| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
| Date: |
01 Oct 2003 09:32:39 PM |
| Object: |
Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
"ESPN Should Punt Rush Limbaugh
http://tinyurl.com/pegf
Rush Limbaugh's comments this past week on why African American
quarterbacks are succeeding in the NFL is repugnant and based on a
skewed view of reality. In Rush Limbaugh's world, quarterbacks that
are among the top in statistical ratings, that lead their teams to
the brink of the Super Bowl and are repeatedly voted among the best
players in the league are a creation of some media conspiracy.
Wake up, Rush. African American quarterbacks have worked as hard as
any other quarterback to achieve their position. Their success is due
to the same reasons as any player is successful in the league -- they
have worked tirelessly to perfect their game. Their accolades are due
to their success on the field, not because the league or the media
created them.
ESPN knew what they were getting when they hired Limbaugh, who has
shown intolerance for diversity in the past. According to FAIR
(Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), Limbaugh once told an African
American caller into his radio show, "take that bone out of your nose
and call me back." He also said, "Have you ever noticed how all
composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?"
While freedom of speech protects the right of people to say horribly
offensive statements like this, there is no law requiring that
networks like ESPN give them a venue to spew this ugly venom of
bigotry.
Rush Limbaugh should have never been hired in the first place by
ESPN. But now that he has proven that he will not leave his bigoted
views outside the studio, his contract should be immediately
terminated. I will begin an online petition to ESPN demanding that
he be dismissed.
Rush Limbaugh's racist views are a sad remnant of a bigoted past that
still lives today in the far right wing of the Republican Party.
There is no place in legitmate American dialogue for the racist views
along the likes of Rush Limbaugh."
--
He who would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy
from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a
precedent that will reach to himself.
-- Thomas Paine
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
| User: "E.E.Bud Keith" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 12:35:25 AM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9407C7061FB9Btimsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
"ESPN Should Punt Rush Limbaugh
http://tinyurl.com/pegf
Rush Limbaugh's comments this past week on why African American
quarterbacks are succeeding in the NFL is repugnant and based on a
skewed view of reality. In Rush Limbaugh's world, quarterbacks that
are among the top in statistical ratings, that lead their teams to
the brink of the Super Bowl and are repeatedly voted among the best
players in the league are a creation of some media conspiracy.
Wake up, Rush. African American quarterbacks have worked as hard as
any other quarterback to achieve their position. Their success is due
to the same reasons as any player is successful in the league -- they
have worked tirelessly to perfect their game. Their accolades are due
to their success on the field, not because the league or the media
created them.
ESPN knew what they were getting when they hired Limbaugh, who has
shown intolerance for diversity in the past. According to FAIR
(Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), Limbaugh once told an African
American caller into his radio show, "take that bone out of your nose
and call me back." He also said, "Have you ever noticed how all
composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?"
While freedom of speech protects the right of people to say horribly
offensive statements like this, there is no law requiring that
networks like ESPN give them a venue to spew this ugly venom of
bigotry.
Rush Limbaugh should have never been hired in the first place by
ESPN. But now that he has proven that he will not leave his bigoted
views outside the studio, his contract should be immediately
terminated. I will begin an online petition to ESPN demanding that
he be dismissed.
Rush Limbaugh's racist views are a sad remnant of a bigoted past that
still lives today in the far right wing of the Republican Party.
There is no place in legitmate American dialogue for the racist views
along the likes of Rush Limbaugh."
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American dialogue all
points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if you do not like them you
have a perfect right not to listen, but you do not have the right to attempt
to stop him from stating his views. Or is it that free speech only applies
to liberals making statements that others might judge to be offensive
Perhaps you have not seen or heard of racist remarkes uttered by blacks, but
thats ok because they are oppressed and have a perfect right to say whatever
comes to their minds.
--
He who would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy
from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a
precedent that will reach to himself.
-- Thomas Paine
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy. Just Roy." |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 10:22:06 AM |
|
|
"E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<kZydnQSkrN6OJOaiU-KYiA@comcast.com>...
but you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Actually, if you are a private citizen, you do. Saying, "Shut the fvck
up" is also free speech. The Democratic candidates are, for all the
media attention, still only private citizens until they are elected.
Or is it that free speech only applies
to liberals making statements that others might judge to be offensive
Free speech applies to anybody. However, free speech only protects
your speech FROM THE GOVERNMENT. ESPN, and anyone watching it, are
free to exercise THEIR free speech as well.
Personally, I think ESPN was EXCEPTIONALLY tactful in the way they
handled the situation. By Rush's reaction, I think that ESPN gave Rush
the choice to either apologize on air or resign. To save face, he
resigned.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 12:43:40 AM |
|
|
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen, but
you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
--
The search for static security--in the law and elsewhere--is
misguided. The fact is security can only be achieved through constant
change, adapting old ideas that have outlived their usefulness to
current facts."
--Justice William O. Douglas
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 03:20:58 AM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9407E79DDD928timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen, but
you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Er, Howard Dean and Wesley Clark to name 2.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 05:44:15 AM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:KdReb.15902$xB4.14414@twister.southeast.rr.com...
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9407E79DDD928timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen, but
you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Er, Howard Dean and Wesley Clark to name 2.
No. It is beneficial to us for more and more people to know what a windbag
rushie is
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 06:30:19 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3kTeb.9419$gO4.2815@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:KdReb.15902$xB4.14414@twister.southeast.rr.com...
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9407E79DDD928timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen, but
you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Er, Howard Dean and Wesley Clark to name 2.
No. It is beneficial to us for more and more people to know what a
windbag
rushie is
Why, you thinking of running against him?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 08:52:04 AM |
|
|
On 02 Oct 2003, "Fester" <not@home.com> posted this:
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
message news:Xns9407E79DDD928timsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted
this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen,
but you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from
stating his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Er, Howard Dean and Wesley Clark to name 2.
How are they trying to shut Rush up? He's free to say what he wants
in between fixes.
--
"Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to
authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent
us?"
--Justice William O. Douglas
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Scott Linder" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 07:23:30 AM |
|
|
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote:
On 01 Oct 2003, "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> posted this:
In case you had not noticed it there is a place in American
dialogue all points of view or so sayrth the Constitution, if
you do not like them you have a perfect right not to listen, but
you do not have the right to attempt to stop him from stating
his views.
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Howard Dean.
Wesley Clark.
I'm sure there are many more.
JSL
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
02 Oct 2003 09:24:37 PM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote:
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Howard Dean.
Wesley Clark.
I'm sure there are many more.
I believe that what they both said was that Rush should be fired
from his ESPN job.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Scott Linder" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
03 Oct 2003 02:01:32 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote:
Who's trying to shut Rush up?
Howard Dean.
Wesley Clark.
I'm sure there are many more.
I believe that what they both said was that Rush should be fired
from his ESPN job.
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
Do you want your next president making hiring/firing decisions in the
private sector?
JSL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffraham Prestonian" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
03 Oct 2003 08:41:41 PM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
I believe that what they both said was that Rush should be fired
from his ESPN job.
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
.... 'cause we all know, ESPN is Rush's only forum, and
football commentary would suffer immensely without him.
--
Toucan
Be heard. Spread the word.
www.usaidit.org or www.YouSaidit.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
03 Oct 2003 09:59:00 PM |
|
|
July 24, 2001 4:02 PM EDT
OXYCONTIN HOLDS SECRET TO GAY PILL
Story by Andrew Weisman
The media is filled with stories on the newest scourge to
hit America's streets, the latest "hip" drug, Oxycontin. We
gloss over the reports on this latest fad to hit the drug
culture, this "Poor man's smack," the "Hillbilly Heroin,"
failing to so much as register the fact that the pills are
selling for as much as $300 a piece, many times higher
than the price of heroin. What's a little inconsistency in
news reporting anyway? We don't even notice anymore.
We've got a coffee to finish, a bus to catch. Wondering
how a new, rarely prescribed and extremely expensive
drug could come to such high demand would only slow
us down. And what a demand it is.
CNN reports that no less than 37 pharmacies in
Massachusetts alone have been robbed of their Oxycontin
supply, all in a brief six-month period. To this we must
add the countless number of doses obtained with
prescriptions, either forged by addicts or written out by
liberal doctors. Huge quantities of this drug hitting the
streets, all this demand, and the medias only response is
to claim that it's an "inexpensive" alternative to drugs
costing much, much less. Why the lies? Why the cover
up? It's because the truth would hurt you so much more
than the lie.
THE TRUTH
Oxycontin is a main ingredient to the "gay pill," the
chemical compound proven to turn normal, red-blooded men
and boys into devout homosexuals. Worse yet, Oxycontin
alone is enough to win the average male over to the
homosexual lifestyle.
HOW IT WORKS
Oxycontin is a powerful, synthetic opium derivative, and
a quick, efficient painkiller. How it works is by latching
itself on to your body's nerve receptors, blocking them so
that your nerves are unable to report pain. Unfortunately,
your body reports physical pleasure using this exact same
process. If anything, physical pleasure, like from sex, is
blocked much more quickly and easily than the pain caused
by a cancer. The same amount of Oxycontin used to treat the
pain from cancer would be enough to block physical sexual
pleasure in any five men. It is in this manner that the victim
of Oxycontin is stripped of a normal sex life, with the
operative word being "normal."
THE LINK TO HOMOSEXUALITY
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex. Starting with Kinsey in
1947, researchers have been documenting the heightened
physical pleasure and increased psychological response
found in men who engage in homosexual acts. What's more,
this "heightened" sexuality appears to be true regardless of
whether or not the male experiences physical contact with
another male, or simply engages in homosexual fantasies
while masturbating. Homosexual sex is simply that intense.
As the respected researcher Dr. Paul Cameron of The Family
Research Institute stated in an interview published in the
March 1999 issue of "The Rolling Stone" magazine:
"If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own
personal amusement, and all you want is the most satisfying
orgasm you can get - and that is what homosexuality seems
to be - then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The
evidence is that men do a better job on men, and women on
women, if all you are looking for is orgasm." A little later
Dr. Cameron went on to add:
"It's pure sexuality. It's almost like pure heroin. It's such a rush."
The research makes it clear: Homosexual sex is well beyond
anything normal people can experience, and this is how
Oxycontin alone can turn people gay.
CLIMB UP AND JOIN US
Just a small amount of Oxycontin, with it's nerve defeating
powers, eliminates your ability to experience normal sex.
Although some men do report that they are capable of
functioning sexually while on Oxycontin, all report that the
physical pleasure and psychological stimulation is almost
nil. Literally, by blocking the nerve receptors in your body,
Oxycontin raises the threshold necessary to feel physical
stimulation (be it pain or pleasure) to a point much higher
than normal sex is usually able to attain. Victims soon
discover that they are left with few choices; they must either
forgo sex, accept drastically diminshed sexual feelings or
turn to homosexuality in order to experience orgasmic
pleasure as they were accustomed.
HOOKED
If exposure to Oxycontin will entice normal, healthy men
and boys to engage in homosexual activity (including, but
not limited to homosexual fantasies while masturbating),
eliminating the Oxycontin will restore them to a normal,
heterosexual lifestyle. Right? Wrong. The exact opposite is
true. It is when the victim is off Oxycontin, and it is cleared
from their system, that their sexual capacity is restored to
"normal" and they discover the "allure" of homosexuality.
The problem is, while on Oxycontin, they were
experiencing homosexual sex at the same intensity as they
had previously experienced heterosexual sex. The
Oxycontin raised their pleasure threshold, so the
homosexual sex was no better, if not worse, than the normal
sex they had previously experienced. It is only after the
Oxycontin is removed from their system, and they engage in
homosexual behavior, that they finally experience sex as does
a homosexual male, and they understand what they've been
missing with normal sex.
THE FACTS
As many as 75% of Oxycontin victims report a return to their
previous homosexual lifestyle, either fantasizing about or
having sexual contact with other males, within two days of
kicking the drug. The figure grows to over 90% within a
two-week period, with the remainder falling well below the
expected "false reports" of heterosexuality, given the stigma
attached to being gay within this society.
NO RETURN
Unfortunately, once a victim has been "turned on" to
homosexual sex there appears to be no turning back. "It's a
'Keeping up With The Jones' mentality," one researcher
explained. "People are happy with what they've got right up
until the moment they discover that somebody else has it
better. Once they've seen the lights of Paris," he said, something
of a pun on Gay Pari, "They're no longer happy living on the farm."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bear Trucker Lvr" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 01:11:12 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cu-cnV4GlZxIq-OiU-KYjA@comcast.com>...
July 24, 2001 4:02 PM EDT
OXYCONTIN HOLDS SECRET TO GAY PILL
<snipped for brevity>
If this is not the epitome of junk science. No facts, no
documentation to back it up, and the most REDICULOUS premisis. Makes
a middle of the road guy like me just cringe...
people actually BELIEVE this tripe?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Raymond" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
05 Oct 2003 05:35:56 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cu-cnV4GlZxIq-OiU-KYjA@comcast.com>...
July 24, 2001 4:02 PM EDT
OXYCONTIN HOLDS SECRET TO GAY PILL
Story by Andrew Weisman
The media is filled with stories on the newest scourge to
hit America's streets, the latest "hip" drug, Oxycontin. We
gloss over the reports on this latest fad to hit the drug
culture, this "Poor man's smack," the "Hillbilly Heroin,"
failing to so much as register the fact that the pills are
selling for as much as $300 a piece, many times higher
than the price of heroin. What's a little inconsistency in
news reporting anyway? We don't even notice anymore.
We've got a coffee to finish, a bus to catch. Wondering
how a new, rarely prescribed and extremely expensive
drug could come to such high demand would only slow
us down. And what a demand it is.
CNN reports that no less than 37 pharmacies in
Massachusetts alone have been robbed of their Oxycontin
supply, all in a brief six-month period. To this we must
add the countless number of doses obtained with
prescriptions, either forged by addicts or written out by
liberal doctors. Huge quantities of this drug hitting the
streets, all this demand, and the medias only response is
to claim that it's an "inexpensive" alternative to drugs
costing much, much less. Why the lies? Why the cover
up? It's because the truth would hurt you so much more
than the lie.
THE TRUTH
Oxycontin is a main ingredient to the "gay pill," the
chemical compound proven to turn normal, red-blooded men
and boys into devout homosexuals. Worse yet, Oxycontin
alone is enough to win the average male over to the
homosexual lifestyle.
****************
It sure looks like Rush is in for some bad time. I don't like him or
his politics but I still have to see the proof that he ate the
quantity of junk that is claimed. This guy sure is the last person I
ever expected to get so screwed up. There has been talk around the
internet for a long time about his drug use and possible homosexual
activity that I questioned. I read where the drug was VICODIN which is
alleged to act much like oxycontin.
There is a site that spends a great deal of time on Rush and there
are some comments about him that may or may not be true.
Look it over and decide for yourselves.
There is one woman on there that says she had sex with Rush when she
shared time with him in a rehab place in Florida.
"Rush Is A Vicodin Gulping Closet Queen"
Try: http://killdevilhill.com/rushlimbaughchat/messages2/964.html
I guess we will see. If he doesn't end up in the can, he is now
qualified to run for political office. Bob Graham's term is up in 2004
and since BOB won't be president, like he want's to be, Rush could run
against him and now, with this new revelation of his fucked up life
style, he would be a sure winner. Especially in Florida.
Enjoy Yom Kippur
Bluerhymer
************************
HOW IT WORKS
Oxycontin is a powerful, synthetic opium derivative, and
a quick, efficient painkiller. How it works is by latching
itself on to your body's nerve receptors, blocking them so
that your nerves are unable to report pain. Unfortunately,
your body reports physical pleasure using this exact same
process. If anything, physical pleasure, like from sex, is
blocked much more quickly and easily than the pain caused
by a cancer. The same amount of Oxycontin used to treat the
pain from cancer would be enough to block physical sexual
pleasure in any five men. It is in this manner that the victim
of Oxycontin is stripped of a normal sex life, with the
operative word being "normal."
THE LINK TO HOMOSEXUALITY
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex. Starting with Kinsey in
1947, researchers have been documenting the heightened
physical pleasure and increased psychological response
found in men who engage in homosexual acts. What's more,
this "heightened" sexuality appears to be true regardless of
whether or not the male experiences physical contact with
another male, or simply engages in homosexual fantasies
while masturbating. Homosexual sex is simply that intense.
As the respected researcher Dr. Paul Cameron of The Family
Research Institute stated in an interview published in the
March 1999 issue of "The Rolling Stone" magazine:
"If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own
personal amusement, and all you want is the most satisfying
orgasm you can get - and that is what homosexuality seems
to be - then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The
evidence is that men do a better job on men, and women on
women, if all you are looking for is orgasm." A little later
Dr. Cameron went on to add:
"It's pure sexuality. It's almost like pure heroin. It's such a rush."
The research makes it clear: Homosexual sex is well beyond
anything normal people can experience, and this is how
Oxycontin alone can turn people gay.
CLIMB UP AND JOIN US
Just a small amount of Oxycontin, with it's nerve defeating
powers, eliminates your ability to experience normal sex.
Although some men do report that they are capable of
functioning sexually while on Oxycontin, all report that the
physical pleasure and psychological stimulation is almost
nil. Literally, by blocking the nerve receptors in your body,
Oxycontin raises the threshold necessary to feel physical
stimulation (be it pain or pleasure) to a point much higher
than normal sex is usually able to attain. Victims soon
discover that they are left with few choices; they must either
forgo sex, accept drastically diminshed sexual feelings or
turn to homosexuality in order to experience orgasmic
pleasure as they were accustomed.
HOOKED
If exposure to Oxycontin will entice normal, healthy men
and boys to engage in homosexual activity (including, but
not limited to homosexual fantasies while masturbating),
eliminating the Oxycontin will restore them to a normal,
heterosexual lifestyle. Right? Wrong. The exact opposite is
true. It is when the victim is off Oxycontin, and it is cleared
from their system, that their sexual capacity is restored to
"normal" and they discover the "allure" of homosexuality.
The problem is, while on Oxycontin, they were
experiencing homosexual sex at the same intensity as they
had previously experienced heterosexual sex. The
Oxycontin raised their pleasure threshold, so the
homosexual sex was no better, if not worse, than the normal
sex they had previously experienced. It is only after the
Oxycontin is removed from their system, and they engage in
homosexual behavior, that they finally experience sex as does
a homosexual male, and they understand what they've been
missing with normal sex.
THE FACTS
As many as 75% of Oxycontin victims report a return to their
previous homosexual lifestyle, either fantasizing about or
having sexual contact with other males, within two days of
kicking the drug. The figure grows to over 90% within a
two-week period, with the remainder falling well below the
expected "false reports" of heterosexuality, given the stigma
attached to being gay within this society.
NO RETURN
Unfortunately, once a victim has been "turned on" to
homosexual sex there appears to be no turning back. "It's a
'Keeping up With The Jones' mentality," one researcher
explained. "People are happy with what they've got right up
until the moment they discover that somebody else has it
better. Once they've seen the lights of Paris," he said, something
of a pun on Gay Pari, "They're no longer happy living on the farm."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jaym1212" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 11:48:28 AM |
|
|
A plant is so genetically different from humans that we accept it for
what it is and do not make a moral judgement that is bad or wrong.
However, when the genetic difference is very minor, many of us start
to make moral judgements that they (Gays) are bad or wrong. At what
threshold of genetic difference should be we start becoming morally
judgemental?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ctrl Alt Del" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
03 Oct 2003 09:59:48 PM |
|
|
In article <cu-cnV4GlZxIq-OiU-KYjA@comcast.com>, says...
July 24, 2001 4:02 PM EDT
OXYCONTIN HOLDS SECRET TO GAY PILL
Story by Andrew Weisman
The media is filled with stories on the newest scourge to
hit America's streets, the latest "hip" drug, Oxycontin. We
gloss over the reports on this latest fad to hit the drug
culture, this "Poor man's smack," the "Hillbilly Heroin,"
failing to so much as register the fact that the pills are
selling for as much as $300 a piece, many times higher
than the price of heroin. What's a little inconsistency in
news reporting anyway? We don't even notice anymore.
We've got a coffee to finish, a bus to catch. Wondering
how a new, rarely prescribed and extremely expensive
drug could come to such high demand would only slow
us down. And what a demand it is.
CNN reports that no less than 37 pharmacies in
Massachusetts alone have been robbed of their Oxycontin
supply, all in a brief six-month period. To this we must
add the countless number of doses obtained with
prescriptions, either forged by addicts or written out by
liberal doctors. Huge quantities of this drug hitting the
streets, all this demand, and the medias only response is
to claim that it's an "inexpensive" alternative to drugs
costing much, much less. Why the lies? Why the cover
up? It's because the truth would hurt you so much more
than the lie.
THE TRUTH
Oxycontin is a main ingredient to the "gay pill," the
chemical compound proven to turn normal, red-blooded men
and boys into devout homosexuals. Worse yet, Oxycontin
alone is enough to win the average male over to the
homosexual lifestyle.
HOW IT WORKS
Oxycontin is a powerful, synthetic opium derivative, and
a quick, efficient painkiller. How it works is by latching
itself on to your body's nerve receptors, blocking them so
that your nerves are unable to report pain. Unfortunately,
your body reports physical pleasure using this exact same
process. If anything, physical pleasure, like from sex, is
blocked much more quickly and easily than the pain caused
by a cancer. The same amount of Oxycontin used to treat the
If he hasn't tried it out yet, He will have plenty of chances to find out, if
he's gay in jail.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Levy Oates" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 01:52:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:59:00 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
---------
Archdeacom Levy Oates
On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh)
Basingstoke, England
http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 04:00:05 AM |
|
|
"Levy Oates" <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
Sex researcher and all around darling of the Christian right wing,
Dr. Paul Cameron of the "Family Research Institute."
I checked it out. Go to Google and punch in:
"Paul Cameron" "Rolling Stone"
The quotes are genuine. Here's a blurb from the Orlando Weekly:
http://www.orlandoweekly.com/weird/index.asp?now=1793
.
|
|
|
| User: "Levy Oates" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
05 Oct 2003 12:24:10 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 05:00:05 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Levy Oates" <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
Sex researcher and all around darling of the Christian right wing,
Dr. Paul Cameron of the "Family Research Institute."
I checked it out. Go to Google and punch in:
"Paul Cameron" "Rolling Stone"
The quotes are genuine. Here's a blurb from the Orlando Weekly:
http://www.orlandoweekly.com/weird/index.asp?now=1793
OK, thanks for the info, but when I asked if anyone could verify that gay sex
was more fun than straight sex, I was kinda hoping that someone with personal
experience of both could give us an opinion ;-)
---------
Archdeacom Levy Oates
On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh)
Basingstoke, England
http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
06 Oct 2003 02:34:11 AM |
|
|
"Levy Oates" <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote
OK, thanks for the info, but when I asked if anyone could
verify that gay sex was more fun than straight sex, I was
kinda hoping that someone with personal experience of
both could give us an opinion ;-)
In Dubya's America?
Perish the thought!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Monroe" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 10:49:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 07:52:17 +0100, Levy Oates
<levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:59:00 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
Too bad the gay blade King Pineapple has disappeared due to his
embarrassment over the drunken bush's failures. His consultation could
be germane for once.
---------
Archdeacom Levy Oates
On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh)
Basingstoke, England
http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/
"Hard work never hurt anyone.But,
there's no point in taking a chance."
Ronald Reagan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ctrl Alt Del" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 01:00:24 PM |
|
|
In article <urqtnvoheker8f566vs00s229q4qqtrrje@4ax.com>,
says...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 07:52:17 +0100, Levy Oates
<levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:59:00 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
Too bad the gay blade King Pineapple has disappeared due to his
embarrassment over the drunken bush's failures. His consultation could
be germane for once.
All he's capable of throwing around insults.
I doubt he would have anything to contribute on any subject, even one he is
intimately familiar with.
---------
Archdeacom Levy Oates
On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh)
Basingstoke, England
http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/
"Hard work never hurt anyone.But,
there's no point in taking a chance."
Ronald Reagan
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Monroe" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 03:06:24 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 18:00:24 GMT, Ctrl Alt Del <spam@hotmail.com>
wrote:
In article <urqtnvoheker8f566vs00s229q4qqtrrje@4ax.com>,
says...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 07:52:17 +0100, Levy Oates
<levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:59:00 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
It has long been established that homosexual sex is a great
deal more intense than normal sex.
Is there anyone out there who can confirm this for me?
Too bad the gay blade King Pineapple has disappeared due to his
embarrassment over the drunken bush's failures. His consultation could
be germane for once.
All he's capable of throwing around insults.
I doubt he would have anything to contribute on any subject, even one he is
intimately familiar with.
No doubt you're correct.
---------
Archdeacom Levy Oates
On behalf of the Prophet Eric Peabody (pbuh)
Basingstoke, England
http://www.angelfire.com/alt/bumblism/
"Hard work never hurt anyone.But,
there's no point in taking a chance."
Ronald Reagan
"Hard work never hurt anyone.But,
there's no point in taking a chance."
Ronald Reagan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 04:24:31 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:59:00 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
OXYCONTIN HOLDS SECRET TO GAY PILL
I've seen quite some bull ***** about homosexuality, but this stands
out by a mile.
Very much surprised to see this nonsense posted by you, Jtem.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: New Facts: Is Rush Limbaugh Gay? |
04 Oct 2003 05:39:15 PM |
|
|
"Jos Flachs" <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote
Very much surprised to see this nonsense posted by you, Jtem.
Look where it was crossposted to ;^)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
03 Oct 2003 05:39:22 PM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
I believe that what they both said was that Rush should be fired
from his ESPN job.
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
Assuming that Rush Limbaugh didn't already have 987^576 times
more media time than any ten of us combined -- without ever
appearing on ESPN -- you have a point.
Otherwise you're a complete loser who's blown things way out
of proportion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Scott Linder" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
06 Oct 2003 01:27:27 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
I believe that what they both said was that Rush should be fired
from his ESPN job.
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
Assuming that Rush Limbaugh didn't already have 987^576 times
more media time than any ten of us combined -- without ever
appearing on ESPN -- you have a point.
Otherwise you're a complete loser who's blown things way out
of proportion.
The irony of that statement must have escaped you.
JSL
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
07 Oct 2003 12:18:05 AM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
Assuming that Rush Limbaugh didn't already have 987^576 times
more media time than any ten of us combined -- without ever
appearing on ESPN -- you have a point.
Otherwise you're a complete loser who's blown things way out
of proportion.
The irony of that statement must have escaped you.
That you can't see how idiotic your claims are?
How do you "shut up" a man by kicking him off ESPN, when he
has a nationally syndicated radio program?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Scott Linder" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
07 Oct 2003 09:46:07 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
Yes, if effect, shutting him up.
Assuming that Rush Limbaugh didn't already have 987^576 times
more media time than any ten of us combined -- without ever
appearing on ESPN -- you have a point.
Otherwise you're a complete loser who's blown things way out
of proportion.
The irony of that statement must have escaped you.
That you can't see how idiotic your claims are?
How do you "shut up" a man by kicking him off ESPN, when he
has a nationally syndicated radio program?
That's one front. The next is the "Equal Time" provisions people are
trying to enact.
JSL
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean asks ESPN to punt Rush |
07 Oct 2003 12:12:48 PM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linder.one@osu.edu> wrote
How do you "shut up" a man by kicking him off ESPN, when he
has a nationally syndicated radio program?
That's one front. The next is the "Equal Time" provisions people
are trying to enact.
Great. But before you translate that into English, would you mind
answering my question?
Thanks in advance.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|