| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
25 Aug 2006 04:12:55 PM |
| Object: |
David Horn was Fired from his last three jobs! |
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my cousin here)
to provide evidence that David Horn was discharged from his past three
jobs. This is all public information that this liar does not want you
to know. He seems to forget about his past usenet history, and about
all message boards that he posts.
So I do expect that this crybaby will file a police report and file a
complaint with all ISP's like he always does. Heck I just know he was
one of the geeks in High School that always went to the principle
everytime I walked by.
Angelo
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: David Horn was Fired from his last three jobs! |
25 Aug 2006 09:46:46 PM |
|
|
writes:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my cousin here)
to provide evidence that David Horn was discharged from his past three
jobs. This is all public information that this liar does not want you
to know. He seems to forget about his past usenet history, and about
all message boards that he posts.
So I do expect that this crybaby will file a police report and file a
complaint with all ISP's like he always does. Heck I just know he was
one of the geeks in High School that always went to the principle
everytime I walked by.
So, all anyone needs to do about you is notify the CSU admins...who are
headquartered in Los Alamitos, a stone's throw from Long Beach State.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
RIP Irene Aldridge Compton
December 2, 1909, Keokee, Va.
August 24, 2006, Benham, Ky.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 01:35:32 AM |
|
|
wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages? Is it
Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Wolf is a fraud. He is not a Christian and he is not qualified to run
a Christian "ministry," or a "ministry" of any sort.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ujb" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 04:11:34 AM |
|
|
Dave wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages? Is it
Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Wolf is a fraud. He is not a Christian and he is not qualified to run
a Christian "ministry," or a "ministry" of any sort.
It would seem you are right?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 05:48:17 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Aug 2006 23:35:32 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome). If that
is true (and it appears likely), that would explain his bizarre
behavior AND his lying, as untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people
DO tend to act out (YOU certainly prove THAT).
One way mentally ill people (such as you and John Wolf (Bible John, or
"BJ") ) act out is to lie.
As you and BJ both have a track record of flagrant exaggeration and
accusations, you are running neck and neck for who is more
mentally/emotionally ill.
As for John Wolf being a Christian, he would not be the first mentally
ill Christian, nor will he be the last.
It is sufficient that he does his best (in God's eyes), and that he
claim the name of Christ.
If I were you (thank GOD I'm not), I'd leave the judging to God!
Is it
Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Is it Christian to harass every Christian in sight? Of course it
isn't! So you cannot judge John Wolf! You are not qualified!
God will Judge John Wolf, just like God will judge YOU!
Wolf is a fraud.
Well, we certainly know YOU are a fraud, as well as being an attention
*****! You and John Wolf certainly have THAT in common!
He is not a Christian
You are not qualified to make that determination. The most you can
say is that he is not a "good Christian." IN fact, I don't know of
any "good Christians."
and he is not qualified to run
a Christian "ministry," or a "ministry" of any sort.
On THAT point, we would agree. Then again, I don't know many who are!
At any rate, it would seem you should have better things to do than
sit in a Christian group and throw Molotov cocktails at Christians!
maybe not.
john w
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 09:03:55 AM |
|
|
And now it's Weatherly's turn.
john w wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome).
People have made the same kinds of "observations" about Weatherly, but we
only know really presume that because Weatherly, himself, makes claims
about it. My impression of Weatherly, regardless of what's going on
outside of Usenet, is that he's simply an evil, small-minded, bitter
fellow, hateful of others even marginally more successful, more
intelligent, or even more articulate than he. "He's a sick old man," they
tell me. Well...maybe. Then again, maybe he's just an *****.
At any rate, whatever Weatherly presumes to say about Wolf, he's never been
sympathetic to him, and he even effectively contradicts himself in
responses to Wolf in one thread, responding to Wolf as if one aspect of
Wolf's character is true, and responding to me as if another is true. So
Weatherly can't really make up his mind about Wolf, and doesn't know more
than anyone else about him. For myself, my response to Wolf is based on
the same principle that governs my response to Weatherly, that is, that
regardless of whatever "mental illness" may be present, that doesn't excuse
their behavior. They're supposed to be *Christians*, which means tha that
they're supposed to have the power (or be able to draw on the power) to
resist the human nature that causes them to behave as they do. They not
only don't do that, they *refuse* to do it. Christianity is nothing to
either of them but an extension of their own respective arrogance.
If that is true (and it appears likely)...
Weatherly is not qualified to presume to diagnose another person with
respect to his or her psychology (that he does it routinely is not evidence
of qualification). Were Weatherly truly amenable to Biblical instruction,
there could be room for comments about setting his own house in order, and
looking to the beam in his eye, but Weatherly has no interest in the
application of Biblical or Christian principles to him.
...that would explain his bizarre behavior AND his lying, as
untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people DO tend to act out
(YOU certainly prove THAT).
Once again, I can point out that neither Weatherly nor Wolf have ever been
able to demonstrate a single lie on my part. They simply claim that they
exist, and then duck the issue when challenged to provide the details.
Meanwhile, each of them has been shown to consistently lie, and in
Weatherly's case, he's unrepentent. Weatherly also consistently berates
others and attacks them, personally. He does this quite often because he
has no rational answer to things that are written to him or about him, and
those responses follow a pattern of a few basic, constantly-repeated
mutterings, rantings, and whinings. There's certainly nothing *Christian*
about them or him.
One way mentally ill people (such as you and John Wolf (Bible John, or
"BJ") ) act out is to lie.
As you and BJ both have a track record of flagrant exaggeration and
accusations, you are running neck and neck for who is more
mentally/emotionally ill.
And when challenged, Weatherly can never quite provide specifics about my
own lies. It's interesting, but not especially enlightening, that
Weatherly constantly relies on these kinds of vague yammerings and, when
challenged for evidence or specifics, he runs. Even if we forget that his
rants, name-calling, and hateful behavior are, according to Christian
theology, indications of his lack of Christian sincerity, that kind of
evasion indicates *intent*. Weatherly deceives, and *intends* to deceive.
He is, therefore, himself a liar. Furthermore, he's brazen and unrepentent
about his lies. We'ave all seen examples of Weatherly's arrogance, and
we've seen that it extends so far that he presumes that the readers are
stupid. He doesn't think that they will ever see through his lies.
As for John Wolf being a Christian, he would not be the first mentally
ill Christian, nor will he be the last.
So, apparently, the Holy Spirit is incapable of surmounting this "illness,"
whatever it might be.
It is sufficient that he does his best (in God's eyes), and that he
claim the name of Christ.
Lots of people "claim the name of Christ." That does not make them a
Christian any more than Weatherly's occasional references to Christ make
*him* a Christian. Assuming that the New Testament accurately reflects he
words of Jesus, even he was clear on that.
If I were you (thank GOD I'm not), I'd leave the judging to God!
It is quite reasonable for anyone in these groups to view Christians as
Christian or not based on certain criteria of which most of us are aware.
Christians are expected to follow a certain pattern of behavior that is
explained in the New Testament words attributed to Jesus. Occasional
lapses are one thing, but consistent, unChristian behavior is well within
the purview of any reader to determine for himself or herself. Weatherly
may whimper that such things are the provence of God, and that's just
another mechanism by which he excuses his own, unChristian behavior, but an
intelligent, reflective Christian, were he or she sincere, would be wise to
consider that appearances are something that cannot be easily dismissed,
especially in a newsgroup, where the words printed on the screen are all we
have of the person making certain statements. Jesus was pretty clear about
how Christian should act toward others, and again, if the New Testament
accurately reflects those views, he was pretty sharp. He understood that
the methods were as important as the message, and a bad witness can
invalidate the message. Of course, behavior also is a reflection of
sincerity.
Is it Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Is it Christian to harass every Christian in sight? Of course it
isn't! So you cannot judge John Wolf! You are not qualified!
In fact, I'm well-qualified, and if I harassed "every Christian in sight,"
that does not excuse unChristian behavior. Jesus was rather clear about
that, too.
God will Judge John Wolf, just like God will judge YOU!
If Weatherly truly believed that, he'd look to the beam in his own eye. He
doesn't do that because he doesn't believe it.
Wolf is a fraud.
Well, we certainly know YOU are a fraud, as well as being an attention
*****! You and John Wolf certainly have THAT in common!
Weatherly makes quite a bit of noise about "we," and yet doesn't represent
any concensus of opinion. If I am a fraud, he certainly doesn't explain
just why that is. If we understand that a fraud is a poser--one who makes
dishonest claims and engages in trying to fool others--well, it's pretty
clear that Weatherly qualifies far more than I.
He is not a Christian
You are not qualified to make that determination.
Asked and answered. I am well-qualified to make that determination. The
fact is that, if I were not--if any unbeliever were not--Jesus would not
have made the comments that he made with respect to how a Christian should
behave in public.
The most you can say is that he is not a "good Christian."
No, I can say that he's not a Christian. "Many will say to me in that day,
Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast
out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I
profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work
iniquity."
IN fact, I don't know of any "good Christians."
Weatherly tries to play semantics. We all know about the comments that
"there are none that doeth good," but there are quite a few who at least
try. Wolf doesn't try. Neither does Weatherly.
and he is not qualified to run a Christian "ministry," or a
"ministry" of any sort.
On THAT point, we would agree. Then again, I don't know many
who are!
Since all Christians are called to be ministers and evangelists on some
level, all are called to run "ministries," and it's not usual for
Christians to refer to their own, private evangelistic efforts as "my
ministry." Weatherly fails to understand the application.
At any rate, it would seem you should have better things to do than
sit in a Christian group and throw Molotov cocktails at Christians!
There is very little that serves a more useful purpose than exposing
religious phonies, particularly if they run "ministries" and solicit
donations from the gullible.
maybe not.
And, of course, I am the best judge of how to use my time.
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harvest Dancer" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 01:41:06 PM |
|
|
john w wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 23:35:32 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome). If that
is true (and it appears likely), that would explain his bizarre
behavior AND his lying, as untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people
DO tend to act out (YOU certainly prove THAT).
I suppose you can offer proof that Dave Horn is mentally ill? All Dave
accused Wolf of doing was lying. You have now opened yourself up to
potential libel accusations against TWO people. Not very smart.
But then I've never libeled you by accusing you of being smart.
One way mentally ill people (such as you and John Wolf (Bible John, or
"BJ") ) act out is to lie.
As you and BJ both have a track record of flagrant exaggeration and
accusations, you are running neck and neck for who is more
mentally/emotionally ill.
Someone who lies, or someone who doesn't. Which is the weaker party
....
As for John Wolf being a Christian, he would not be the first mentally
ill Christian, nor will he be the last.
It is sufficient that he does his best (in God's eyes), and that he
claim the name of Christ.
If I were you (thank GOD I'm not), I'd leave the judging to God!
Is it
Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Is it Christian to harass every Christian in sight? Of course it
isn't! So you cannot judge John Wolf! You are not qualified!
God will Judge John Wolf, just like God will judge YOU!
It might not be Christian to "harass" Christians. Is Dave a Christian?
Wolf is a fraud.
Well, we certainly know YOU are a fraud, as well as being an attention
*****! You and John Wolf certainly have THAT in common!
He is not a Christian
You are not qualified to make that determination. The most you can
say is that he is not a "good Christian." IN fact, I don't know of
any "good Christians."
and he is not qualified to run
a Christian "ministry," or a "ministry" of any sort.
On THAT point, we would agree. Then again, I don't know many who are!
At any rate, it would seem you should have better things to do than
sit in a Christian group and throw Molotov cocktails at Christians!
maybe not.
You can only accuse him of attacking Christians if the people he
attacks are Christians.
Jason Harvestdancer
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 06:18:45 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On 28 Aug 2006 11:41:06 -0700, "Harvest Dancer"
<harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
john w wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 23:35:32 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome). If that
is true (and it appears likely), that would explain his bizarre
behavior AND his lying, as untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people
DO tend to act out (YOU certainly prove THAT).
I suppose you can offer proof that Dave Horn is mentally ill?
????????
I believe that David Horn's unprovoked attacks on me are proof enough.
Should he make the mistake of hauling me into court before I can haul
HIM into court, I believe the posts will be proof sufficient.
All Dave
accused Wolf of doing was lying.
I am not and did not accuse Dave Horn of mental illness MERELY because
of how he has attacked John Wolf. I have said what I said about Dave
Horn because of how he has also acted towards me.
I believe the combination of behaviors in those attacks makes his
mental illness self-evident.
Nor do I feel the need to justify myself at length in here-- or to
you!
This doesn't seem to be the forum in which people come to "wax
eloquent" and provide exhaustive proof.
This place-- this "forum" -- is a virtual soapbox.
You have now opened yourself up to
potential libel accusations against TWO people.
They / you may accuse me of whatever you like. There isn't much I have
not been accused of.
As for "libel", I know quite a bit about "libel", since I am a
professionally trained author/writer. For a "libel" accusation/ charge
to stick, you / they would have to be able to prove that I LIED, and
that I LIED DELIBERATELY (knowing full well when I said what I said
that I was lying.
I could well be wrong, but I certainly didn't lie.
Not very smart.
I think I am much smarter than some give me credit for being. And--
again-- I certainly don't take anyone's remarks in HERE regarding that
seriously.
But then I've never libeled you by accusing you of being smart.
chuckle.
I'd say that hurt, but that wouldn't be true.
One way mentally ill people (such as you and John Wolf (Bible John, or
"BJ") ) act out is to lie.
As you and BJ both have a track record of flagrant exaggeration and
accusations, you are running neck and neck for who is more
mentally/emotionally ill.
Someone who lies, or someone who doesn't. Which is the weaker party
I was being facetious.
...
As for John Wolf being a Christian, he would not be the first mentally
ill Christian, nor will he be the last.
It is sufficient that he does his best (in God's eyes), and that he
claim the name of Christ.
If I were you (thank GOD I'm not), I'd leave the judging to God!
Is it
Christian to *lie*, as he has done. Of course it isn't.
Is it Christian to harass every Christian in sight? Of course it
isn't! So you cannot judge John Wolf! You are not qualified!
God will Judge John Wolf, just like God will judge YOU!
It might not be Christian to "harass" Christians. Is Dave a Christian?
I was being facetious.
Wolf is a fraud.
Well, we certainly know YOU are a fraud, as well as being an attention
*****! You and John Wolf certainly have THAT in common!
lol!
"That hurt!"
(my lie for the day)
He is not a Christian
You are not qualified to make that determination. The most you can
say is that he is not a "good Christian." IN fact, I don't know of
any "good Christians."
and he is not qualified to run
a Christian "ministry," or a "ministry" of any sort.
On THAT point, we would agree. Then again, I don't know many who are!
At any rate, it would seem you should have better things to do than
sit in a Christian group and throw Molotov cocktails at Christians!
maybe not.
You can only accuse him of attacking Christians if the people he
attacks are Christians.
Since last I was aware, John Wolf and I both claim the name of Jesus
Christ, and we both call Him "Lord", however frail we be...
I am forced to leave "is he or isn't he" to God.
john w
Jason Harvestdancer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
28 Aug 2006 06:58:34 PM |
|
|
In article <hut6f2htcaq5iqhigvh5n3hi3uoms70h46@4ax.com> john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> writes:
x-no-archive: yes
On 28 Aug 2006 11:41:06 -0700, "Harvest Dancer"
<harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
john w wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 23:35:32 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome). If that
is true (and it appears likely), that would explain his bizarre
behavior AND his lying, as untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people
DO tend to act out (YOU certainly prove THAT).
I suppose you can offer proof that Dave Horn is mentally ill?
????????
I believe that David Horn's unprovoked attacks on me are proof enough.
Should he make the mistake of hauling me into court before I can haul
HIM into court, I believe the posts will be proof sufficient.
All Dave
accused Wolf of doing was lying.
I am not and did not accuse Dave Horn of mental illness MERELY because
of how he has attacked John Wolf. I have said what I said about Dave
Horn because of how he has also acted towards me.
I believe the combination of behaviors in those attacks makes his
mental illness self-evident.
Nor do I feel the need to justify myself at length in here-- or to
you!
This doesn't seem to be the forum in which people come to "wax
eloquent" and provide exhaustive proof.
This place-- this "forum" -- is a virtual soapbox.
You have now opened yourself up to
potential libel accusations against TWO people.
They / you may accuse me of whatever you like. There isn't much I have
not been accused of.
As for "libel", I know quite a bit about "libel", since I am a
professionally trained author/writer. For a "libel" accusation/ charge
to stick, you / they would have to be able to prove that I LIED, and
that I LIED DELIBERATELY (knowing full well when I said what I said
that I was lying.
Not always. If you acted with "reckless disregard" as to whatever
you were saying was true or false, then you can be convicted.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 02:14:52 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:58:34 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
In article <hut6f2htcaq5iqhigvh5n3hi3uoms70h46@4ax.com> john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> writes:
x-no-archive: yes
On 28 Aug 2006 11:41:06 -0700, "Harvest Dancer"
<harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
john w wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 23:35:32 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
hornexposer@yahoo.com wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my
cousin here) to provide evidence that David Horn was
discharged from his past three jobs.
When Wolf first posted this, he was challenged to provide his evidence.
He has failed to do so. In fact, he says nothing more in the thread.
Of course, *I* know that Wolf's claim is false, but it's not up to me
to disprove it. It's up to him to prove it, and he claims to have
evidence. Where's the evidence?
The answer is that it doesn't exist. Wolf *lied*.
Is it Christian to engage in the behavior in which Wolf engages?
In fact, as some others have suggested, Wolf gives every appearance of
being severely mentally ill ( suffering Asperger's Syndrome). If that
is true (and it appears likely), that would explain his bizarre
behavior AND his lying, as untreated, undiagnosed mentally ill people
DO tend to act out (YOU certainly prove THAT).
I suppose you can offer proof that Dave Horn is mentally ill?
????????
I believe that David Horn's unprovoked attacks on me are proof enough.
Should he make the mistake of hauling me into court before I can haul
HIM into court, I believe the posts will be proof sufficient.
All Dave
accused Wolf of doing was lying.
I am not and did not accuse Dave Horn of mental illness MERELY because
of how he has attacked John Wolf. I have said what I said about Dave
Horn because of how he has also acted towards me.
I believe the combination of behaviors in those attacks makes his
mental illness self-evident.
Nor do I feel the need to justify myself at length in here-- or to
you!
This doesn't seem to be the forum in which people come to "wax
eloquent" and provide exhaustive proof.
This place-- this "forum" -- is a virtual soapbox.
You have now opened yourself up to
potential libel accusations against TWO people.
They / you may accuse me of whatever you like. There isn't much I have
not been accused of.
As for "libel", I know quite a bit about "libel", since I am a
professionally trained author/writer. For a "libel" accusation/ charge
to stick, you / they would have to be able to prove that I LIED, and
that I LIED DELIBERATELY (knowing full well when I said what I said
that I was lying.
Not always. If you acted with "reckless disregard" as to whatever
you were saying was true or false, then you can be convicted.
-- cary
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
"I rest my case!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 07:51:02 AM |
|
|
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 10:52:51 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
Yup-- he'd be resting his carcass in the State Ritz!! :O)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 11:20:02 AM |
|
|
<NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
news:qlo8f2pashs47hee0fbjt5akf6e6rohq2a@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What
do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
Yup-- he'd be resting his carcass in the State Ritz!! :O)
What he fails to realize (and I can't understand why) is that he hardly has
a pristine record here. Perhaps he's thinking that he can fall back on his
"I suffer from a mental illness" excuse. He certainly throws that around
here enough.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 05:14:10 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:20:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
<NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
news:qlo8f2pashs47hee0fbjt5akf6e6rohq2a@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What
do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
Yup-- he'd be resting his carcass in the State Ritz!! :O)
What he fails to realize (and I can't understand why) is that he hardly has
a pristine record here. Perhaps he's thinking that he can fall back on his
"I suffer from a mental illness" excuse. He certainly throws that around
here enough.
Yupper - most likely- but you're absolutely right - it won't work.
I know of another mental case who has AGAIN committed an assault
causing bodily harm, and will soon be facing a long period behind
bars.
'Bout time...
These individuals need to LEARN that their so-called 'mental' problems
are no excuse for their violence and ridiculous temper outbursts.
"commit the crime; DO THE TIME"...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 08:32:42 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:20:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
<NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
news:qlo8f2pashs47hee0fbjt5akf6e6rohq2a@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What
do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
Yup-- he'd be resting his carcass in the State Ritz!! :O)
What he fails to realize (and I can't understand why)
You don't understand, Elaine II, because you're STUPID!
;-)
is that he hardly has
a pristine record here.
????????????
I have committed NO CRIMES in here, idiot!
john w
snip
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 08:14:07 AM |
|
|
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
news:vjq9f298r81f2r60ujmfao3okh0nrm6ppq@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: NO
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:20:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
<***** copyright removed>
snip
What he fails to realize (and I can't understand why)
You don't understand, Elaine II, because you're STUPID!
Wow - How juvenile. Color me both unsurprised and disgusted.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 08:09:31 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:32:42 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
I have committed NO CRIMES in here, idiot!
^^^^^So you ADMIT you have elsewhere?
Thank you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 08:31:29 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:52:51 -0400, wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies, not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys. What do
you think the court would think of that?
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
Yup-- he'd be resting his carcass in the State Ritz!! :O)
I guess we'll find out!
:-)
OH! Elaine SOoooooooooooooooooooooo loves to gossip!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 08:10:03 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:31:29 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
OH! Elaine SOoooooooooooooooooooooo loves to gossip!
Speaking THE TRUTH ain't 'gossip', weatherless...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 08:30:46 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies,
not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys.
This is about your funniest memory so far, STUPID person!
You forgot to re-tell the part about my FIGHTING back someone who had
just ASSAULTED me! You stupid person!
The police know all about that! And they said, "Good job!"
if you're going to tell the story, why don't you tell ALL of it?
Lies by omission are STILL LIES, you stupid person!
What do
you think the court would think of that?
I suppose we'll find out!
;-)
"I rest my case!"
Hardly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
01 Sep 2006 11:04:35 AM |
|
|
In <meq9f25emge3rp3bca5bc02udgupin3pmd@4ax.com>, on 08/29/06
at 06:30 PM, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> in his standard "that is not
what happened" act left the following errors behind.
Path:
dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-01.inet.qwest.net!news.qwest.net!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.christnet.public,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.bible,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:30:46 -0700
Message-ID: <meq9f25emge3rp3bca5bc02udgupin3pmd@4ax.com>
References: <f3i5f294nrgtbaaih40accid8r8npggbdd@4ax.com>
<1156790466.724778.156790@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
<hut6f2htcaq5iqhigvh5n3hi3uoms70h46@4ax.com>
<ecvvva$ama$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>
<e9q7f25adapc56re3fg9mv8t46vt96ucj4@4ax.com>
<4liralF24p9tU1@individual.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0635-1, 08/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 44
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: ac8702e6.news.qwest.net
X-Trace:
DXC=3RfUJg965LV^F8M55U1L;TF85SKJoGf>T=k30eCm]d[S?0m@:jUHMZSkmnKmITI^fUT]l^6;JRa9P1fnE@L7CIR[SBUABG_:Wc[
X-Complaints-To:
X-Old-Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu alt.christnet.public:184946
alt.religion.christian.baptist:855432 alt.atheism:3515125
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this article
may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the author
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
snip
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies,
not to mention that lovely
story about when you bragged about kicking someone in the kidneys.
This is about your funniest memory so far, STUPID person!
& your version is better?
You forgot to re-tell the part about my FIGHTING back someone who had
just ASSAULTED me! You stupid person!
Lets get this straight, you did nothing to provoke the *attack*, nothing
at all?
The police know all about that! And they said, "Good job!"
No, they did not. Care to prove otherwise? after all the claims of a known
liar are cheap.
if you're going to tell the story, why don't you tell ALL of it?
Good idea, why don't you start. But be sure to leave out any self
glorifying acts that are not verifiable. Not claims, facts only if you
know what they are. You did get a copy of the police report, didn't you
Lies by omission are STILL LIES, you stupid person!
Yes, & you are the expert at lies by omission or implication. Or are you
in fact a war vert & a retired sargent e-5, USAF. A sargent e-5 who was
dismissed under less than honorable conditions according to you. Not to
mention you do not have any awards/medals for you did not complete your
sworn period of service.
What do
you think the court would think of that?
I suppose we'll find out!
If we wait on you, we will all be dead of borebdom.
;-)
Now what was it your god said about liars, or do you think they are to
stupid to see through your sham?
which wannabe this time jw, the genuine artificial known liar & child of
god?
walksalone who doubts that jw will post his information to back his claims
of being a hero of the moment, because he can make the claim, but the
evidence says he lies as usual.
Pray if it feels good
Don't expect me to join you
A placebo only.
Enkidu AA#2165
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 08:12:22 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:30:46 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
You forgot to re-tell the part about my FIGHTING back someone who had
just ASSAULTED me! You stupid person!
Bollocks, weatherless.
YOU SAID the guy simply boarded the bus, and punched you in the face.
YOU did not tell what PROVOKED HIM TO DO THAT, either.
And whether he punched you or not, TO KICK A PERSON IN THE BACK IS
NOTHING BUT COWARDICE.
The police know all about that! And they said, "Good job!"
Bollocks again. NO Police officer would condone that. No one is to
take the law into their own hands.
Self-defense is one thing ; sheer COWARDICE is quite another.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 09:21:32 AM |
|
|
john w wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:51:02 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
And what in the world would you do when your posts, especially those where
you've told people to go "have intercourse" with themselves, threats of
physical violence, long-winded death fantasies,
not to mention that lovely story about when you bragged about
kicking someone in the kidneys.
This is about your funniest memory so far, STUPID person!
Feel the love.
You forgot to re-tell the part about my FIGHTING back someone who had
just ASSAULTED me!
Which, of course, is just another story for which we have no proof.
You stupid person!
Feel the love.
The police know all about that! And they said, "Good job!"
Uh, huh. I wonder if Weatherly would be willing to provide a case number...
if you're going to tell the story, why don't you tell ALL of it?
Lies by omission are STILL LIES, you stupid person!
Are they, *really*? Let's keep that in mind.
What do you think the court would think of that?
I suppose we'll find out!
Another empty, impotent threat.
--
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 07:34:33 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:14:52 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
"I rest my case!"
And all any of US would need to do is show a few of YOURS, old man
weatherless..... and you'd most likely find yourself committed.
I can also personally GUARANbloodyTEE you that if you were dumb enough
to even TRY taking anyone to court from here, you'd have a lot of US
testifying on their behalf, against you.
Written any more porn filth lately, liar johnnie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
29 Aug 2006 08:28:17 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:34:33 -0400, wrote:
© 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
author
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:14:52 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
"I rest my case!"
And all any of US would need to do is show a few of YOURS, old man
weatherless..... and you'd most likely find yourself committed.
I can also personally GUARANbloodyTEE you that if you were dumb enough
to even TRY taking anyone to court from here, you'd have a lot of US
testifying on their behalf, against you.
Well, darlin', it may soon be time for you to "put up or shut up!"
;-)
Written any more porn filth lately, liar johnnie?
Why!... Why!...
I am surprised that you'd ask!
You talk like you're observing my every move! You talk like you know
what time I went to bed, what time I got up, what time I turned on my
TV!
What did I have for dinner last nite, Elaine?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 09:22:49 AM |
|
|
john w wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:34:33 -0400, wrote:
I can also personally GUARANbloodyTEE you that if you were dumb enough
to even TRY taking anyone to court from here, you'd have a lot of US
testifying on their behalf, against you.
Well, darlin', it may soon be time for you to "put up or shut up!"
Another empty, impotent threat.
Written any more porn filth lately, liar johnnie?
Why!... Why!...
I am surprised that you'd ask!
You talk like you're observing my every move! You talk like you know
what time I went to bed, what time I got up, what time I turned on my
TV!
What did I have for dinner last nite, Elaine?
Notice that Weatherly did not answer the question.
--
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 09:19:29 AM |
|
|
john w wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:58:34 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
As for "libel", I know quite a bit about "libel", since I am a
professionally trained author/writer. For a "libel" accusation/ charge
to stick, you / they would have to be able to prove that I LIED, and
that I LIED DELIBERATELY (knowing full well when I said what I said
that I was lying.
Not always. If you acted with "reckless disregard" as to whatever
you were saying was true or false, then you can be convicted.
Quite right.
All I need do if hauled into court (snicker) is to say I gave my
honest opinion and produce 100 of Dave Horn's RIDICULOUS posts.
"I rest my case!"
There's no "case" to rest.
The problem with such a silly response is that the court would only accept
the posts into evidence were they evidence of libel which Weatherly can
prove by example. Were I to claim that Weatherly buggers sheep, and were
that to be the cause of the action that Weatherly were to take, he'd have
to show, somewhere in those 100 posts, that I made that claim, and did so
with reckless disregard, or I knew that it was false. Weatherly cannot
just walk into a courtroom, toss out 100 posts, declare then "RIDICULOUS,"
and that would be that.
There's more that we could discuss about how the courts tend to work, but
the point is sufficiently made. The court is not going to accept anything
based on Weatherly's word. He has to show that it is evidence for
something, and disagreeing with the content of a post is not sufficient to
prove that libel occurred. Weatherly doesn't know what he's yapping
about--as usual.
--
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: John Wolf runs from his lies |
30 Aug 2006 09:14:05 AM |
|
|
john w wrote:
I suppose you can offer proof that Dave Horn is mentally ill?
????????
I believe that David Horn's unprovoked attacks on me are proof enough.
The problem is that the "attacks" are not "unprovoked."
Should he make the mistake of hauling me into court before I can haul
HIM into court, I believe the posts will be proof sufficient.
Weatherly has shown that he is completely ignorant of the sorts of legal
proceedings to which he refers. It's just a lot of bluster on his part, as
substanceless as most other articles that he posts.
All Dave accused Wolf of doing was lying.
I am not and did not accuse Dave Horn of mental illness MERELY because
of how he has attacked John Wolf. I have said what I said about Dave
Horn because of how he has also acted towards me.
I've been one of several who has exposed Weatherly as a liar and a fraud.
To Weatherly, that's an indicator of mental illness. That's not
surprising. Weatherly hasn't been able to make a case for anything else.
On the other hand, he doesn't try to make a case for this, either.
I believe the combination of behaviors in those attacks makes his
mental illness self-evident.
Nor do I feel the need to justify myself at length in here-- or to
you!
Well, now, there's a surprise! Weatherly make an assertion, but feels no
obligation, on any level, to support it.
This doesn't seem to be the forum in which people come to "wax
eloquent" and provide exhaustive proof.
This place-- this "forum" -- is a virtual soapbox.
One needn't provide "exhaustive proof," if simple proof is sufficient.
Weatherly provides *no* proof.
You have now opened yourself up to potential libel accusations
against TWO people.
They / you may accuse me of whatever you like. There isn't much I have
not been accused of.
Nor much that hasn't been shown to be true.
As for "libel", I know quite a bit about "libel", since I am a
professionally trained author/writer.
Weatherly's boasts never cease to provide entertainment, but Weatherly
clearly has no special insight into any of these kinds of issues.
For a "libel" accusation/ charge to stick, you / they would
have to be able to prove that I LIED, and that I LIED DELIBERATELY
(knowing full well when I said what I said that I was lying.
That wouldn't be difficult. Speaking personally, I've been able to do it in
these groups. In part, the demonstration of lying may quite reasonably
include indications of intent to deceive, and that intent may be inferred
by word or deed. I've seen far better liars lose badly in court over a
failure to understand such things.
I could well be wrong, but I certainly didn't lie.
No, Weatherly lies consistently--*and* he's often wrong.
Not very smart.
I think I am much smarter than some give me credit for being.
No one should be surprised that Weatherly thinks that he his smarter than he
demonstrates in these groups.
And--again--I certainly don't take anyone's remarks in HERE regarding
that seriously.
And--again--Weatherly has no concern for his witness. He's a fraud.
[Snip]
You can only accuse him of attacking Christians if the people he
attacks are Christians.
Since last I was aware, John Wolf and I both claim the name of Jesus
Christ, and we both call Him "Lord", however frail we be...
The key word is "claim." Both make the claim. Neither demonstrates that it
is sincere.
[Snip]
--
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: David Horn was Fired from his last three jobs! |
25 Aug 2006 08:44:52 PM |
|
|
wrote:
I gathered some info on the Internet (with the help of my cousin here)
to provide evidence that David Horn was discharged from his past three
jobs.
And yet, this "evidence" is not provided. What we have here is a bit
of an bigger lie that Wolf told before. Some months back, he claimed
that he had "heard" that I had been fired from my last job. When I
challenged him, then, to provide his source and his evidence, Wolf ran.
Now, we have him complaining that I have been fired from my last
*three* jobs. Interesting.
This is all public information that this liar does not want you
to know. He seems to forget about his past usenet history, and about
all message boards that he posts.
Actually, I haven't forgotten any of that, nor do I recall ever making
any statements, myself, about having been fired (because it's not true,
for one thing). So the burden of proof is on Wolf. He claims to have
evidence, but he fails to produce it, instead posting yet another in a
string of lies.
One thing that needs to be kept in the minds of all readers is that
this is an alleged Christian making all of this noise and telling all
of these lies. If part of what I do is to expose the phoniness of some
Christians, Wolf is giving me plenty with which to work.
So I do expect that this crybaby will file a police report and file a
complaint with all ISP's like he always does. Heck I just know he was
one of the geeks in High School that always went to the principle
everytime I walked by.
Actually, I was one of those guys in high school who took bullies and
made them understand that picking on weaker kids was not a good career
choice. But be that as it may, it's interesting that Wolf goes for
this kind of juvenile comment *twice*.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grinder" |
|
| Title: Re: David Horn was Fired from his last three jobs! |
25 Aug 2006 11:51:24 PM |
|
|
Dave wrote:
Now, we have him complaining that I have been fired from my last
*three* jobs. Interesting.
Bible John (hornexposer@yahoo.com) wrote:
This is all public information that this liar does not want you
to know. He seems to forget about his past usenet history, and about
all message boards that he posts.
Actually, I haven't forgotten any of that, nor do I recall ever making
any statements, myself, about having been fired (because it's not true,
for one thing). So the burden of proof is on Wolf. He claims to have
evidence, but he fails to produce it, instead posting yet another in a
string of lies.
Just quick aside.
Bible John, you might want to note something that Dave has done here.
Even though your accusations come with no real evidence, and are about
something that really isn't your business, Dave has directly confonted
them with a specific denial.
If you had managed to do that about the repeated accusations that you
have a diaper fetish, instead of whining about those accusations without
every denying that they were true, I probably would have figured that
someone was having a laugh at your expense.
As it is, though, the most reasonable explanation for your behavior is
that you *do* have a fondness for lounging around in diapers, you
*don't* want to admit it, but you *can't* bring yourself to lie about
it. Which, ironically, would cause less damage to my estimation of your
character than all of your diversionary mewlings.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory A Greenman" |
|
| Title: Re: David Horn was Fired from his last three jobs! |
26 Aug 2006 05:07:41 PM |
|
|
In article <grQHg.153478$1i1.10848@attbi_s72>, Grinder
<grinder@no.spam.maam.com> declared...
Dave wrote:
Now, we have him complaining that I have been fired from my last
*three* jobs. Interesting.
Bible John (hornexposer@yahoo.com) wrote:
This is all public information that this liar does not want you
to know. He seems to forget about his past usenet history, and about
all message boards that he posts.
Actually, I haven't forgotten any of that, nor do I recall ever making
any statements, myself, about having been fired (because it's not true,
for one thing). So the burden of proof is on Wolf. He claims to have
evidence, but he fails to produce it, instead posting yet another in a
string of lies.
Just quick aside.
Bible John, you might want to note something that Dave has done here.
Even though your accusations come with no real evidence, and are about
something that really isn't your business, Dave has directly confonted
them with a specific denial.
If you had managed to do that about the repeated accusations that you
have a diaper fetish, instead of whining about those accusations without
every denying that they were true, I probably would have figured that
someone was having a laugh at your expense.
As it is, though, the most reasonable explanation for your behavior is
that you *do* have a fondness for lounging around in diapers, you
*don't* want to admit it, but you *can't* bring yourself to lie about
it. Which, ironically, would cause less damage to my estimation of your
character than all of your diversionary mewlings.
Yes, I second this.
--
Greg
----
http://www.spencerbooksellers.com
greg00 -at- spencersoft -dot- com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
