Religions > Atheism > DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"No One" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2008 09:34:01 AM |
| Object: |
DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated from
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfounded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all known
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when man
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. In the story universe that the Bible puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry Potter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say that
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from the
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you would
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossible,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the basic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bible is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientists in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator because
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence from
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 10:42:03 AM |
|
|
"No One" <no.one@budweiser.com> wrote
snip
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Jeeze, what the ***** is your problem, you big baby? Grow up.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 04:47:02 PM |
|
|
In article <5vc31oF1lr8mbU1@mid.individual.net>, Robibnikoff
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"No One" <no.one@budweiser.com> wrote
snip
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Jeeze, what the ***** is your problem, you big baby? Grow up.
He's fourteen and momma put Net-Nanny on his 'puter.
-chib
--
Member of SMASH
Sarcastic Middle-Aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Emerson Wainwright" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 04:57:53 PM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 5:47=A0pm, chibiabos <chibia...@nospam.com> wrote:
In article <5vc31oF1lr8m...@mid.individual.net>, Robibnikoff
<witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
"No One" <no....@budweiser.com> wrote
snip
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Jeeze, what the ***** is your problem, you big baby? Grow up.
He's fourteen and momma put Net-Nanny on his 'puter.
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 06:46:02 PM |
|
|
No One <no.one@budweiser.com> wrote in
news:3cba957f-506d-4889-8c22-541e60ec786b@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
Subject: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his
is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut
from now on.
A spelling flame from a can't-spell shitwhiskers like you is pretty rich.
"mispelling"?
"scull"?
Moron.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
- James Carroll (Boston Globe)
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 07:31:39 PM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 7:46=A0pm, Doc Smartass <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com>
wrote:
No One <no....@budweiser.com> wrote innews:3cba957f-506d-4889-8c22-541e60e=
c786b@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
Subject: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his
is a =A0numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut
from now on.
A spelling flame from a can't-spell shitwhiskers like you is pretty rich.
"mispelling"?
"scull"?
Moron.
Indeed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his isa numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from nowon. |
18 Jan 2008 09:37:06 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated from
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfounded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all known
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when man
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. In the story universe that the Bible puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry Potter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say that
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from the
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you would
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossible,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the basic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bible is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientists in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator because
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence from
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting *
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of *
* separation between church and state." *
* --Thomas Jefferson, 1802 *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 05:55:41 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:37:06 -0800, DanielSan <petersonj07@comcast.net> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
He probably also means (had he the wit to know) "advice" and "skull".
aa #2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheel http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 09:36:42 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated from
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfounded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all known
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when man
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. In the story universe that the Bible puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry Potter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say that
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from the
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you would
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossible,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the basic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bible is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientists in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator because
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence from
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 07:30:29 PM |
|
|
No One <no.one@budweiser.com> wrote in
news:81b0ec8a-0ad7-4558-86b8-4f446615a3ff@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly
intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated
from one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural
selection to its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is
not only unfounded, unscientific, and untenable, but that it is
also, based on all known and established laws, impossible.
Moreover, I suggest that when man denies God, man becomes a
fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. In the story universe that the
Bible puts forth, God exists, just like in the story universe
that the Harry Potter books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say
that magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible
for life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If
I were to show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply
evolved from the basic shapeless metals and materials into its
present state, you would view me as the fool that I most surely
would be. "Such is impossible," would be the outcry. "If such
could happen, from where were the basic metals and materials
derived?" Still, a further question could be asked, "what
intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and
simple compared to the more advanced complexities involved in
the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the
Bible is "uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing
physicist) wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing
professional scientists in the USA alone who openly believe in
a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator
because ONLY finite things which come into being require a
Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first
THING into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence
from Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word
"nonexistent" shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.
Don't you mean "skull", shitwhiskers?
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
- James Carroll (Boston Globe)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gwen Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
19 Jan 2008 07:27:12 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 8:30=A0pm, Doc Smartass <gek...@astroskivviesboymail.com>
wrote:
No One <no....@budweiser.com> wrote innews:81b0ec8a-0ad7-4558-86b8-4f44661=
5a3ff@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
=A0 =A0The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly
=A0 =A0intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated
from one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural
selection to its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is
not only unfounded, unscientific, and untenable, but that it is
also, based on all known and established laws, impossible.
Moreover, I suggest that when man denies God, man becomes a
fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. =A0In the story universe that the
Bible puts forth, God exists, just like in the story universe
that the Harry Potter books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say
that magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible
for life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If
I were to show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply
evolved from the basic shapeless metals and materials into its
present state, you would view me as the fool that I most surely
would be. "Such is impossible," would be the outcry. "If such
could happen, from where were the basic metals and materials
derived?" Still, a further question could be asked, "what
intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and
simple compared to the more advanced complexities involved in
the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. =A0And your argument ignores one thing:=
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the
Bible is "uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing
physicist) wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing
professional scientists in the USA alone who openly believe in
a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: =A0The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator
because ONLY finite things which come into being require a
Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first
THING into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
=A0If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence
from Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word
"nonexistent" shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.
Don't you mean "skull", shitwhiskers?
"No One" meant mispelling [SIC]. ;-)
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
=A0of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
=A0failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
=A0- James Carroll (Boston Globe)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
19 Jan 2008 11:23:53 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
So you give "skull', huh, smart *****? I always suspected that you did
because you spend way, way to much time fraternizing with the
knob-gobblers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
20 Jan 2008 11:46:19 AM |
|
|
<farsmarter@pillinor.net> wrote in message
news:3sl5p35661ga6jg8k1fe8vi5d0gn4ajmcq@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
So you give "skull', huh, smart *****? I always suspected that you did
because you spend way, way to much time fraternizing with the
knob-gobblers.
Deary me. Kindergarten got out early today.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
20 Jan 2008 03:00:05 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:3sl5p35661ga6jg8k1fe8vi5d0gn4ajmcq@
4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
S<SMACK>
When I want your opinion, little boy, I'll slap yermom.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
- James Carroll (Boston Globe)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
22 Jan 2008 09:40:07 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:00:05 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
farsmarter@pillinor.net wrote in news:3sl5p35661ga6jg8k1fe8vi5d0gn4ajmcq@
4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
S<SMACKING MY LIPS - WHEN DICKS ARE MENTIONED>
When I want your opinion, little boy, I'll slap yermom.
...and when I want any ***** out of you smart *****, I'll squeeze your
head.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
22 Jan 2008 05:32:07 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:id3cp39p1cg9b96q83jq2s9bohqtdob5tu@
4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:00:05 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
wrote in
news:3sl5p35661ga6jg8k1fe8vi5d0gn4ajmcq@
4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
S<SMACKING MY LIPS - WHEN DICKS ARE MENTIONED>
When I want your opinion, little boy, I'll slap yermom.
..a<SLAP>
Quiet. Grown-ups are talking.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
- James Carroll (Boston Globe)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
22 Jan 2008 07:33:13 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:40:07 GMT, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:00:05 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
wrote in news:3sl5p35661ga6jg8k1fe8vi5d0gn4ajmcq@
4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:30:29 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Don't you mean "skull"
S<SMACKING MY LIPS - WHEN DICKS ARE MENTIONED>
When I want your opinion, little boy, I'll slap yermom.
..and when I want any ***** out of you smart *****, I'll squeeze your
head.
When I want something like your opinion on anything, I'll give my dog an enema.
aa #2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheel http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his isa numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from nowon. |
18 Jan 2008 10:00:33 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intelligent
people is that there is no God and that present life originated from
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfounded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all known
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when man
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. In the story universe that the Bible puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry Potter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say that
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from the
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you would
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossible,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the basic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the universe.
A wristwatch is not alive. And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bible is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientists in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator because
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence from
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.
Three times in exactly the same way?
Oh, and by the way, "nonexistant" was a typo, too.
Now that we got that out of the way, are you going to address the issue?
Or are you going to bash me personally again?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting *
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of *
* separation between church and state." *
* --Thomas Jefferson, 1802 *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gwen Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 10:40:13 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 11:00=A0am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
=A0 =A0The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intellige=
nt
people is that there is no God and that present life originated fr=
om
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection=
to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfoun=
ded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all kno=
wn
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when ma=
n
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. =A0In the story universe that the Bible=
puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry P=
otter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say th=
at
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were =
to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from t=
he
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you w=
ould
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossib=
le,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the ba=
sic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation o=
f
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the univers=
e.
A wristwatch is not alive. =A0And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bibl=
e is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientist=
s in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: =A0The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator =A0bec=
ause
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator =
;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING=
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
=A0If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence fr=
om
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.
Three times in exactly the same way?
Oh, and by the way, "nonexistant" was a typo, too.
Well, yes, I kind of figured that.
Now that we got that out of the way, are you going to address the issue?
=A0 Or are you going to bash me personally again?
--
****************************************************
* =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0*
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act *
* of the whole American people which declared that *
* their legislature should make no law respecting =A0*
* an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the *
* free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of =A0 *
* separation between church and state." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0*
* =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --Thomas Jefferson, 1802=
*
****************************************************- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 09:44:04 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 10:36=A0am, No One <no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:37 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
=A0 =A0The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intellige=
nt
people is that there is no God and that present life originated fr=
om
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection=
to
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfoun=
ded,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all kno=
wn
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when ma=
n
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. =A0In the story universe that the Bible=
puts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry P=
otter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say th=
at
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were =
to
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from t=
he
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you w=
ould
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossib=
le,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the ba=
sic
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation o=
f
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the univers=
e.
A wristwatch is not alive. =A0And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bibl=
e is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientist=
s in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: =A0The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator =A0bec=
ause
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator =
;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING=
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
=A0If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence fr=
om
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
That was a typo, numb-scull.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And the typo resulted in an incorrectly spelled word. Hence it is a
misspelling.
Oh and skull is spelled with a "k" not a "c" in modern english
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gwen Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 10:39:40 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 10:37=A0am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:28 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
IlBeBa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:12 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
http://www.bibletruths.net/Archives/BTAR251.htm
=A0 =A0The biggest bill of goods ever sold to supposedly intelligent=
people is that there is no God and that present life originated from=
one simple cell and evolved through a process of natural selection t=
o
its present form. I submit that this hypothesis is not only unfounde=
d,
unscientific, and untenable, but that it is also, based on all known=
and established laws, impossible. Moreover, I suggest that when man
denies God, man becomes a fool (Rom. 1: 21, 22).
No, "Romans" suggests that. =A0In the story universe that the Bible p=
uts
forth, God exists, just like in the story universe that the Harry Pot=
ter
books put forth, magic exists.
In the Bible, only a fool would say that God does not exist.
In the Harry Potter books, only a wizard who is a fool would say that=
magic does not exist.
There are many
irrefutable proofs that spontaneous generation is responsible for
life. Creation implies a Creator and design a designer. If I were to=
show you my wrist watch and tell you that it simply evolved from the=
basic shapeless metals and materials into its present state, you wou=
ld
view me as the fool that I most surely would be. "Such is impossible=
,"
would be the outcry. "If such could happen, from where were the basi=
c
metals and materials derived?" Still, a further question could be
asked, "what intelligence provided the impetus for the formation of
the watch?" Yet, my wrist watch example is very crude and simple
compared to the more advanced complexities involved in the universe.=
A wristwatch is not alive. =A0And your argument ignores one thing:
Who designed the designer?
The Bible believer who necessarily accepts the six-day creation
account of Genesis one and two is often styled as uneducated.
I don't know a single person who said that one who accepts the Bible =
is
"uneducated".
Notwithstanding, Doctor Russell Humphreys (practicing physicist)
wrote, "there are around 10, 000 practicing professional scientists =
in
the USA alone who openly believe in a six-day recent creation"
Irrelevant.
REPLY: =A0The Designer/Creator doesnt need a Designer/Creator =A0becau=
se
ONLY finite things which come into being require a Designer/Creator ;
Now prove that the "Designer/Creator" is infinite.
God the First Cause has to be INfinite if he brought the first THING
into existence from nothing (which he did).
You don't have a shred of evidence to back this up, do you?
=A0If you dont buy this,
then, can you tell me how Nothing brings Something into existence from=
Nothing ?
Are you assuming that the universe was, at one time, nonexistant?
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
Don't you mean "misspelling"?
By his own logic, then, he's a numb-scull [SIC] for mispelling [Sic].
;-) Have a good day.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 09:42:50 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no.one@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 09:47:07 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 10:42 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
Those were typos.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 07:31:11 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST) No One <tool_@budweiser.com>
carved the following into the hard stone of alt.atheism
On Jan 18, 10:42 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
Those were typos.
In five different messages?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "RedDog" |
|
| Title: Hey No One! Doug Berry agrees with us! Five consecutive identicalmisspellings means it is NOT a typo. ...... What a pathetic little liar youare, No One. |
18 Jan 2008 08:13:59 PM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 8:31 pm, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST) No One <to...@budweiser.com>
carved the following into the hard stone of alt.atheism
On Jan 18, 10:42 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
Those were typos.
In five different messages?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 09:53:27 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <tool_@budweiser.com>
wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:42 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
<plonk>
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 10:00:08 AM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 10:53 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <to...@budweiser.com>
wrote:
On Jan 18, 10:42 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0800 (PST), No One
<no....@budweiser.com> wrote:
Take my advise and shut up. Your mispelling of the word "nonexistent"
shows you are a numb-scull.
What do your misspellings of the words "advice" and "numbskull" say
about you?
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
Yes they were and I can prove it. The "c" is on the lower row of the
keyboard and is hit by the left middle finger, while the "k" sits on
the middle row and is hit by the middle RIGHT finger. You're the one
who makes mispellings, not me. I'm a genius.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 10:28:30 AM |
|
|
No One <capgun@budweiser.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 10:53 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <to...@budweiser.com>
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
Yes they were and I can prove it. The "c" is on the lower row of the
keyboard and is hit by the left middle finger, while the "k" sits on
the middle row and is hit by the middle RIGHT finger. You're the one
who makes mispellings, not me. I'm a genius.
If the troll trying to use my name were smarter, he'd have pointed out
that, with the middle finger being longer than the adjacent fingers,
you can try to type an 's' and accidentally type "sc" or sometimes
"cs". If you then don't hit the 'k' hard enough, you can get "scull"
instead of "sckull" or "skull".
But, the troll is too stupid to figure that one out.
BTW, for some reason, I tend to make mistakes typing that I don't make
when writing by hand. There are probably a number of contributing
factors. It's silly to get too upset about misspellings/typos in
usenet posts - a lot are the result of simply trying to type too
quickly, and not everyone uses software that autocorrects for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Emerson Wainwright" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 01:15:03 PM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 11:28=A0am, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
No One <cap...@budweiser.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 10:53 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <to...@budweiser.com>=
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
Yes they were and I can prove it. The "c" is on the lower row of the
keyboard and is hit by the left middle finger, while the "k" sits on
the middle row and is hit by the middle RIGHT finger. You're the one
who makes mispellings, not me. I'm a genius.
If the troll trying to use my name were smarter, he'd have pointed out
that, with the middle finger being longer than the adjacent fingers,
you can try to type an 's' and accidentally type "sc" or sometimes
"cs".
And then again, monkeys might fly out of your butt.
=A0If you then don't hit the 'k' hard enough, you can get "scull"
instead of "sckull" or "skull".
Kinda hard not to hit the "k" since the finger rests on it at all
times. It's not as if you're trying to type a tilde or a plus sign.
BTW, for some reason, I tend to make mistakes typing that I don't make
when writing by hand
Just as with Larry Craig's insistence that he wasn't trolling for hot
man-sex in the MSP public lav, I guess we'll never know for sure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is a numb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 03:07:41 PM |
|
|
Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwright@hotmail.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 11:28 am, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
No One <cap...@budweiser.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 10:53 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <to...@budweiser.com>
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
If the troll trying to use my name were smarter, he'd have pointed out
that, with the middle finger being longer than the adjacent fingers,
you can try to type an 's' and accidentally type "sc" or sometimes
"cs".
And then again, monkeys might fly out of your butt.
Idiot.
If you then don't hit the 'k' hard enough, you can get "scull"
instead of "sckull" or "skull".
Kinda hard not to hit the "k" since the finger rests on it at all
times. It's not as if you're trying to type a tilde or a plus sign.
When typing a 'u' with your index finger, where do *you* keep your
middle finger?
BTW, for some reason, I tend to make mistakes typing that I don't make
when writing by hand
Just as with Larry Craig's insistence that he wasn't trolling for hot
man-sex in the MSP public lav, I guess we'll never know for sure.
Oh, some of us know for sure and really don't care whether you believe
it or not.
"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, who
is simply recycling his old material. He has a grudge - a very long
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy. He is a
pathological liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Emerson Wainwright" |
|
| Title: Re: DanielSan's mispelling of the word "nonexistent" proves his is anumb-scull. Take my advise, DanielSan, and keep your mouth shut from now on. |
18 Jan 2008 03:21:45 PM |
|
|
On Jan 18, 4:07=A0pm, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@hotmail.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 11:28=A0am, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
No One <cap...@budweiser.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 10:53 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:47:07 -0800 (PST), No One <to...@budweiser.=
com>
Those were typos.
Sure they were.
If the troll trying to use my name were smarter, he'd have pointed out=
that, with the middle finger being longer than the adjacent fingers,
you can try to type an 's' and accidentally type "sc" or sometimes
"cs".
And then again, monkeys might fly out of your butt.
Idiot.
=A0If you then don't hit the 'k' hard enough, you can get "scull"
instead of "sckull" or "skull".
Kinda hard not to hit the "k" since the finger rests on it at all
times. =A0It's not as if you're trying to type a tilde or a plus sign.
When typing a 'u' with your index finger, where do *you* keep your
middle finger?
On the "k". Where it belongs.
You're trying to say that your "typo" in typing a "c" instead of a "k"
was because you had to press the "u"?
What kind of convoluted nonsense IS that? The "c" is on the lower
left of the keyboard and is pressed with the LEFT middle finger, and
the "u" and "k" both are clicked using the right hand (the right index
finger and the right middle finger, respectively). And here's the
kicker: THE RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER RESTS ON THE LETTER "K"!! So if
ANYTHING, instead of "mistyping" "skull" as "scull", it would be much
more likely to make a typo when typing "skull" when you meant "scull"!
But you meant "skull", and since the right middle finger is positioned
on the letter "k", your "argument" that it was a typo is dismissed in
its entirety!
Have a nice day! :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
