| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
27 Oct 2004 05:09:17 PM |
| Object: |
Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
The 'rats favorite crazy, one flipper kerry, is not running around the country hollowing
and screaming that the military lost tract of 400 tons of explosives. Yet the military
has destroyed 400,000 tons of explosives.
And no one can even figure out if the 400 tons was around at the start of the war.
Now there's the 'rats hero dragging his campaign down to the bitter end on a lie - no plan
for America, no dream no America - just where is the 400 tons out of 400,000 tons.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Steve" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
27 Oct 2004 06:15:35 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:cr60o0t7u35f0d9lr1n7nc7qskkifsd4je@4ax.com...
The 'rats favorite crazy, one flipper kerry, is not running around the
country hollowing
and screaming that the military lost tract of 400 tons of explosives. Yet
the military
has destroyed 400,000 tons of explosives.
And no one can even figure out if the 400 tons was around at the start of
the war.
Now there's the 'rats hero dragging his campaign down to the bitter end on
a lie - no plan
for America, no dream no America - just where is the 400 tons out of
400,000 tons.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ? Or is it a case of not forgetting..but your
inability to offer a valid reply ?
from another thread..
How can so many people be so compulsively attached to their religion?
Is
the fear of death so great that most people need to believe in a
glorious
after life? Religious belief and faith is one of the most illogical and
unsubstantiated beliefs one can imagine.
Me: win (hopefully)/no win. You: lose/no win. No win comes into play
if there is no
almighty God.
And now you know the rest of the story.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
so you only believe in your invisible friend "in case" he is there - you
acknowledge the possibility that he/she/it may not exist.
Steve
Well Duke ??..... do u concede the possibility that there is no god and u
only follow religion as a kind of heavenly insurance policy ?
steve
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
28 Oct 2004 05:33:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:15:35 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
And I follow threads religiously but I'm sure I lose track of a few. Sometimes a comment
isn't worth a response, so I don't.
Do you have one in mind?
..
from another thread..
How can so many people be so compulsively attached to their religion?
Is
the fear of death so great that most people need to believe in a
glorious
after life? Religious belief and faith is one of the most illogical and
unsubstantiated beliefs one can imagine.
Me: win (hopefully)/no win. You: lose/no win. No win comes into play
if there is no
almighty God.
And now you know the rest of the story.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
so you only believe in your invisible friend "in case" he is there - you
acknowledge the possibility that he/she/it may not exist.
No, all evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for his nonexistence.
Well Duke ??..... do u concede the possibility that there is no god and u
only follow religion as a kind of heavenly insurance policy ?
Nope. I can't envision this world without the presence of the almighty.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
28 Oct 2004 07:43:54 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hns2o057juaqifmnj4up5eesbnpec86fpd@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:15:35 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
And I follow threads religiously but I'm sure I lose track of a few.
Sometimes a comment
isn't worth a response, so I don't.
Do you have one in mind?
.
from another thread..
How can so many people be so compulsively attached to their religion?
Is
the fear of death so great that most people need to believe in a
glorious
after life? Religious belief and faith is one of the most illogical
and
unsubstantiated beliefs one can imagine.
Me: win (hopefully)/no win. You: lose/no win. No win comes into
play
if there is no
almighty God.
And now you know the rest of the story.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
so you only believe in your invisible friend "in case" he is there - you
acknowledge the possibility that he/she/it may not exist.
No, all evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for his
nonexistence.
What evidence would that be ?
Say what ? :"there is no evidence for his nonexistance" how can you have
evidence that something does not exist ? This is a stupid statement....even
for you.
Well Duke ??..... do u concede the possibility that there is no god and u
only follow religion as a kind of heavenly insurance policy ?
Nope. I can't envision this world without the presence of the almighty.
I see....*you* cant envision a world without a god..therefore god exists. I
think its the other way around.... you *envision* a god to try to make sense
of this big scary world.
But again why did you invoke Pascals wager ? - as i said this is just the
insurance policy approach which means you *must* allow for the non existance
of your god.
Steve
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
29 Oct 2004 02:01:30 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:43:54 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
No, all evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for his
nonexistence.
What evidence would that be ?
Say what ? :"there is no evidence for his nonexistance" how can you have
evidence that something does not exist ? This is a stupid statement....even
for you.
I've been using it for years to stifle atheists. The point is that any claim by you silly
atheists re there is no God is going to be just - you can't support such a stupid idea.
All you can do is make an unsubstantiated claim.
Well Duke ??..... do u concede the possibility that there is no god and u
only follow religion as a kind of heavenly insurance policy ?
Nope. I can't envision this world without the presence of the almighty.
I see....*you* cant envision a world without a god..therefore god exists. I
think its the other way around.... you *envision* a god to try to make sense
of this big scary world.
All evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for the nonexistence of God.
But again why did you invoke Pascals wager ? - as i said this is just the
insurance policy approach which means you *must* allow for the non existance
of your god.
I didn't invoke Pascal's wager. The premise of the PW is rock solid, though.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
29 Oct 2004 02:24:25 PM |
|
|
In article <cj45o095khjp3s3t43cbabhh4f9sptqohs@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:43:54 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
No, all evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for his
nonexistence.
What evidence would that be ?
Say what ? :"there is no evidence for his nonexistance" how can you have
evidence that something does not exist ? This is a stupid statement....even
for you.
I've been using it for years to stifle atheists. The point is that any claim by you silly
atheists re there is no God is going to be just - you can't support such a stupid idea.
All you can do is make an unsubstantiated claim.
Well Duke ??..... do u concede the possibility that there is no god and u
only follow religion as a kind of heavenly insurance policy ?
Nope. I can't envision this world without the presence of the almighty.
I see....*you* cant envision a world without a god..therefore god exists. I
think its the other way around.... you *envision* a god to try to make sense
of this big scary world.
All evidence demands his existence. There is no evidence for the nonexistence of God.
But again why did you invoke Pascals wager ? - as i said this is just the
insurance policy approach which means you *must* allow for the non existance
of your god.
I didn't invoke Pascal's wager. The premise of the PW is rock solid, though.
Not if Allah or Shiva or It Of Whom You've Never Heard turns out to be
the head honcho.
In fact, It may well be extremely pissed of you for guessing wrong,
rather than doing the honest thing and waiting to see.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
29 Oct 2004 05:51:21 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC), (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
But again why did you invoke Pascals wager ? - as i said this is just the
insurance policy approach which means you *must* allow for the non existance
of your god.
I didn't invoke Pascal's wager. The premise of the PW is rock solid, though.
Not if Allah or Shiva or It Of Whom You've Never Heard turns out to be
the head honcho.
Allah, Jehovah, and almighty God are the names for the one and only almighty God.
In fact, It may well be extremely pissed of you for guessing wrong,
rather than doing the honest thing and waiting to see.
He's already told me.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
29 Oct 2004 06:58:49 PM |
|
|
In article <r8i5o05sfta0gun0bb3mlc7fv7np63old7@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC), (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
But again why did you invoke Pascals wager ? - as i said this is just the
insurance policy approach which means you *must* allow for the non existance
of your god.
I didn't invoke Pascal's wager. The premise of the PW is rock solid, though.
Not if Allah or Shiva or It Of Whom You've Never Heard turns out to be
the head honcho.
Allah, Jehovah, and almighty God are the names for the one and only almighty God.
In fact, It may well be extremely pissed of you for guessing wrong,
rather than doing the honest thing and waiting to see.
He's already told me.
But how can you trust anything He says? Clearly He told Martin Luther and
various popes and Joseph Smith and Pat Robertson and Charles Taze
Russel and Sun Myung Moon and Aimee Semple McPherson different and
contradictory things.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
31 Oct 2004 03:28:05 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:58:49 +0000 (UTC), (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
But how can you trust anything He says? Clearly He told Martin Luther and
various popes and Joseph Smith and Pat Robertson and Charles Taze
Russel and Sun Myung Moon and Aimee Semple McPherson different and
contradictory things.
-- cary
He told everyone of them the same thing he told me.
What's your point?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
29 Oct 2004 08:52:50 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<hns2o057juaqifmnj4up5eesbnpec86fpd@4ax.com>...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:15:35 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
How are you accomplishing that, when all you're doing is lying?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Crazed fanatic flipper kerry and the NY Times |
31 Oct 2004 03:28:25 PM |
|
|
On 29 Oct 2004 18:52:50 -0700, (Chris) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<hns2o057juaqifmnj4up5eesbnpec86fpd@4ax.com>...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:15:35 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
How are you accomplishing that, when all you're doing is lying?
Easy, I'm not lying.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
28 Oct 2004 07:50:28 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:15:35 +1000, "Steve" <kmbs57@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
To expose us to deep ignorance andutter stupidity of a
man that hate competence and patriotism.
Bush has wrecked our economy and asddled us with immense debt.
And lied us into a war he is losing.
he has not done a single good or competent thing.
Yet you lie and smear and ignore facts.
Because you are stupid and no good American,
not a patriot.
Here, facts why Bush is imcompetent and bad for America.
Truth you are just to low IQ'd to be able to handle, you are a retard.
**************************************
Yearly Average Real Deficits Broken
down by Presidental Administrations.
Source: www.publicdebt.treas.gov
Summary: Up to Carter's last budget
year,12-31-81, the US national debt was
at $1.029 trillion dollars.
Three Republican presidents account
for most of the present day national
debt.
Bush $1.611 trillions
Bush $1.824
Reagan $1.846
---------------
Total $5.281 trillions
This represents 71% of the current
national debt.
For 300 million Americans, this represents
$17,603 for each and every American, or
$70,413 for a family of four.
*************************************
Date Amount
Bush (Budget years)
10/07/2004 $7,418,151,165,657.99
09/30/2004 7,397.052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 6.783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16
$7.419 trillions
- 5.807
-------
$1.611 trillion / 3 budget years
= $537 billions average deficit per year
----------------------------------
Clinton
09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32
$5.807 trillions
- 4.411
--------
1.396 trillions / 8 budget years
= $174.5 billion average deficit per budget year
----------------------------------
Bush
09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 3,233,313,451,777.25
$4.411 trillions
- 2.587
---------
1.824 trillions / 4 budget years
= $456 billions average deficit per budget year
----------------------------------
Reagan
09/29/1989 2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 2,125,302,616,658.42
12/31/1985 1,945,941,616,459.88
12/31/1984 1,662,966,000,000.00
12/31/1983 1,410,702,000,000.00
12/31/1982 1,197,073,000,000.00
$2.857 trillions
- 1.029
--------
$1.846
= $228.5 billions average deficit per budget year
----------------------------------
Carter
12/31/1981 1,028,729,000,000.00
12/31/1980 930,210,000,000.00
12/31/1979 845,116,000,000.00
12/29/1978 789,207,000,000.00
$1.029 trillions
- 719 billions
----------
$238 billions / 4 budget years
= $59.5 billions deficits average per budget year
----------------------------------
Nixon/Ford
12/30/1977 718,943,000,000.00
12/31/1976 653,544,000,000.00
12/31/1975 576,649,000,000.00
12/31/1974 492,665,000,000.00
12/31/1973 469,898,039,554.70
12/29/1972 449,298,066,119.00
12/31/1971 424,130,961,959.95
12/31/1970 389,158,403,690.26
$719 billions
- 368 billions
---------------
$351 billions / 4 budget years
= $43.9 billions average deficit per budget year
------------------------------------
Kennedy/Johnson
12/31/1969 368,225,581,254.41
12/31/1968 358,028,625,002.91
12/29/1967 344,663,009,745.18
12/30/1966 329,319,249,366.68
12/31/1965 320,904,110,042.04
12/31/1964 317,940,472,718.38
12/31/1963 309,346,845,059.17
12/31/1964 303,470,080,489.27
$368 billions
- 296 billions
---------------
$72 billons / 8 budget years
= $9 billion average deficit per budget year
-----------------------------------
Eisenhower
12/29/1961 296,168,761,214.92
12/30/1960 290,216,815,241.68
12/31/1959 290,797,771,717.63
12/31/1958 282,922,423,583.87
12/31/1957 274,897,784,290.72
12/31/1956 276,627,527,996.11
12/30/1955 280,768,553,188.96
12/31/1954 278,749,814,391.33
$296 billions
- 275 billions
-------------
$21 billions / 8 budget years
= $2.625 billions average deficit per budget year
----------------------------------
Truman
12/31/1953 275,168,120,129.39
06/30/1953 266,071,061,638.57
06/30/1952 259,105,178,785.43
06/29/1951 255,221,976,814.93
06/30/1950 257,357,352,351.04
06/30/1949 252,770,359,860.33
$275 billions
-253
------
$24 billions / 4 budget years
= $6 billions average deficit per budget year
**********************************************
--
Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well they don't give medals
for going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
29 Oct 2004 12:30:32 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:50:28 -0400, wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
To expose us to deep ignorance andutter stupidity of a
man that hate competence and patriotism.
Happy hunting ground, barwell. The US military blew up the explosives.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
02 Nov 2004 02:54:02 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<1gv4o0d5di615ccki02u72ev6fb137lgro@4ax.com>...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:50:28 -0400, wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to follow
other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
To expose us to deep ignorance andutter stupidity of a
man that hate competence and patriotism.
Happy hunting ground, barwell. The US military blew up the explosives.
Yet another in a long, long, long, tediously long and endless list of
Puke's unsupported blind-***** assertions.
Let's just make unsupported assertions in return. Obviously the facts
are lost on an ***** as big as Puke, so forget supporting our case,
let's just offer the same "evidence" that Puke does. Here's my
response:
No they didn't. There, I win.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
29 Oct 2004 02:34:01 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:50:28 -0400, wbarwell
<wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
Why do u post this political crap here everyday.... but forget to
follow other threads that you post in ?
To expose you to the truth.
To expose us to deep ignorance andutter stupidity of a
man that hate competence and patriotism.
Happy hunting ground, barwell. The US military blew up the
explosives.
Now they blew it up. Yesterday the Russians took it.
Then there was "we don't know when it disappeared."
And our friend Earl believes all of the stories....
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
29 Oct 2004 05:36:12 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:34:01 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Now they blew it up. Yesterday the Russians took it.
Then there was "we don't know when it disappeared."
And our friend Earl believes all of the stories....
But it was not an unprotected site, like fanatic kerry claims as he relies on the current
NY Times headline for his campaign issues.
Good grief - the man has no plans, no dreams for America. Just the latest NY Times
headlines.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
02 Nov 2004 02:56:20 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<hbh5o0tcq4uauvmhgd12b6rujchp7pu0d7@4ax.com>...
But it was not an unprotected site,
Existing evidence proves you wrong - yet again.
Good grief - the man has no plans, no dreams for America.
That pretty much sums up Bush.
Do you have a poster of him in your room, Puke, so you can masturbate
looking dreamily at the one you love? How do you do that when all
evidence suggests you don't even have balls, let alone a *****?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
29 Oct 2004 09:53:45 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:34:01 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Now they blew it up. Yesterday the Russians took it.
Then there was "we don't know when it disappeared."
And our friend Earl believes all of the stories....
But it was not an unprotected site, like fanatic kerry claims as he
relies on the current NY Times headline for his campaign issues.
So now the material disappeared from a protected site?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
31 Oct 2004 01:27:01 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:53:45 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:34:01 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Now they blew it up. Yesterday the Russians took it.
Then there was "we don't know when it disappeared."
And our friend Earl believes all of the stories....
But it was not an unprotected site, like fanatic kerry claims as he
relies on the current NY Times headline for his campaign issues.
So now the material disappeared from a protected site?
Try the new news, mikey - the US military blew it up.
So much for flippers ammo-gate. No more NY Times timely headlines to build his campaign
around.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
31 Oct 2004 02:36:29 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:53:45 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:34:01 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Now they blew it up. Yesterday the Russians took it.
Then there was "we don't know when it disappeared."
And our friend Earl believes all of the stories....
But it was not an unprotected site, like fanatic kerry claims as he
relies on the current NY Times headline for his campaign issues.
So now the material disappeared from a protected site?
Try the new news, mikey - the US military blew it up.
The White House made that claim, the military was honest about it.:
"But the Defense Department said it was not clear whether those munitions
had anything to do with the nearly 380 tons of high explosives that the
Iraqi government and the International Atomic Energy Agency have said are
missing from the complex."
.....
At the news conference, the demolition expert, Maj. Austin Pearson, and the
Pentagon spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, were both asked repeatedly whether the
material the unit destroyed was the same as that reported missing. They both
said they did not know.
.....
Mr. Di Rita said that while some of what Major Pearson described destroying
was a plastic explosive called RDX, similar to some of the material that the
International Atomic Energy Agency has said is missing, "I can't say that
RDX that was on the list of the I.A.E.A. is in what the major pulled out."
Other explosives that Major Pearson's unit destroyed on April 13, 2003, 10
days after American forces first reached Al Qaqaa, included TNT, detonation
cords, initiators and white phosphorous rounds - none of them the type of
material that had been inspected and sealed by the agency before the war.
"I did not see any I.A.E.A. seals at the locations that we went into," Major
Pearson told reporters. "I was not looking for that. My mission specifically
was to go in there and prevent the exposure of U.S. forces and to minimize
that by taking out what was easily accessible and putting it back and
bringing it in to our captured ammunition holding area."
begin 666 spacer.gif
M1TE&.#EA!0`%`( ``,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````%``4```($A(^I6 `[
`
end
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
01 Nov 2004 05:37:57 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:36:29 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
The White House made that claim, the military was honest about it.:
"But the Defense Department said it was not clear whether those munitions
had anything to do with the nearly 380 tons of high explosives that the
Iraqi government and the International Atomic Energy Agency have said are
missing from the complex."
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal
the munitions.
Which makes him a very desperate flip flopper trying to win the White House by hook, or
crook, or lying.
To a 'rat, they are one and the same.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
02 Nov 2004 02:51:53 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<c2ido0946fpqobgv9qmhqbifvhuggclk8p@4ax.com>...
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal the munitions.
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Far from preventing terrorism, it would seem that Bush is aiding and
abetting them by not taking proper precautions. Just like you in
these threads, he blundered in there without a plan and now his ***** is
hanging out to dry.
How pathetic is it that the incumbent president has to fight tooth and
nail to hold on to his job? Wouldn't you think that if he were doing
it right, he'd be a shoo-in for a second term?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
02 Nov 2004 05:48:10 PM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2004 00:51:53 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal the munitions.
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway in a desperate attempt to win the
election.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
02 Nov 2004 06:14:06 PM |
|
|
In article <947go0hiv74k0gageh2relct9n7kflor4o@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
J3.28150@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <freao0hiv009ac6s40m48fbiv4fag0gq6r@4ax.com> <h1chd.15913$6q2.1011@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <c2ido0946fpqobgv9qmhqbifvhuggclk8p@4ax.com> <e1e30450.0411020051.3749bd43@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:48:10 -0600
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.255.81.198
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: fed1read07 1099439292 24.255.81.198 (Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:48:12 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:48:12 EST
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:52164
On 2 Nov 2004 00:51:53 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal the munitions.
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway in a desperate attempt to win the
election.
Kerry lied and said he knows where the explosives are?
When? Where?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
03 Nov 2004 05:19:47 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 00:14:06 +0000 (UTC), (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway in a desperate attempt to win the
election.
Kerry lied and said he knows where the explosives are?
When? Where?
A few days ago.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
03 Nov 2004 09:44:26 AM |
|
|
In article <clfho09rtvofhr6a7mg2clq2pfjftoj34d@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 00:14:06 +0000 (UTC), (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway in a desperate attempt to win the
election.
Kerry lied and said he knows where the explosives are?
When? Where?
A few days ago.
I fail to find that. Where was he, and what exactly did he say?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
03 Nov 2004 04:43:13 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<947go0hiv74k0gageh2relct9n7kflor4o@4ax.com>...
On 2 Nov 2004 00:51:53 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal the munitions.
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway
in a desperate attempt to win the election.
Nobody lied about anything (except you, and that's been well
documented). The fact is that there were some 350 tons of explosives
there when the US took over and they're gone now. If they were
destroyed, you would think someone, somewhere would recall that. You
would think it was documented, but apparently they took a leaf out of
your book, Puke and failed to document a single thing they claimed.
So as of now, Puke, the simple, single fact is that there are no
epxlosives locked away safely or destroyed. Instead, there is 350
tons of explosives that are unaccounted for. Where was the
commander-in-chief there, Puke? In a nation in which the US is
unwelcome, in which terrorists are running around at will, and in
which US soldiers are needlessly dying almost every day there is 350
tons of explosives unaccounted for. How are those soldiers dying,
Puke? Well they're being blown up by exlosives. Hmmm! Wonder where
those explosives are coming from?
No one is lying but you, Puke. No surprises there. It's what you do
best. You've been so jammed into a corner that it's the only thing
you can do. Everybody knows it.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
03 Nov 2004 07:37:14 PM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2004 02:43:13 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<947go0hiv74k0gageh2relct9n7kflor4o@4ax.com>...
On 2 Nov 2004 00:51:53 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
Yet flipper kerry has accused President Bush of letting the terrorists/insurgents steal the munitions.
The 350 tons of explosives were there when the US took over, as news
footage documents. They're not there now. Those in charge don't know
where they are!
Neither does flipper, yet he lied about it anyway
in a desperate attempt to win the election.
Nobody lied about anything (except you, and that's been well
documented). The fact is that there were some 350 tons of explosives
there when the US took over and they're gone now.
Right, the US military realized they blew it up. flipper, x-presidential candidate, says
that the US military didn't protect it.
He knows.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
06 Nov 2004 04:50:24 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<jr1jo0p3v3ggc9ivrutq801irmph6redi5@4ax.com>...
Right, the US military realized they blew it up.
Once again your blind faith claims are unsupported. Yawn. No
surprises there. The simple fact is that you cannot support any
assertion you make and this has been demonstrated tediously.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
06 Nov 2004 01:15:41 PM |
|
|
Budikka wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:<jr1jo0p3v3ggc9ivrutq801irmph6redi5@4ax.com>...
Right, the US military realized they blew it up.
Once again your blind faith claims are unsupported. Yawn. No
surprises there. The simple fact is that you cannot support any
assertion you make and this has been demonstrated tediously.
Unsupported and the latest in the line of lies put forth. Earl has accepted
that they were gone when we got there, that the Russians and French took
them after we got there and now that the military blew them up.
All statements from the White House and none of them supported by either
evidence or what the military said.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL destroys America, Puke applauds. |
08 Nov 2004 08:40:32 PM |
|
|
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<xp9jd.5476$zx1.5027@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
Budikka wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:<jr1jo0p3v3ggc9ivrutq801irmph6redi5@4ax.com>...
Right, the US military realized they blew it up.
Once again your blind faith claims are unsupported. Yawn. No
surprises there. The simple fact is that you cannot support any
assertion you make and this has been demonstrated tediously.
Unsupported and the latest in the line of lies put forth. Earl has accepted
that they were gone when we got there, that the Russians and French took
them after we got there and now that the military blew them up.
All statements from the White House and none of them supported by either
evidence or what the military said.
No surprises there! LoL! ;)
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
