Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times



 Religions > Atheism > Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Michelle Malkin"
Date: 05 Oct 2007 11:09:08 PM
Object: Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times
Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times
Posted by: "Zepp"
Fri Oct 5, 2007 7:56 am (PST)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin>
Conservatives Are Such Jokers
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: October 5, 2007
In 1960, John F. Kennedy, who had been shocked by the hunger he saw in
West Virginia, made the fight against hunger a theme of his presidential
campaign. After his election he created the modern food stamp program,
which today helps millions of Americans get enough to eat.
Skip to next paragraph
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin#secondParagraph>
Paul Krugman.
The Conscience of a Liberal
Share Your Comments About This Column
<http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/>
Paul Krugman takes readers' questions about economics and international
finance.
Go to Columnist Page »
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html>
But Ronald Reagan thought the issue of hunger in the world's richest
nation was nothing but a big joke. Here's what Reagan said in his famous
1964 speech "A Time for Choosing," which made him a national political
figure: "We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed
hungry each night. Well, that was probably true. They were all on a diet."
Today's leading conservatives are Reagan's heirs. If you're poor, if you
don't have health insurance, if you're sick - well, they don't think
it's a serious issue. In fact, they think it's funny.
On Wednesday, President Bush vetoed legislation that would have expanded
S-chip, the State Children's Health Insurance Program, providing health
insurance to an estimated 3.8 million children who would otherwise lack
coverage.
In anticipation of the veto, William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly
Standard, had this to say: "First of all, whenever I hear anything
described as a heartless assault on our children, I tend to think it's a
good idea. I'm happy that the president's willing to do something bad
for the kids." Heh-heh-heh.
Most conservatives are more careful than Mr. Kristol. They try to
preserve the appearance that they really do care about those less
fortunate than themselves. But the truth is that they aren't bothered by
the fact that almost nine million children in America lack health
insurance. They don't think it's a problem.
"I mean, people have access to health care in America," said Mr. Bush in
July. "After all, you just go to an emergency room."
And on the day of the veto, Mr. Bush dismissed the whole issue of
uninsured children as a media myth. Referring to Medicaid spending -
which fails to reach many children - he declared that "when they say,
well, poor children aren't being covered in America, if that's what
you're hearing on your TV screens, I'm telling you there's $35.5 billion
worth of reasons not to believe that."
It's not just the poor who find their travails belittled and mocked. The
sick receive the same treatment.
Before the last election, the actor Michael J. Fox, who suffers from
Parkinson's and has become an advocate for stem cell research that might
lead to a cure, made an ad in support of Claire McCaskill, the
Democratic candidate for Senator in Missouri. It was an effective ad, in
part because Mr. Fox's affliction was obvious.
And Rush Limbaugh - displaying the same style he exhibited in his recent
claim that members of the military who oppose the Iraq war are "phony
soldiers" and his later comparison of a wounded vet who criticized him
for that remark to a suicide bomber - immediately accused Mr. Fox of
faking it. "In this commercial, he is exaggerating the effects of the
disease. He is moving all around and shaking. And it's purely an act."
Heh-heh-heh.
Of course, minimizing and mocking the suffering of others is a natural
strategy for political figures who advocate lower taxes on the rich and
less help for the poor and unlucky. But I believe that the lack of
empathy shown by Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Kristol, and, yes, Mr. Bush is
genuine, not feigned.
Mark Crispin Miller, the author of "The Bush Dyslexicon," once made a
striking observation: all of the famous Bush malapropisms - "I know how
hard it is for you to put food on your family," and so on - have
involved occasions when Mr. Bush was trying to sound caring and
compassionate.
By contrast, Mr. Bush is articulate and even grammatical when he talks
about punishing people; that's when he's speaking from the heart. The
only animation Mr. Bush showed during the flooding of New Orleans was
when he declared "zero tolerance of people breaking the law," even those
breaking into abandoned stores in search of the food and water they
weren't getting from his administration.
What's happening, presumably, is that modern movement conservatism
attracts a certain personality type. If you identify with the
downtrodden, even a little, you don't belong. If you think ridicule is
an appropriate response to other peoples' woes, you fit right in.
And Republican disillusionment with Mr. Bush does not appear to signal
any change in that regard. On the contrary, the leading candidates for
the Republican nomination have gone out of their way to condemn
"socialism," which is G.O.P.-speak for any attempt to help the less
fortunate.
So once again, if you're poor or you're sick or you don't have health
insurance, remember this: these people think your problems are funny.
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times 06 Oct 2007 01:45:32 AM
In article <VvCdnQ6B5NDKl5ranZ2dnUVZ_vihnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:

Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times
Posted by: "Zepp"
Fri Oct 5, 2007 7:56 am (PST)

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin>

Conservatives Are Such Jokers

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: October 5, 2007

In 1960, John F. Kennedy, who had been shocked by the hunger he saw in
West Virginia, made the fight against hunger a theme of his presidential
campaign. After his election he created the modern food stamp program,
which today helps millions of Americans get enough to eat.

Skip to next paragraph
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin#
secondParagraph>

Paul Krugman.

The Conscience of a Liberal

Share Your Comments About This Column
<http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/>

Paul Krugman takes readers' questions about economics and international
finance.

Go to Columnist Page »
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulk
rugman/index.html>

But Ronald Reagan thought the issue of hunger in the world's richest
nation was nothing but a big joke. Here's what Reagan said in his famous
1964 speech "A Time for Choosing," which made him a national political
figure: "We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed
hungry each night. Well, that was probably true. They were all on a diet."

Today's leading conservatives are Reagan's heirs. If you're poor, if you
don't have health insurance, if you're sick - well, they don't think
it's a serious issue. In fact, they think it's funny.

On Wednesday, President Bush vetoed legislation that would have expanded
S-chip, the State Children's Health Insurance Program, providing health
insurance to an estimated 3.8 million children who would otherwise lack
coverage.

In anticipation of the veto, William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly
Standard, had this to say: "First of all, whenever I hear anything
described as a heartless assault on our children, I tend to think it's a
good idea. I'm happy that the president's willing to do something bad
for the kids." Heh-heh-heh.

Most conservatives are more careful than Mr. Kristol. They try to
preserve the appearance that they really do care about those less
fortunate than themselves. But the truth is that they aren't bothered by
the fact that almost nine million children in America lack health
insurance. They don't think it's a problem.

"I mean, people have access to health care in America," said Mr. Bush in
July. "After all, you just go to an emergency room."

And on the day of the veto, Mr. Bush dismissed the whole issue of
uninsured children as a media myth. Referring to Medicaid spending -
which fails to reach many children - he declared that "when they say,
well, poor children aren't being covered in America, if that's what
you're hearing on your TV screens, I'm telling you there's $35.5 billion
worth of reasons not to believe that."

It's not just the poor who find their travails belittled and mocked. The
sick receive the same treatment.

Before the last election, the actor Michael J. Fox, who suffers from
Parkinson's and has become an advocate for stem cell research that might
lead to a cure, made an ad in support of Claire McCaskill, the
Democratic candidate for Senator in Missouri. It was an effective ad, in
part because Mr. Fox's affliction was obvious.

And Rush Limbaugh - displaying the same style he exhibited in his recent
claim that members of the military who oppose the Iraq war are "phony
soldiers" and his later comparison of a wounded vet who criticized him
for that remark to a suicide bomber - immediately accused Mr. Fox of
faking it. "In this commercial, he is exaggerating the effects of the
disease. He is moving all around and shaking. And it's purely an act."
Heh-heh-heh.

Of course, minimizing and mocking the suffering of others is a natural
strategy for political figures who advocate lower taxes on the rich and
less help for the poor and unlucky. But I believe that the lack of
empathy shown by Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Kristol, and, yes, Mr. Bush is
genuine, not feigned.

Mark Crispin Miller, the author of "The Bush Dyslexicon," once made a
striking observation: all of the famous Bush malapropisms - "I know how
hard it is for you to put food on your family," and so on - have
involved occasions when Mr. Bush was trying to sound caring and
compassionate.

By contrast, Mr. Bush is articulate and even grammatical when he talks
about punishing people; that's when he's speaking from the heart. The
only animation Mr. Bush showed during the flooding of New Orleans was
when he declared "zero tolerance of people breaking the law," even those
breaking into abandoned stores in search of the food and water they
weren't getting from his administration.

What's happening, presumably, is that modern movement conservatism
attracts a certain personality type. If you identify with the
downtrodden, even a little, you don't belong. If you think ridicule is
an appropriate response to other peoples' woes, you fit right in.

And Republican disillusionment with Mr. Bush does not appear to signal
any change in that regard. On the contrary, the leading candidates for
the Republican nomination have gone out of their way to condemn
"socialism," which is G.O.P.-speak for any attempt to help the less
fortunate.

So once again, if you're poor or you're sick or you don't have health
insurance, remember this: these people think your problems are funny.

These people live in their own little bubble in their own narrow
protected little world. They have no idea how real people live. This
reminds me of some years ago when Daddy Bush was in a supermarket and
didn't even know how the bar code reader at the check out worked. Why
should he? One of his maids or cooks does all of the shopping for him.
Their motto: "I got mine, Jack."
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.

User: "Geoff"

Title: Re: Conservatives Are Such Jokers - New York Times 06 Oct 2007 08:15:34 AM
Michelle Malkin wrote:

Mark Crispin Miller, the author of "The Bush Dyslexicon," once made a
striking observation: all of the famous Bush malapropisms - "I know
how hard it is for you to put food on your family," and so on - have
involved occasions when Mr. Bush was trying to sound caring and
compassionate.

By contrast, Mr. Bush is articulate and even grammatical when he talks
about punishing people; that's when he's speaking from the heart. The
only animation Mr. Bush showed during the flooding of New Orleans was
when he declared "zero tolerance of people breaking the law," even
those breaking into abandoned stores in search of the food and water
they weren't getting from his administration.

Very insightful.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
2 More GI's Killed by Bush's Big Lie. Why Are Chickenhawk Cons Such Dishonest Traitors?
Another GI Killed By Bush's Big Lie. Why Are Rightwing Chickenhawks Such Cowards?
Re: Why are atheists such intolerant bigots.
CANNED KRAUT. Liberals are such pathetic morons!
Re: Why are atheists such intolerant bigots.
Fox News Quaking in their Boots! Liberals Are Such FOOLS!
Liberal Radio Talks And Nobody Listens. Liberals are such morons!
Surprise! Christian Church of the Painful Fraud Resorts to "Chink" Slur (re: Why are Creationists Such Racists?)
1,000th Coalition GIs Killed By Bush's Iraq Lies. Mission Accomplished! (re: Why Are NeoCon Draft Dodgers Such Dishonest Pussies?)
Republicans are such idiots.
NBC says Clinton Ordered Bin Laden Spared! Liberals Are Such Morons!
Kerry's Daughters: Hotter, Smarter, and Less Drunk (re: Why Are NeoCons Such Lousy Parent?)
Bush Won't Import Prescription Drugs From Canada Because "Terrorist Might Use Them As Weapons" (re: Why Are NeoCon Such Morons?)
NeoCons Are Phony Soldiers (re: Why Are NeoCons Such Cowards?)
Yet More Republicans Jumping Off Of Bush's Sinking HSip Part XIX (re: Why Are NeoCons Such Traitors?)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER