| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
28 Aug 2005 04:54:17 AM |
| Object: |
Daniel Clement Dennett |
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
Daniel Clement Dennett
http://news.google.com/news?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+(Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan)+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+%28Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan%29+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&btnG=Search+Directory&hl=en&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d&tab=wg
.
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Daniel Clement Dennett |
28 Aug 2005 06:10:34 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
Daniel Clement Dennett
http://news.google.com/news?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+(Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan)+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+%28Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan%29+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&btnG=Search+Directory&hl=en&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d&tab=wg
If you are going to give citatations with very long URLs it would be
nice to abbreviate them by using tinyurl or some such similar facility.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Daniel Clement Dennett |
28 Aug 2005 06:40:55 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
"Because it is nothing but a hoax."
Yes!!! Somebody GETS it!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Daniel Clement Dennett |
04 Sep 2005 05:16:45 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
When Faith and Science Cross Paths (9 Letters)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/opinion/l04evolution.html
Daniel Clement Dennett
http://news.google.com/news?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+(Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan)+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+%28Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan%29+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&btnG=Search+Directory&hl=en&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d&tab=wg
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron O" |
|
| Title: Re: Daniel Clement Dennett |
04 Sep 2005 09:35:11 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
maff wrote:
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
When Faith and Science Cross Paths (9 Letters)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/opinion/l04evolution.html
Daniel Clement Dennett
http://news.google.com/news?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+(Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan)+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+%28Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan%29+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&btnG=Search+Directory&hl=en&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d&tab=wg
I liked this letter:
To the Editor:
Do the anthropocentric intelligent design proponents really believe
that Homo sapiens is the end product? Would the designer be proud of
us? Why? Let's revisit their idea in, say, another 570 million years.
Andrew Nevin
Vancouver, British Columbia
Aug. 28, 2005
The writer is a geologist.
Leave it to a geologist to think like that. Heck the Dinos didn't last
200 million. This is so pessimistic, what does he expect for humanity?
Are we going to be the cockroaches of the universe? It shouldn't take
more than a hundred million years, tops.;-)
Ron Okimoto
.
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Daniel Clement Dennett |
04 Sep 2005 04:01:24 PM |
|
|
Ron O wrote:
maff wrote:
maff wrote:
Show Me the Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/opinion/28dennett.html?pagewanted=all
By DANIEL C. DENNETT
Why "intelligent design" doesn't deserve to be taught with evolution.
When Faith and Science Cross Paths (9 Letters)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/opinion/l04evolution.html
Daniel Clement Dennett
http://news.google.com/news?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+(Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan)+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dennett+%28Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan%29+Daniel+OR+Clement+OR+Dan&btnG=Search+Directory&hl=en&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dennett%20(Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan)%20Daniel%20OR%20Clement%20OR%20Dan&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d&tab=wg
I liked this letter:
To the Editor:
Do the anthropocentric intelligent design proponents really believe
that Homo sapiens is the end product? Would the designer be proud of
us? Why? Let's revisit their idea in, say, another 570 million years.
Andrew Nevin
Vancouver, British Columbia
Aug. 28, 2005
The writer is a geologist.
Leave it to a geologist to think like that. Heck the Dinos didn't last
200 million. This is so pessimistic, what does he expect for humanity?
Are we going to be the cockroaches of the universe? It shouldn't take
more than a hundred million years, tops.;-)
650 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/precambr.htm
514 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage12.htm
458 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage1.htm
425 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage2.htm
390 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage3.htm
356 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage4.htm
306 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/late.htm
255 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage5.htm
237 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage8.htm
200 million years ago
http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/atlanticeruptions990423.html
195 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/jurassic.htm
152 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/late1.htm
94 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/cretaceo.htm
69.4 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/K/t.htm
'Lost continent' discovered
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_353000/353277.stm
50.2 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/newpage9.htm
14 million years ago
http://www.scotese.com/miocene.htm
18,000 years ago
http://www.scotese.com/lastice.htm
Today
http://www.scotese.com/lastice.htm
In 50 million years
http://www.scotese.com/future.htm
In 100 million years
http://www.scotese.com/future1.htm
Next Pangea in 250 million years
http://www.scotese.com/future2.htm
Ron Okimoto
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Audio: Rebroadcast of Aussie interview with Dan Dennett on Religion.
Four Horsemen: Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, Hitchens
Daniel Dennett, rational atheist.
Daniel C. Dennett: Religion as Parasite
On Radio 4 Now. Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Richard Harries, Hamish Mykura and Barbara Ehrenreich
Dawkins, Dennett, Harris in "Wired Magazine."
(cp) Dan Dennett: Ants, terrorism, and the awesome power of meme
Common Sense Response to Dawkins and Dennett
| Daniel Dennett responds to Dinesh D'Souza
Daniel Dennett interview: Dissecting God
An Infinitheistic take on Dennett
DANIEL DENNETT - The Evaporation of the Powerful Mystique of Religion
Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (Dennett)
Podcast: Breaking the Spell: Daniel Dennett on Religion
Michael Shermer's "Open letter to Messrs. Dawkins, Dennett, Harris and Hitchens"
|
|
|
