Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees'



 Religions > Atheism > Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees'

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "J Young"
Date: 24 Feb 2006 10:48:14 PM
Object: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees'
The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one always
log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted making
the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm these
judges now!
http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0039658.cfm
Pro-family Judiciary Committee members say it's time to fill appeals-court
vacancies.
With two U.S. Supreme Court confirmations behind them, conservative
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, such as Sens. Tom Coburn of
Oklahoma, John Cornyn of Texas and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, are hoping the
attention will now turn toward breaking the logjam of the president's
embargoed judicial nominees.
Dr. Coburn, a practicing physician who told CitizenLink he takes pride in
being "one of the few non-lawyer members" of the Judiciary Committee, said
it's time to act. There are far too many candidates whose nominations have
been stymied for far too long.
"It is certainly the time to get to the ones that are stacked up in the
queue in the Judiciary Committee," Coburn said. "The president has done a
great job of selecting judges. The concern I have is that we need to get
them done between now and early summer, so that (Senate liberals) can't
delay them through the next election cycle."
Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst at Focus on the Family Action, said part
of the inaction of recent days is directly due to the committee's focus on
the Supreme Court.
"Because the Senate Judiciary Committee expended so much time on the two
Supreme Court vacancies," he said, "the appellate-court and district-court
vacancies have been left unattended, and therefore, we have a serious need
right now to confirm federal judges."
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.

User: "HotelCharlieOne"

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 07:15:35 AM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
news:3e-dnT0aJLgNfGLenZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@giganews.com:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not
one always log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who
they wanted making the decisions about these appointments in the
last Presidential election; the Bush administration. Enough of the
*****-footing around, confirm these judges now!

This message paid for by the "would you damned republicans get off your
damned fat a**es and confirm these judges" committee. Yeah baby, that
blade cuts both ways. Clinton couldn't get his extremists in and
neither can Bush. Don't expect progress until both parties give up
their extremist view and move toward the center.
--
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
Anon.
.

User: "Leif Erikson"

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 03:35:04 AM
J Young wrote:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one always
log-jammed.

The rest of your post equates to "give us what we want".
"fully operating judicial system" equals, in your view,
radically conservative judges who render decisions that
yhou like.
No, thanks.
The Republicans - *not* conservatives - control the
White House and the Congress, and they are as entitled
to get their judge nominees throught the process as
were the Democrats when they controlled the government.
But you just cut the ***** about "fully operating
judicial system", do you understand? Cut it out. What
you really mean is "conservative judges", and everyone
knows it.
.

User: "Gregory Gadow"

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 27 Feb 2006 08:44:54 AM
J Young wrote:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one always
log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted making
the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm these
judges now!

http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0039658.cfm

You are such a fucking liar. The reason there are so many unfilled judicial
seats is because Congress blocked so many of Clinton's nominees. There are far
fewer empty judgeships now than there were in early 2000, thanks to roadblocking
Repugs and conservative scumbags like you.l
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
KiltWear - http://www.cafepress.com/KiltWear
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in
the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary,
self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition
of tyranny." - James Madison, _The Federalist_, #47
.

User: "Adam H."

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 10:00:18 AM
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:48:14 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one always
log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted making
the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm these
judges now!

I didn't see you demanding that Clinton's nominees be confirmed after
he so resoundingly beat Bush Sr. Why is that? Your typical hypocrisy?
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.
User: "J Young"

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 03:23:15 PM
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:blv0029p31l3iekfhjs97goodop8ob0978@fe06.highwinds-media.phx...

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:48:14 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one

always

log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted

making

the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm

these

judges now!


I didn't see you demanding that Clinton's nominees be confirmed after
he so resoundingly beat Bush Sr. Why is that? Your typical hypocrisy?

I wasn't posting back then but if I had been, I most certainly would have.
You'll never read anything from me criticizing President Clinton in his role
as Chief Executive or Commander-in-Chief.
.
User: "Adam H."

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 05:19:57 PM
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:23:15 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:


"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:blv0029p31l3iekfhjs97goodop8ob0978@fe06.highwinds-media.phx...

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:48:14 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one

always

log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted

making

the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm

these

judges now!


I didn't see you demanding that Clinton's nominees be confirmed after
he so resoundingly beat Bush Sr. Why is that? Your typical hypocrisy?




I wasn't posting back then but if I had been, I most certainly would have.
You'll never read anything from me criticizing President Clinton in his role
as Chief Executive or Commander-in-Chief.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/browse_frm/thread/abde452b05d4b267/4a4c836a552e1a97?lnk=st&q=clinton+author%3Aj+author%3Ayoung&rnum=1&hl=en#4a4c836a552e1a97
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.



User: "Karl"

Title: Re: Conservatives: 'Let's Confirm Stalled Judicial Nominees' 25 Feb 2006 02:30:49 PM
Stop your whining. The Cons held up large numbers of Clinton's nominees not
even sending them out of the Judiciary committee. Your guys are not the
innocent pure defenders of justice.
BOTH parties love to play politics here. You just won't admit it!
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3e-dnT0aJLgNfGLenZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@giganews.com...

The American people deserve a fully operating judical system, not one
always
log-jammed. The voters let their representatives know who they wanted
making
the decisions about these appointments in the last Presidential election;
the Bush administration. Enough of the *****-footing around, confirm these
judges now!





http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0039658.cfm



Pro-family Judiciary Committee members say it's time to fill appeals-court
vacancies.








With two U.S. Supreme Court confirmations behind them, conservative
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, such as Sens. Tom Coburn of
Oklahoma, John Cornyn of Texas and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, are hoping
the
attention will now turn toward breaking the logjam of the president's
embargoed judicial nominees.

Dr. Coburn, a practicing physician who told CitizenLink he takes pride in
being "one of the few non-lawyer members" of the Judiciary Committee, said
it's time to act. There are far too many candidates whose nominations have
been stymied for far too long.

"It is certainly the time to get to the ones that are stacked up in the
queue in the Judiciary Committee," Coburn said. "The president has done a
great job of selecting judges. The concern I have is that we need to get
them done between now and early summer, so that (Senate liberals) can't
delay them through the next election cycle."

Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst at Focus on the Family Action, said
part
of the inaction of recent days is directly due to the committee's focus on
the Supreme Court.

"Because the Senate Judiciary Committee expended so much time on the two
Supreme Court vacancies," he said, "the appellate-court and district-court
vacancies have been left unattended, and therefore, we have a serious need
right now to confirm federal judges."









--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"


.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
OT: Clash on Judicial Nominees Could Spill Into Lawmaking
OT: Cheney Enters Fray on Judicial Nominees
FL: judicial nominees asked about their religion
Liberals should get tough on Bush's conservative judicial nominees -- and stop opposing Michael McConnell.
Putting Judicial Nominees in Perspective
SCOTUS Nominees Forced to Pay Fines After Defrauding Investors (GOP, The Stench of Corruption)
OT: Darwin Award Nominees?
Re: Prediction: The Republican nominees in the 2008 election will be
OT: Conservatives: The New Stalinists
Jew-Hating Rightwing Conservatives (Re: Jew-Hating French Liberals)
OT- The difference between liberals and conservatives
OT: Conservatives Restive About Bush Policies
Conservatives Jumping Off Bush's Sinking Ship, Part V (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Conservatives Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Bush Seeks to Mobilize Religious Conservatives
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER