Religions > Atheism > Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Not-easily-duped" |
| Date: |
03 Feb 2004 12:29:32 PM |
| Object: |
Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
03 Feb 2004 01:22:57 PM |
|
|
"Not-easily-duped" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Oh yes, instead we certainly need more laws the one in Arkansas that sez:
5-71-207. Disorderly conduct.
(a) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if, with the purpose
to cause public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm or recklessly creating a
risk thereof, he:
(1) Engages in fighting or in violent, threatening, or tumultuous
behavior; or
(snip snip snip #2 to 8))
(8) In a public place, mars, defiles, desecrates, or otherwise damages a
patriotic or religious symbol that is an object of respect by the public or
a substantial segment thereof
--For sure, for sure, we gotta imprison anyone who publicly shows disrespect
for the Bible, and it sure looks like the folks in Arkansas sure know how to
handle them infidels and blasphemers . . .
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
08 Feb 2004 05:35:03 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"Not-easily-duped" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Oh yes, instead we certainly need more laws the one in Arkansas that sez:
5-71-207. Disorderly conduct.
(a) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if, with the purpose
to cause public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm or recklessly creating a
risk thereof, he:
(1) Engages in fighting or in violent, threatening, or tumultuous
behavior; or
(snip snip snip #2 to 8))
(8) In a public place,
public place - detruction of property is illegel in all states.
mars, defiles, desecrates, or otherwise damages a
patriotic or religious symbol that is an object of respect by the public or
a substantial segment thereof
you are for legal vandalism?
--For sure, for sure, we gotta imprison anyone who publicly shows disrespect
for the Bible,
???? i publically display my flag on my front door - upsidedown (and
shall continue until Bu$hler is gone). On private property you can do
these things - yes even in Arkansas.
and it sure looks like the folks in Arkansas sure know how to
handle them infidels and blasphemers . . .
more like vandals.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Thomas" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
04 Feb 2004 11:06:10 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:22:57 GMT in alt.atheism
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"Not-easily-duped" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Oh yes, instead we certainly need more laws the one in Arkansas that sez:
5-71-207. Disorderly conduct.
(a) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if, with the purpose
to cause public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm or recklessly creating a
risk thereof, he:
(1) Engages in fighting or in violent, threatening, or tumultuous
behavior; or
(snip snip snip #2 to 8))
(8) In a public place, mars, defiles, desecrates, or otherwise damages a
patriotic or religious symbol that is an object of respect by the public or
a substantial segment thereof
That should cover the Darwin Fish. It includes a Christian
symbol. Well OK, it is actually a parody - but lawyers are paid
to argue about such details. And it is an object of respect by a
substantial segment of the public.
-
Martin Thomas
Official "Teddy Bear" Atheist
mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "VTM Malkavian" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
04 Feb 2004 01:31:17 AM |
|
|
(Not-easily-duped) wrote:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
"In other news today, Congress passed several laws directly contradicting the
Gospel of Salvation. One Congressman is quoted as having said, 'We're very
proud to pass these laws directly contradicting this very shameful Gospel of
Salvation.'"
"The best way to get religion out of government is to insist that ALL religions
have EQUAL rights in a government context. Nothing scares the fundies more than
a 'devil inspired' but equally government sponsored religious service."
--Gregory Gadow
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
03 Feb 2004 12:55:24 PM |
|
|
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in
news:bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Only in your myth induced wishful thinking.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
04 Feb 2004 08:40:50 AM |
|
|
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
05 Feb 2004 11:19:08 AM |
|
|
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
06 Feb 2004 11:35:25 AM |
|
|
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
07 Feb 2004 09:08:12 AM |
|
|
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
08 Feb 2004 05:37:17 PM |
|
|
Not-easily-duped wrote:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
what a load of *****.
Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of John.
that equals four dipshit. not one.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
09 Feb 2004 11:35:21 AM |
|
|
gaffo <gaffo@usenet.net> wrote in message news:<NKzVb.915$0p7.266327202@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>...
Not-easily-duped wrote:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
what a load of *****.
Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of John.
that equals four dipshit. not one.
Add the Gospel of Paul and that would make it five Gospels.LOL
Paul to the GALATIANS.
"....If anyone preached another Gospel than the one I preached to
you let him be cursed..."
One would wonder what that Gospel was. Was Paul reading the
Gospel according to Matthews or Mark...?
Please do anwser
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
09 Feb 2004 11:27:38 AM |
|
|
gaffo <gaffo@usenet.net> wrote in message news:<NKzVb.915$0p7.266327202@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>...
Not-easily-duped wrote:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com (Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
what a load of *****.
Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of John.
that equals four dipshit. not one.
The Gospel as it appears in Paul's epistles is not wanting and in
that Gospel there is no room for Matthews, Mark,john or luke.
I learn to think outside the editorial box.
You are free to call them Gospels as I am also free
to call them THE ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthews, John
Luke or Mark. THERE BUT ONE GOSPEL OF SALVATION FOR MANKIND
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
07 Feb 2004 11:07:09 AM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
07 Feb 2004 04:48:54 PM |
|
|
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<7n6a205hmkmvj72ulneatgqjocep8u1m9k@4ax.com>...
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
Where do you get the idea of a Gospel according to luke?
I am saying that there is no such thing at all, but the Act
of the Messiah according to luke wrongly labelled as Gospel.
The editors named it this way to confuse you.
And you are still confused unable to see through.JERK
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
08 Feb 2004 12:18:46 AM |
|
|
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402071448.4cffcc4b@posting.google.com>...
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<7n6a205hmkmvj72ulneatgqjocep8u1m9k@4ax.com>...
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
Where do you get the idea of a Gospel according to luke?
Just a quick use of Google gave the following links:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/intro.htm
http://www.geocities.com/gospelofluke/
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html
http://religion.rutgers.edu/nt/primer/
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
I am saying that there is no such thing at all, but the Act
of the Messiah according to luke wrongly labelled as Gospel.
....and we're just supposed to take the word of a known internet kook
(that's you, Boobie) over everyone else who says you're wrong?
The editors named it this way to confuse you.
I'm not in the least confused. Call it what you will, "GOSPEL" or
"Acts of the Messiah", unlike you, I know it's *all* *****. It's
easy to prove its all not a lie -- simply show us some of your
superpowers that are guaranteed to be granted by Jeezus. I suggest
you start with the one about drinking deadly poison.
And you are still confused unable to see through.JERK
Oh, I can see through all your *****. No problem.
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
08 Feb 2004 12:54:40 PM |
|
|
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402071448.4cffcc4b@posting.google.com>...
Alan Hobson < > wrote in message news:<7n6a205hmkmvj72ulneatgqjocep8u1m9k@4ax.com>...
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
(Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
Where do you get the idea of a Gospel according to luke?
Just a quick use of Google gave the following links:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/intro.htm
http://www.geocities.com/gospelofluke/
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html
http://religion.rutgers.edu/nt/primer/
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...Your inability to think outside the box
has been noted,child.
I am saying that there is no such thing at all, but the Act
of the Messiah according to luke wrongly labelled as Gospel.
...and we're just supposed to take the word of a known internet kook
(that's you, Boobie) over everyone else who says you're wrong?
The editors named it this way to confuse you.
I'm not in the least confused. Call it what you will, "GOSPEL" or
"Acts of the Messiah", unlike you, I know it's *all* *****. It's
easy to prove its all not a lie -- simply show us some of your
superpowers that are guaranteed to be granted by Jeezus. I suggest
you start with the one about drinking deadly poison.
And you are still confused unable to see through.JERK
Oh, I can see through all your *****. No problem.
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
08 Feb 2004 01:26:10 PM |
|
|
On 8 Feb 2004 10:54:40 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402071448.4cffcc4b@posting.google.com>...
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<7n6a205hmkmvj72ulneatgqjocep8u1m9k@4ax.com>...
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
Where do you get the idea of a Gospel according to luke?
Just a quick use of Google gave the following links:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/intro.htm
http://www.geocities.com/gospelofluke/
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html
http://religion.rutgers.edu/nt/primer/
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...
What kind of ***** line is that? Truth is *not* always in the
minority. You're obviously just making this stuff up as you go.
Your inability to think outside the box
has been noted,child.
Unfortunately for you, the box I refuse to think outside of is has a
big label on the outside that says "reality".
<snip>
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
09 Feb 2004 11:38:51 AM |
|
|
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<623d201qu5q5t8etr0dk3v1298bshd75fj@4ax.com>...
On 8 Feb 2004 10:54:40 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402071448.4cffcc4b@posting.google.com>...
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<7n6a205hmkmvj72ulneatgqjocep8u1m9k@4ax.com>...
On 7 Feb 2004 07:08:12 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402060935.6fc1b0ea@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402050919.588929e@posting.google.com>...
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402040640.6438c5ba@posting.google.com>...
(Not-easily-duped) wrote in message news:<bbba7302.0402031029.425fb5d5@posting.google.com>...
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Your "Gospels" do that fine all by themselves. They don't require
Congressional help.
I did not say "Gospels" as if there WERE many, but the GOSPEL.
You fathead, can't you read?
OK... Which "Gospel" are you talking about? Matthew? Mark? Luke?
John? Gnostic? BillyBob?
We already went through this. There is but one GOSPEL.
You should not confuse the ACTS OF THE MESSIAH according to Matthew
or Luck or Mark with the Gospel
So if Congress were to make a law that put the GOSPEL of Luke to
shame, that would be OK with you?
Where do you get the idea of a Gospel according to luke?
Just a quick use of Google gave the following links:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/intro.htm
http://www.geocities.com/gospelofluke/
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html
http://religion.rutgers.edu/nt/primer/
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...
What kind of ***** line is that? Truth is *not* always in the
minority. You're obviously just making this stuff up as you go.
How many people in Israel saw Jesus as the TRUTH and The MESSIAH?
a minority.
I say it again Truth always is in minority.
Your inability to think outside the box
has been noted,child.
Unfortunately for you, the box I refuse to think outside of is has a
big label on the outside that says "reality".
<snip>
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
09 Feb 2004 12:42:32 PM |
|
|
On 9 Feb 2004 09:38:51 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<623d201qu5q5t8etr0dk3v1298bshd75fj@4ax.com>...
On 8 Feb 2004 10:54:40 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
<snip>
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...
What kind of ***** line is that? Truth is *not* always in the
minority. You're obviously just making this stuff up as you go.
How many people in Israel saw Jesus as the TRUTH and The MESSIAH?
a minority.
How many people have seen the TRUTH of ALIEN ABDUCTIONS?
Oh, I see... You're using the religious definition of Truth(tm) . My
bad. I thought you meant actual, testable, objective truth. If you
mean religious Truth(tm) you would be much more clear and accurate if
you would simply replace the word "Truth" with "superstitious
ramblings".
I say it again Truth always is in minority.
That's because your capitalized Truth bears no correspondence with
reality. Real truth may be spelled with lower-case letters but it
is more useful and powerful than your imaginary TRUTH is any day.
Your inability to think outside the box
has been noted,child.
Unfortunately for you, the box I refuse to think outside of has a
big label on the outside that says "reality".
<snip>
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Not-easily-duped" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
10 Feb 2004 07:49:38 AM |
|
|
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<atjf20tav5sbn4n5p0o0be4m2kgl40jtp8@4ax.com>...
On 9 Feb 2004 09:38:51 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<623d201qu5q5t8etr0dk3v1298bshd75fj@4ax.com>...
On 8 Feb 2004 10:54:40 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
<snip>
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...
What kind of ***** line is that? Truth is *not* always in the
minority. You're obviously just making this stuff up as you go.
How many people in Israel saw Jesus as the TRUTH and The MESSIAH?
a minority.
How many people have seen the TRUTH of ALIEN ABDUCTIONS?
Oh, I see... You're using the religious definition of Truth(tm) . My
bad. I thought you meant actual, testable, objective truth. If you
mean religious Truth(tm) you would be much more clear and accurate if
you would simply replace the word "Truth" with "superstitious
ramblings".
I say it again Truth always is in minority.
That's because your capitalized Truth bears no correspondence with
reality. Real truth may be spelled with lower-case letters but it
is more useful and powerful than your imaginary TRUTH is any day.
And this too is your fucking opinion. Why would I care?
Your inability to think outside the box
has been noted,child.
Unfortunately for you, the box I refuse to think outside of has a
big label on the outside that says "reality".
<snip>
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Hobson" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
10 Feb 2004 08:09:52 AM |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2004 05:49:38 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<atjf20tav5sbn4n5p0o0be4m2kgl40jtp8@4ax.com>...
On 9 Feb 2004 09:38:51 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
Alan Hobson <alhob@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<623d201qu5q5t8etr0dk3v1298bshd75fj@4ax.com>...
On 8 Feb 2004 10:54:40 -0800,
(Not-easily-duped) pontificated:
alhob@earthlink.net (Alan Hobson) wrote in message news:<d1d6cbe3.0402072218.6ed1a94@posting.google.com>...
<snip>
There were at least 10 more pages of similar links. Looks like your
interpretation is in the minority, Duped.
Truth always is in minority...
What kind of ***** line is that? Truth is *not* always in the
minority. You're obviously just making this stuff up as you go.
How many people in Israel saw Jesus as the TRUTH and The MESSIAH?
a minority.
How many people have seen the TRUTH of ALIEN ABDUCTIONS?
Oh, I see... You're using the religious definition of Truth(tm) . My
bad. I thought you meant actual, testable, objective truth. If you
mean religious Truth(tm) you would be much more clear and accurate if
you would simply replace the word "Truth" with "superstitious
ramblings".
I say it again Truth always is in minority.
That's because your capitalized Truth bears no correspondence with
reality. Real truth may be spelled with lower-case letters but it
is more useful and powerful than your imaginary TRUTH is any day.
And this too is your fucking opinion. Why would I care?
You're the one who's posting all these idiotic rants to multiple
newsgroups. Wassamata? Can't defend your own words?
Go ahead, do something with your Truth(tm) that demonstrates an
actual, physical effect. Prove to us that your Truth(tm) is anything
other than fantasy.
-Alan
aa#1608 BAAWA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
04 Feb 2004 10:45:21 AM |
|
|
And so upon Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:29:32 -0800 didst Not-easily-duped speak
thusly:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Sorry, we have a secular government. Don't like secular government? Move
to Iran.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
04 Feb 2004 03:00:24 PM |
|
|
In talk.atheism, Mark K. Bilbo
<y@hoo.com-amikchi>
wrote
on Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:45:21 -0600
<pan.2004.02.04.16.45.21.110416@hoo.com-amikchi>:
And so upon Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:29:32 -0800 didst Not-easily-duped speak
thusly:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Sorry, we have a secular government. Don't like secular government? Move
to Iran.
Or wait for Bush's reelection. (*barf*)
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
05 Feb 2004 01:21:28 AM |
|
|
Subject: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of
Salvation.
Too bad this isn't in the Constitution.
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
Dissent is not a right.
It is a RESPONSIBILITY.
--me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Justin_Martyr2000" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
05 Feb 2004 05:45:42 AM |
|
|
Doc Smartass <gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9486EB4E7155askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>...
Subject: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of
Salvation.
Too bad this isn't in the Constitution.
The previous comments in this thread illustrate why those who
seek substantive dialogue on important controversial issues need not
waste their time here. The furniture is missing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
11 Feb 2004 09:19:09 AM |
|
|
On 5 Feb 2004 03:45:42 -0800, (Justin_Martyr2000),
Message ID: <51ab5982.0402050345.681d6769@posting.google.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;
Doc Smartass <gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9486EB4E7155askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>...
Subject: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of
Salvation.
Too bad this isn't in the Constitution.
The previous comments in this thread illustrate why those who
seek substantive dialogue on important controversial issues need not
waste their time here. The furniture is missing.
Toxic waste is furniture, oh liar for Jesus?
The moron, Duped, wouldn't know 'substantive dialog' if it jumped up and
plugged his *****.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Justin_Martyr2000" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
05 Feb 2004 05:49:57 AM |
|
|
Doc Smartass <gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9486EB4E7155askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>...
Subject: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of
Salvation.
Too bad this isn't in the Constitution.
Therefore:
"Let them alone; They are blind guides. And if a blind man
leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit." - Jesus (Matt.
15:14)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
11 Feb 2004 09:17:15 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 07:21:28 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com>, Message ID:
<Xns9486EB4E7155askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18> wrote in alt.atheism;
Subject: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of
Salvation.
Too bad this isn't in the Constitution.
It will be, if the Christian Taliban have anything to say about it.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
11 Feb 2004 09:16:37 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:00:24 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net>, Message ID:
<7gv7f1-e4r.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in alt.atheism;
In talk.atheism, Mark K. Bilbo
<y@hoo.com-amikchi>
wrote
on Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:45:21 -0600
<pan.2004.02.04.16.45.21.110416@hoo.com-amikchi>:
And so upon Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:29:32 -0800 didst Not-easily-duped speak
thusly:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Sorry, we have a secular government. Don't like secular government? Move
to Iran.
Or wait for Bush's reelection. (*barf*)
Election, not re-election. As to your reaction-I agree.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Congres Shall Pass No Law To Contradict The Gospel Of Salvation. |
11 Feb 2004 01:53:26 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
news:gphk20dl04iqt9uuufsjee4qqdbn8lqjie@4ax.com:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:00:24 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net>, Message ID:
<7gv7f1-e4r.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in alt.atheism;
In talk.atheism, Mark K. Bilbo
<y@hoo.com-amikchi>
wrote
on Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:45:21 -0600
<pan.2004.02.04.16.45.21.110416@hoo.com-amikchi>:
And so upon Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:29:32 -0800 didst Not-easily-duped
speak thusly:
Nor pass any Law to put the Gospel in shame
Sorry, we have a secular government. Don't like secular government?
Move to Iran.
Or wait for Bush's reelection. (*barf*)
Election, not re-election. As to your reaction-I agree.
Re-appointment!
We need a man in office, not a monkey.
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
Brought to you by the letter 'H'
Without it, you'd be eating doug nuts.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
