Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals onHis birthday (12/25/2005)



 Religions > Atheism > Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals onHis birthday (12/25/2005)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Date: 05 Jan 2006 02:09:12 PM
Object: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals onHis birthday (12/25/2005)
Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136465760.904773.22980@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:

"I'm telling you the most solemn and sober truth now: Whoever believes
in me has real life, eternal life. I am the Bread of Life. Your
ancestors ate the manna bread in the desert and died. But now here is
Bread that truly comes down out of heaven. Anyone eating this Bread
will not die, ever. I am the Bread--living Bread!-who came down out of
heaven. Anyone who eats this Bread will live--and forever! The Bread
that I present to the world so that it can eat and live is myself, this
flesh-and-blood self." John 6 : 47-50 The Message


This is a very interpretive (i.e., going beyond the original language)
translation. The Revised Standard Version is much truer to the original
Greek text and to the way Jesus reportedly spoke and taught, that is to
say poetically and symbolically:

"Truly, truly*, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life. I am
the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and
they died. This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man
may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread which came down from
heaven; if any one eats of this bread , he will live forever; and the
bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh."

* Doubled terms or phrases are typical of Hebrew (Semitic) poetry.

The other significant problem is that John is the most allegorical,
non-literal of the four Gospels. Fundamentalists who take things
literally make a mockery of the original teachings.

The LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.
Truth is simple.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat(01/05/2006) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Bob this one"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7seals on His birthday (12/25/2005) 05 Jan 2006 03:57:33 PM
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

The LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.

Truth is simple.

And so are judgements, huh, Andrew... Knowing what's in God's mind.
Knowing God's opinion of things. Knowing God's opinion of Don.
Sanctimonious fraud.
Pastorio
.
User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7seals onHis birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 01:03:08 AM
"Bob (this one)" wrote:


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

The LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.

Truth is simple.


And so are judgements, huh, Andrew...

No.

Knowing what's in God's mind.

Receiving the LORD's guidance is not reading the LORD's mind...

Knowing God's opinion of things.

.... nor is it knowing HIS opinion of things...

Knowing God's opinion of Don.

.... or of Don.

Sanctimonious fraud.

If you were also secure in the truth, you too would have the strength to
resist the temptation of descending into namecalling.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/12/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals on His birthday (12/25/2005) 05 Jan 2006 07:19:54 PM
Dear Andrew,
T>>>>>>>>>>>>he LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use
that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.
<<<<<<<<<<<<
I'm not so sure we can know this to be true Andrew. A man who can clear
his mind of all that he sees to be stumbling blocks may end up walking
much closer to Him than ever I could.
Don, did have a valid point and one I have raised myself in the past
when The Message was read. If it does nothing else, The Message sparks
the flame in some people. It's lively and I've seen it waken the
elderly and made them sit up in surprise and listen. Maybe it's a
reflection of The Holy Spirit within the reader when it is read.
I have an academic friend who has an array of bibles and yet he seems
to have honed in on The Message and taken a lot of spiritual comfort
and interpretation from it. It seems to be far removed from the
academic world. The Lord finds a way to speak to us and touch our souls
one way or another.
In Christ's love
Carol T
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals on His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 11:33:27 AM
<cteasd5941@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1136510394.819733.66830@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Dear Andrew,

T>>>>>>>>>>>>he LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use
that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.
<<<<<<<<<<<<

I'm not so sure we can know this to be true Andrew. A man who can clear
his mind of all that he sees to be stumbling blocks may end up walking
much closer to Him than ever I could.

You're a looney!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 sealson His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 07:13:52 AM
"cteasd5941@gmail.com" wrote:


Dear Andrew,

T>>>>>>>>>>>>he LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use
that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.
<<<<<<<<<<<<

I'm not so sure we can know this to be true Andrew. A man who can clear
his mind of all that he sees to be stumbling blocks may end up walking
much closer to Him than ever I could.

Don, did have a valid point and one I have raised myself in the past
when The Message was read. If it does nothing else, The Message sparks
the flame in some people. It's lively and I've seen it waken the
elderly and made them sit up in surprise and listen. Maybe it's a
reflection of The Holy Spirit within the reader when it is read.

I have an academic friend who has an array of bibles and yet he seems
to have honed in on The Message and taken a lot of spiritual comfort
and interpretation from it. It seems to be far removed from the
academic world. The Lord finds a way to speak to us and touch our souls
one way or another.

In Christ's love
Carol T

Amen and amen :-)
May Don make the choice to turn from the wide meandering path of the
world to the straight and narrow path of the LORD, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
"He drew His bow and made me the target for His arrows. He pierced my
heart with arrows from His quiver." (Lamentations 3:12-13)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/12/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.


User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 sealson His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 07:13:49 AM
Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136512420.953456.181850@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Dear Don,


BTW, you really do need to work on your comprehension skills. Nowhere
did I say Carol's message is "mockery of HIM" (though it is) but that
it is "a mockery of the original teachings", an example of
fundamentalist oversimplification and reliance on tendentious teachers.


Please learn to separate quotes from your own text so people can follow
the discussion. I wrote the above, you wrote the following.

As a child I was given The Good News Bible. You might know it, it is
the one with the little pictures of Jesus without form. It never quite
got the full picture across to me, but perhaps this is because the
adult world uses words children don't. So, although the Good News Bible
was simple enough, the Latin and Old English spoken in church didn't
seem to relate to the book I was given by the local chapel Sunday
School. To me my book was about my Lord Jesus and what was spoken in
the church was about the church and its rituals. Of course, as I got a
little older the two came together and spoke the same language of
Jesus' love. Now I prefer the versions I could never understand as a
child.


"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I
thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish
things." KJ 1Cr 13:11


My point was pretty much that you and other fundamentalists pretty much
speak as children, not having the mental discipline to deal with the
many cultural and linguistic issues of Bible interpretation.

If 'Christian doctrine' is not teaching you about Christ's love and
what He did for you on His cross, then maybe it's what you have been
hearing before you need to be questioning. Did you pray for God's Holy
Spirit to reveal Christ's love for you? Because Jesus is about love,
and ultimately He has been bringing you His message. This is all He did
2,000 years ago, and for that He was put to death after suffering
agonies. He went to His death, He suffered, His hands were nailed, His
side pierced all for bringing a Godly message to feed our heart, mind
and souls.


Real Christian doctrine *does* teach much; fundamentalism is a truncated
form of Christianity, religious pap for those afraid of real world
issues.

People are no different today, they think that they are; that they are
more loving, more compassionate, charitable, patient and all the things
that Salvation through sacrifice brings, but they are no different to
those people who jeered at Jesus as they beat Him, nailed Him down and
lifted Him up on The cross to die. People will still go to those same
lengths to silence the very Word which will bring them salvation and
turn their conscience towards God. This is the nature of man.


Your total message is non-responsive to what I wrote.

Not to the discerning.
"He drew His bow and made me the target for His arrows. He pierced my
heart with arrows from His quiver." (Lamentations 3:12-13)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/12/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
User: "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrichs effort"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals on His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 08:01:07 AM
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136512420.953456.181850@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Dear Don,


BTW, you really do need to work on your comprehension skills. Nowhere
did I say Carol's message is "mockery of HIM" (though it is) but that
it is "a mockery of the original teachings", an example of
fundamentalist oversimplification and reliance on tendentious teachers.


Please learn to separate quotes from your own text so people can follow
the discussion. I wrote the above, you wrote the following.

As a child I was given The Good News Bible. You might know it, it is
the one with the little pictures of Jesus without form. It never quite
got the full picture across to me, but perhaps this is because the
adult world uses words children don't. So, although the Good News Bible
was simple enough, the Latin and Old English spoken in church didn't
seem to relate to the book I was given by the local chapel Sunday
School. To me my book was about my Lord Jesus and what was spoken in
the church was about the church and its rituals. Of course, as I got a
little older the two came together and spoke the same language of
Jesus' love. Now I prefer the versions I could never understand as a
child.


"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I
thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish
things." KJ 1Cr 13:11


My point was pretty much that you and other fundamentalists pretty much
speak as children, not having the mental discipline to deal with the
many cultural and linguistic issues of Bible interpretation.

If 'Christian doctrine' is not teaching you about Christ's love and
what He did for you on His cross, then maybe it's what you have been
hearing before you need to be questioning. Did you pray for God's Holy
Spirit to reveal Christ's love for you? Because Jesus is about love,
and ultimately He has been bringing you His message. This is all He did
2,000 years ago, and for that He was put to death after suffering
agonies. He went to His death, He suffered, His hands were nailed, His
side pierced all for bringing a Godly message to feed our heart, mind
and souls.


Real Christian doctrine *does* teach much; fundamentalism is a truncated
form of Christianity, religious pap for those afraid of real world
issues.

People are no different today, they think that they are; that they are
more loving, more compassionate, charitable, patient and all the things
that Salvation through sacrifice brings, but they are no different to
those people who jeered at Jesus as they beat Him, nailed Him down and
lifted Him up on The cross to die. People will still go to those same
lengths to silence the very Word which will bring them salvation and
turn their conscience towards God. This is the nature of man.


Your total message is non-responsive to what I wrote.


Not to the discerning.

Too bad you can't accept the truth.
.
User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 sealson His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 08:45:44 AM
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136512420.953456.181850@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Dear Don,


BTW, you really do need to work on your comprehension skills. Nowhere
did I say Carol's message is "mockery of HIM" (though it is) but that
it is "a mockery of the original teachings", an example of
fundamentalist oversimplification and reliance on tendentious teachers.


Please learn to separate quotes from your own text so people can follow
the discussion. I wrote the above, you wrote the following.

As a child I was given The Good News Bible. You might know it, it is
the one with the little pictures of Jesus without form. It never quite
got the full picture across to me, but perhaps this is because the
adult world uses words children don't. So, although the Good News Bible
was simple enough, the Latin and Old English spoken in church didn't
seem to relate to the book I was given by the local chapel Sunday
School. To me my book was about my Lord Jesus and what was spoken in
the church was about the church and its rituals. Of course, as I got a
little older the two came together and spoke the same language of
Jesus' love. Now I prefer the versions I could never understand as a
child.


"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I
thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish
things." KJ 1Cr 13:11


My point was pretty much that you and other fundamentalists pretty much
speak as children, not having the mental discipline to deal with the
many cultural and linguistic issues of Bible interpretation.

If 'Christian doctrine' is not teaching you about Christ's love and
what He did for you on His cross, then maybe it's what you have been
hearing before you need to be questioning. Did you pray for God's Holy
Spirit to reveal Christ's love for you? Because Jesus is about love,
and ultimately He has been bringing you His message. This is all He did
2,000 years ago, and for that He was put to death after suffering
agonies. He went to His death, He suffered, His hands were nailed, His
side pierced all for bringing a Godly message to feed our heart, mind
and souls.


Real Christian doctrine *does* teach much; fundamentalism is a truncated
form of Christianity, religious pap for those afraid of real world
issues.

People are no different today, they think that they are; that they are
more loving, more compassionate, charitable, patient and all the things
that Salvation through sacrifice brings, but they are no different to
those people who jeered at Jesus as they beat Him, nailed Him down and
lifted Him up on The cross to die. People will still go to those same
lengths to silence the very Word which will bring them salvation and
turn their conscience towards God. This is the nature of man.


Your total message is non-responsive to what I wrote.


Not to the discerning.


Too bad you can't accept the truth.

You are confusing me with Don Kirkman.
May Don make the choice to turn from the wide meandering path of the
world to the straight and narrow path of the LORD.
"He drew His bow and made me the target for His arrows. He pierced my
heart with arrows from His quiver." (Lamentations 3:12-13)
May the LORD continue to bless the writing of His Word here in these
usenet newsgroups, in Jesus' most precious and holy name. Amen and
amen.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/12/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.



User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 sealson His birthday (12/25/2005) 06 Jan 2006 01:03:01 AM
Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <43BD7CE8.43A5CC26@heartmdphd.com>:

Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136465760.904773.22980@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:


"I'm telling you the most solemn and sober truth now: Whoever believes
in me has real life, eternal life. I am the Bread of Life. Your
ancestors ate the manna bread in the desert and died. But now here is
Bread that truly comes down out of heaven. Anyone eating this Bread
will not die, ever. I am the Bread--living Bread!-who came down out of
heaven. Anyone who eats this Bread will live--and forever! The Bread
that I present to the world so that it can eat and live is myself, this
flesh-and-blood self." John 6 : 47-50 The Message


This is a very interpretive (i.e., going beyond the original language)
translation. The Revised Standard Version is much truer to the original
Greek text and to the way Jesus reportedly spoke and taught, that is to
say poetically and symbolically:


"Truly, truly*, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life. I am
the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and
they died. This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man
may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread which came down from
heaven; if any one eats of this bread , he will live forever; and the
bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh."


* Doubled terms or phrases are typical of Hebrew (Semitic) poetry.


The other significant problem is that John is the most allegorical,
non-literal of the four Gospels. Fundamentalists who take things
literally make a mockery of the original teachings.


The LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.


The Lord knows who walks with him and who doesn't;

Correct.

not all who say
"Lord, Lord" know him nor will they find him.

Correct.

Repent while there is
time, Doc.

Repentence is part of walking with Christ.

BTW, you really do need to work on your comprehension skills. Nowhere
did I say Carol's message is "mockery of HIM" (though it is) but that it
is "a mockery of the original teachings", an example of fundamentalist
oversimplification and reliance on tendentious teachers.

The LORD knows what is in your heart. Thankfully, the LORD continues to
guide what I say, do, and write.

Truth is simple.


Sometimes.

Always.

So is error, usually;

Error is not the opposite of truth. What is the opposite of truth is
complicated, politically correct, and a wide meandering path away from
the LORD.

yours is extremely simple in mind and
in knowledge of Christian doctrine.

Without the LORD, knowledge of Christian doctrine is meaningless.
With the LORD, there is knowledge of all things seen and unseen.

It seems to be you and Carol
against millions of Christians in thousands of generations who have read
and understood the documents and the teachings..

The number taking the straight and narrow path to the LORD, Who is the
truth, is smaller than the larger numbers taking the wide and meandering
path away from the LORD.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/12/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

Title: Re: Conqueror bent on conquest: The Lamb opened the 1st of the 7 seals on His birthday (12/25/2005) 05 Jan 2006 10:09:20 PM
Don Kirkman wrote:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <43BD7CE8.43A5CC26@heartmdphd.com>:

Don Kirkman wrote:


It seems to me I heard somewhere that

wrote in
article <1136465760.904773.22980@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:


"I'm telling you the most solemn and sober truth now: Whoever believes
in me has real life, eternal life. I am the Bread of Life. Your
ancestors ate the manna bread in the desert and died. But now here is
Bread that truly comes down out of heaven. Anyone eating this Bread
will not die, ever. I am the Bread--living Bread!-who came down out of
heaven. Anyone who eats this Bread will live--and forever! The Bread
that I present to the world so that it can eat and live is myself, this
flesh-and-blood self." John 6 : 47-50 The Message


This is a very interpretive (i.e., going beyond the original language)
translation. The Revised Standard Version is much truer to the original
Greek text and to the way Jesus reportedly spoke and taught, that is to
say poetically and symbolically:


"Truly, truly*, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life. I am
the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and
they died. This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man
may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread which came down from
heaven; if any one eats of this bread , he will live forever; and the
bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh."


* Doubled terms or phrases are typical of Hebrew (Semitic) poetry.


The other significant problem is that John is the most allegorical,
non-literal of the four Gospels. Fundamentalists who take things
literally make a mockery of the original teachings.


The LORD guides those who walk with HIM exactly how to use that which HE
teaches them. Because Carol's walk with the LORD is infinitely closer
than your walk, her use of HIS teachings is not mockery of HIM at all.
The same can not be written concerning your comments about the Gospels.


The Lord knows who walks with him and who doesn't;

Correct.

not all who say
"Lord, Lord" know him nor will they find him.

Correct.

Repent while there is
time, Doc.

Already done and continue to do in my choice to continue walking with
the LORD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength :-)).

BTW, you really do need to work on your comprehension skills. Nowhere
did I say Carol's message is "mockery of HIM" (though it is) but that it
is "a mockery of the original teachings", an example of fundamentalist
oversimplification and reliance on tendentious teachers.

Only the LORD's opinion matters here. You would have known this had
you ever walked with HIM.

Truth is simple.


Sometimes.

All the time.

So is error, usually;

The opposite of truth is not error. You would have known this had you
been able to discern the truth.

yours is extremely simple in mind and
in knowledge of Christian doctrine.

Without the LORD, knowledge of Christian doctrine is meaningless.
With the LORD, there is infinite knowledge of all things seen and
unseen.

It seems to be you and Carol
against millions of Christians in thousands of generations who have read
and understood the documents and the teachings..

Those who side with the truth remain invincible whether one or many in
number.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (01/05/06) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Prayerfully in Christ's love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER