Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****"



 Religions > Atheism > Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "johac"
Date: 03 Mar 2007 01:10:12 AM
Object: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****"

" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** soŠ."
See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:
http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx
What a kook!
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "Harry F. Leopold"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 05 Mar 2007 04:38:49 AM

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.

That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
People like (paste name of favorite troll here) learned everything they will
ever know in Kindergarten, and they flunked that.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 05 Mar 2007 06:14:09 PM
In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.

LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Harry F. Leopold"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 04:41:11 AM

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?

I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?
As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?
I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded onto his
Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President positively has to
be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
Cthulhu saves souls and redeems them for valuable coupons later.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 05:39:53 PM
In article <0001HW.C212A1670026719AF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?

That's true. I think he couldn't do worse than many of them, including
present example.


As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?

Just prop him up like 'Weekend at Bernie's' and he'd do fine.


I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded onto his
Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President positively has to
be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."

I'd tape those.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Harry F. Leopold"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 10:30:35 PM

In article <0001HW.C212A1670026719AF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive
and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election
season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?


That's true. I think he couldn't do worse than many of them, including
present example.

Very true, but since we all like a choice in whom we vote for this would do
that while still keeping anyone from passing any laws.
I would go so far as to state I would support electing none but the dead for
any elected office. Sort of like Futurama, we get Nixon's head without the
annoying chatter of his voice or the danger to our liberties of him having a
thought, paranoid or otherwise.

As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?


Just prop him up like 'Weekend at Bernie's' and he'd do fine.

I have always imagined him sealed in a man-sized (armor) glass or plastic
cigar tube. Makes it simple to slip him into a FedEx shipping carton.

I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded onto
his Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President positively

has

to be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."


I'd tape those.

I would put money into making them.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"It's tough ... but not as tough as comedy!" - Edmund Gwenn on dying
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 11:57:01 PM
In article <0001HW.C2139C0B0004B655F0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C212A1670026719AF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac
<jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have
to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to
the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other
Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive
and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle
and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election
season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?


That's true. I think he couldn't do worse than many of them, including
present example.


Very true, but since we all like a choice in whom we vote for this would do
that while still keeping anyone from passing any laws.

I would go so far as to state I would support electing none but the dead for
any elected office. Sort of like Futurama, we get Nixon's head without the
annoying chatter of his voice or the danger to our liberties of him having a
thought, paranoid or otherwise.

Damn! I miss that show. Yes. If we got tired of Nixon, we could always
bring back someone else. We could even bring back poor William Henry
Harrison. At least he's get a chance to serve a term this time.


As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?


Just prop him up like 'Weekend at Bernie's' and he'd do fine.


I have always imagined him sealed in a man-sized (armor) glass or plastic
cigar tube. Makes it simple to slip him into a FedEx shipping carton.

Heh! Better yet.


I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded onto
his Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President positively

has

to be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."


I'd tape those.


I would put money into making them.

Same here.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Harry F. Leopold"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 01:12:41 AM

In article <0001HW.C2139C0B0004B655F0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C212A1670026719AF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac
<jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have
to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to
the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other
Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive
and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle
and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over
any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election
season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have
been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?


That's true. I think he couldn't do worse than many of them, including
present example.


Very true, but since we all like a choice in whom we vote for this would do
that while still keeping anyone from passing any laws.

I would go so far as to state I would support electing none but the dead
for
any elected office. Sort of like Futurama, we get Nixon's head without the
annoying chatter of his voice or the danger to our liberties of him having
a
thought, paranoid or otherwise.


Damn! I miss that show. Yes. If we got tired of Nixon, we could always
bring back someone else. We could even bring back poor William Henry
Harrison. At least he's get a chance to serve a term this time.

With his luck he would get elected and then spontaneously combust immediately
after. ;-)

As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?


Just prop him up like 'Weekend at Bernie's' and he'd do fine.


I have always imagined him sealed in a man-sized (armor) glass or plastic
cigar tube. Makes it simple to slip him into a FedEx shipping carton.


Heh! Better yet.


I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded onto
his Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President
positively

has

to be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."


I'd tape those.


I would put money into making them.


Same here.

"No discrimination against the dead!"
"Dead Americans have just as much right to be your President as the living
have. Elect Geronimo today."
"Fictional cartoon characters have gotten votes, why not a REAL American?
Vote John Paul Jones as your Senator. (Just as soon as we have the Russians
dig him up and mail him back to us.)"
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
Ò(B)iological evolution is a team sport.Ò-Louis Friend
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 02:00:09 PM
In article <0001HW.C213C209000D9DD5F0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2139C0B0004B655F0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C212A1670026719AF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff"
<gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac
<jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have
to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to
the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other
Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive
and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle
and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of
Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over
any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election
season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I always thought that Zappa deserved a chance, how bad could he have
been,
compared to so many of our other elected parisit... er ... presidents?


That's true. I think he couldn't do worse than many of them, including
present example.


Very true, but since we all like a choice in whom we vote for this would
do
that while still keeping anyone from passing any laws.

I would go so far as to state I would support electing none but the dead
for
any elected office. Sort of like Futurama, we get Nixon's head without the
annoying chatter of his voice or the danger to our liberties of him having
a
thought, paranoid or otherwise.


Damn! I miss that show. Yes. If we got tired of Nixon, we could always
bring back someone else. We could even bring back poor William Henry
Harrison. At least he's get a chance to serve a term this time.


With his luck he would get elected and then spontaneously combust immediately
after. ;-)

LOL! Or get struck by a meteor.


As for Nixon, he was always great for funerals, why should he be any
different simply because he happens to be dead?


Just prop him up like 'Weekend at Bernie's' and he'd do fine.


I have always imagined him sealed in a man-sized (armor) glass or plastic
cigar tube. Makes it simple to slip him into a FedEx shipping carton.


Heh! Better yet.


I would love to see those FedEx commercials showing him being loaded
onto
his Air Force 2 in his shipping crate. "When the Vice President
positively

has

to be at the funeral by 2 PM the next day."


I'd tape those.


I would put money into making them.


Same here.


"No discrimination against the dead!"

"Dead Americans have just as much right to be your President as the living
have. Elect Geronimo today."

"Fictional cartoon characters have gotten votes, why not a REAL American?
Vote John Paul Jones as your Senator. (Just as soon as we have the Russians
dig him up and mail him back to us.)"

Sounds good to me. Though just to spite us, Putin might dig up Lenin and
send him instead.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.






User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 03:28:17 AM
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-A264E2.16140905032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?

I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.
--
.
User: "Rev. Jones Says \Drink More Koolaid"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 06:37:28 PM
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>

LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.

You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.
--
******************************************
Rev. Mercutio Jones
http://www.myspace.com/therightreverendjones
http://www.myspace.com/dayofthesick
************************************************
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 11:48:25 PM
In article <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
"Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com>
wrote:

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.

I'm just being polite although the little ***** certainly doesn't
deserve it.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 12:59:02 AM
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.

I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.
--
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 01:57:35 PM
In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--

Never does for me.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 03:46:32 PM
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.

How do you know?
--
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 06:15:09 PM
In article <7lcuu25ohhucr9b23qs0tmtf0djdtls6th@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.


How do you know?

--

I'm exaggerating, of course, but there have been times when I've tried
to be nice and others have tried to take advantage of it.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 07 Mar 2007 10:44:51 PM
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:15:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-C26AF6.16150907032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <7lcuu25ohhucr9b23qs0tmtf0djdtls6th@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.


How do you know?

--


I'm exaggerating, of course, but there have been times when I've tried
to be nice and others have tried to take advantage of it.

Blast those scout masters.
--
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 08 Mar 2007 12:21:03 AM
In article <k55vu2ph1fpg4eeollcgjn090f1vc0d12o@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:15:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-C26AF6.16150907032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <7lcuu25ohhucr9b23qs0tmtf0djdtls6th@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.


How do you know?

--


I'm exaggerating, of course, but there have been times when I've tried
to be nice and others have tried to take advantage of it.


Blast those scout masters.

--

I was a Boy Scout once, believe it or not. The scoutmaster didn't try
anything with us since being tough city kids, we probably would have
kicked the crap out of him.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 08 Mar 2007 12:38:18 AM
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:21:03 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-2E0E38.22210307032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <k55vu2ph1fpg4eeollcgjn090f1vc0d12o@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:15:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-C26AF6.16150907032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <7lcuu25ohhucr9b23qs0tmtf0djdtls6th@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.


How do you know?

--


I'm exaggerating, of course, but there have been times when I've tried
to be nice and others have tried to take advantage of it.


Blast those scout masters.

--


I was a Boy Scout once, believe it or not. The scoutmaster didn't try
anything with us since being tough city kids, we probably would have
kicked the crap out of him.

And there's a lot of crap in a scout master!
--
.
User: "John Hachmann"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 08 Mar 2007 11:01:20 PM
In article <bqbvu2hl453b7c3jn5q6dek5akkkb43feg@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:21:03 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-2E0E38.22210307032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <k55vu2ph1fpg4eeollcgjn090f1vc0d12o@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:15:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-C26AF6.16150907032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <7lcuu25ohhucr9b23qs0tmtf0djdtls6th@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:57:35 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-588218.11573507032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0kosu2pkb22s2es763de5q692etes5442p@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:37:28 GMT, "Rev. Jones Says \"Drink More
Koolaid\"" <lawtoniww@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <cPnHh.1024$FG1.963@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com...

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac
<jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current
puddin'-head.


You misspelled "*****." There's no "p" or apostrophe in it.


I knew I'd get into trouble for being polite!
That's twice in my life I've done it, and it hasn't worked either
time.

--


Never does for me.


How do you know?

--


I'm exaggerating, of course, but there have been times when I've tried
to be nice and others have tried to take advantage of it.


Blast those scout masters.

--


I was a Boy Scout once, believe it or not. The scoutmaster didn't try
anything with us since being tough city kids, we probably would have
kicked the crap out of him.


And there's a lot of crap in a scout master!

Actually, or scoutmaster was rather cool. The assistant scoutmaster was
a fundy who was always trying to 'save' us. We used to get back on him
on hikes by hiding all his stuff and putting rocks under his sleeping
bag, etc.
.









User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 06 Mar 2007 05:41:03 PM
In article <a0dqu2p4pppnoki98402vdpkmk5h6k0kd3@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:14:09 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-A264E2.16140905032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <0001HW.C2114F590031214CF0284530@news.central.cox.net>,
Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:

In article <6rrku21ckcdi9j2dunvb0ki30pisqpo4r4@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-DC970E.16343603032007@news.giganews.com>

In article <9hqju257cam86dcf2nfc6m4qf2c1sv0ifl@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to
go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.
Although, had it been the case, there may have been some method to
the
madness; vis: an attempt to move the White House to "The Other
Side"!!
;)


Edwards isn't the worst of the bunch. He claims to be a progressive
and
for the little guy, even though as a trial lawyer he made a bundle and
lives in a huge house in N. Carolina. He wants to get us out of Iraq
and
is for some form of universal heath coverage.

I haven't made up my mind for whom I vote in the primaries yet, but
given the current Republican slate, I would vote for Edwards over any
of
them in the national election.


Reminds me of Douglas Adams' take on elections.
Read about "voting for lizards" sometime, if you haven't already.
Both illustrative and instructive.


I know. They're all lizards. Our problem is finding the lizard which
will do the least harm.


That would be a dead lizard, which is why I recommend each election season
that we elect the dead. I am still partial to the Zappa/Nixon ticket.


LOL! In that case, why not bring back Jefferson or Lincoln?


I'm sure they'd do a far better job than the current puddin'-head.

--

To tell the truth, I think my neighbor's dog could do better than ole
puddin' head.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.




User: ""

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 05:46:27 PM
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:06:45 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.

Oh ***** you!
(But Gawd damn...that was funny as Hell ;-)
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 05:50:24 PM
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:46:27 -0600,
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:06:45 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.


Oh ***** you!
(But Gawd damn...that was funny as Hell ;-)

Uh..You do know I was joking with the "***** you" right?
atheist@home#1554


<snip>

.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 10:34:27 PM
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:50:24 -0600,
wrote:
- Refer: <onmmu2d2iiqo629rbdpq222jp05khsgj8h@4ax.com>

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:46:27 -0600,

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:06:45 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.


Oh ***** you!
(But Gawd damn...that was funny as Hell ;-)

Uh..You do know I was joking with the "***** you" right?

You can't offend an Aussie *that* easily! ;)
"***** you" is a polite greeting between equals where I come from!
--
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 10 Mar 2007 12:43:43 AM
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:04:27 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:50:24 -0600,

wrote:
- Refer: <onmmu2d2iiqo629rbdpq222jp05khsgj8h@4ax.com>

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:46:27 -0600,

wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:06:45 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:47:18 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <cYCdnTxTfcbL83TYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@giganews.com>

"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:56giu2t5rr62t7uojbus60ks8cc6rc2aiu@4ax.com...

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032007@news.giganews.com>


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


That's Jon Edward, in case you weren't being sarcastic.


Thanks, and no, I was *not* being sarcastic.
You point out that it is another liar who is running for office.

It's hard to tell with you yanks.
You elect all manner of idiots simply because they have acted in B
grade movies, I see no reason why the idiocy should not extend to
so-called "psychic" frauds** as well.


Oh ***** you!
(But Gawd damn...that was funny as Hell ;-)

Uh..You do know I was joking with the "***** you" right?


You can't offend an Aussie *that* easily! ;)
"***** you" is a polite greeting between equals where I come from!

Heh :-)
atheist@home#1554
.




User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 03 Mar 2007 04:40:09 AM
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in alt.atheism

johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:

" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"
See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:
http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx
What a kook!

Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 03:47:09 AM
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:40:09 GMT, Elroy Willis
<elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in alt.atheism

johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote:


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"


See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:


http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx


What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards

Lol!
Quite the typical elitist Democrat he is.
But then consider the sourse of the information.
Maybe correct or maybe not.
atheist@home#1554
.


User: "Agki"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 05 Mar 2007 03:30:52 PM
On Mar 3, 4:33 am, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-E5DC1F.23101202032...@news.giganews.com>



" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so?"


See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:


http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx


What a kook!


Is that John Edwards, the psychic fraud?
Or another liar?

--

The psychic fraud's name is John Edward. Note, Edward... no final
"s".
Agki
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 03:43:14 AM
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** soŠ."

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!

At least the mean spirited lying twit is consistent.
Republicans should be as embarrassed over her as Democrats
should be over the equally mean spirited and full of absolute crap
Al Franken.
Peas in a pod the two of them are.
Sheesh!
atheist@home#1554
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 06:41:29 PM
In article <df4lu2pq96cqrlo2botuaavatshk6hnpsj@4ax.com>,
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** soŠ."

See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:

http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx

What a kook!


At least the mean spirited lying twit is consistent.
Republicans should be as embarrassed over her as Democrats
should be over the equally mean spirited and full of absolute crap
Al Franken.
Peas in a pod the two of them are.
Sheesh!

I don't recall Franken calling anyone a "*****" though.


atheist@home#1554

--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "tirebiter"

Title: Re: Coulter at CPAC calls Edwards "*****" 04 Mar 2007 08:56:47 PM
On Mar 4, 7:41=C2=A0pm, johac <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com> wrote:

In article <df4lu2pq96cqrlo2botuaavatshk6hn...@4ax.com>,





=C2=A0athe...@home.com wrote:

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:10:12 -0800, johac <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:


" I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic
presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go
into rehab if you use the word ***** so=C5=A0."


See Little Annie Tranny put her foot in her mouth at:


http://tinyurl.com/33hqnx


What a kook!


At least the mean spirited lying twit is consistent.
Republicans should be as embarrassed over her as Democrats
should be over the equally mean spirited and full of absolute crap
Al Franken.
Peas in a pod the two of them are.
Sheesh!


I don't recall Franken calling anyone a "*****" though.

I agree. I listened to Franken's show whenever possible. When he was
speaking seriously, his information was properly fact checked and
accurate. His attacks were focused at certain targets for specific
actions, instead of vague generalizations. Granted, he made some
jokes that were, at best, unkind, I can't recall him ever just
chanting schoolyard taunts the way Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh do.



atheist@home#1554


--
John Hachmann aa #1782

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocitie=

s"

=C2=A0-Voltaire

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Contact - Throw a .net over the .com- Hide quoted text -

---
a=2Ea. #2273
.




  Page 2 of 4

1