| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2005 01:17:35 PM |
| Object: |
Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 07:45:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> thought hard and said:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
Pluralities are nice things. They worked nicely during the Clinton
administration.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 07:40:17 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
What a disgrace. Clinton reduced the deficit into the green and our
faith based chimp spends like Jeebus is coming back.
The world is going to end so who gives a *****. Right...?
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
| User: "jwk" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 06:18:10 PM |
|
|
Steve Knight wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
What a disgrace. Clinton reduced the deficit into the green and
our
faith based chimp spends like Jeebus is coming back.
The world is going to end so who gives a *****. Right...?
That's exactly how they see it. In fact I don't know how anyone who
doesn't believe the world will end soon could support this
administration's policies.
jwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 10:40:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
The Bush Crime Family and their sychophants don't care as their stock
portfolios are booming.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 05:18:35 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 08:38:27 AM |
|
|
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead of
getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the massive
spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses are
"Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 09:11:13 AM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:270120050638271750%chib@nospam.com:
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead
of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the
massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses
are "Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults against anybody who
disagrees with their politics.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 02:58:33 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults
against anybody who disagrees with their politics.
It's not a matter to agree or disagree with.
There were no WMDs. There is a deficit. The economy
still has yet to produce a single job under Bush. The WTC
is still gone.
These are facts. These things are *Not* matters of
opinion.
The dollar is worth less. Oil is more expensive. Heck,
so isn't milk and just about everything else. If you get
a decent raise -- and that's a big if -- it'll only cover
inflation. You'll have *Zero* net gain. As for the people
who don't receive a generous raise, they get to watch
helplessly as they fall further & further behind,
wondering if they should just give up on the idea of
a simple middle class life.
No matter of opinion here, "Fred."
Ignoring the crime of Bush's foreign policy, Bush has
failed you. While Clinton easily surpassed Reagan's
economic success, Bush trails behind his own father.
This is objective reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 03:01:26 PM |
|
|
In article <p6CdnShYc6CtyWTcRVn-3Q@comcast.com> "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> writes:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults
against anybody who disagrees with their politics.
It's not a matter to agree or disagree with.
There were no WMDs. There is a deficit. The economy
still has yet to produce a single job under Bush. The WTC
is still gone.
These are facts. These things are *Not* matters of
opinion.
The dollar is worth less. Oil is more expensive. Heck,
so isn't milk and just about everything else. If you get
a decent raise -- and that's a big if -- it'll only cover
inflation. You'll have *Zero* net gain. As for the people
who don't receive a generous raise, they get to watch
helplessly as they fall further & further behind,
wondering if they should just give up on the idea of
a simple middle class life.
No matter of opinion here, "Fred."
Ignoring the crime of Bush's foreign policy, Bush has
failed you. While Clinton easily surpassed Reagan's
economic success, Bush trails behind his own father.
This is objective reality.
(sound of two hands clapping)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 09:29:28 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:270120050638271750%chib@nospam.com:
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
< >
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead
of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the
massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses
are "Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults against anybody who
disagrees with their politics.
Yeah, ain't that first amendment just a wonderful thing.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 10:07:55 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:85enc2-1fr.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:270120050638271750%chib@nospam.com:
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead
of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the
massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses
are "Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults against anybody
who disagrees with their politics.
Yeah, ain't that first amendment just a wonderful thing.
Yes, Democrats are good at exercising their right to make fools of
themselves.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:10:59 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" < > wrote in
news:85enc2-1fr.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:270120050638271750%chib@nospam.com:
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
< >
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead
of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the
massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses
are "Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults against anybody
who disagrees with their politics.
Yeah, ain't that first amendment just a wonderful thing.
Yes, Democrats are good at exercising their right to make fools of
themselves.
Looked in the mirror lately?
BTW, I'm not a democrat either. But your right to both act and say
stupid things, is well protected Fred.
For now at least.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:17:40 PM |
|
|
on 27 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Fred Stone dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:85enc2-1fr.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in
news:270120050638271750%chib@nospam.com:
In article <q79gv0lhn5lnuksr3m822tuec5dv2rt2l0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead
of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the
massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
It happens without fail. When rightards are confronted with
monkey-boy's abysmal failures, their two most predictable responses
are "Clinton got a *****," and "9/11."
It would be funny if it weren't so uselessly predictable.
Almost as predictable as leftards' egregious insults against anybody
who disagrees with their politics.
Yeah, ain't that first amendment just a wonderful thing.
Yes, Democrats are good at exercising their right to make fools of
themselves.
That's OK. The republicans are already there.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 07:05:48 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:18:35 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> drained
his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
As Earl lies again.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 07:46:51 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:18:35 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue instead of getting
blow jobs in the White House, 911 may not have happened and the massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
Your chimp was ***** in Charge during 9/11. The chimp that gutted
the CIA and did everything fucking possible to hinder the 9/11
investigation. Everything... If Clinton had even a shred to do with
it, your chimp would have Whitehouse spun him to death in a heart beat
to save his own cowardly draft dodging rich boy *****.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 09:46:57 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net>
wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue
He *was* tending to the terrorist issue. He came closer to killing
Osama than BushCo ever has.
instead of getting
blow jobs in the White House,
And what were the Republicans doing, huh? Spending millions of dollars
*investigating* a ***** and accusing Clinton of "wagging the dog"
when he *would* strike at terrorist camps!
Where was Republican concern about terrorism? What did BushCo ever do
or say about terrorism before 9/11 -- besides ignore the detailed
information that Clinton left them?
911 may not have happened and the massive spending
of going to war definitely falls in his lap.
That's *****, and you know it. Most of that massive spending is
being dumped into Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 and
wasn't a threat to US national security. Furthermore, Clinton is hardly
to blame for BushCo's idiotically timed corporate tax cut.
< snip >
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 10:09:00 AM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote in
news:35sgniF4phni6U1@individual.net:
duke wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue
He *was* tending to the terrorist issue. He came closer to killing
Osama than BushCo ever has.
Close but no cigar.
<snicker>
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:41:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote in
news:35sgniF4phni6U1@individual.net:
duke wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue
He *was* tending to the terrorist issue. He came closer to killing
Osama than BushCo ever has.
Close but no cigar.
<snicker>
So, what do you call increases in counter-terrorism spending during
every year Clinton was in office?
Two different executive orders calling for the capture of killing of
Osama bin-Laden?
The attacks on al Qaeda base camps in Afghanistan?
The facts (Fred screams in pain) show that Clinton paid more attention
to terrorism issues than Reagan or Bush I. Clinton left a detailed
plan to deal with al Qaeda for Bush II, who ignored it.
Try reading the 9/11 Commission Report.
Oh, remember the 1993 WTC bombing? The Clinton Justice Department
invesitgated, arrested, and convicted everyone involved without
resorting to unlawful dentention, secret trials, or wholesale
violations of civil rights. Those morons are in prison for life, and
we followed the rules doing it.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:58:58 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:47div0dqnmoul9qrvb78ece5vgdm3frobc@4ax.com:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote in
news:35sgniF4phni6U1@individual.net:
duke wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
Yes, if bill clinton had been tending to the terrorist issue
He *was* tending to the terrorist issue. He came closer to killing
Osama than BushCo ever has.
Close but no cigar.
<snicker>
So, what do you call increases in counter-terrorism spending during
every year Clinton was in office?
I call it a waste of money, given the success of their operations that
led directly to 9/11.
Two different executive orders calling for the capture of killing of
Osama bin-Laden?
Close but no cigar.
The attacks on al Qaeda base camps in Afghanistan?
And another no cigar.
The facts (Fred screams in pain) show that Clinton paid more attention
to terrorism issues than Reagan or Bush I. Clinton left a detailed
plan to deal with al Qaeda for Bush II, who ignored it.
Try reading the 9/11 Commission Report.
Been there, done that. Bush didn't ignore any "detailed plans". There
weren't any "detailed plans". Richard Clarke has been completely
discredited.
Oh, remember the 1993 WTC bombing? The Clinton Justice Department
invesitgated, arrested, and convicted everyone involved without
resorting to unlawful dentention, secret trials, or wholesale
violations of civil rights. Those morons are in prison for life, and
we followed the rules doing it.
And we got exactly *none* of the leadership of the organizations that
supported that operation.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 03:02:50 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
I call it a waste of money, given the success of their
operations that led directly to 9/11.
I dunno, "Fred," but some people think that giving Bush
months of precious warning was actually a good thing,
even if Bush refused to act on that warning.
Even the Whitehouse admitted -- back in May of 2002 --
that they knew the terrorist were inside the United States
before 9/11.
But, of course, in April of 2001 the Bush administration
was already DENOUNCING Clinton for his "Focus"
on Osama Bin Laden, calling it "a mistake."
But, even with hindsight, you still can't admit that it was
your god that made the mistake....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DJ Nozem" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 10:55:50 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:58:58 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:47div0dqnmoul9qrvb78ece5vgdm3frobc@4ax.com:
(snip)
The facts (Fred screams in pain) show that Clinton paid more attention
to terrorism issues than Reagan or Bush I. Clinton left a detailed
plan to deal with al Qaeda for Bush II, who ignored it.
Try reading the 9/11 Commission Report.
Been there, done that. Bush didn't ignore any "detailed plans". There
weren't any "detailed plans". Richard Clarke has been completely
discredited.
Ah, sweet revisionism...
Yer both wrong, though. Clinton didn't leave an officially approved
plan, but Clarke brought his plan (which had been shelved in the
latter days of the Clinton admin) along to the Bush admin. This
detailed plan by Clarke, which you falsely allege not to have existed,
amounted pretty much to everything the US did in Afghanistan
post-9/11.
All of this is, btw, perfectly congruent with the background briefing
given by Clarke that supposedly discredited him (according to the
right-wing echo chamber).
Compare:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020812/story.html
(reads like a movie script, only the first page is necessary)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115085,00.html
Eventually, comparing Bush with Clinton on this matter is not very
helpful. Both wanted more to be done, but failed to effectively push
the plans through the bureaucracy. Eventually, this is another classic
case of politics getting in the way of effective policy. When will the
tragedy end?
(snip)
--
We give meaning to each other
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:56:34 PM |
|
|
on 27 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Douglas Berry dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Try reading the 9/11 Commission Report.
Fred thinks this is the same as watching the 9/11 DVD.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
29 Jan 2005 09:51:11 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:56:34 -0600, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 27 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Douglas Berry dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Try reading the 9/11 Commission Report.
Fred thinks this is the same as watching the 9/11 DVD.
Fred *thinks?* He's Puke's butt buddy.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 02:45:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, Rev. Karl E. Taylor <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
That's nothing. By his third year of his second term, we'll probably be seeing
$700bil deficits assuming the federal govt. isn't already bankrupt.
It's a laughable as RR's '80 campaign promise "we will balance the budget in
'83" and then going on to borrow far more money in 8 years than every other
president previously combined.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Williams" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 03:52:02 PM |
|
|
lovely.... spend and spend like drunken whores...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Religion Is A Disease...Clayton Is The Placebo" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 06:03:46 PM |
|
|
"Williams" <c-williams3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1106776322.346263.277200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
lovely.... spend and spend like drunken whores...
Then blame it on Clinton, homosexuals, terrorists and anyone else you can
think of!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 09:18:35 AM |
|
|
Religion Is A Disease...Clayton Is The Placebo wrote:
"Williams" <c-williams3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1106776322.346263.277200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
lovely.... spend and spend like drunken whores...
Then blame it on Clinton, homosexuals, terrorists and anyone else you can
think of!!!
Then cut corporate taxes again.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 10:26:24 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <35sf2bF4lf4hdU2@individual.net>, Tukla Ratte lumbered
into the room and mumbled:
Religion Is A Disease...Clayton Is The Placebo wrote:
"Williams" <c-williams3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1106776322.346263.277200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
lovely.... spend and spend like drunken whores...
Then blame it on Clinton, homosexuals, terrorists and anyone else you
can think of!!!
Then cut corporate taxes again.
No, no, it's time to divert trillions from the treasury into Wall Street...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:38:06 PM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Religion Is A Disease...Clayton Is The Placebo wrote:
"Williams" <c-williams3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1106776322.346263.277200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
lovely.... spend and spend like drunken whores...
Then blame it on Clinton, homosexuals, terrorists and anyone else you can
think of!!!
Then cut corporate taxes again.
And then cut them again.
I'm reminded of the twits now gathered in Olympia. In order to close a
shortfall of more than $1.5 billion in the Washington state budget, the
legislators are conducting an audit of state agencies to find out what can be
cut after five years of cutting these agencies to near uselessness. In the mean
time, some $13.5 billion in potential state revenue is lost every year
(according to a report issued by the state Department of Revenue just last
year) due to tax cuts and exemptions given to corporations and the nitwits cut
business taxes even more. Screw the homeless, ***** the poor, to hell with the
police and who gives a rat's ***** about bridges that are on the verge of
collapse; we gotta make sure Boeing gets another $4 billion in "business
incentives." And mind you, the legislature is dominated by Democrats as it has
been for most of the last two decades.
Sorry. The opening of the state legislative season kind of sets my temper on
edge.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 12:42:45 PM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow wrote:
< snip >
I'm reminded of the twits now gathered in Olympia. In order to close a
shortfall of more than $1.5 billion in the Washington state budget, the
legislators are conducting an audit of state agencies to find out what can be
cut after five years of cutting these agencies to near uselessness. In the mean
time, some $13.5 billion in potential state revenue is lost every year
(according to a report issued by the state Department of Revenue just last
year) due to tax cuts and exemptions given to corporations and the nitwits cut
business taxes even more. Screw the homeless, ***** the poor, to hell with the
police and who gives a rat's ***** about bridges that are on the verge of
collapse; we gotta make sure Boeing gets another $4 billion in "business
incentives." And mind you, the legislature is dominated by Democrats as it has
been for most of the last two decades.
Sorry. The opening of the state legislative season kind of sets my temper on
edge.
That reminds me of the Iowa state legislature. Except that *they're*
handing out incentives to companies that aren't even *in* Iowa and
usually decide not to *come* to Iowa, but they keep the money.
Meanwhile, Des Moines decided to turn off half of the streetlights in
the city (at $15 a light) to save money -- until a kid got hit by a car
on a street where they'd turned off *all* the lights. At least they
didn't have to pay to get the lights turned back on.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 01:44:26 PM |
|
|
on 26 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Rev. Karl E. Taylor dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
Boy, look at the figures fall post Clinton. It's difficult to draw the
conclusion that Bush is the best thing that ever happened to this country,
as held by all the drooling neo-con religious half-wits that voted him in.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
