Religions > Atheism > Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
10 May 2006 11:27:01 PM |
| Object: |
Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son deciding
to become gay.
http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=30271
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina couple is
suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the program. Jim
and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's School seminar
called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was unsure of his
"sexual orientation."
The parents believe the seminar was intentionally scheduled as the last
optional one before classes ended in order to leave a strong, lasting
impression on the students and bypass any parental notification about the
seminar.
Jim Burrows says he noticed a big difference in his otherwise normal son
upon his return from the school.
"He [said he] was thinking now that he perhaps was gay -- and of course I
was floored by this [pronouncement] and was, like, 'where did this come
from?' This kind of came out of left field," the dad says. After questioning
his son for an extended period, Burrows says he discovered the source. "I
found out that this was as a result of this seminar."
According to Burrows, his son was instructed by two openly homosexual staff
members of the Governor's School to question his sexuality as well as Bible
passages that condemn homosexuality. And the students were also encouraged
by instructors to start a Gay Straight Alliance club at their schools, he
says.
The North Carolina dad explains that his son's subsequent struggle with
homosexuality has turned his family upside down. "As far as our family is
concerned, the damage has already been done," he laments. "There's no way
that we can go back and undo what has been done."
Still, Mr. Burrows feels he needs to warn other parents of the homosexual
indoctrination his son encountered at the Governor's School. "[I]f I can
keep one other family from having to go through this, then all this trouble
has been worthwhile," he says.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
11 May 2006 12:18:15 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Young has it backwards as usual.
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son deciding
to become gay.
<snip>
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina couple is
suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the program. Jim
and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's School seminar
called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was unsure of his
"sexual orientation."
<snip>
I.e., after attending the seminar, the kid started to realize why he
was attracted to guys, and realized that it was no big deal. Then his
parents, who are in denial, started looking for a scapegoat. Too bad
the kid can't trade his parents in for decent ones. :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
10 May 2006 11:34:45 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:DPudnWB1aN6bIP_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com...
(snip)
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
(snip)
Well, then the Two Christian Parents are fucking idiots.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
15 May 2006 09:21:34 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:45 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:DPudnWB1aN6bIP_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com...
(snip)
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
(snip)
Well, then the Two Christian Parents are fucking idiots.
Two among myraid millions.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
15 May 2006 10:03:27 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 15 May 2006 07:21:34 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
message <qi3h6256fkkedoi9joo9jjf06lbbtaqid9@4ax.com>
On Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:45 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:DPudnWB1aN6bIP_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com...
(snip)
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
(snip)
Well, then the Two Christian Parents are fucking idiots.
The parents are victims of fundie indoctrination is more like it.
Religions hold the patent on indoctrination. It's such a part of
their life they assume everybody else practices it too. It is beyond
their comprehension that information could ever be imparted outside an
agenda of indoctrination.
What I wonder is how their kid ever got into such a school given
parents like that. He demonstrated some ability to think for himself,
but his parents appear determined to beat that out of him. They must
indoctrinate him to become another mindless, religious, zombie drone.
And they want everybody else to be so indoctrinated, too.
Ignorance loves company. Ask at any fundie church for details.
Two among myraid millions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
11 May 2006 12:57:35 AM |
|
|
*This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on
such
*controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
*whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son
deciding
*to become gay.
There is no such thing as a "gay-program".
Besides, if you want to be taken seriously, J Closet Gay Young, how
about coming with credible sources?!? "Newsbull"? Really?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sgeo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
11 May 2006 06:37:11 PM |
|
|
wrote:
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son
deciding to become gay.
Sexuality is not a decision
http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=30271
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina couple
is suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the program.
Jim and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's School
seminar called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was unsure
of his "sexual orientation."
You mean the teen is thinking for himself? That's a good thing! (Unless of
course, you want religion to be preserved..)
The parents believe the seminar was intentionally scheduled as the last
optional one before classes ended in order to leave a strong, lasting
impression on the students and bypass any parental notification about the
seminar.
Jim Burrows says he noticed a big difference in his otherwise normal son
upon his return from the school.
His son was thinking for himself
"He [said he] was thinking now that he perhaps was gay -- and of course I
was floored by this [pronouncement] and was, like, 'where did this come
from?'
In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
This kind of came out of left field," the dad says. After
questioning his son for an extended period, Burrows says he discovered the
source. "I found out that this was as a result of this seminar."
According to Burrows, his son was instructed by two openly homosexual
staff members of the Governor's School to question his sexuality as well
as Bible passages that condemn homosexuality. And the students were also
encouraged by instructors to start a Gay Straight Alliance club at their
schools, he says.
Good! Learn about yourself. Question the Bible. I'm a member of the Gay
Straight Alliance at my own school, actually
The North Carolina dad explains that his son's subsequent struggle with
homosexuality has turned his family upside down. "As far as our family is
concerned, the damage has already been done," he laments. "There's no way
that we can go back and undo what has been done."
That's what happens when families are close-minded.
Still, Mr. Burrows feels he needs to warn other parents of the homosexual
indoctrination his son encountered at the Governor's School. "[I]f I can
keep one other family from having to go through this, then all this
trouble has been worthwhile," he says.
Indoctrination? And how about preventing the struggle a homosexual teen
would have to go through not knowing why s/he isn't attracted to members of
the opposite sex.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
11 May 2006 08:43:37 PM |
|
|
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:IUP8g.2417$ph2.1164@fe08.lga...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on
such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son
deciding to become gay.
Sexuality is not a decision
If that were true then why the need for a gay course?
http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=30271
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina couple
is suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the
program.
Jim and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's School
seminar called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was
unsure
of his "sexual orientation."
You mean the teen is thinking for himself? That's a good thing!
Who doesn't think for themself?
(Unless of
course, you want religion to be preserved..)
Illogical.
The parents believe the seminar was intentionally scheduled as the last
optional one before classes ended in order to leave a strong, lasting
impression on the students and bypass any parental notification about the
seminar.
Jim Burrows says he noticed a big difference in his otherwise normal son
upon his return from the school.
His son was thinking for himself
His son was immersed in a gay curriculum course it what it seems happened.
How many times did the gay staff teach about the dangers of STDs in relation
to homosexual behaviors?
"He [said he] was thinking now that he perhaps was gay -- and of course I
was floored by this [pronouncement] and was, like, 'where did this come
from?'
In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
In your homosexually biased opinion.
This kind of came out of left field," the dad says. After
questioning his son for an extended period, Burrows says he discovered
the
source. "I found out that this was as a result of this seminar."
According to Burrows, his son was instructed by two openly homosexual
staff members of the Governor's School to question his sexuality as well
as Bible passages that condemn homosexuality. And the students were also
encouraged by instructors to start a Gay Straight Alliance club at their
schools, he says.
Good!
There isn't much at all that aligns between gay and straight.
Learn about yourself. Question the Bible. I'm a member of the Gay
Straight Alliance at my own school, actually
What is there in common with gay and straight?
The North Carolina dad explains that his son's subsequent struggle with
homosexuality has turned his family upside down. "As far as our family is
concerned, the damage has already been done," he laments. "There's no way
that we can go back and undo what has been done."
That's what happens when families are close-minded.
You are saying something that is more the case with gays.
Your mind is closed to prudent behaviors.
Still, Mr. Burrows feels he needs to warn other parents of the homosexual
indoctrination his son encountered at the Governor's School. "[I]f I can
keep one other family from having to go through this, then all this
trouble has been worthwhile," he says.
Indoctrination?
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable.
Notice how these gays are targeting underage citizens.
That in itself is illegal.
They are teaching sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes
that prohibit doing such.
They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching such matters to
underage children.
And how about preventing the struggle a homosexual teen
would have to go through not knowing why s/he isn't attracted to members
of
the opposite sex.
How do you prevent someone's own inner struggle when they are aware that
there is a conflict with how they are and what they know to be the way to
be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 07:23:32 AM |
|
|
Johnny the bigot wrote:
*What is there in common with gay and straight?
Well, they're humans to start with... they pay their taxes, they vote,
they buy books, drive cars and try to be happy.
Although not gay, I have much more in common with homosexuals than with
bigoted morons like you, J Young or Duke...
*> In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
*
*In your homosexually biased opinion.
What's a "homoxexually opinion"? Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism? Black to condemn the KKK?
You're a bigoted idiot. Thank god, people like you are becoming the
minority...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 07:28:58 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
*What is there in common with gay and straight?
Well, they're humans to start with...
Obvious.
What is in common with gay and straight?
they pay their taxes, they vote,
they buy books, drive cars and try to be happy.
Although not gay, I have much more in common with homosexuals than with
bigoted morons like you, J Young or Duke...
Your bigotry towards homosexuality is showing.
*> In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
*
*In your homosexually biased opinion.
What's a "homoxexually opinion"?
Homosexually biased.
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
Black to condemn the KKK?
How is that related to homosexuality and anti-semitism?
You're a bigoted idiot.
Actually, that is you.
Thank god, people like you are becoming the
minority...
Believing that will cause you harm.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jack" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 08:55:45 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 09:36:43 AM |
|
|
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
<snip>
A better question would be, does he think? On this current rampage of his,
apparently not...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 09:43:18 AM |
|
|
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147442145.533419.97830@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
No.
Why would a person need to be Jewish to be against anti-semitism?
Couldn't a person be a Gentile and be against anti-semitism?
Being a Jew is being Semitic, right?
Since when is being gentile anti-semitic?
Jew is a practice; therefore, Gentiles and Jews are related in their
semitism.
If you will notice the terms Jew and Gentile and Semite are different terms.
Jewishness entails more than only the reference to Semitism, right, even
though maybe all the other references are subject to the Semitic or Jewish
faith.
What I think is that without a proper understanding of the terms anyone can
be anti-semitic or semitic; and that homosexuality is anti-semitic.
<snip>
That part was too hard for you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sgeo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 05:12:35 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147442145.533419.97830@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
No.
Why would a person need to be Jewish to be against anti-semitism?
Couldn't a person be a Gentile and be against anti-semitism?
Being a Jew is being Semitic, right?
Since when is being gentile anti-semitic?
Jew is a practice; therefore, Gentiles and Jews are related in their
semitism.
If you will notice the terms Jew and Gentile and Semite are different
terms. Jewishness entails more than only the reference to Semitism, right,
even though maybe all the other references are subject to the Semitic or
Jewish faith.
What I think is that without a proper understanding of the terms anyone
can be anti-semitic or semitic; and that homosexuality is anti-semitic.
The question is, why are you saying homosexuality is anti-semitic?
<snip>
That part was too hard for you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 08:19:17 PM |
|
|
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message news:oL79g.40$8U3.8@fe08.lga...
Johnny wrote:
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147442145.533419.97830@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
No.
Why would a person need to be Jewish to be against anti-semitism?
Couldn't a person be a Gentile and be against anti-semitism?
Being a Jew is being Semitic, right?
Since when is being gentile anti-semitic?
Jew is a practice; therefore, Gentiles and Jews are related in their
semitism.
If you will notice the terms Jew and Gentile and Semite are different
terms. Jewishness entails more than only the reference to Semitism,
right,
even though maybe all the other references are subject to the Semitic or
Jewish faith.
What I think is that without a proper understanding of the terms anyone
can be anti-semitic or semitic; and that homosexuality is anti-semitic.
The question is, why are you saying homosexuality is anti-semitic?
Homosexuality does not propogate the species.
<snip>
That part was too hard for you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 10:26:33 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message news:oL79g.40$8U3.8@fe08.lga...
Johnny wrote:
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147442145.533419.97830@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
Do you need to be Jewish to condemn
antisemitism?
No. Homosexuality is included in anti-semitism.
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
No.
Why would a person need to be Jewish to be against anti-semitism?
Couldn't a person be a Gentile and be against anti-semitism?
Being a Jew is being Semitic, right?
Since when is being gentile anti-semitic?
Jew is a practice; therefore, Gentiles and Jews are related in their
semitism.
If you will notice the terms Jew and Gentile and Semite are different
terms. Jewishness entails more than only the reference to Semitism,
right,
even though maybe all the other references are subject to the Semitic or
Jewish faith.
What I think is that without a proper understanding of the terms anyone
can be anti-semitic or semitic; and that homosexuality is anti-semitic.
The question is, why are you saying homosexuality is anti-semitic?
Homosexuality does not propogate the species.
....which has what to do with anything? You're not propagating the species,
either...so by your own Alice in Wonderland logic, *you're* anti-Semitic.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-SponsoredProgram |
13 May 2006 01:11:08 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message news:oL79g.40$8U3.8@fe08.lga...
Johnny wrote:
"Jack" <joat_mon@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147442145.533419.97830@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147436612.375145.200850@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny the bigot wrote:
<snip>
The question is, why are you saying homosexuality is anti-semitic?
Homosexuality does not propogate the species.
The question is, with overpopulation looming.... does the Earth really
need a lot more mouths to feed?
<snip>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-SponsoredProgram |
13 May 2006 05:58:33 PM |
|
|
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
The question is, with overpopulation looming.... does the Earth
really need a lot more mouths to feed?
Hell yes! Can't have Armageddon otherwise.
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 08:03:09 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:43:18 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
I really have to see the explanation of this.
Does he think are all Jews homosexual?
No.
Why would a person need to be Jewish to be against anti-semitism?
Does one has to be gay to condemn your bigotry?
Couldn't a person be a Gentile and be against anti-semitism?
Couldn't a person be straight and be against your bigotry?
Being a Jew is being Semitic, right?
Being in favor of equal rights is being gay, right?
Since when is being gentile anti-semitic?
Since when is being in favour of equal rights homosexual?
Jew is a practice; therefore, Gentiles and Jews are related in their
semitism.
B
If you will notice the terms Jew and Gentile and Semite are different terms.
Jewishness entails more than only the reference to Semitism, right, even
though maybe all the other references are subject to the Semitic or Jewish
faith.
What I think is that without a proper understanding of the terms anyone can
be anti-semitic or semitic; and that homosexuality is anti-semitic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jcon" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 08:30:58 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:IUP8g.2417$ph2.1164@fe08.lga...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on
such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son
deciding to become gay.
Sexuality is not a decision
If that were true then why the need for a gay course?
Maybe so that gay kids don't commit suicide and straight kids don't
decide it would be fun "to go beat up some fags" after they've
had a few beers.
http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=30271
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of North
Carolina."
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina couple
is suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the
program.
Jim and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's School
seminar called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was
unsure
of his "sexual orientation."
You mean the teen is thinking for himself? That's a good thing!
Who doesn't think for themself?
(Unless of
course, you want religion to be preserved..)
Illogical.
The parents believe the seminar was intentionally scheduled as the last
optional one before classes ended in order to leave a strong, lasting
impression on the students and bypass any parental notification about the
seminar.
Jim Burrows says he noticed a big difference in his otherwise normal son
upon his return from the school.
His son was thinking for himself
His son was immersed in a gay curriculum course it what it seems happened.
How did one seminar morph into "immersed in a gay curriculum course"?
How many times did the gay staff teach about the dangers of STDs in relation
to homosexual behaviors?
I hate to burst your bubble, but STD's can happen during straight
sex, too. My kids learned about STD's in health class.
BTW, the lesbian sex generally has the lowest risk of STD transmission
(certainly AIDS), I guess you're OK with that?
"He [said he] was thinking now that he perhaps was gay -- and of course I
was floored by this [pronouncement] and was, like, 'where did this come
from?'
In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
In your homosexually biased opinion.
This kind of came out of left field," the dad says. After
questioning his son for an extended period, Burrows says he discovered
the
source. "I found out that this was as a result of this seminar."
According to Burrows, his son was instructed by two openly homosexual
staff members of the Governor's School to question his sexuality as well
as Bible passages that condemn homosexuality. And the students were also
encouraged by instructors to start a Gay Straight Alliance club at their
schools, he says.
Good!
There isn't much at all that aligns between gay and straight.
Learn about yourself. Question the Bible. I'm a member of the Gay
Straight Alliance at my own school, actually
What is there in common with gay and straight?
How much of your day do you spend having sex? Even
the most active people have a least a few hours a day
for other things, where the difference doesn't matter at all.
Gay students have a lot in common with straight students that get
picked on by "normal" people: band geeks, math nerds, etc, etc.
The North Carolina dad explains that his son's subsequent struggle with
homosexuality has turned his family upside down. "As far as our family is
concerned, the damage has already been done," he laments. "There's no way
that we can go back and undo what has been done."
That's what happens when families are close-minded.
You are saying something that is more the case with gays.
Your mind is closed to prudent behaviors.
So I guess you can give me an example of a gay person who
says that straight people shouldn't be allowed to have sex, marry,
or discuss either of those things?
Still, Mr. Burrows feels he needs to warn other parents of the homosexual
indoctrination his son encountered at the Governor's School. "[I]f I can
keep one other family from having to go through this, then all this
trouble has been worthwhile," he says.
Indoctrination?
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable.
Notice how these gays are targeting underage citizens.
That in itself is illegal.
They are teaching sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes
that prohibit doing such.
They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching such matters to
underage children.
What part of Appalachia do you live in?
-jc
And how about preventing the struggle a homosexual teen
would have to go through not knowing why s/he isn't attracted to members
of
the opposite sex.
How do you prevent someone's own inner struggle when they are aware that
there is a conflict with how they are and what they know to be the way to
be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
12 May 2006 10:49:36 PM |
|
|
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable. Notice how these gays are
targeting underage citizens. That in itself is illegal. They are teaching
sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes that prohibit
doing such. They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching such
matters to underage children.
What part of Appalachia do you live in?
He's on the fringes, in western South Carolina near northeastern
Georgia....and he's about a half-hour from Bob Jones U in Greenville. (I'm a
native of Appalachia, albeit up in the Kentucky coalfields, and I was raised
Appalachian by my parents, who were born and raised there, while I was growing
up in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas...and unlike Johnny, I'm secure enough in
knowing I'm a Kinsey 0 that I'm not terrified by the mere existence of anyone
not exactly like me. I've been pro-choice since the tail end of the 1960s, as
has my wife, and she's got a daughter who's given us two grandchildren since
late 1994, with number three on the way in about two and a half months, if all
goes as it should. We've got a few gay friends, and we never have cared for
the rabid homophobes, some of whom I think should be given their own private
island somewhere along the Louisiana coast...and not allowed out.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 08:44:49 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable. Notice how these gays are
targeting underage citizens. That in itself is illegal. They are
teaching
sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes that prohibit
doing such. They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching such
matters to underage children.
What part of Appalachia do you live in?
He's on the fringes, in western South Carolina near northeastern
Georgia....and he's about a half-hour from Bob Jones U in Greenville.
(I'm a
native of Appalachia, albeit up in the Kentucky coalfields, and I was
raised
Appalachian by my parents, who were born and raised there, while I was
growing
up in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas...and unlike Johnny, I'm secure enough in
knowing I'm a Kinsey 0 that I'm not terrified by the mere existence of
anyone
not exactly like me. I've been pro-choice since the tail end of the
1960s,
How could you be Pro-Choice in a non-Pro-Choice state before 1973?
And, how did you even know about pro-choice at that time?
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the public's
knowledge.
No one taught me about 'a woman's right to choose'.
No one.
The whole thing is a sham.
Roe V Wade is nothing more than a secret agenda to seduce people and to deny
others their rights at law while absolving criminals of their crimes they
committed against other persons.
Problem with Roe V Wade now is that most people know about it, too few have
benefitted from it, and far too many have been punished by it without due
process or just cause.
The blinders fell off regarding Row V Wade long ago.
as has my wife, and she's got a daughter who's given us two grandchildren
since
late 1994, with number three on the way in about two and a half months, if
all
goes as it should. We've got a few gay friends, and we never have cared
for
the rabid homophobes, some of whom I think should be given their own
private
island somewhere along the Louisiana coast...and not allowed out.)
How in the USA did you automatically turn Pro-Choice when you weren;t even
in a Pro-Choice district before 1973?
Are you telling us that you were allied with people who were breaking the
law before 1973 in a non-Pro-Choice state?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 09:24:33 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable. Notice how these gays are
targeting underage citizens. That in itself is illegal. They are
teaching
sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes that prohibit
doing such. They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching such
matters to underage children.
What part of Appalachia do you live in?
He's on the fringes, in western South Carolina near northeastern
Georgia....and he's about a half-hour from Bob Jones U in Greenville. (I'm
a native of Appalachia, albeit up in the Kentucky coalfields, and I was
raised Appalachian by my parents, who were born and raised there, while I
was growing up in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas...and unlike Johnny, I'm secure
enough in knowing I'm a Kinsey 0 that I'm not terrified by the mere
existence of anyone not exactly like me. I've been pro-choice since the
tail end of the 1960s,
How could you be Pro-Choice in a non-Pro-Choice state before 1973?
The same way anyone else could be, no matter what state they were in. (In
other words, by paying attention, something you've managed to make yourself
incapable of.)
And, how did you even know about pro-choice at that time?
Just because you were brain-damaged at that time doesn't oblige the rest of us
to emulate you. I *was* seventeen and coming up on eighteen when that
decision was handed down, remember? Are you saying you can't even remember
anything about you being thirteen? You've got serious problems, if that's the
case.
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the public's
knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already re-legalized
elective abortion by 1973.
No one taught me about 'a woman's right to choose'. No one.
So? What kept you from trying to learn? (It didn't hurt that the particular
case that SCOTUS based its ruling on was first tried in Dallas County, but
even at the turn of the '70s it wasn't *that* hard to find news, even in your
wide spot in the road.)
The whole thing is a sham.
Your whole impotent crusade is the sham.
Roe V Wade is nothing more than a secret agenda to seduce people and to deny
others their rights at law while absolving criminals of their crimes they
committed against other persons.
Go sit on your tinfoil hat, Wentzky. Abortion is legal, and you and your
fellow Christkooks aren't going to reverse that.
Problem with Roe V Wade now is that most people know about it, too few have
benefitted from it, and far too many have been punished by it without due
process or just cause.
....which would have nothing to do with you, even if your fantasy was even
faintly tainted by reality.
The blinders fell off regarding Row V Wade long ago.
Your brain fell off and was lost years ago. (Row? Sheesh.) You're the moron
who coined this gem: "Gay is gay. Lesbian is lesbian." How is it that
*this* heterosexual knows that "lesbian" == "homosexual female" == "gay", and
you don't? *Is* English your first (or even second) language?
as has my wife, and she's got a daughter who's given us two grandchildren
since late 1994, with number three on the way in about two and a half
months, if all goes as it should. We've got a few gay friends, and we
never have cared for the rabid homophobes, some of whom I think should be
given their own private island somewhere along the Louisiana coast...and
not allowed out.)
How in the USA did you automatically turn Pro-Choice when you weren;t even
in a Pro-Choice district before 1973?
How did Americans make the break with Britain in the 1770s, using your
delusional logic? Last I looked, political opinions aren't subject to local
ordinance, in most respects...
Are you telling us that you were allied with people who were breaking the
law before 1973 in a non-Pro-Choice state?
No, you tweaking circus freak...I'm telling you that I was pro-choice before
1973. If you're too fried to understand that, that's your problem. Don't
make it anyone else's.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 02:07:11 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Gay blade perversions taught as acceptable. Notice how these gays are
targeting underage citizens. That in itself is illegal. They are
teaching
sexual items to underage persons in violation of the codes that
prohibit
doing such. They are guilty of breaking laws that forbid teaching
such
matters to underage children.
What part of Appalachia do you live in?
He's on the fringes, in western South Carolina near northeastern
Georgia....and he's about a half-hour from Bob Jones U in Greenville.
(I'm
a native of Appalachia, albeit up in the Kentucky coalfields, and I was
raised Appalachian by my parents, who were born and raised there, while
I
was growing up in Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas...and unlike Johnny, I'm
secure
enough in knowing I'm a Kinsey 0 that I'm not terrified by the mere
existence of anyone not exactly like me. I've been pro-choice since the
tail end of the 1960s,
How could you be Pro-Choice in a non-Pro-Choice state before 1973?
The same way anyone else could be, no matter what state they were in. (In
other words, by paying attention, something you've managed to make
yourself
incapable of.)
And, how did you even know about pro-choice at that time?
Just because you were brain-damaged at that time doesn't oblige the rest
of us
to emulate you. I *was* seventeen and coming up on eighteen when that
decision was handed down, remember? Are you saying you can't even
remember
anything about you being thirteen? You've got serious problems, if that's
the
case.
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's
knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already re-legalized
elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that?
The secret agenda is no longer a secret.
No one taught me about 'a woman's right to choose'. No one.
So? What kept you from trying to learn?
All I have learned from it is that it is and has been a failure.
(It didn't hurt that the particular
case that SCOTUS based its ruling on was first tried in Dallas County, but
even at the turn of the '70s it wasn't *that* hard to find news, even in
your
wide spot in the road.)
Watergate and Vietnam took up the gist of the programming during thr Roe V
Wade trial.
The Roe V Wade derelicts wouldn't even give The President of the United
States of America a search warrant.
The whole thing is a sham.
Your whole impotent crusade is the sham.
*****, deepthroat charlatan.
Your leader is codenamed Deepthroat.
The President is who you are supposed to recognize as your leader, not
Deepthroat.
Roe V Wade is nothing more than a secret agenda to seduce people and to
deny
others their rights at law while absolving criminals of their crimes they
committed against other persons.
Go sit on your tinfoil hat, Wentzky.
I thought you had a monopoly in tin foil hats.
Abortion is legal, and you and your
fellow Christkooks aren't going to reverse that.
Is that why Nixon was impeached?
Are you now trying to tell everyone that it was anti-Constitutional,
anti-liberty, anti-free exercise of religion, anti-law, anti-justice freaks
who got this crap started?
Why, why , why would you want to ***** off all of Christendom against
Pro-Choicers and gays?
Problem with Roe V Wade now is that most people know about it, too few
have
benefitted from it, and far too many have been punished by it without due
process or just cause.
...which would have nothing to do with you,
Liar.
even if your fantasy was even
faintly tainted by reality.
The reality is that Roe V Wade has harmed the USA.
The blinders fell off regarding Roe V Wade long ago.
Your brain fell off and was lost years ago. (Row? Sheesh.)
'e' is next to 'w'
You're the moron
who coined this gem: "Gay is gay. Lesbian is lesbian." How is it that
*this* heterosexual knows that "lesbian" == "homosexual female" == "gay",
and
you don't? *Is* English your first (or even second) language?
Oh, why is it called the gay lesbian bisexual transgender GLBT group then?
Gay is exclusively a homosexual male thing.
Lesbians don't want to be called gay do they?
as has my wife, and she's got a daughter who's given us two
grandchildren
since late 1994, with number three on the way in about two and a half
months, if all goes as it should. We've got a few gay friends, and we
never have cared for the rabid homophobes, some of whom I think should
be
given their own private island somewhere along the Louisiana coast...and
not allowed out.)
How in the USA did you automatically turn Pro-Choice when you weren;t even
in a Pro-Choice district before 1973?
How did Americans make the break with Britain in the 1770s, using your
delusional logic? Last I looked, political opinions aren't subject to
local
ordinance, in most respects...
Are you telling us that you were allied with people who were breaking the
law before 1973 in a non-Pro-Choice state?
No, you tweaking circus freak...
But, you are telling me you were of the criminal mind then, the sect that
sought to have the law sturck down for their benefit. Your mind is still of
the criminal sect since you are still Pro-Choice.
I'm telling you that I was pro-choice before
1973.
Were you born Pro-Choice; or, is this something that doesn't hold to your
belief that persons are born one way or another?
If you're too fried to understand that, that's your problem. Don't
make it anyone else's.
Surely, I have no questions in my mind as to my particualar beliefs.
I wasn't born gay and I wasn't born Pro-Choice.
I neither feel nor sense any need to change.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 02:50:34 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the public's
knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already re-legalized
elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that?
The secret agenda is no longer a secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in your
backwater road crossing.)
No one taught me about 'a woman's right to choose'. No one.
So? What kept you from trying to learn?
All I have learned from it is that it is and has been a failure.
You don't get to choose for any woman. Maybe you'll get the chance to choose
for yourself, some day.
(It didn't hurt that the particular case that SCOTUS based its ruling on
was first tried in Dallas County, but even at the turn of the '70s it
wasn't *that* hard to find news, even in your wide spot in the road.)
Watergate and Vietnam took up the gist of the programming during thr Roe V
Wade trial.
Idiot. California and New York had legalized abortion before Watergate. What
were you doing back then, besides being a poster child for the March of Dimes?
The Roe V Wade derelicts wouldn't even give The President of the United
States of America a search warrant.
So? It figures you'd suck up to the likes of Tricky ***** - and Chimp 43 makes
him look almost respectable, three decades later.
The whole thing is a sham.
Your whole impotent crusade is the sham.
*****, deepthroat charlatan.
***** is your life, Wentzky. You've spared no effort to demonstrate that.
Your leader is codenamed Deepthroat.
You're crazier than the proverbial possum on a nine-day crack binge.
Watergate's Deep Throat was finally revealed recently, not that I'd expect you
to have any idea of what that means.
The President is who you are supposed to recognize as your leader, not
Deepthroat.
Too bad the Constitution doesn't force us to respect leaders like the ones you
brown-nose.
Roe V Wade is nothing more than a secret agenda to seduce people and to
deny others their rights at law while absolving criminals of their crimes
they committed against other persons.
Go sit on your tinfoil hat, Wentzky.
I thought you had a monopoly in tin foil hats.
You destroyed your ability to think years ago.
Abortion is legal, and you and your fellow Christkooks aren't going to
reverse that.
Is that why Nixon was impeached?
Idiot. What brought him down was ordering the break-in of the DNC offices (in
the Watergate Hotel) during the 1972 campaign, and then lying about it.
Justice took two years to be served, but your hero bugged out and ran in the
face of a certain conviction if the process had reached impeachment.
Are you now trying to tell everyone that it was anti-Constitutional,
anti-liberty, anti-free exercise of religion, anti-law, anti-justice freaks
who got this crap started?
No, you're telling everyone that you're a delusional babbling circus freak who
can't tell night from day, the majority of the time.
Why, why , why would you want to ***** off all of Christendom against
Pro-Choicers and gays?
You're not "Christendom", moron, and you speak for no one but yourself...and
you do a *****-poor job of even that.
Problem with Roe V Wade now is that most people know about it, too few have
benefitted from it, and far too many have been punished by it without due
process or just cause.
...which would have nothing to do with you,
Liar.
Truer than any of your psychotic fantasies. Bet on it.
even if your fantasy was even
faintly tainted by reality.
The reality is that Roe V Wade has harmed the USA.
The reality is that no one particularly cares about the delusional babblings
of a nutbar in South Carolina.
The blinders fell off regarding Roe V Wade long ago.
Your brain fell off and was lost years ago. (Row? Sheesh.)
'e' is next to 'w'
So much for your alleged education at Furman, eh?
You're the moron who coined this gem: "Gay is gay. Lesbian is lesbian."
How is it that *this* heterosexual knows that "lesbian" == "homosexual
female" == "gay", and you don't? *Is* English your first (or even second)
language?
Oh, why is it called the gay lesbian bisexual transgender GLBT group then?
Ask the people who newgrouped it. This may be news to you, but I don't speak
for them. I speak for me.
Gay is exclusively a homosexual male thing.
*****.
Lesbians don't want to be called gay do they?
I know a couple, and it doesn't bother them in the least. Maybe you should
get out in reality once in a while, as there *is* a gay community in
Anderson...and you might even know someone who's part of it.
[...]
Are you telling us that you were allied with people who were breaking the
law before 1973 in a non-Pro-Choice state?
No, you tweaking circus freak...
But, you are telling me you were of the criminal mind then, the sect that
sought to have the law sturck down for their benefit. Your mind is still of
the criminal sect since you are still Pro-Choice.
Really, Tweaker Wentzky? When are you calling the cops? Pro-choice is legal,
you blustering buffoon.
I'm telling you that I was pro-choice before 1973.
Were you born Pro-Choice; or, is this something that doesn't hold to your
belief that persons are born one way or another?
Jesus fucking Christ on a pogo stick, Wentzky, can you read and remember
_anything_? I've only made no secret that I've been pro-choice since the tail
end of the 1960s. I was born in 1955, you idiot. Do the math (and I have no
doubt you still aren't able to figure it out).
If you're too fried to understand that, that's your problem. Don't
make it anyone else's.
Surely, I have no questions in my mind as to my particualar beliefs.
I wasn't born gay and I wasn't born Pro-Choice.
I neither feel nor sense any need to change.
Good for you. Try forcing it on anyone else, and see how fast you get it
shoved down your throat until you learn how to do something more sane.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 10:57:04 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szk4pztzotx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already
re-legalized elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that? The secret agenda is no longer a
secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in
your backwater road crossing.)
Secret agenda? One of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in US
history was a "secret agenda" and "withheld from the public's knowledge?"
I wonder what color the sky is on his planet?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 11:48:17 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szk4pztzotx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already
re-legalized elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that? The secret agenda is no longer a
secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in
your backwater road crossing.)
Secret agenda? One of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in US
history was a "secret agenda" and "withheld from the public's knowledge?"
Even though he wasn't quite yet a teenager on that day, I'd think he'd have
managed to hear something about it, even in South Carolina.
I wonder what color the sky is on his planet?
I'd rather wonder why ICE hasn't deported him back to it...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
14 May 2006 11:15:41 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szku07tnre6.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szk4pztzotx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already
re-legalized elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that? The secret agenda is no longer a
secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in
your backwater road crossing.)
Secret agenda? One of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in US
history was a "secret agenda" and "withheld from the public's knowledge?"
Even though he wasn't quite yet a teenager on that day, I'd think he'd
have managed to hear something about it, even in South Carolina.
I wonder what color the sky is on his planet?
I'd rather wonder why ICE hasn't deported him back to it...
NASA has its head up its butt?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
14 May 2006 11:56:53 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szku07tnre6.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szk4pztzotx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already
re-legalized elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that? The secret agenda is no longer a
secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in
your backwater road crossing.)
Secret agenda? One of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in US
history was a "secret agenda" and "withheld from the public's knowledge?"
Even though he wasn't quite yet a teenager on that day, I'd think he'd
have managed to hear something about it, even in South Carolina.
I wonder what color the sky is on his planet?
I'd rather wonder why ICE hasn't deported him back to it...
NASA has its head up its butt?
The Feds have made sure that NASA makes decisions the same way as is done in
Washington: just do what Chimp 43 says.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
14 May 2006 09:35:41 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:-NydnZaM7-YNN_vZRVn-gw@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Chief Instigator in episode
<szk4pztzotx.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyje9f4u.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslne37ov.fsf@fnord.io.com...
[...]
The freaking idiocy of Roe V Wade is that it was withheld from the
public's knowledge.
Yeah, I guess that's why California and New York had already
re-legalized elective abortion by 1973.
But who was reporting it?
Who was telling the people about that? The secret agenda is no longer a
secret.
The news media of the time, you drooling Mongoloid. (Possibly even in
your backwater road crossing.)
Secret agenda? One of the most talked about Supreme Court cases in US
history was a "secret agenda" and "withheld from the public's knowledge?"
Show me the cites then from the publications concerning Roe V Wade back in
its day and show me the school curricula that taught it to every person in
the USA after Roe V Wade became law.
I am sick of the taxation without representation fools getting their way
here.
I am sick of seeing so many criminals in society.
Criminal Justice is an oxymoron.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Dad Says His Son 'Damaged' by Homosexual Indoctrination at State-Sponsored Program |
13 May 2006 08:40:02 AM |
|
|
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1147483857.987624.205290@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Sgeo" <sgeoster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:IUP8g.2417$ph2.1164@fe08.lga...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
This is why parents should be informed and allowed to give consent on
such
controversial school programming. These parents can't help but wonder
whether or not this particular program had any bearing on their son
deciding to become gay.
Sexuality is not a decision
If that were true then why the need for a gay course?
Maybe so that gay kids don't commit suicide and straight kids don't
decide it would be fun "to go beat up some fags" after they've
had a few beers.
So, you are into exposing any gay person so they are beat up and insulted to
the point that they commit suicide?
http://www.newsbull.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=30271
(AgapePress) - Two Christian parents say their son was a victim of
homosexual indoctrination at the prestigious "Governor's School of
North
Carolina."
The Governor's School of North Carolina describes itself as "program
for
intellectually gifted high school students, integrating academic
disciplines, the arts, and unique courses." But one North Carolina
couple
is suffering some after effects of their son's involvement in the
program.
Jim and Beverly Burrows say after their son attended a Governor's
School
seminar called "The New Gay Teenager," he began telling them he was
unsure
of his "sexual orientation."
You mean the teen is thinking for himself? That's a good thing!
Who doesn't think for themself?
(Unless of
course, you want religion to be preserved..)
Illogical.
The parents believe the seminar was intentionally scheduled as the
last
optional one before classes ended in order to leave a strong, lasting
impression on the students and bypass any parental notification about
the
seminar.
Jim Burrows says he noticed a big difference in his otherwise normal
son
upon his return from the school.
His son was thinking for himself
His son was immersed in a gay curriculum course it what it seems
happened.
How did one seminar morph into "immersed in a gay curriculum course"?
"course". The elective course was the only one available to the students to
enroll in at the time.
Sure looks like a gay indoctrination effort to me.
There were no alternatives to this course even though other elective courses
had alternatives to them.
Again, it looks like the gay staff members are trying to influence underage
persons.
How many times did the gay staff teach about the dangers of STDs in
relation
to homosexual behaviors?
I hate to burst your bubble, but STD's can happen during straight
sex, too.
You didn't 'burst my bubble', moron. The failure of the gays to teach the
risks associated with gay sex is what I see as an act of nelgigence and
ineptitude and as a failure to disclose to people the truth about gay sex.
The constant ignorance and shifting the topic to characteristics of
hetersexuals is showing me that your gay alliance loses sight of itself.
My kids learned about STD's in health class.
So, why would they need any course on gay teenagers at The Governor's
School?
I imagine the Governor of NC has a lot to answer for in this dispute.
BTW, the lesbian sex generally has the lowest risk of STD transmission
(certainly AIDS), I guess you're OK with that?
Lesbian is lesbian. Gay is gay.
Why do you change the subject under discussion so much?
Is it because you are gay and are trying to ward off the heat?
"He [said he] was thinking now that he perhaps was gay -- and of
course I
was floored by this [pronouncement] and was, like, 'where did this
come
from?'
In other words, the dad's a bigoted idiot.
In your homosexually biased opinion.
This kind of came out of left field," the dad says. After
questioning his son for an extended period, Burrows says he discovered
the
source. "I found out that this was as a result of this seminar."
According to Burrows, his son was instructed by two openly homosexual
staff members of the Governor's School to question his sexuality as
well
as Bible passages that condemn homosexuality. And the students were
also
encouraged by instructors to start a Gay Straight Alliance club at
their
schools, he says.
Good!
There isn't much at all that aligns between gay and straight.
Learn about yourself. Question the Bible. I'm a member of the Gay
Straight Alliance at my own school, actually
What is there in common with g | | | | |
