Religions > Atheism > Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
14 Jun 2005 11:45:04 PM |
| Object: |
Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/print?id=845713
I bet the ones who voted for the apology wouldn't be afraid
to say who they are. That's one way of outing the cowards.
I wonder what all those black churches whose members
voted for Republicans are thinking now. This should be
brought out in public before the election next year. These
people are being used, and they should be made aware of it.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 12:20:15 AM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in news:y-
qdneKMjvdu9jLfRVn-tQ@comcast.com:
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/print?id=845713
I bet the ones who voted for the apology wouldn't be afraid
to say who they are. That's one way of outing the cowards.
So tell us, why wasn't Robert Byrd a featured speaker?
It wasn't Republicans who filibustered anti-lynching laws.
I wonder what all those black churches whose members
voted for Republicans are thinking now.
They're thinking, "Who do these Democrats think they're fooling?"
This should be
brought out in public before the election next year. These
people are being used, and they should be made aware of it.
Oh, spare us, it's the Democrats who are using the Blacks, pandering
with this phony "apology" after having filibustered anti-lynching
legislation for decades.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 01:05:42 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1118794815.3a5cc9e35f50a5573e1ab9f4898355d1@teranews...
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in news:y-
qdneKMjvdu9jLfRVn-tQ@comcast.com:
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/print?id=845713
I bet the ones who voted for the apology wouldn't be afraid
to say who they are. That's one way of outing the cowards.
So tell us, why wasn't Robert Byrd a featured speaker?
Voting for it not good for you then?
It wasn't Republicans who filibustered anti-lynching laws.
No, but those racist Democrats who did 40+ years ago either
joined the Republican party (welcomed with open arms, I might
add) after the Democrats embraced civil rights or repudiated
their previous views (like Bird). Your party is the party of
bigots now.
Richard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 01:24:43 AM |
|
|
<richard@nospam.edu> wrote in news:d8nv05$r7h$1@news.asu.edu:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1118794815.3a5cc9e35f50a5573e1ab9f4898355d1@teranews...
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in news:y-
qdneKMjvdu9jLfRVn-tQ@comcast.com:
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/print?id=845713
I bet the ones who voted for the apology wouldn't be afraid
to say who they are. That's one way of outing the cowards.
So tell us, why wasn't Robert Byrd a featured speaker?
Voting for it not good for you then?
Not when he's the "defender of the filibuster".
It wasn't Republicans who filibustered anti-lynching laws.
No, but those racist Democrats who did 40+ years ago either
joined the Republican party (welcomed with open arms, I might
add) after the Democrats embraced civil rights
After the Republicans forced the issues through the Congress.
or repudiated
their previous views (like Bird).
What do you mean, "or". If Robert "Sheets" Byrd can repudiate his views,
why can't any Republican?
Your party is the party of
bigots now.
Nonsense. The Democrats are still the party of racial preferences. It's
obvious when you look at the way they react to Black conservatives who
get ahead in the Republican party.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 03:23:06 AM |
|
|
In article <1118798683.585167d13b97e5b764a4578ebd9bd960@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Nonsense. The Democrats are still the party of racial preferences. It's
obvious when you look at the way they react to Black conservatives who
get ahead in the Republican party.
It's telling how often conservatives mention *race* when we criticize a
black conservative's *politics.*
And don't bother trying to find cites of liberals calling Powell or
Rice or Thomas "Uncle Tom" or worse. I know it's probably happened. But
*every time* a black conservative is criticized, you guys bring up his
or her race. Such fake indignance doesn't become you.
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 11:21:43 AM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:140620052023064878%chib@nospam.com:
In article <1118798683.585167d13b97e5b764a4578ebd9bd960@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Nonsense. The Democrats are still the party of racial preferences.
It's obvious when you look at the way they react to Black
conservatives who get ahead in the Republican party.
It's telling how often conservatives mention *race* when we criticize
a black conservative's *politics.*
That's because you tie your criticism to their race yourselves.
And don't bother trying to find cites of liberals calling Powell or
Rice or Thomas "Uncle Tom" or worse. I know it's probably happened.
You bet it's happened. Every time a black conservative gets ahead, they
get the racial epithets thrown at them, or they get accused of betraying
their race just by being Republican.
Some liberals on alt.atheism will *defend* their use of racial epithets
like "Uncle Tom" and worse.
But *every time* a black conservative is criticized, you guys bring up
his or her race. Such fake indignance doesn't become you.
You have that backwards. In this very thread, Michelle brought up how
Republicans are racists and how they're "using" Black Republicans.
Howlin' Howard Dean brings up race when he calls Republicans the "White
Christian party". It's not Republicans who repeat that lie about how the
Dixiecrats all changed parties after the *REPUBLICANS* pushed through
the civil rights laws *OVER DEMOCRATS FILIBUSTERS*.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Misleart Chuff" |
|
| Title: Re: Cowardly Republicans Who Won't Vote For or Against Anti-Lynching Apology & Won't Say Who They Are |
15 Jun 2005 04:47:25 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1118834504.562323814f3bba3f6f0ad7a52511fca3@teranews...
: chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
: news:140620052023064878%chib@nospam.com:
:
: > In article <1118798683.585167d13b97e5b764a4578ebd9bd960@teranews>,
: > Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
: >
: >> Nonsense. The Democrats are still the party of racial
preferences.
: >> It's obvious when you look at the way they react to Black
: >> conservatives who get ahead in the Republican party.
: >
: > It's telling how often conservatives mention *race* when we
criticize
: > a black conservative's *politics.*
: >
:
: That's because you tie your criticism to their race yourselves.
:
: > And don't bother trying to find cites of liberals calling Powell
or
: > Rice or Thomas "Uncle Tom" or worse. I know it's probably
happened.
:
: You bet it's happened. Every time a black conservative gets ahead,
they
: get the racial epithets thrown at them, or they get accused of
betraying
: their race just by being Republican.
:
: Some liberals on alt.atheism will *defend* their use of racial
epithets
: like "Uncle Tom" and worse.
:
: > But *every time* a black conservative is criticized, you guys
bring up
: > his or her race. Such fake indignance doesn't become you.
: >
:
: You have that backwards. In this very thread, Michelle brought up
how
: Republicans are racists and how they're "using" Black Republicans.
: Howlin' Howard Dean brings up race when he calls Republicans the
"White
: Christian party". It's not Republicans who repeat that lie about how
the
: Dixiecrats all changed parties after the *REPUBLICANS* pushed
through
: the civil rights laws *OVER DEMOCRATS FILIBUSTERS*.
What a strange little world you live in. Try a little reality
sometime, it might even give you the character you lack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
