Sep 2003 03:56:25 PM |
|
|
"Butterfly" <butterfly@roadhouse.com> wrote in message news:<ADV6E5EC37886.28875@bogg.dynu.com>...
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
I don't know what's going on here, but if the argument involves the
"sanctity of the blacks", I'd sure like to know exactly what that
statement means in the context of a color blind society.
I suppose that when the welfare of children is involved, I become
color blind myself. Perhaps I'm strange, but in determining the fate
and future of the children, I'd think that the backgounds and historic
behavior patterns of both families would say more about their
qualifications to raise children than would their race.
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "EvilAllahtm" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 07:42:21 PM |
|
|
Butterfly wrote:
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
And what does this have to do with any of the newsgroups you crossposted it
in?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DarkMatter" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 09:20:56 AM |
|
|
On 22 Sep 2003 10:55:48 -0000, "Butterfly" <butterfly@roadhouse.com>
Gave us:
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
Probably because this is a PHYSICS newsgroup, you RETARDED TWIT!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Poopy-pants " |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 07:03:20 PM |
|
|
DarkMatter wrote:
On 22 Sep 2003 10:55:48 -0000, "Butterfly" <butterfly@roadhouse.com>
Gave us:
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
Probably because this is a PHYSICS newsgroup, you RETARDED TWIT!
No...it's a poopie newsgroup.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
22 Sep 2003 11:16:08 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:55:48 +0000, Butterfly wrote:
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
What is this? Random Crossposting Month?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Titan Point" |
|
| Title: Re: Color Blind Negro's |
26 Sep 2003 08:22:03 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:16:08 -0500, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:55:48 +0000, Butterfly wrote:
There is a lot of controversy going on about the
term "in the best interest of the children" when it
comes to"blacks"and the Child Protective Services dealing with
abuse cases. One of the things that is said is that
that the best interest of the children has to be
put on a scale with the sanctity of the blacks,
and then the kids are put into a white family .
I know there are logical errors in saying that there
can be something that protects one family but hurts
the children in a normal family.
What is going on here and how come this argument
is so hard to refute?
What is this? Random Crossposting Month?
It's an outreach from stormfront.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
