Has anyone else seen all these annoying xian morons attempting to
reinterpret the "Star of Bethlehem" as the "conjunction" of two or more
astronomical bodies? I've seen several shows and articles in this last
few weeks where xian apologist idiots have offered various and sundry
baseless and contradictory speculation on what the star "really was".
Since the alleged "divinely-inspired" gospel writers didn't have any
fucking clue what a "star" was, it becomes trivial for opportunistic
xian conmen to reinterpret this object as anything from a meteor to a
comet or a supernova.

But the fashion of late seems to have been for some xian jackass to
belatedly figure out how to run "Starry Night" for Windows and promptly
amaze himself with the fact that two objects can appear close together
in the sky on certain days. I've seen at least a half a dozen different
breathless suggestions about how the conjunction of Jupiter and Venus,
or Jupiter and the Moon, or Jupiter Mars and Venus, or Jupiter and the
Star Regulus, all represent "proof" of the divinity of Jebus.

It really is quite laughable to see the intellectual bankruptcy of what
passes for xian "scholarship" with these ridiculous claims. For
example, conjunctions between Jupiter and Venus happen about three times
per year. Furthermore, celestial conjunctions are obviously not a
single object, as any attentive observer can see that these are separate
objects that slowly come together and then slowly separate.

Anyway, why is it that theist retards, who couldn't tell the difference
between their ***** and *****-tronomy, imagine that natural conjunctive
events in the sky would prove anything about Jesus? Even if the
astronomical event took place, that doesn't prove that Jesus was
actually born during that event or that the event was a reference
announcing his birth. Clearly there must have been many important
people born or other momentous events that occurred at the same time for
which the astronomical signs could just as easily portend instead.

It's not like there was a tradition beforehand that the messiah would be
born under a bright star. Mithras was predicted to have been born under
a bright star, but that's a different legend altogether, and one that
predates xianity. That doesn't mean that I'm any more likely to believe
it, or even the similar claims about bright stars announcing the birth
of Alexander the Great. But if this is all the better that xians can do
with their own mythology then they might as well give up now.

Clearly there must have been many important
people born or other momentous events that occurred at the same time for
which the astronomical signs could just as easily portend instead.

Anyway, why is it that theist retards, who couldn't tell the difference
between their ***** and *****-tronomy, imagine that natural conjunctive
events in the sky would prove anything about Jesus? Even if the
astronomical event took place, that doesn't prove that Jesus was
actually born during that event or that the event was a reference
announcing his birth. Clearly there must have been many important
people born or other momentous events that occurred at the same time for
which the astronomical signs could just as easily portend instead.

Has anyone else seen all these annoying xian morons attempting to
reinterpret the "Star of Bethlehem" as the "conjunction" of two or more
astronomical bodies? I've seen several shows and articles in this last
few weeks where xian apologist idiots have offered various and sundry
baseless and contradictory speculation on what the star "really was".
Since the alleged "divinely-inspired" gospel writers didn't have any
fucking clue what a "star" was, it becomes trivial for opportunistic
xian conmen to reinterpret this object as anything from a meteor to a
comet or a supernova.

But the fashion of late seems to have been for some xian jackass to
belatedly figure out how to run "Starry Night" for Windows and promptly
amaze himself with the fact that two objects can appear close together
in the sky on certain days. I've seen at least a half a dozen different
breathless suggestions about how the conjunction of Jupiter and Venus,
or Jupiter and the Moon, or Jupiter Mars and Venus, or Jupiter and the
Star Regulus, all represent "proof" of the divinity of Jebus.

It really is quite laughable to see the intellectual bankruptcy of what
passes for xian "scholarship" with these ridiculous claims. For
example, conjunctions between Jupiter and Venus happen about three times
per year. Furthermore, celestial conjunctions are obviously not a
single object, as any attentive observer can see that these are separate
objects that slowly come together and then slowly separate.

Anyway, why is it that theist retards, who couldn't tell the difference
between their ***** and *****-tronomy, imagine that natural conjunctive
events in the sky would prove anything about Jesus? Even if the
astronomical event took place, that doesn't prove that Jesus was
actually born during that event or that the event was a reference
announcing his birth. Clearly there must have been many important
people born or other momentous events that occurred at the same time for
which the astronomical signs could just as easily portend instead.

It's not like there was a tradition beforehand that the messiah would be
born under a bright star. Mithras was predicted to have been born under
a bright star, but that's a different legend altogether, and one that
predates xianity. That doesn't mean that I'm any more likely to believe
it, or even the similar claims about bright stars announcing the birth
of Alexander the Great. But if this is all the better that xians can do
with their own mythology then they might as well give up now.

Has anyone else seen all these annoying xian morons attempting to
reinterpret the "Star of Bethlehem" as the "conjunction" of two or more
astronomical bodies? I've seen several shows and articles in this last
few weeks where xian apologist idiots have offered various and sundry
baseless and contradictory speculation on what the star "really was".
Since the alleged "divinely-inspired" gospel writers didn't have any
fucking clue what a "star" was, it becomes trivial for opportunistic
xian conmen to reinterpret this object as anything from a meteor to a
comet or a supernova.

But the fashion of late seems to have been for some xian jackass to
belatedly figure out how to run "Starry Night" for Windows and promptly
amaze himself with the fact that two objects can appear close together
in the sky on certain days. I've seen at least a half a dozen different
breathless suggestions about how the conjunction of Jupiter and Venus,
or Jupiter and the Moon, or Jupiter Mars and Venus, or Jupiter and the
Star Regulus, all represent "proof" of the divinity of Jebus.

It really is quite laughable to see the intellectual bankruptcy of what
passes for xian "scholarship" with these ridiculous claims. For
example, conjunctions between Jupiter and Venus happen about three times
per year. Furthermore, celestial conjunctions are obviously not a
single object, as any attentive observer can see that these are separate
objects that slowly come together and then slowly separate.

Anyway, why is it that theist retards, who couldn't tell the difference
between their ***** and *****-tronomy, imagine that natural conjunctive
events in the sky would prove anything about Jesus? Even if the
astronomical event took place, that doesn't prove that Jesus was
actually born during that event or that the event was a reference
announcing his birth. Clearly there must have been many important
people born or other momentous events that occurred at the same time for
which the astronomical signs could just as easily portend instead.

It's not like there was a tradition beforehand that the messiah would be
born under a bright star. Mithras was predicted to have been born under
a bright star, but that's a different legend altogether, and one that
predates xianity. That doesn't mean that I'm any more likely to believe
it, or even the similar claims about bright stars announcing the birth
of Alexander the Great. But if this is all the better that xians can do
with their own mythology then they might as well give up now.