| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"HVAC" |
| Date: |
03 Feb 2006 11:58:49 AM |
| Object: |
Danish Anyone? |
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
.
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
07 Feb 2006 03:26:27 AM |
|
|
And we all read about the other papers that ran the same cartoons in support of free speech. It
turns out all seven have denied they collaborated on publishing them even though they all published
them on the same day. What a coincidence.
--
Bush wants laws against human-animal hybrids. Does he not know mad
scientists do not obey laws? What would T'Ruth and C'Mel say?
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3574
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
antisemitism http://www.giwersworld.org/antisem/ a1
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
07 Feb 2006 02:09:40 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:26:27 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
And we all read about the other papers that ran the same cartoons in support of free speech. It
turns out all seven have denied they collaborated on publishing them even though they all published
them on the same day. What a coincidence.
So if a news story breaks, you beleive that newspapers should wait a
day or so each before they publish?
It must also be a conspiracy that they publish the same images of
rioting, or earthquake damage on the same day.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
07 Feb 2006 04:38:21 PM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:26:27 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
And we all read about the other papers that ran the same cartoons in support of free speech. It
turns out all seven have denied they collaborated on publishing them even though they all published
them on the same day. What a coincidence.
So if a news story breaks, you beleive that newspapers should wait a
day or so each before they publish?
It must also be a conspiracy that they publish the same images of
rioting, or earthquake damage on the same day.
A news story occurs when it does. Seven independent decisions to republish the cartoons on the same
day occurs when it does for the lack of independence. If even one had lead and the others thought it
a good idea and published the next day it would not be such an obvious conspiracy.
--
Israel does not recognize Israeli nationality. Why should anyone else?
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3572
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Goodness Godless" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 04:08:09 PM |
|
|
"HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138989529.460863.141300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
Of course the we must not forget the just as nasty, WankoXianRicht!
All of a sudden they are pretending to be oh! so liberal!
We should not appease thess rented Faciest Muslins crowds that the USA
Faciest Christians created and funded!
Walhabi Muslims and Evangelical Christians are al from the same faciest
Dream!
--
Why is it OK to say: Not all Islamics are Terrorists, but most Terrorist
are Islamic.
But you can't say: Not all Christians are Nazi, but all the Nazis were
Christian.
Ask a Jew, (not a Christian) about the religion of the Nazi!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 06:25:04 PM |
|
|
"HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138989529.460863.141300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
Will those morons just get a fucking sense of humor?
Who was it that said: At its most basic, religious war is killing each other
over who has the best imaginary friend?"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pumpkinhead" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 05:20:57 PM |
|
|
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
i.e. Not European law. Muslims must understand that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rune B" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 10:11:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:20:57 GMT, "Pumpkinhead"
<pumpkin_head060877@hotmail.com> wrote:
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
i.e. Not European law. Muslims must understand that.
I believe they have no real concept of freedom of speech.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 05:24:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:20:57 GMT, in alt.atheism
"Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060877@hotmail.com> wrote in
<tzREf.78173$W4.6955@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net>:
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
i.e. Not European law. Muslims must understand that.
Many do. Some do not wish to.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Holly" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 06:28:26 PM |
|
|
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
Let them eat cake!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 05:05:21 AM |
|
|
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
You'd think by the way some are freaking out that they'd shown Mohammed
being fucked by a pig.
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://peaceinspace.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 08:10:18 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:05:21 +0000, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
You'd think by the way some are freaking out that they'd shown Mohammed
being fucked by a pig.
Trolling is not nice. besides some of george bush's best friends and
partners in crime are muslim. and a lot of the carlyle money is muslim too.
money power and control are a religion and smart psychological operative use
religion to manipulate people
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 04:23:40 PM |
|
|
http://peaceinspace.com wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:05:21 +0000, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
You'd think by the way some are freaking out that they'd shown Mohammed
being fucked by a pig.
Trolling is not nice. besides some of george bush's best friends and
partners in crime are muslim. and a lot of the carlyle money is muslim too.
money power and control are a religion and smart psychological operative use
religion to manipulate people
I'm not trolling, just stating the bleeding obvious. Religions deserve
to be ridiculed at every opportunity. I'm just surprised at the mock
outrage which accompanied this total non-event.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 07:37:19 AM |
|
|
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
--
December 2005: The US tied with Myanmar in 6th place among the top
10 countries for jailing reporters. This does not count murdering
reporters for al Jazeera.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3549
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Lawful to bomb Israelis http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml a11
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 09:22:47 AM |
|
|
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote in message
news:j62Ff.12698$Fw6.9736@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
What is the difference?
Exactly - ***** organized religion.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 08:17:39 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 11:35:27 PM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating
babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also
objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the
Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers
rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at
censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Gwibberish is still flapping his gills?
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Have patience. First I shall deal with the State of Oregon
and County of Josephine, Then the AFAB, government/media
disinformation Agents with whom you conspire to libel me and my
family. Your time will come."
-- Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, usenet "christ"
"Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming from
someone who obviously has no understanding of what a signature is. Tell me,
Haslam, do you sign your checks as 'Can't you show a little restraint?'"
-- David Tholen, Clueless Newbie of the Month, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 12:16:09 AM |
|
|
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:040220062235275565%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Wally AngleseaT <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon
eating
babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It
also
objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel,
the
Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers
rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful
at
censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Gwibberish is still flapping his gills?
What an underwater confession!
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Have patience. First I shall deal with the State of Oregon
and County of Josephine, Then the AFAB, government/media
disinformation Agents with whom you conspire to libel me and my
family. Your time will come."
-- Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, usenet "christ"
"Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
from
someone who obviously has no understanding of what a signature is. Tell
me,
Haslam, do you sign your checks as 'Can't you show a little restraint?'"
-- David Tholen, Clueless Newbie of the Month, February 2003
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 06:15:17 AM |
|
|
Art Deco wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating
babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also
objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the
Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers
rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at
censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Gwibberish is still flapping his gills?
The fact remains Israel is as much an enemy of free speech as is Islam and for clearly more
spurious reasons such as deliberately adopting a religious symbol for its military and then
complaining it is a religious symbol when used in a negative manner towards Israel. If it is a
religious symbol them the IDF usage is a sacriledge.
--
Operation Enduring Freedom has become Operation Screw the Pooch.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3546
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Lawful to bomb Israelis http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml a11
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 06:15:16 AM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
--
Support for war is inversely proportional to the chance of fighting it.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3543
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Larry Shiff http://www.giwersworld.org/computers/newsagent.phtml a8
.
|
|
|
| User: "Holly" |
|
| Title: Where's Bugs When You Need Him? Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 07:11:36 AM |
|
|
Matt Giwer wrote:
Wally Anglesea=99 wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon e=
ating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It=
also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, =
the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspaper=
s rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successf=
ul at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
=20
Now I'm freaken angry!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's Bugs When You Need Him? Re: Danish Anyone? |
06 Feb 2006 04:07:15 AM |
|
|
Holly wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
Now I'm freaken angry!
The US has sided with Jews also. Are you still angry?
--
December 2005: The US tied with Myanmar in 6th place among the top
10 countries for jailing reporters. This does not count murdering
reporters for al Jazeera.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3549
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 08:11:54 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:15:16 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
An apology was tendered by the Danes. Notice the difference. It was
enough. No-one started burning embassies over it.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
They just don't want to inflame things further.
I look forward tot he US censoring political cartoons of *any* nature.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
06 Feb 2006 04:05:46 AM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:15:16 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
An apology was tendered by the Danes. Notice the difference. It was
enough. No-one started burning embassies over it.
By the government not the newspaper. And then more papers in Europe ran the same cartoons.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
They just don't want to inflame things further.
I look forward tot he US censoring political cartoons of *any* nature.
Even internal politics of course. All of the name of totalitarian rule of course.
--
Hodie postridie Nonas Februarias MMVI est
-- The Ferric Webceasar
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
environmentalism http://www.giwersworld.org/environment/aehb.phtml a9
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Giwer" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
07 Feb 2006 08:50:50 PM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:15:16 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:37:19 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
HVAC wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
But when a British newspaper ran a political cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating babies reminiscent of
Geurnica Israel demanded and received an apology from the newspaper. It also objects to any cartoon
which is negative of the IDF which uses the official symbol of Israel, the Star of David, on the
grounds it is a religious symbol. When these things happen no newspapers rerun the cartoons to
demonstrate their support of freedom of speech.
Should this not also lead to double ***** the Jews as they are successful at censorship and enemies
of freedom of speech?
What is the difference?
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
An apology was tendered by the Danes. Notice the difference. It was
enough. No-one started burning embassies over it.
I looked that up. There has been NO apology from the government nor anyone in Denmark.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
They just don't want to inflame things further.
I look forward tot he US censoring political cartoons of *any* nature.
Like the complaint about the cartoon of Rumsfeld and the quadraplegic being recategorized as
stretched thin. It isn't so much censorship as self-censorship.
Al Jazeera is castigated for showing the results of US military actions on the ground. Not one US
source has shown that I can find has shown the results on the ground. That does not mean bombed out
buildings. That means films of the screaming child victims trying to put their body parts back in
place. Showing the consequences of war is not playing fair according to US self-censorship.
--
Intelligence always creates human situations beyond the ability of
intelligence to comprehend by the very definition of intelligence.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3570
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
06 Feb 2006 06:55:14 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:15:16 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
I don't think the Israeli's started riots all over the place and
burned down the British Embassies because of the 'toon.
Notice the difference. An apology was tendered.
For the record, the US has sided with Islam in this matter.
Of course. That was to be expected. Bush wants censorship at any cost.
This is a shot into an open goal.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "moondusterone" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 03:25:46 PM |
|
|
I totally agree.
"HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138989529.460863.141300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
Depicting the picture of the prophet is prohibited under Sharia law.
"Neither the Danish government nor the Danish nation as such can be
held responsible for drawings published in a Danish newspaper," Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting with Muslim
envoys in Copenhagen.
"A Danish government can never apologize on behalf of a free and
independent newspaper," he said. "This is basically a dispute between
some Muslims and a newspaper."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
***** the muslims..........
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "http://peaceinspace.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 11:41:27 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
***** the muslims..........
Betcha don't have the balls to say ***** the Buddhists.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "http://peaceinspace.com" |
|
| Title: Ping-> All Buddhists Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 11:43:06 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
***** the muslims..........
Betcha don't have the balls to say ***** the Buddhists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Gilligan Horry" |
|
| Title: Re: Ping-> All Buddhists Re: Danish Anyone? |
04 Feb 2006 07:55:43 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 05:43:06 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
<truth@R.us> wrote:
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
***** the muslims..........
Betcha don't have the balls to say ***** the Buddhists.
Depending on which one of the 100's of types of Buddhist groups, one
or more groups might act in a fashion similar to one of the 100's of
different types of Christian groups, etc.
i.e.
Alexa, here is the New World Order...
http://www.vov.com
You see everyone is from everywhere.
Dedicated to HVAC.
Because Trillions of different intelligent life forms in the Universe
should not throw eggs at you and you family.
(Besides, in self defense, you might zap them with an "Advanced Solar
System Fuse Weapon") ASSFW
;-)
If many of the USA & ET UFOs stories are real, many of them have
defense systems.
And respect to the department of defense. DOD.
Because before they existed, life and history on Earth was crap.
I respect Bob O Dean.
He mentioned that an insider said that a different 'balloon' was seen
over the other crashed 'balloon' that created that whole mess down
there at Roswell. "Kind of as a wake up call".
__________
Disclaimer:
All the above information is true or not ?
I have no idea, except it would make a good SciFi movie.
Speaking of which, "Invaders" is showing on TV next week for the first
time in New Zealand.
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://peaceinspace.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Ping-> All Buddhists Re: Danish Anyone? |
05 Feb 2006 08:40:24 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:55:43 +1300, Sir Gilligan Horry <GM@ga7rm5er.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 05:43:06 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
<truth@R.us> wrote:
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
***** the muslims..........
Betcha don't have the balls to say ***** the Buddhists.
Depending on which one of the 100's of types of Buddhist groups, one
or more groups might act in a fashion similar to one of the 100's of
different types of Christian groups, etc.
i.e.
Alexa, here is the New World Order...<snip>
Here it is:
Dungeon Vatican Rituals At
Satan's Altar Was How Joanna,
Born Into The Illuminati, Spent
Her Childhood Days
By Greg Szymanski
2-5-6
Joanna spent time as child in the dungeons of the Vatican, attending rituals
of torture at the altar of the devil.
Joanna's story follows the same satanic pattern as the incredible story
recently told by former Illuminist Svali, born into the Illuminati and who
witnessed a four-year-old boy sacrificed at her underground Vatican
induction ceremony at the age of 12.
Now Joanna of Florida comes forward, saying she was a "blood liner," born
into the French House of the Illuminati, her exact placement in the
worldwide cult being in the spiritual sector.
"I was born into a multigenerational family that one side was Masonic and on
the other Illuminati. My family were members of the DAR, referred to as
bluebloods," said Joanna in an extended conversation from her Florida home,
having finally rid herself of the Illuminati influence.
"Most of my childhood was spent in training and grooming, and I attended
rituals at the Vatican, in a sub basement, where I was used as an "oracle".
"The militia I was involved with was connected to a Masonic group and my
childhood was almost all training for the Illuminati and intense military
type training for the militia. Extreme torture was used to form what is
known as alters, with amnesia barriers that kept me from knowing that I was
a slave for these cults.
"My everyday persona was typical upper class suburbia. I was a model for a
time and to all appearances, my husband and I were known as sporadic
jetsetters. While I traveled around the world as a team leader for a group
that monitored Vatican moles, we had our own crew of trainers and
programmers when we detected a problem with one of our own.
Anna said her specific Illuminati-family job was as a channel, psychic, and
tarot reader, as she moved between both of her worlds without detection of
her cult's sinister motives.
"I moved between both worlds relatively smoothly, although my job as a team
leader was not on a daily or even weekly basis, so that I was able to
fulfill my new age role under the spiritual sector Illuminati," said Joanna.
"I attended think tanks that decided how best to meet the requirements for a
New World Order, dealing with the issues of religion and new age
philosophy."
Specifically, Anna said her role within the religious sector had to do with
an extremely devious Illuminati ploy, creating a false Christianity leading
to mass genocide.
"My huge area of concern, is an extremely deceptive ploy by both the
illuminati, and the core of Vatican cult members, to unite all people under
a false Christianity, that will give reason for genocide," said Joanna,
"Think about people like Ann Coulter who make statements, like, war is
necessary, go in and destroy their leaders and convert everyone to
Christianity.
"I call the New World Order the fourth Reich, where anti-Semitic thinking
becomes acceptable under the guise of "saving' people in the Middle East.
People will also look at all the Jewish power leaders that conspiracies
point to, not realizing that not only are they not practicing Jews, but that
they are not the puppet masters.
"Instead, one needs to look at the old Church of Rome, which became a so
called Catholic structure, with ancient powerful bloodlines, such as the
Borgia's and the De Medici's. The Protocols of Zion are also blamed on the
Jews, but in actuality it is this Vatican core which includes the Jesuits.
"The mask of Christianity, is just that, a mask, there are many charismatic
movements
I attended and many think tanks where illuminati members planned how
religion and the new age movement would be used to create a one religion,
under a false Christianity, There are also many evangelist that are
Illuminati, as well as new age leaders."
Asked whether she was inducted into the Illuminati like Svali, who had to
witnessed at age 12 a child sacrificed in the Vatican sub-basement, Joanna
said her ritual differed, saying "I was promised to the cult before my birth
and continuously throughout my life" with Vatican rituals being only a part
of her training.
"The message I feel that is important to convey, is on the
illuminati/Vatican connection, with an agenda of a unified false religion
under the guise of Christianity to cover genocide," said Joanna.
"Instead of humankind appreciating diversity, in religion and culture, one
will be led to believe that other religions are the enemy, as well as the
cultures and people that practice them.
Finally, wanting to leave the evil clutches of the Illuminati, Joanna said
basically deprogrammed herself, convincing herself that good always triumphs
over evil.
"Through years of memory work, getting a good grasp of my programming,
tearing down amnesia barriers and remembering codes given to each alter who
had a cult job, I finally broke free," said Joanna, who is now trying to
alert how Americans that the Illuminati plans to destroy America from
within.
In controversial author, Eric Phelps book, Vatican Assassins, he delves into
much of what Anna experienced in real life, in a well-researched historical
account showing in astonishing detail that the true diabolical power
resides in the Vatican.
Phelps, one of the most thorough Vatican/Illuminati researchers, also brings
to the table a number of priceless old documents and historical manuscripts,
hidden from the average reader, documenting the true evil existing in Rome.
Others like Phelps have also commented on the diabolical role of the Vatican
as well as the ultimate religious henchmen, the Jesuits, include:
"No political event or circumstance can be evaluated without the knowledge
of the Vatican's part in it. And no significant world situation exists in
which the Vatican does not play an important explicit or implicit role,"
said Avro Manhattan, Protestant Knight of Malta and English historian in a
1960 book, "The Vatican And World Politics."
"The Jesuits offer the world at large a system of theology by which every
law, Divine and human, may be broken with impunity, and by which the very
Bulls of Popes may be defied. It is a ghastly religion; it is a religion to
be abhorred by all honest and honorable men," said M. F. Cusack, "Converted
Nun of Kenmare,The Black Pope".
"The Jesuits laugh at us; and during their hilarity, the rattlesnake is
coiled at our feet, climbing to strike us in the heart," said Edwin A.
Sherman, American Shriner/ Freemason in "The Engineer Corps Of Hell".
For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "erikc" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 09:16:19 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Denmark said on Friday it could not
apologize for cartoons in a Danish newspaper depicting the Prophet
Mohammad as outrage spread across the Muslim world from the Middle East
to countries in Asia.
More European newspapers published the cartoons on Friday, arguing
freedom of speech was sacred, but angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
[===]
***** the muslims..........
And Mohammad (***** be upon him)
Erikc (alt.atheist #002) | "An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil."
BAAWA Knight (retired) | "The Truth against the World."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles D. Bohne™" |
|
| Title: Re: Danish Anyone? |
03 Feb 2006 09:04:52 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2006 09:58:49 -0800, "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
angry Muslims staged violent protests
against jokes they consider blasphemous.
angry Catholics did the same, not too many years in our past -
and angry Bushists beat women in Congress for wearing T-shirts
that say
2272 death
how many more?
So where does this leave you Mr. Bigot?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
