| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"raven1" |
| Date: |
02 Jul 2007 03:25:16 PM |
| Object: |
Dealing with V |
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
| User: "Medusa" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
02 Jul 2007 08:41:37 PM |
|
|
raven1;
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
Ok, I'll try to help out. But I predict he will just respond with
more of his looooooooooooong, borrrrrrrrrrring pseudo intellectual
blather.
How's that again?
HO! <whack!>
<snicker>
Medusa
.
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 07:41:35 AM |
|
|
On Jul 2, 9:41?pm, Medusa <Medusa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
raven1;
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
Ok, I'll try to help out. But I predict he will just respond with
more of his looooooooooooong, borrrrrrrrrrring pseudo intellectual
blather.
How's that again?
HO! <whack!>
<snicker>
Medusa
This is your problem my friend. It is 'all show' for you and nothing
in the practical application department.
Forget what V is or isn't.
Look at principles and not personalties.
Either what I write about is true or false.
If true, adopt it if you wish to be at peace.
If false, then do the opposite of what I propose if you wish to be at
peace.
It is that simple.
But I can assure you, you will never find peace by trying to tear
others down with idle talk as many of you are predisposed to do.
You think that intellectualism rules, when intellectualism is useless
with developing inner peace.
Sure we need enough intellect to read, write and understand
basics...but that is it.
If anything, your intellect makes you the god and blocks you from
peace, as many of you are prime examples of.
.....My discussion of this topic from an earlier post.
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=4.0
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 09:31:08 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:41:35 +0000, V wrote:
HO! <WHACK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 03:37:15 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:41:35 -0000, V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 2, 9:41?pm, Medusa <Medusa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
raven1;
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
Ok, I'll try to help out. But I predict he will just respond with
more of his looooooooooooong, borrrrrrrrrrring pseudo intellectual
blather.
How's that again?
HO! <whack!>
<snicker>
Medusa
This is your problem my friend. It is 'all show' for you and nothing
in the practical application department.
HO! <whack!>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gail Futoran" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
02 Jul 2007 10:04:34 PM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com...
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Damn. It would almost be worth taking
V out of my killfile to use that reply. :)
But I'll resist the temptation and enjoy
watching others using it.
Gail
aa#2247
.
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 08:03:28 AM |
|
|
On Jul 2, 11:04 pm, "Gail Futoran" <futo...@NOSPAMworldnet.att.net>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com...
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Damn. It would almost be worth taking
V out of my killfile to use that reply. :)
But I'll resist the temptation and enjoy
watching others using it.
Gail
aa#2247
If my posts offended anyone, I offer you my compassion for any pain
you experienced.
You also have my compassion for your desire to cause pain to others
for your own enjoyment Gail.
.....my discussion of this topic from an earlier post.
Neil Kelsey wrote:
"Theists like you (V) should be given electric shocks every time they
use parables. That is my new policy."
"That still makes me laugh. You're a dork. (V) I wouldn't electro-
shock Hitler, and you think I'd electro-shock someone for murdering
the English language? I explained it to you in my previous reply that
was a joke (duh), I apologized for it in case you actually took me
seriously,and I pointed out that you have no sense of humour, and that
theists in general seem to be humour impaired."
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
V:
Thank you for your reply Neil. I like comedy as much as anyone Neil.
But, when we find comic relief in hurting others...that is no joke
Neil. If it makes me a dork to not want to hurt others, so be it. I
will gladly be a dork...a dork that can be at peace within. Yes,
apologies do matter, but apologies must also be authentic for them to
be of any worth. In you case, an apology is just 'lip service' and
nothing more.
The formula for success is: Authentic Nature + Right Actions = Peace
The formula for failure is: Authentic Nature + Wrong Actions =
Destruction
You have a history of hurtful, abusive replies my friend. You
routinely go out of your way to humiliate others. It is so easy for
you to 'dismiss it all as joke,' just as you do with many of the cruel
remarks you support that your fellow atheists make. But we both know
you are confusing the two 'H' words Neil.
HUMOR is nothing more that a 'code word' for HATRED for you Neil.
Be honest and you will not have to hide behind the lies any longer
Neil. It will save both of us time that way so we do not have to play
games. I can at least respect your honesty that way, albeit as
misguided as it may be Neil. A liar that cannot even be honest with
themselves is really in trouble Neil. You are a very smart fellow
Neil, but as smart as you are, you are bankrupt in the area of finding
inner peace as your actions demonstrate.
And of course you do not like talk or parables of morality and virtue
as you told me below. They may shed some light on the fact that Neil
is not all he thinks himself to be.
Neil Kelsey writes:
"I'm not interested in vague horoscopish parables like the ones you
spout. When I do bother to derive meaning from them I usually roll my
eyes and think "this person is the master of the bleedin' obvious," to
paraphrase a certain fictional British twit. I think you're fooling
yourself. I don't think you have any ties to any particular religion
because you want to be worshipped like a god yourself. The other gods
are competition. You want US to be spiritual, and to regard you with
religious awe If you're interested in truth then study science and
forget trying to set yourself up as an object of worship." (quote
condensed)
Until you learn that Neil is not God and Neil must bow to the God of
Peace and the God of Nature, you will continue on your mockery of a
life that can best be described as the tragedy that manifests itself
as Neil Kelsey. I wish you the best of luck with finding peace someday
Neil, I really do, for if nothing else it would save me some typing
time answering you constant barrage of derogatory attacks on me.
If I was a religious man, I'd pray for you Neil. But we both know that
prayer wont fix you. Only Neil can fix Neil and it all stems from a
desire within you to be a new person Neil.
An important thing to remember with internal change is the 3-D's:
Desire, Determination and Diligence.
Desire:
Desire is the foundation for all recovery quests and this includes
recovery from ego addiction and hatred as you exhibit Neil. You cannot
help someone without the desire in them to be helped, as the
spiritually sick and defiant atheists prove. Desire is what gets us
taking that first step in the right direction when all seems hopeless.
Have you every tried to give advice or help someone in need and they
respond: "I don't care."
Or in the case of one defiance based lady atheist response to me...
"So. Fucking what...do you think I give a flying ***** what you think,
dipshit...Not that it's any of YOUR fucking business...Don't presume
that you know what's best for me, you deluded, motherfucking,
cocksucking son of a *****."
I can tell this lady and you Neil that the business of humanism is
'all our business' if we with to live life at peace. I suggest you
read the 'informal creed' of atheism that discusses this topic.
(Snip)
"An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes
that heaven is something for which we should work now - here on earth
for all men together to enjoy."
As such I ask if someone is thirsty and needs a drink when I see them
parched Neil. And if I am mistaken, then no harm done. I leave them in
peace, but I do ask. there are many more 'atheist approved' guidelines
for you to adopt Neil. Just read some of my old posts, I discuss them
in detail. But as you read them, do so with an open mind instead of
reading them with a mindset of what error can I find in this post to
destroy V.
Atheists are their own worse enemy, aren't they Neil. They do the best
job at keeping people in religion. For who in their right mind would
wish to have such thoughts as you and this lady have in your heads.
But as noxious as both you are, you both can change in heartbeat...if
YOU desire to change.
Desire must come from within, you cannot force someone to change, they
must change themselves. But, before a desire to change can be
manifested, one must come to a "realization" that a change needs to
occur in ones life. You and other defiance based atheists will sooner
or later realize though pain and suffering that a change must come
about as their old life is destroying them. The God of Nature and the
God of Peace demand this of all humans.
Determination:
Determination serves two purposes here. When something is "determined"
it is accepted as fact. We have determined that we are powerless over
our addiction and our lives are unmanageable. We have determined we
must abstain from certain people, places or things that we cannot
comfortably have in our lives. We are in the process of determining a
new set of rules on how to live. We have also determined what
injuries we have caused and what needs to be repaired through taking
personal inventory.
Determination serves a second purpose and that is it keeps us on the
long road to recovery. We cannot keep on this long road without being
determined to change our lives day in day out. Whether it is debt
recovery, clutter, restructuring our complex lives or losing weight or
ego deification, it all takes time and determination to stay on the
path of recovery. Many distractions, detours and set backs along the
way, but we should always be determined to keep pointed in the
direction of recovery.
Diligence:
Diligence keeps us from going backwards once we finally arrive at the
recovery place we are aiming for. It takes diligence once we get to
where we want to be to maintain that serene spot, otherwise we fall
back on our old "natural" ways of living. Once you become humble, let
go of the ego, lose the fat, once you pay off your debts, get sober
and abstinent from your drug of choice it takes diligence to keep you
that way.
James Allen calls this watchfulness...."Victories attained by right
thought can only be maintained by watchfulness. Many give way when
success is assured and rapidly fall back into failure."
(oops I guess that is just another on of those vague horoscopish
parables that is so bleedin' obvious...obvious to all except Neil it
seems)
Good Luck Neil, I hope you take that first step today and head in the
opposite direction you have been traveling in for so long and build
yourself a new life of inner peace.
Take Care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 06:49:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:03:28 +0000, V wrote:
HO! <WHACK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys
on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING
like Shakespeare!" - Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 03:37:35 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:03:28 -0000, V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 2, 11:04 pm, "Gail Futoran" <futo...@NOSPAMworldnet.att.net>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com...
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Damn. It would almost be worth taking
V out of my killfile to use that reply. :)
But I'll resist the temptation and enjoy
watching others using it.
Gail
aa#2247
If my posts offended anyone, I offer you my compassion for any pain
you experienced.
HO! <whack!>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
03 Jul 2007 12:52:02 AM |
|
|
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 08:23:07 AM |
|
|
On Jul 3, 1:52?am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848di...@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.> --
--
John #1782
Why am I a creep John?
Am I creepy because I wish to be at peace and have a desire for you to
be at peace as well?
Sometime we imagine discrimination when there is none John.
Atheists as well as theists can't argue truth against me, so they
argue personalties.
The bible tells us in Phillipians 4:11 "For I have learned in whatever
situation I find myself to be content. I am experienced in living low
and I know what it is to have abundance. I have learned how to cope
with every circumstance - how to eat well or go hungry, to be well
provided for or to do without."
While not perfect advice for all occasions, it is good to be mindful
of this concept of contentment whether religious minded or atheist if
we desire to be at peace.
As such, if atheists only offer negatives on our forum, I will discuss
those negatives and promote 'doing the opposite' of such atheists if
one desires to be at peace.
When the atheists offer positives, I will be happy to disuse those as
well.
The prejudiced, blind, small minded thinker cannot entertain
freethought as they must block or censor the ideas and concepts before
testing them for truth.
Their ego will not allow it!
Such people do not operate on truth, they operate on ego. This is why
I am banned so much John.
The business of humanism is 'all our business' if we with to live life
at peace John.
If you wish to be at peace John, I suggest you stop blocking ideas via
your preconceived prejudices. That way you will not have to call
others names any longer to artificially boost your self worth my
friend.
On the contrary, you will be able to develop true self worth from the
inside out! Real and substantial self worth that will be their even if
stripped naked. so much of the facade masquerading as self worth is
bought in the stores or online nowadays John.
Don't fall prey to the hype John. Self worth cannot be bought. Self
worth cannot be developed by calling others names or putting them
down. Self worth is built on a foundation of inner peace John.
I found that developing self worth was a simple and natural byproduct
of 'just being' as long as I was able to 'be at peace' within and with
all John. You see, peace is our birthright, if we are not destroying
it by our own actions.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 06:48:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:23:07 +0000, V wrote:
HO! <WHACK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Warned you we tried! Listen you did not! Now screwed
we will all be!"
http://www.sequentialpictures.com/moviestarwarsepisode3.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 03:37:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:23:07 -0000, V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 3, 1:52?am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848di...@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.> --
--
John #1782
Why am I a creep John?
HO! <whack!>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
03 Jul 2007 03:54:32 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:52:02 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-939D90.22520202072007@news.giganews.com>
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.
He lives for the attention, negative or negative.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
03 Jul 2007 06:19:41 PM |
|
|
In article <5l3k831ceelep00gtvt2jfu668pq7f4e9i@4ax.com>,
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:52:02 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jhachmann-939D90.22520202072007@news.giganews.com>
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.
He lives for the attention, negative or negative.
Which is all he gets.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
03 Jul 2007 01:45:24 AM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> writes:
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.
I've dumped him, as well. He's just spinning his wheels.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
03 Jul 2007 06:20:47 PM |
|
|
In article <szkzm2et27v.fsf@eris.io.com>,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> writes:
In article <t5ni83h8kbjkdkebffjf0pm1lb848dibf9@4ax.com>,
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I just ignore the little creep. No point in encouraging him.
I've dumped him, as well. He's just spinning his wheels.
I know. I don't know what his game is, but it's not worth the bother.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
08 Jul 2007 02:52:23 PM |
|
|
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
10 Jul 2007 06:27:26 PM |
|
|
On Jul 8, 3:52?pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
Reply or don't reply it doesn't matter to me. Same as I told Michelle
Malkin.
You like to whack me, go ahead. If you lose some of the anger that is
fine. I can take it.
I plant seeds, sprouting the seeds is not in my power.
Look at some of the other forums I am on. I post and keep posting even
with little or no replies.
I am not ego based, but truth based.
The ego based personalities live for replies, I don't.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
10 Jul 2007 06:40:48 PM |
|
|
"V" <vfr44@aol.com> wrotesnip
Reply or don't reply
***** off!
HO! <Whacky!>
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
11 Jul 2007 04:47:05 AM |
|
|
On 11 jul, 01:27, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 8, 3:52?pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
Reply or don't reply it doesn't matter to me. Same as I told Michelle
Malkin.
You like to whack me, go ahead. If you lose some of the anger that is
fine. I can take it.
I plant seeds, sprouting the seeds is not in my power.
Look at some of the other forums I am on. I post and keep posting even
with little or no replies.
I am not ego based, but truth based.
The ego based personalities live for replies, I don't.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#
Now see what you have done!
Robibnikoff Mark K. Bilbo and raven1 together now make father
Christmas
HOHOHO!
But I am serious
If they do not think your posts deserve a serious answer,
they should refrain from making any reply
To be honest,
you often give the impression
of thinking to much of your own thoughts,
and of thinking to little how to make them clear.
But that's just an impression, I get
when I start reading them, and fall aslpee half way through:)
Peter van Velzen
July 2007
Amsteleen
The Netherlands
(as you can see merely stating facts)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
11 Jul 2007 10:40:43 AM |
|
|
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1184147225.679782.277750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On 11 jul, 01:27, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 8, 3:52?pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
Reply or don't reply it doesn't matter to me. Same as I told Michelle
Malkin.
You like to whack me, go ahead. If you lose some of the anger that is
fine. I can take it.
I plant seeds, sprouting the seeds is not in my power.
Look at some of the other forums I am on. I post and keep posting even
with little or no replies.
I am not ego based, but truth based.
The ego based personalities live for replies, I don't.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#
Now see what you have done!
Robibnikoff Mark K. Bilbo and raven1 together now make father
Christmas
HOHOHO!
But I am serious
If they do not think your posts deserve a serious answer,
they should refrain from making any reply
Spoil sport! :P
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
11 Jul 2007 10:48:23 AM |
|
|
On 11 jul, 17:40, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
<pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1184147225.679782.277750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On 11 jul, 01:27, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 8, 3:52?pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
Reply or don't reply it doesn't matter to me. Same as I told Michelle
Malkin.
You like to whack me, go ahead. If you lose some of the anger that is
fine. I can take it.
I plant seeds, sprouting the seeds is not in my power.
Look at some of the other forums I am on. I post and keep posting even
with little or no replies.
I am not ego based, but truth based.
The ego based personalities live for replies, I don't.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#
Now see what you have done!
Robibnikoff Mark K. Bilbo and raven1 together now make father
Christmas
HOHOHO!
But I am serious
If they do not think your posts deserve a serious answer,
they should refrain from making any reply
Spoil sport! :P
Well this is alt.atheism
not alt.Ho_Wack . . .
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
11 Jul 2007 11:36:56 AM |
|
|
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1184168903.396843.133330@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 11 jul, 17:40, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
<pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1184147225.679782.277750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On 11 jul, 01:27, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
On Jul 8, 3:52?pm, "pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 2 jul, 22:25, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
--
I think you should stop replying to V
Don't you know he gets a kick out of it?
Reply or don't reply it doesn't matter to me. Same as I told Michelle
Malkin.
You like to whack me, go ahead. If you lose some of the anger that is
fine. I can take it.
I plant seeds, sprouting the seeds is not in my power.
Look at some of the other forums I am on. I post and keep posting even
with little or no replies.
I am not ego based, but truth based.
The ego based personalities live for replies, I don't.
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#
Now see what you have done!
Robibnikoff Mark K. Bilbo and raven1 together now make father
Christmas
HOHOHO!
But I am serious
If they do not think your posts deserve a serious answer,
they should refrain from making any reply
Spoil sport! :P
Well this is alt.atheism
not alt.Ho_Wack . . .
True, so you should just gloss over those posts then ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
10 Jul 2007 10:32:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:27:26 -0700, V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote:
Reply or don
HO! <whack!>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
10 Jul 2007 07:55:05 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:27:26 -0700, V wrote:
Reply
HO! <WHACK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"What the hell is an aluminum Falcon?"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
12 Jul 2007 09:38:22 PM |
|
|
V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote in news:1184110046.781498.202470
@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
Reply or don't rep
Ho! <whack!>
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. Give him a religion,
and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish.
--Timothy Jones
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
02 Jul 2007 08:22:33 PM |
|
|
On Jul 2, 1:25 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
From now on, all my replies to him will consist solely of :
HO! <whack!>
simulating a Zen Roshi correcting and guiding him to enlightenment
with the tender ministrations of his bo-staff. I'd like to ask my
fellow regulars to join me in this; perhaps it may even bring the
egomaniacal twit a bit of enlightenment.
I'm game(y). How many words/sentences is he allowed before a proper
Ho! Whacking?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
02 Jul 2007 08:35:38 PM |
|
|
In article <1183425753.422063.38990
@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Neil Kelsey
said...
I'm game(y). How many words/sentences is he allowed before a proper
Ho! Whacking?
How many times would you let a rattlesnake bite
you, before you took action to save yourself?
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
02 Jul 2007 10:05:22 PM |
|
|
On Jul 2, 6:35 pm, Brian E. Clark <r...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1183425753.422063.38990
@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Neil Kelsey
said...
I'm game(y). How many words/sentences is he allowed before a proper
Ho! Whacking?
How many times would you let a rattlesnake bite
you, before you took action to save yourself?
Hmmmm...V is to rattlesnakes as three year old girls are to Green
Berets. I'm not exactly afraid for my well-being.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "V" |
|
| Title: Re: Dealing with V |
06 Jul 2007 07:23:35 AM |
|
|
On Jul 2, 9:35?pm, Brian E. Clark <r...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1183425753.422063.38990
@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Neil Kelsey
said...
I'm game(y). How many words/sentences is he allowed before a proper
Ho! Whacking?
How many times would you let a rattlesnake bite
you, before you took action to save yourself?
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
Yes, that is good thinking Brian...same Hitler must have sued to
justify his actions.
V
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
