| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2005 07:17:35 PM |
| Object: |
Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 09:57:26 PM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 10:12:13 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore the ones
that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 10:46:05 PM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:_NmdnX13Cuixi2XcRVn-hw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/p
ho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore the
ones that have.
They're *all* "the White House's own numbers".
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 11:50:37 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAB4C89472fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:_NmdnX13Cuixi2XcRVn-hw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/p
ho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore the
ones that have.
They're *all* "the White House's own numbers".
Clue: Some are FANTASY and some are REALITY.
Anyone can put any numbers they like in a prediction, it's only when the
future becomes the past that the numbers become fact.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 02:31:13 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:ZKudnfV1mIvesGXcRVn-2g@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAB4C89472fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:_NmdnX13Cuixi2XcRVn-hw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/p
ho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
They're *all* "the White House's own numbers".
Clue: Some are FANTASY and some are REALITY.
Anyone can put any numbers they like in a prediction, it's only when
the future becomes the past that the numbers become fact.
Can I quote you on that the next time some Democrat makes a prediction?
Like, say, about Medicare or Social Security?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 02:55:10 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EADAF4E8366fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:ZKudnfV1mIvesGXcRVn-2g@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAB4C89472fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:_NmdnX13Cuixi2XcRVn-hw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/p
ho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
They're *all* "the White House's own numbers".
Clue: Some are FANTASY and some are REALITY.
Anyone can put any numbers they like in a prediction, it's only when
the future becomes the past that the numbers become fact.
Can I quote you on that the next time some Democrat makes a prediction?
Like, say, about Medicare or Social Security?
Sure! It's true no matter who says it.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 10:24:28 PM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore the
ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes when he
can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 10:48:31 PM |
|
|
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes
when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 10:57:12 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes
when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
So you are actually being serious?
Sorry. My mistake.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 01:53:10 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:57:12 +0000, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
Fred Stone wrote:
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
So you are actually being serious?
Sorry. My mistake.
Did you misspell "sympathy"?
--
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your
Christ."
- Mohandas Gandhi
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 06:15:38 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes
when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
Face it, Fred. You believe in the republicans like xians believe in
"jesus" and/or "god" and/or the "holy spirit".
Maybe you have an historical nostalgia for kings and dynasties. Maybe
you'd like a one-party "democratic" country. Better yet, make the USA
the official ruler of the world.
You're just one neuron away from being "Dore".
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 01:55:40 PM |
|
|
Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote in news:gG%Jd.24266$m5.1382960
@wagner.videotron.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes
when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
Face it, Fred. You believe in the republicans like xians believe in
"jesus" and/or "god" and/or the "holy spirit".
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
Maybe you have an historical nostalgia for kings and dynasties. Maybe
you'd like a one-party "democratic" country. Better yet, make the USA
the official ruler of the world.
No, no, and sure, why not?
You're just one neuron away from being "Dore".
Hardly. But thanks for the egregious insults, you only help to validate
my political stance.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 07:21:30 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote in news:gG%Jd.24266$m5.1382960
@wagner.videotron.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he makes
when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
Face it, Fred. You believe in the republicans like xians believe in
"jesus" and/or "god" and/or the "holy spirit".
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
I meant that you relate to the republican party like a fundie to his
religion : without critical thinking. At least according to your posts.
Maybe you have an historical nostalgia for kings and dynasties. Maybe
you'd like a one-party "democratic" country. Better yet, make the USA
the official ruler of the world.
No, no, and sure, why not?
You're just one neuron away from being "Dore".
Hardly. But thanks for the egregious insults, you only help to validate
my political stance.
I don't see why. My "insults" were to show you that you write like a
fundie whenever the topic is politics.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 08:57:06 PM |
|
|
Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote in
news:_abKd.10418$8i7.176236@wagner.videotron.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote in
news:gG%Jd.24266$m5.1382960 @wagner.videotron.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:63049$41f81997$51569c09$30329@nf1.news-service.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95EAAC8886673fstone69@205.188.138.161...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1
&u=/050125/
pho tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the
projected deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that
page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Ah, yes, believe the numbers that haven't happened yet, and ignore
the ones that have.
That's like Duke saying "It's your funeral!"
I think that was one of Fred's "jokes". You know, the ones he
makes when he can't lie and bluster his way out of a jam.
What jam? Why would I want to "lie and bluster" my way out of a CBO
projection? Oh, you think these numbers are somehow embarrassing?
Face it, Fred. You believe in the republicans like xians believe in
"jesus" and/or "god" and/or the "holy spirit".
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
I meant that you relate to the republican party like a fundie to his
religion : without critical thinking. At least according to your
posts.
I only ape the libruls and the way they relate to anti-administration
propaganda. Whatg ets me is how seldom they recognize their own "logic"
when it comes back at them.
Maybe you have an historical nostalgia for kings and dynasties. Maybe
you'd like a one-party "democratic" country. Better yet, make the USA
the official ruler of the world.
No, no, and sure, why not?
You're just one neuron away from being "Dore".
Hardly. But thanks for the egregious insults, you only help to
validate my political stance.
I don't see why. My "insults" were to show you that you write like a
fundie whenever the topic is politics.
Only because I frequently ape the "reasoning" shown by the lefties in
*their* writing about politics.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 09:22:11 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Whatg ets me is how seldom they recognize their
own "logic" when it comes back at them.
And it must give you great pleasure in thinking about
your oh so "logical" victories, as you survey the
many thousands of WMDs recovered from Iraq...
(Psst. They were hiding behind Bush's "Robust
Economic Growth.")
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 02:33:04 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns95EB5AD7C8595fstone69@205.188.138.161>, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
The important difference being we have ample evidence of Republicans'
existence.
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 08:55:02 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:33:04 -0800, chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> said
in alt.atheism:
In article <Xns95EB5AD7C8595fstone69@205.188.138.161>, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
The important difference being we have ample evidence of Republicans'
existence.
And of the evil they bring.
--
Zymurgist # 2
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 03:09:06 PM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in news:270120050633042366%
chib@nospam.com:
In article <Xns95EB5AD7C8595fstone69@205.188.138.161>, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
The important difference being we have ample evidence of Republicans'
existence.
But you have no evidence that they're collectively any more evil than any
other average members of the human race.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 05:39:02 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns95EB674B39D0fstone69@205.188.138.161>, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in news:270120050633042366%
chib@nospam.com:
In article <Xns95EB5AD7C8595fstone69@205.188.138.161>, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Face it, Olrik. You believe in the Republicans like xians believe in
Satan aka The Devil.
The important difference being we have ample evidence of Republicans'
existence.
But you have no evidence that they're collectively any more evil than any
other average members of the human race.
Since you brought evil into it, no, I don't have that evidence, nor do
I believe it's true, or even worth considering.
-chib
--
Member of SMASH
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
(email: change out to in)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 12:57:23 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" < > wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it going
into surplus by 2015.
Damn it's tough to argue with the NUMBERS.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 09:58:32 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going into surplus by 2015.
They elect a Democrat in 2012?
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Kiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 11:25:52 AM |
|
|
Kevin Anthoney said:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going into surplus by 2015.
They elect a Democrat in 2012?
No, they assume the tax cuts aren't made permanent (and thus revert to
Clinton-era levels) and that the alternative minimum tax is never reformed:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_01_23.php#004557
--
Pat K. aa#1154 ('someplace.net' is comcast)
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(attributed to Don Marti)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 01:52:28 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:58:32 +0000, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
[piggybacking]
Fred Stone wrote:
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going into surplus by 2015.
You mean the one that the REPUBLICAN CBO *ESTIMATES* will hit bottom
in 2005 and go into surplus by 2012 (not 2015)?
Is this the same Republican CBO that consistently estimates the
deficit smaller than it becomes and the surplus larger than it
becomes?
--
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus
was not born of a virgin."
Cardinal Bellarmine,[1615, during the trial of Galileo]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 11:24:59 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:58:32 +0000, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in
news:c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/pho
tos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
How convenient that they cut off the main graphic just when the projected
deficit hit bottom. The little one to the right on that page shows it
going into surplus by 2015.
They elect a Democrat in 2012?
No, one after the impeachment in 2006. He got re-elected.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 04:44:20 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <c47lc2-1n92.ln1@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com>, Rev. Karl E.
Taylor lumbered into the room and mumbled:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 04:58:33 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet...
When it comes to Bush, I don't want to see any more.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 04:45:37 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:58:33 -0500, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet...
When it comes to Bush, I don't want to see any more.
Sorry, but you have no choice.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 05:07:50 AM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet...
When it comes to Bush, I don't want to see any more.
Sorry, but you have no choice.
You are correct. I will not deny reality... I will merely
curse it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
29 Jan 2005 03:51:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:07:50 -0500, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet...
When it comes to Bush, I don't want to see any more.
Sorry, but you have no choice.
You are correct. I will not deny reality... I will merely
curse it.
Like billions around the world.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
26 Jan 2005 11:11:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> said in alt.atheism:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
But some neocon will undoubtedly try to argue that Clinton caused it.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
So we can only guess how bad it REALLY is. You can bet that they
estimated low.
--
There are three kinds of men:
The ones that learn by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence.
- (Will Rogers)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
28 Jan 2005 01:45:28 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> thought hard and said:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
Pluralities are nice things. They worked nicely during the Clinton
administration.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: Damn, it's tough to argue with the numbers. |
27 Jan 2005 01:40:17 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
<ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote:
Worst fucking president? The numbers don't lie.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1756&e=1&u=/050125/photos_pl/deficit_2005_graphic
And these are the White House's own numbers.
What a disgrace. Clinton reduced the deficit into the green and our
faith based chimp spends like Jeebus is coming back.
The world is going to end so who gives a *****. Right...?
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
