| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2006 07:44:35 AM |
| Object: |
Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Have you drunk from the sea yet, LIARS?
I cussed you OUT and said, If you don't like it go and drink
from the sea.
I know you don't like, but the sea is still there,
so what do you think you can do to me?
.
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 09:14:31 AM |
|
|
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1137591875.783454.104060@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Thanks, but we have all the excitement we can handle what with
protowhales and midget men literally (OK...figuratively) jumping
out of the Earth to be studied.
Have you drunk from the sea yet, LIARS?
Is "drinking out of the seas" some kind of slur somewhere that
I don't know about? Sure, getting a gulp of salt water is no fun,
but I can think of worse things.
I cussed you OUT and said, If you don't like it go and drink
from the sea.
I know you don't like, but the sea is still there,
so what do you think you can do to me?
Zing! That was harsh! Stop!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 04:09:52 PM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1137591875.783454.104060@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Thanks, but we have all the excitement we can handle what with
protowhales and midget men literally (OK...figuratively) jumping
out of the Earth to be studied.
Protowhales? I haven't heard about them yet...have you got a link?
Have you drunk from the sea yet, LIARS?
Is "drinking out of the seas" some kind of slur somewhere that
I don't know about? Sure, getting a gulp of salt water is no fun,
but I can think of worse things.
I cussed you OUT and said, If you don't like it go and drink
from the sea.
I know you don't like, but the sea is still there,
so what do you think you can do to me?
Zing! That was harsh! Stop!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 05:33:14 PM |
|
|
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137622192.194599.103620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Geoff wrote:
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1137591875.783454.104060@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Thanks, but we have all the excitement we can handle what with
protowhales and midget men literally (OK...figuratively) jumping
out of the Earth to be studied.
Protowhales? I haven't heard about them yet...have you got a link?
Perhaps the term isn't right, but here you go...
http://www.talkorigins.org/features/whales/
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2b.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC216_1.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 05:45:13 PM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137622192.194599.103620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Geoff wrote:
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1137591875.783454.104060@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Thanks, but we have all the excitement we can handle what with
protowhales and midget men literally (OK...figuratively) jumping
out of the Earth to be studied.
Protowhales? I haven't heard about them yet...have you got a link?
Perhaps the term isn't right, but here you go...
http://www.talkorigins.org/features/whales/
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2b.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC216_1.html
Thanks!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scott Richter" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 09:23:00 AM |
|
|
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:
so what do you think you can do to me?
Nothing, compared to what years of religious brainwashing has already
done to you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D6" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 10:51:42 AM |
|
|
said:
<...>
Have you drunk from the sea yet, LIARS?
I cussed you OUT and said, If you don't like it go and drink
from the sea.
I know you don't like, but the sea is still there,
so what do you think you can do to me?
How about <plonk>?
--- Jim07D6
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 02:29:58 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:1137591875.783454.104060
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Apparently, though, it DOES mean that, in the religion of this person,
students in Kansas should be taught LIES about evolution. When a
religion starts teaching false doctrines like this and when that religion
calls itself Christian, then *I* call it heresy. It is heresy, not
because it is teaching a literal interpretation of Genesis but because it
is teaching its devotees to lie in God's name.
If America teaches its children that lying in God's name is OK, they are
apt to wonder which other sins in the ten commandments are all right to
commit in God's name, are they not? Perhaps they may fall prey to the
teachings of people who fly airplanes full of people into buildings full
of people. After all, they are taught to MURDER in God's name. That's
on the same list with lying isn't it?
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
18 Jan 2006 04:31:56 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote in news:1137591875.783454.104060
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Apparently, though, it DOES mean that, in the religion of this person,
students in Kansas should be taught LIES about evolution. When a
religion starts teaching false doctrines like this and when that religion
calls itself Christian, then *I* call it heresy. It is heresy, not
because it is teaching a literal interpretation of Genesis but because it
is teaching its devotees to lie in God's name.
If America teaches its children that lying in God's name is OK, they are
apt to wonder which other sins in the ten commandments are all right to
commit in God's name, are they not? Perhaps they may fall prey to the
teachings of people who fly airplanes full of people into buildings full
of people. After all, they are taught to MURDER in God's name. That's
on the same list with lying isn't it?
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
It's already happening. There are some people here (U.S.) who think it
is their "Christian duty" to murder those who disagree with them on
certain issues, primarily abortion.
John
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
19 Jan 2006 07:41:48 PM |
|
|
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
"Dave Oldridge" <doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns974F7F25F2530doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote in news:1137591875.783454.104060
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Apparently, though, it DOES mean that, in the religion of this person,
students in Kansas should be taught LIES about evolution. When a
religion starts teaching false doctrines like this and when that religion
calls itself Christian, then *I* call it heresy. It is heresy, not
because it is teaching a literal interpretation of Genesis but because it
is teaching its devotees to lie in God's name.
If America teaches its children that lying in God's name is OK, they are
apt to wonder which other sins in the ten commandments are all right to
commit in God's name, are they not? Perhaps they may fall prey to the
teachings of people who fly airplanes full of people into buildings full
of people. After all, they are taught to MURDER in God's name. That's
on the same list with lying isn't it?
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
20 Jan 2006 02:14:21 PM |
|
|
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
21 Jan 2006 01:47:32 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
Your assessment is wrong. YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
21 Jan 2006 10:46:08 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1137872852.768013.30710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But
deliberate lies are actually not that common. Even among
creationists, those seem to be mainly the province of a few
professional frauds. The rest of the peanut gallery just chooses to
follow the frauds.
Your assessment is wrong. YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER
And you're probably a self-made moron.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 08:22:58 AM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
Tohu.Bohu@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1137872852.768013.30710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But
deliberate lies are actually not that common. Even among
creationists, those seem to be mainly the province of a few
professional frauds. The rest of the peanut gallery just chooses to
follow the frauds.
Your assessment is wrong. YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER
And you're probably a self-made moron.
Why should we care about your opinion?
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 07:53:38 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:1138112578.875139.217770
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
Tohu.Bohu@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1137872852.768013.30710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But
deliberate lies are actually not that common. Even among
creationists, those seem to be mainly the province of a few
professional frauds. The rest of the peanut gallery just chooses
to
follow the frauds.
Your assessment is wrong. YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER
And you're probably a self-made moron.
Why should we care about your opinion?
Because if it's my opinion that you're about to run headlong into a brick
wall and you really are, the information might be useful.
On the other hand, some might not damage any really vital organ in such a
collision.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earle Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 11:29:32 PM |
|
|
In article <1138112578.875139.217770@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
Tohu.Bohu@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1137872852.768013.30710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But
deliberate lies are actually not that common. Even among
creationists, those seem to be mainly the province of a few
professional frauds. The rest of the peanut gallery just chooses to
follow the frauds.
Your assessment is wrong. YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER
And you're probably a self-made moron.
Why should we care about your opinion?
*
Hey Codebreaker! Go break some code:
Uyo rae a gnifkuc dioti.
earle
*
If you have a problem breaking this code, I can send you a key.
ej
*
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
21 Jan 2006 01:44:40 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marc" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
22 Jan 2006 05:04:51 AM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
Awww, it was *science fiction*, that's what it was.
Not religion..... (not really....)
I mean it wasn't *good* science fiction or sci-fi that
I would want to read (if I remembered what leisure
reading was in my post-thesis life), but if it *was*
sci-fi then you would have to find him Not Guilty By
Reason of Imagination. Go ask Alice (to quote J.A.).
(signed) marc
M. Buhler
(who recently rediscovered the joy of
listening to Jefferson Airplane)
Parramatta
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
22 Jan 2006 02:59:07 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:40 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
The Court finds Scientology guilty as charged.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 07:44:23 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:40 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
The Court finds Scientology guilty as charged.
Scientology is not Christianity and doesn't even meet none
of the standards to be called religion.
THESE ARE PARASITES CHURCHES
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevyn@Winkless" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 08:50:36 AM |
|
|
In article <1138110263.137730.319600@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com says...
John Baker wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:40 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
The Court finds Scientology guilty as charged.
Scientology is not Christianity
No one said it was. It's called comparison.
and doesn't even meet none
of the standards to be called religion.
THESE ARE PARASITES CHURCHES
Really? And what are the standards to be called religion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
24 Jan 2006 12:00:07 PM |
|
|
Kevyn@Winkless wrote:
In article <1138110263.137730.319600@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com says...
John Baker wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:40 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT), Dave Oldridge
<doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns97517C8049021doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159>
"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:XaXzf.800$C%3.10@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Fables, yes. And sometimes a lot of cognitive dissonance. But deliberate
lies are actually not that common. Even among creationists, those seem to
be mainly the province of a few professional frauds. The rest of the
peanut gallery just chooses to follow the frauds.
I present as exhibit A, Scientology.
The prosecution rests, m'lud.
The Court finds Scientology guilty as charged.
Scientology is not Christianity
No one said it was. It's called comparison.
and doesn't even meet none
of the standards to be called religion.
THESE ARE PARASITES CHURCHES
Really? And what are the standards to be called religion?
That is an interesting question that the American founders
would have researched before coming up with nonsense
of separation of Christ and State or plurality of religion.
But anyway, it is not too late
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Darwinian Dogma Shall Be Exposed And Crushed |
21 Jan 2006 01:49:51 PM |
|
|
Bill wrote:
Most religions are based on a foundation of fables and lies.
Why should we listen to a *****?
We know where your mom was fucked. IN THE CAR
"Dave Oldridge" <doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns974F7F25F2530doldridgsprintca@64.59.135.159...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote in news:1137591875.783454.104060
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Kansas Protest
"This doesn't mean that students in Kansas or elsewhere shouldn't be
taught about evolution. In context, the Kansas action was a protest
against enshrining a particular worldview as a scientific fact and
against making "evolution" an exception to the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts. Take
evolution away from the worldview promoters and return it to the real
scientific investigators, and a chronic social conflict will become an
exciting intellectual adventure."
Apparently, though, it DOES mean that, in the religion of this person,
students in Kansas should be taught LIES about evolution. When a
religion starts teaching false doctrines like this and when that religion
calls itself Christian, then *I* call it heresy. It is heresy, not
because it is teaching a literal interpretation of Genesis but because it
is teaching its devotees to lie in God's name.
If America teaches its children that lying in God's name is OK, they are
apt to wonder which other sins in the ten commandments are all right to
commit in God's name, are they not? Perhaps they may fall prey to the
teachings of people who fly airplanes full of people into buildings full
of people. After all, they are taught to MURDER in God's name. That's
on the same list with lying isn't it?
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "VoiceOfReason" |
|
| Title: 1 + 1 = 3 |
18 Jan 2006 02:01:54 PM |
|
|
wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3. I expect this to be taught in all math classes from now on.
Failure to do so will constitute a violation of American tradition and
my rights.
--
I hear voices...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Pease" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
18 Jan 2006 07:08:37 PM |
|
|
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3. I expect this to be taught in all math classes from now on.
Failure to do so will constitute a violation of American tradition and
my rights.
--
I hear voices...
This is very easy to show.
Even without ZoeMath
let a = b
Thus a^2 = b^2
or
a^2 - b^2 = 0
from which
(a + b)*(a-b) = 0
but a-b =0
etc
RJ P
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
19 Jan 2006 10:54:33 AM |
|
|
In talk.atheism Bob Pease <robertjp@popebobby2.youknow.net> wrote:
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3. I expect this to be taught in all math classes from now on.
Failure to do so will constitute a violation of American tradition and
my rights.
--
I hear voices...
This is very easy to show.
Even without ZoeMath
let a = b
Thus a^2 = b^2
or
a^2 - b^2 = 0
from which
(a + b)*(a-b) = 0
but a-b =0
etc
Actually, that will prove that any number added to itself equals 1.
Let's continue the equations:
(a+b)*(a-b)=0
a-b=0
substituting...
(a+b)*(a-b)=(a-b)
then divide both sides...
((a+b)*(a-b))/(a-b)=(a-b)/(a-b)
Any number divided by itself is 1 so we get:
((a+b)*(a-b))/(a-b)=1
Then we cancel the (a-b) above and below the division on the left and get
(a+b)=1 for any value of a and/or b that are equal.
(yes, I know there's a flaw in it but I'm going along with the thread and
also leaving it up to the reader to find the flaw.)
--
Mike
-------------------------------
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop
thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do
we," George W. "Shrub" Bush Aug 5, 2004
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
18 Jan 2006 03:41:00 PM |
|
|
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3.
Which also equals Pi! :-B
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "VoiceOfReason" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
18 Jan 2006 04:05:38 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3.
Which also equals Pi! :-B
Well there you go. ID is now proven. Who brought the beer?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
18 Jan 2006 05:47:45 PM |
|
|
On 18 Jan 2006 14:05:38 -0800, "VoiceOfReason"
<papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote:
jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3.
Which also equals Pi! :-B
Well there you go. ID is now proven. Who brought the beer?
2+2 = 3 for sufficently small units of 2.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys little helper" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
19 Jan 2006 03:01:50 AM |
|
|
VoiceOfReason wrote:
jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3.
Which also equals Pi! :-B
Well there you go. ID is now proven. Who brought the beer?
Nobody, we spent all the money on pitch, wooden gophers and animal feed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 1 + 1 = 3 |
19 Jan 2006 08:01:44 AM |
|
|
"Sanity's little helper" <elvish@noshpam.net> wrote in message
news:29ydnejdhLbiyFLeRVnyiA@brightview.com...
VoiceOfReason wrote:
jrsp8s@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@cybertown.com> wrote in message
news:1137614514.282070.85410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
<...>
the usual American tradition
that the people have a right to disagree with the experts.
In keeping with our tradition, I disagree with the experts. 1 + 1 now
equals 3.
Which also equals Pi! :-B
Well there you go. ID is now proven. Who brought the beer?
Nobody, we spent all the money on pitch, wooden gophers and animal feed.
Wooden gophers? ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|