Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution



 Religions > Atheism > Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"
Date: 14 May 2005 01:31:43 AM
Object: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution
(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution
By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005
Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.
The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.
U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."
The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.
"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.
Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.
"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.
- - -
On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html
- - - - - - -
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 16 May 2005 05:47:16 PM
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan
does not violate Constitution

If enough donations are collected for inscribing "In gods we trust" or
"In demons we trust" on the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, that would
not violate the Constitution either, what? Or would it, according to
the same three judge panel?

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 20 May 2005 05:34:49 PM
wrote:

Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan
does not violate Constitution


If enough donations are collected for inscribing "In gods we trust"

or

"In demons we trust" on the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, that

would

not violate the Constitution either, what? Or would it, according to
the same three judge panel?

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.

I petitioned the U.S. government to stamp the following onto all
currency but was refused:
Prayer To Christ The King:
O Christ Jesus, I acknowledge You as Universal King. All that has been
made, was created for You. Exercise over me all the rights that You
have.
I renew my baptismal promises, renouncing Satan, his pomps and his
works, and I promise to live as a good Christian. Especially do I
pledge myself by all the means in my power to bring about the triumph
of the rights of God and of Your Church.
Divine Heart of Jesus, I offer You my poor actions to obtain that all
hearts may recognize Your consecrated Kingship and that thus the
Kingdom of Your peace may be established in the whole world. Amen.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 20 May 2005 07:13:18 PM
In our last episode
<1116628489.674162.313000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
vivapadrepio@aol.com pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare
proclaimed:

I petitioned the U.S. government to stamp the following onto all currency
but was refused:

Good.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.



User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:33:45 AM
Forwarded message
-To: NormsRevenge
The ACLU is sad, deeply saddened.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers
from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:50:03 PM by goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In
My Heart Forever)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate
Constitution

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."

The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.

Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.

"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

- - -

On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html

- - - - - - -

Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:34:21 AM
Forwarded message
-To: goldstategop
Wow! Sanity!
That stuff might be contagious.
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:51:59 PM by Ronin
(When the fox gnaws....SMILE!)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:35:00 AM
Forwarded message
-To: goldstategop
I'm sure the DUmmies are in an uproar over this.
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:52:15 PM by rdl6989
(If it drives the left into fits, its a good thing.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:35:37 AM
Forwarded message
-To: NormsRevenge
I'm no attorney but I would file this in the "NO DUH!"
file.
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:53:11 PM by Texas_Jarhead
(To hell with Mexico, its policies, and its leaders)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:36:16 AM
Forwarded message
-To: rdl6989
Its not just a national motto. The phrase appears in our
national anthem. Liberals have suffered a minor setback
in their quest to purge God from the public square.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers
from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:53:47 PM by goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In
My Heart Forever)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:36:51 AM
Forwarded message
-To: NormsRevenge
It's a shame that we need a court to tell us this.
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:55:14 PM by Luircin
(Conservatives want to turn losers into winners.
Liberals want them to feel good about being losers.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:37:29 AM
Forwarded message
-To: Luircin
The courts can explain to us why government-appointed
chaplains are constitutional but its verboten for kids to
voluntarily pray in school? First Amendment jurisprudence
on religion and state is a total mess.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers
from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:57:19 PM by goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In
My Heart Forever)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:38:06 AM
Forwarded message
-To: NormsRevenge

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

They'd have to tear down almost every building and
monument in Washington to get rid of Christianity. Even
the the judges at the SC have Moses and the 10
Commandments hanging on the wall above their heads!
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:01:29 PM by concerned about politics
(Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:39:05 AM
Forwarded message
-To: goldstategop

The courts can explain to us why government-appointed
chaplains are constitutional but its verboten for kids to
voluntarily pray in school? First Amendment jurisprudence
on religion and state is a total mess.

Christian military Chaplin's can use the word "God" but
they can't use the name "Jesus Christ" in the Navy - even
though Christianity is based on Jesus Christ. 60
Chaplin's are petitioning our government on the 1st
amendment. The military claims those of other faiths
might be "offended".
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:06:31 PM by concerned about politics
(Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:39:59 AM
Forwarded message
-To: goldstategop

The ACLU is sad, deeply saddened.

I'm waiting for them to go after the Arlington National
Cemetery. It's nothing but crosses.
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:08:02 PM by concerned about politics
(Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:40:57 AM
Forwarded message
-To: concerned about politics
We wouldn't offend any one. Just Christians.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:10:35 PM by goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In
My Heart Forever)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:42:01 AM
Forwarded message
-To: concerned about politics
The entire cemetary is a gross violation of separation of religion
and state. I'm surprised the Left hasn't already gone after it.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for
answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:11:54 PM by goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In
My Heart Forever)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:42:39 AM
Forwarded message
-To: NormsRevenge
So how much are these two lawyers going to have to pony-
up for losing the case?
/sarcasm
Posted on 5/13/2005 11:19:35 PM by VeniVidiVici
(In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.




User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 15 May 2005 07:55:15 AM
in article SoUrO3213asAKE@DzuAe, Dr. Jai Maharaj at
wrote
on 5/14/05 2:39 AM:

Forwarded message

-To: goldstategop

The courts can explain to us why government-appointed
chaplains are constitutional but its verboten for kids to
voluntarily pray in school? First Amendment jurisprudence
on religion and state is a total mess.


Christian military Chaplin's can use the word "God" but
they can't use the name "Jesus Christ" in the Navy - even
though Christianity is based on Jesus Christ. 60
Chaplin's are petitioning our government on the 1st
amendment. The military claims those of other faiths
might be "offended".

Posted on 5/13/2005 11:06:31 PM by concerned about politics
(Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)


Why...so I can spend eternity licking other people's feet?
Paul
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 15 May 2005 02:46:08 PM
In article <BEACBEF3.21503%p.duca@comcast.net>,
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> posted:

Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:


Forwarded message

-To: goldstategop

The courts can explain to us why government-appointed
chaplains are constitutional but its verboten for kids to
voluntarily pray in school? First Amendment jurisprudence
on religion and state is a total mess.


Christian military Chaplin's can use the word "God" but
they can't use the name "Jesus Christ" in the Navy - even
though Christianity is based on Jesus Christ. 60
Chaplin's are petitioning our government on the 1st
amendment. The military claims those of other faiths
might be "offended".

Posted on 5/13/2005 11:06:31 PM by concerned about politics
(Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)




Why...so I can spend eternity licking other people's feet?

Paul

Sure, if you're into that and aren't hurting anyone.
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.











User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 04:54:07 AM
In article <BIoLA1524oFZFI@YsuUp>,
(Dr. Jai Maharaj)
wrote:

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

Obviously, they got it wrong, the poor deluded saps.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 01:15:06 PM
(4th US Circuit) Appeals court:
'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution
By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005
Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.
The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.
U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."
The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.
"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.
Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.
"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.
- - -
On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html
- - - - - - -
Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
.


User: "Guardian Pegasus"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 14 May 2005 10:50:35 PM
On Sat, 14 May 2005 06:31:43 GMT,
(Dr. Jai Maharaj)
wrote:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution

Also known, I believe, as the Louisiana Cangaroo Court.
.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 16 May 2005 03:05:30 PM
In article <nlhd81l9q1f4lahamqv73dkd3ubated4r9@4ax.com>,
Guardian Pegasus <Pope.Been-a-*****.Adolf.Panzer.Rat.Nazinger.Torquemada.II@holysee.va> posted:

On Sat, 14 May 2005 06:31:43 GMT,

(Dr. Jai Maharaj)
wrote:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate

Constitution

Also known, I believe, as the Louisiana Cangaroo Court.

Why -- because its decisions are not popular among wallabies?
http://www.tased.edu.au/tot/fauna/wallaby.html
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
.


User: "harmony"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 17 May 2005 05:14:14 PM
courts are too late on this. tom delay has already spoken, and he rules.
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:BIoLA1524oFZFI@YsuUp...

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate

Constitution


By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."

The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.

Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.

"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

- - -

On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html

- - - - - - -

Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 19 May 2005 07:34:53 PM
Do you have any idea what TD might have been in his previous life?
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <_Wtie.41754$fx3.23846@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:

courts are too late on this. tom delay has already spoken, and he rules.
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate
Constitution

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."

The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.

Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.

"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

- - -

On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html

- - - - - - -

Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.



.
User: "harmony"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 20 May 2005 05:19:52 PM
i wouldn't know that.
delay works like a congressi politician in india. he fixes up judge's sons'
careers to steer the judges.
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:SIOLu3849AcYme@YjeAl...

Do you have any idea what TD might have been in his previous life?

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

In article <_Wtie.41754$fx3.23846@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:

courts are too late on this. tom delay has already spoken, and he rules.


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not

violate

Constitution

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."

The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.

Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.

"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

- - -

On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov


http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html


- - - - - - -

Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so

send

peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and

the

daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her

mother in

law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post

may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of

the

poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption

for

fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by

others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use

of

which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the

copyright

owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is

believed

that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance

with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed

without

profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes

by

subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes

of

your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from

the

copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.



.
User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj"

Title: Re: Court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not violate Constitution 20 May 2005 10:22:31 PM
It is unlikely that he was a human in his previous life.
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <aitje.46827$fx3.42144@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:

i wouldn't know that.
delay works like a congressi politician in india. he fixes up judge's sons'
careers to steer the judges.



Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

Do you have any idea what TD might have been in his previous life?

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

In article <_Wtie.41754$fx3.23846@okepread02>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:

courts are too late on this. tom delay has already spoken, and he rules.


Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

(4th US Circuit) Appeals court: 'In God We Trust' slogan does not

violate

Constitution

By Larry O'Dell
The Associated Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Friday, May 13, 2005

Richmond, Va. - The inscription "In God We Trust" on the
facade of a government building in North Carolina does
not violate the U.S. Constitution's guidelines on the
separation of church and state, a federal appeals court
ruled Friday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals unanimously upheld a lower judge's dismissal of a
lawsuit challenging the slogan written on the Davidson
County Government Center in Lexington, N.C.

The inscription, in 18-inch block letters, was paid for
with donations from individuals and churches in 2002.
Lawyers Charles F. Lambeth Jr. and Michael D. Lea, who
regularly practice in the center, filed a lawsuit a few
months later, claiming the display violated the First
Amendment and seeking its removal.

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen ruled in May 2004
that the display "will not produce an excessive
entanglement of church and state."

The appeals court agreed, noting that "In God We Trust"
has appeared on the nation's coins since 1865 and was
made the national motto by Congress in 1956. The motto
also is inscribed above the speaker's chair in the U.S.
House of Representatives and above the main door of the
U.S. Senate chamber.

"In this situation, the reasonable observer must be
deemed aware of the patriotic uses, both historical and
present, of the phrase 'In God We Trust,'" Judge Robert
King wrote. The court said the inscription would be
unconstitutional if it served a religious purpose.

Lea said he was disappointed but was not sure whether he
would appeal the ruling.

"The 4th Circuit got it exactly right," said James
Redfern Morgan Jr., a Winston-Salem attorney who defended
the county's governing board.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming
weeks whether Ten Commandments displays on government
property violate the Constitution's ban on
"establishment" of religion. Last year the high court
dismissed on technical grounds a case in which an appeals
court ruled that the words "under God" in Pledge of
Allegiance were unconstitutional.

- - -

On the Net:
www.ca4.uscourts.gov


http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050513-1518-ingodwetrust.html


- - - - - - -

Posted on 5/13/2005 10:48:35 PM by NormsRevenge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded message

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so

send

peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and

the

daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her

mother in

law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the

educational

purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post

may

not

have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of

the

poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption

for

fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,

current

e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by

others

are

not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the

article.


FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use

of

which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the

copyright

owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is

believed

that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance

with

Title

17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed

without

profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included

information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes

by

subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more

information

go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes

of

your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from

the

copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.





.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Coward Earl Weber (duke) Does Not Trust His Own Priest (Where's My $500, *****?)
Jesus does not worship the God of Israel!
A CHALLENGE TO ATHEISTS: PROVE THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST
Why Darwinism Does Not Work
The man in the flight-suit did not qualify then and he does not qualify now
The Atheist Does Not See Things That Are Not There
Why does god not smite me??
Charity that begins at home does not have to end there
The US *does not* have volunteers in it's Armed Forces
Why does God not speak to us???
Re: Atheism does not trouble itself to help the poor or give to the needy.
Re: Roe v. Wade Has *NEVER BEEN* Sound Law, and *NEVER WILL BE*!!! PTravel Does NOT Respect Human Life.
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE EVERYONE ==> "Intelligent Design" does not belong in the science classroom
Templeton Study: Prayer Does NOT Work (No ***** Sherlock)
Born or Bred? Science Does Not Support the Claim That Homosexuality Is Genetic
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER