| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kurt Nicklas" |
| Date: |
11 Sep 2007 06:30:33 AM |
| Object: |
#Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Chris Matthews opened his "Hardball" program on Aug. 28 by saying
Larry Craig had been "exposed as both a sexual deviant and a world-
class hypocrite."
Normally, using the word "deviant" in reference to any form of sodomy
would be a linguistic crime worse than calling someone a "nappy headed
ho." Luckily, Craig is a Republican.
As a backup precaution, Matthews has worked to ensure that there is
virtually no audience for "Hardball." I shudder to think of the damage
such a remark might have done if uttered about a non-Republican on a
TV show with actual viewers.
The New York Times ran 15 articles on Craig's guilty plea to
"disorderly conduct" in a bathroom. The Washington Post ran 20
articles on Craig. MSNBC covered it like it was the first moon landing
-- Three small taps for a man, one giant leap for public gay sex!
In other news last week, two Egyptian engineering students, Ahmed
Abdellatif Sherif Mohamed and Youssef Samir Megahed, were indicted in
Tampa on charges of carrying pipe bombs across states lines. They were
caught with the bombs in their car near a Navy base.
But back to the real news of the week: CNN's Dana Bash reported that
the Larry Craig story was "everywhere and it is not going to let up."
If liberals were any happier, they'd be gay.
Just as liberals were reaching a fever-pitch of pretend shock and
dismay at Larry Craig, it was announced that Craig was resigning. And
there went MSNBC's fall program schedule.
Indignant that Craig had short-circuited their gleeful gay-baiting,
liberals quickly switched to a new set of talking points. In the blink
of an eye, they went from calling Craig a "deviant" to attacking
Republicans for not insisting that Craig stay.
Liberals said the only reason Republicans were not blanketing the
airwaves defending Craig -- maybe running him for president -- was
because of Republican "homophobia." After howling with rage all week
about gay Republicans, to turn around and call Republicans homophobes
on Friday was nothing if not audacious.
But last Friday -- or, for short, "the day the two bomb-carrying
Egyptian students were indicted and the mainstream media was too busy
jeering at Larry Craig to notice" -- The New York Times
editorialized:
"Underlying the (Republicans') hurry to disown the senator, of course,
is the party's brutal agenda of trumpeting the gay-marriage issue. To
the extent Sen. Craig, a stalwart in the family values caucus, might
morph into a blatant hypocrite before the voters' eyes, he reflects on
the party's record in demonizing homosexuality. The rush to cast him
out betrays the party's intolerance, which is on display for the
public in all of its ugliness."
Liberals don't even know what they mean by "hypocrite" anymore. It's
just a word they throw out in a moment of womanly pique, like
"extremist" -- or, come to think of it, "gay." How is Craig a
"hypocrite," much less a "blatant hypocrite"?
Assuming the worst about Craig, the Senate has not held a vote on
outlawing homosexual impulses. It voted on gay marriage. Craig not
only opposes gay marriage, he's in a heterosexual marriage with kids.
Talk about walking the walk!
Did Craig propose marriage to the undercover cop? If not, I'm not
seeing the "hypocrisy."
And why is it "homophobic" for Senate Republicans to look askance at
sex in public bathrooms? Is the Times claiming that sodomy in public
bathrooms is the essence of being gay? I thought gays just wanted to
get married to one another and settle down in the suburbs so they
could visit each other in the hospital.
Liberals have no idea what they think about homosexuality, which is
why their arguments are completely contradictory. They gay-bait
Republicans with abandon -- and then turn around and complain about
homophobia.
They call Larry Craig a "deviant" based on accusations that he
attempted to solicit sex in a public bathroom -- and then ferociously
attack efforts to prevent people from having sex in public bathrooms.
They say people are born gay -- and then they say it's the celibacy
requirement that turns Catholic priests gay.
They tell us gays want nothing more than to get married -- and then
say it's homophobic to oppose homosexual sex in public bathrooms.
Unlike liberals, the "family values caucus" that the Times loathes has
only one position on homosexuality: Whatever your impulses are, don't
engage in homosexual sex. In fact, don't have any sex at all unless it
is between a husband and wife.
The Idaho Statesman spent eight months investigating a rumor that
Craig was gay. They interviewed 300 people, going back to his college
days. They walked around Union Station in Washington, D.C., with a
picture of Craig, asking people if they had seen him loitering around
the men's bathrooms.
And they produced nothing.
All they had was the original anonymous charge of sodomy in a bathroom
at Union Station that started the eight-month investigation in the
first place -- and his plea to "disorderly conduct" after an ambiguous
encounter in a bathroom in Minneapolis. Even his enemies said they had
never seen any inappropriate conduct by Craig.
If the charges against Craig are true -- and that is certainly in
doubt -- he's a sinner (and barely that, according to The Idaho
Statesman), but he is among the least hypocritical people in America.
.
|
|
| User: "Startlemyerfieldson" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 07:31:18 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1189510233.090222.29780@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Chris Matthews opened his "Hardball" program on Aug. 28 by saying
Larry Craig had been "exposed as both a sexual deviant and a world-
class hypocrite."
Normally, using the word "deviant" in reference to any form of sodomy
would be a linguistic crime worse than calling someone a "nappy headed
ho." Luckily, Craig is a Republican.
As a backup precaution, Matthews has worked to ensure that there is
virtually no audience for "Hardball." I shudder to think of the damage
such a remark might have done if uttered about a non-Republican on a
TV show with actual viewers.
Apparently Ann Coulter was watching...
The New York Times ran 15 articles on Craig's guilty plea to
"disorderly conduct" in a bathroom. The Washington Post ran 20
articles on Craig. MSNBC covered it like it was the first moon landing
-- Three small taps for a man, one giant leap for public gay sex!
In other news last week, two Egyptian engineering students, Ahmed
Abdellatif Sherif Mohamed and Youssef Samir Megahed, were indicted in
Tampa on charges of carrying pipe bombs across states lines. They were
caught with the bombs in their car near a Navy base.
But back to the real news of the week: CNN's Dana Bash reported that
the Larry Craig story was "everywhere and it is not going to let up."
If liberals were any happier, they'd be gay.
Just as liberals were reaching a fever-pitch of pretend shock and
dismay at Larry Craig, it was announced that Craig was resigning. And
there went MSNBC's fall program schedule.
Indignant that Craig had short-circuited their gleeful gay-baiting,
liberals quickly switched to a new set of talking points. In the blink
of an eye, they went from calling Craig a "deviant" to attacking
Republicans for not insisting that Craig stay.
Liberals said the only reason Republicans were not blanketing the
airwaves defending Craig -- maybe running him for president -- was
because of Republican "homophobia." After howling with rage all week
about gay Republicans, to turn around and call Republicans homophobes
on Friday was nothing if not audacious.
But last Friday -- or, for short, "the day the two bomb-carrying
Egyptian students were indicted and the mainstream media was too busy
jeering at Larry Craig to notice" -- The New York Times
editorialized:
"Underlying the (Republicans') hurry to disown the senator, of course,
is the party's brutal agenda of trumpeting the gay-marriage issue. To
the extent Sen. Craig, a stalwart in the family values caucus, might
morph into a blatant hypocrite before the voters' eyes, he reflects on
the party's record in demonizing homosexuality. The rush to cast him
out betrays the party's intolerance, which is on display for the
public in all of its ugliness."
Liberals don't even know what they mean by "hypocrite" anymore. It's
just a word they throw out in a moment of womanly pique, like
"extremist" -- or, come to think of it, "gay." How is Craig a
"hypocrite," much less a "blatant hypocrite"?
OK, let me try here:
The guy's public pitch is anti-gay.
The guys caught soliciting gay sex.
I think that might qualify.
Assuming the worst about Craig, the Senate has not held a vote on
outlawing homosexual impulses. It voted on gay marriage. Craig not
only opposes gay marriage, he's in a heterosexual marriage with kids.
Talk about walking the walk!
Yes, I can hear the faint echo of hard leather heels clicking on
bathroom floors.
Did Craig propose marriage to the undercover cop? If not, I'm not
seeing the "hypocrisy."
Coulter expects us to believe that she's naive?
<snip>
Enough, I'm late for work.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 05:59:02 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 8:31 am, "Startlemyerfieldson" <St...@stop.me> wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1189510233.090222.29780@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Chris Matthews opened his "Hardball" program on Aug. 28 by saying
Larry Craig had been "exposed as both a sexual deviant and a world-
class hypocrite."
Normally, using the word "deviant" in reference to any form of sodomy
would be a linguistic crime worse than calling someone a "nappy headed
ho." Luckily, Craig is a Republican.
As a backup precaution, Matthews has worked to ensure that there is
virtually no audience for "Hardball." I shudder to think of the damage
such a remark might have done if uttered about a non-Republican on a
TV show with actual viewers.
Apparently Ann Coulter was watching...
The New York Times ran 15 articles on Craig's guilty plea to
"disorderly conduct" in a bathroom. The Washington Post ran 20
articles on Craig. MSNBC covered it like it was the first moon landing
-- Three small taps for a man, one giant leap for public gay sex!
In other news last week, two Egyptian engineering students, Ahmed
Abdellatif Sherif Mohamed and Youssef Samir Megahed, were indicted in
Tampa on charges of carrying pipe bombs across states lines. They were
caught with the bombs in their car near a Navy base.
But back to the real news of the week: CNN's Dana Bash reported that
the Larry Craig story was "everywhere and it is not going to let up."
If liberals were any happier, they'd be gay.
Just as liberals were reaching a fever-pitch of pretend shock and
dismay at Larry Craig, it was announced that Craig was resigning. And
there went MSNBC's fall program schedule.
Indignant that Craig had short-circuited their gleeful gay-baiting,
liberals quickly switched to a new set of talking points. In the blink
of an eye, they went from calling Craig a "deviant" to attacking
Republicans for not insisting that Craig stay.
Liberals said the only reason Republicans were not blanketing the
airwaves defending Craig -- maybe running him for president -- was
because of Republican "homophobia." After howling with rage all week
about gay Republicans, to turn around and call Republicans homophobes
on Friday was nothing if not audacious.
But last Friday -- or, for short, "the day the two bomb-carrying
Egyptian students were indicted and the mainstream media was too busy
jeering at Larry Craig to notice" -- The New York Times
editorialized:
"Underlying the (Republicans') hurry to disown the senator, of course,
is the party's brutal agenda of trumpeting the gay-marriage issue. To
the extent Sen. Craig, a stalwart in the family values caucus, might
morph into a blatant hypocrite before the voters' eyes, he reflects on
the party's record in demonizing homosexuality. The rush to cast him
out betrays the party's intolerance, which is on display for the
public in all of its ugliness."
Liberals don't even know what they mean by "hypocrite" anymore. It's
just a word they throw out in a moment of womanly pique, like
"extremist" -- or, come to think of it, "gay." How is Craig a
"hypocrite," much less a "blatant hypocrite"?
OK, let me try here:
The guy's public pitch is anti-gay.
The guys caught soliciting gay sex.
I think that might qualify.
Assuming the worst about Craig, the Senate has not held a vote on
outlawing homosexual impulses. It voted on gay marriage. Craig not
only opposes gay marriage, he's in a heterosexual marriage with kids.
Talk about walking the walk!
Yes, I can hear the faint echo of hard leather heels clicking on
bathroom floors.
Did Craig propose marriage to the undercover cop? If not, I'm not
seeing the "hypocrisy."
Coulter expects us to believe that she's naive?
Coulter is intelligent, but here there's some kind of desperation. It
back-fired on her.
Proposal of marriage is not illegal, even if in a restroom and to an
undercover cop. Actually, looking for sex isn't illegal, either, not
even in a public restroom. However, peeping into an occupied stall
repeatedly, physically touching a person in his stall, placing your
hands into the physical space of an occupied stall, are activities
that, if the intent is there, are illegal under the Minnesota statute
in question here.
The hypocrisy is that Craig insists he is not gay (something tells me
that even in his own mind he knows he's "homosexual" or "bisexual" and
is pulling a Bill Clinton here with over-analysis of language), is a
closet-case, and that he was looking for homosexual sex in a public
restroom.
While the Democrats yell "Hypocrite!", the Repulicans who want him out
are using his CONFESSION to DISORDERLY CONDUCT as their reason. A
person convicted should not be a member of the Senate. But that's not
their real reason. I mean, the guy pleaded guilty to a simple
misdemeanor.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 01:50:46 PM |
|
|
In article <1189510233.090222.29780@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> Kurt Nicklas <nicklask@bellsouth.net> writes:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
That is correct.
In fact, only the conservatives are making much of a fuss.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 10:39:50 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas <nicklask@bellsouth.net> writes:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
<snip>
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Chris Matthews opened his "Hardball" program on Aug. 28 by saying
Larry Craig had been "exposed as both a sexual deviant and a world-
class hypocrite."
Normally, using the word "deviant" in reference to any form of sodomy
would be a linguistic crime worse than calling someone a "nappy headed
ho." Luckily, Craig is a Republican.
Using the word "deviant" for people who troll for sex in public
restrooms, particularly ones in crowded areas such as airports
where the rest of the public doesn't have a choice, is not out
line. You'd say the same thing about some guy walking around
the airport asking random women for sex.
<lots of snippage>
They call Larry Craig a "deviant" based on accusations that he
attempted to solicit sex in a public bathroom -- and then ferociously
attack efforts to prevent people from having sex in public bathrooms.
The Republicans are the ones calling him a deviant. Liberals are more
or less keeping silent about Craig's personal life.
They say people are born gay -- and then they say it's the celibacy
requirement that turns Catholic priests gay.
They don't say that Caltholic priests turn gay. They are just
desparate.
If the charges against Craig are true -- and that is certainly in
doubt -- he's a sinner (and barely that, according to The Idaho
Statesman), but he is among the least hypocritical people in America.
While the evidence is not compelling enough for a conviction, Craig
certainly qualifies as a hypocrite if he really is gay, and enough has
come out (other alleged incidents included) to suspect that he is a
closet case, although suspicion is not proof.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 11:57:22 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:1189510233.090222.29780
@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
PMSL.
The fun thing with Ann Coulter is working out whether she's as stupid as
she thinks her audience is.
http://uk.video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1118520316&fr=yfp-t-501
Enjoy (she didn't)
--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208
Lord Mayor of Awphucket
Not authentic without this signature.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/proselytising/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 04:21:56 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 12:57 pm, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:
Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:1189510233.090222.29780
@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
PMSL.
The fun thing with Ann Coulter is working out whether she's as stupid as
she thinks her audience is.
The fun thing about posting Coulter essays to alt.atheism is watching
hate
practiced by the hateful.
There must be a way of energy off that sort of hate. Maybe Algore can
work it out....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
12 Sep 2007 01:45:39 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:1189545716.957416.87970@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
On Sep 11, 12:57 pm, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:
Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:1189510233.090222.29780 @50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to
alt.atheism:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
PMSL.
The fun thing with Ann Coulter is working out whether she's as stupid
as she thinks her audience is.
The fun thing about posting Coulter essays to alt.atheism is watching
hate
practiced by the hateful.
There must be a way of energy off that sort of hate. Maybe Algore can
work it out....
Humiliating fuckwits like you works for me.
--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208
Lord Mayor of Awphucket
Not authentic without this signature.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/proselytising/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 06:12:45 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 2:21 pm, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
On Sep 11, 12:57 pm, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:
Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:1189510233.090222.29780
@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
PMSL.
The fun thing with Ann Coulter is working out whether she's as stupid as
she thinks her audience is.
The fun thing about posting Coulter essays to alt.atheism is watching
hate
practiced by the hateful.
There must be a way of energy off that sort of hate. Maybe Algore can
work it out....
LOL Kurt, it's always fun to see you define pointing out lies and
hypocracy as 'hate'.
Aren't you tired of making Ann look like an imbicle, and not to
mention it, violating her copyright?
Careful, she only prints those things to make money off of losers and
you are cutting into her profits. She's not likely to be nice about
it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
12 Sep 2007 01:57:29 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 5:21 pm, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
On Sep 11, 12:57 pm, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:
Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:1189510233.090222.29780
@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
PMSL.
The fun thing with Ann Coulter is working out whether she's as stupid as
she thinks her audience is.
The fun thing about posting Coulter essays to alt.atheism is watching
hate
practiced by the hateful.
Oh, you mean the hatered spread by Coulter and her ilk?
There must be a way of energy off that sort of hate. Maybe Algore can
work it out....
I wish you would find it, Knickers, and leave us alone..
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 06:37:30 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:21:56 -0700, Kurt Nicklas
<nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote:
The fun thing about posting Coulter essays to alt.atheism is watching
hate practiced by the hateful.
That's the definition of Coulter's essays.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 07:52:26 AM |
|
|
Kurt Nicklas wrote:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Tran Coulter should know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jcon" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 11:23:53 AM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 6:30 am, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
Last time I checked, most of the harsh quotes about Craig
were from Republicans, who immediately dropped him
like a used condom.
-jc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 12:25:22 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:30 am, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
It's not that he was "Cruising while Republican".. It's more like he
was "Cruising while Family-Values Republican".
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
<Snip Coulter blather>
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 05:49:05 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:30 am, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Craig not
only opposes gay marriage, he's in a heterosexual marriage with kids.
Sen. Craig has no biological children. The children are his wife's
from a previous marriage. Why do people keep "forgetting" to mention
this?
There is no way of knowing currently that the marriage is
"heterosexual". It is an opposite-sex marriage. Without a sex video
of the hideous couple going at it, this is all we know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 09:56:25 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:30:33 -0700, Kurt Nicklas
<nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Despite the 9/11-level coverage, Larry Craig is merely accused of
"cruising while Republican." There is nothing liberals love more than
gay-baiting, which they disguise as an attack on "hypocrisy."
And there's nothing Republicans love more than hypocrisy.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: #Coulter: Cruising While Republican |
11 Sep 2007 10:55:01 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:30:33 -0700, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
CRUISING WHILE REPUBLICAN
September 5, 2007
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
If you've just returned from your Labor Day vacation and are scanning
the headlines from last week's newspapers -- don't panic! America is
not threatened by a category 5 hurricane named "Larry Craig."
<snip ludicrous Coulter-babble>
I wonder if Ann Coulter has to take a shower every time she writes
something?
--
MarkA
(My OTHER sig line is clever)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
11 Sep 2007 09:22:38 PM |
|
|
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
11 Sep 2007 11:38:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
12 Sep 2007 09:06:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
13 Sep 2007 10:44:11 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
13 Sep 2007 10:52:01 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:kvSdnclY0MdWx3TbnZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@giganews.com...
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
Truth and humor are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
16 Sep 2007 10:01:36 AM |
|
|
Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:kvSdnclY0MdWx3TbnZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@giganews.com...
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff"
<gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were
after?
Truth and humor are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
I never implied it was. bo did.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
13 Sep 2007 11:43:04 AM |
|
|
On Sep 13, 11:44 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
If he thinks that the truth, then that is funny..
PDW
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
14 Sep 2007 06:45:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:43:04 -0700, Syd <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sep 13, 11:44 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
If he thinks that the truth, then that is funny..
HA! The insertion of ANOTHER code word. This time I shan't expose the
meaning of it to the public at large but be assured that I accept your
humble apology.
PDW
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
16 Sep 2007 10:02:29 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:43:04 -0700, Syd <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sep 13, 11:44 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff"
<geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
bo_daci...@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were
after?
If he thinks that the truth, then that is funny..
HA! The insertion of ANOTHER code word. This time I shan't expose the
meaning of it to the public at large but be assured that I accept your
humble apology.
Spell flame. Very lame.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
15 Sep 2007 02:19:15 AM |
|
|
On Sep 14, 7:45 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:43:04 -0700, Syd <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sep 13, 11:44 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
If he thinks that the truth, then that is funny..
HA! The insertion of ANOTHER code word. This time I shan't expose the
meaning of it to the public at large but be assured that I accept your
humble apology.
PDW
In your dreams, *****.
PDW
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
15 Sep 2007 06:46:47 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:19:15 -0700,
Syd <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:
In your dreams.
*****.
No, *****, you've never appeared in my dreams.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
14 Sep 2007 06:35:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:44:11 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were after?
Of course liberals don't write for Henny Youngman, he's dead, Jim.
But they would fit perfectly with his style (funny one liners) were
the good man still among us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
16 Sep 2007 10:07:44 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:44:11 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff"
<gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, I thought you were trying for funny. Was it truth you were
after?
Of course liberals don't write for Henny Youngman, he's dead, Jim.
But they would fit perfectly with his style (funny one liners) were
the good man still among us.
You mean like these:
I promise you I will listen to what has been said here, even though I wasn't
here.
We spent a lot of time talking about Africa, as we should. Africa is a
nation that suffers from incredible disease.
You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy
test.
I am here to make an announcement that this Thursday, ticket counters and
airplanes will fly out of Ronald Reagan Airport.
You work three jobs? ... Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is
fantastic that you're doing that.
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop
thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do
we.
There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on --shame on you. Fool me --
you can't get fooled again.
Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job.
My answer is bring them on.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: Liberals write for Henny Youngman (was -- #Coulter: Cruising While Republican) |
12 Sep 2007 01:58:35 PM |
|
|
On Sep 12, 10:06 am, wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:38:42 -0400, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
wrote:
Changing the subject line of this thread to:
"Liberals write for Henny Youngman."
Keep that day job.
You want truth or you want humor?
Well, your a failure at both..
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
