| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
03 Jun 2005 11:10:50 PM |
| Object: |
Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
They never changed. They just got worse.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 02:17:03 AM |
|
|
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "Behold Clayton...The Anti-Jeebus!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 04:45:51 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-78FE60.00170304062005@news.giganews.com...
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
Well I was only two years old and I know about it! I think it's more wilful
ignorance than anything else. As the saying goes....those that don't know
history are destined to repeat it!
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 02:00:57 AM |
|
|
In article <42a17813$0$5180$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
"Behold Clayton...The Anti-Jeebus!!" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymails.com>
wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-78FE60.00170304062005@news.giganews.com...
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
Well I was only two years old and I know about it! I think it's more wilful
ignorance than anything else. As the saying goes....those that don't know
history are destined to repeat it!
The problem is that that most US kids these days don't read history
unless it's required for school. They'd rather listed to rap on their
iPods on the way to McDonald's. I always enjoyed reading about other
places in other times and even historical novels. My mind boggles at the
ignorance of some of the youngsters today about even the history of
their own country.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 02:31:36 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
What's sad is that people older than I am (I'm 27) and they don't know
about Watergate, and I do. Some people actually thought it was
something that a Democrat did; that "-gate" is a suffix attached to
anything that a Democrat does that is scandalous... such as "Filegate"
or "Cigargate" not knowing that the suffix -gate actually originated
with Watergate.
Amerrikin Edjewkayshinnul Sistim at it's fynist...
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 02:07:16 AM |
|
|
In article <sNcoe.1958$yS2.1867@trnddc07>,
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
What's sad is that people older than I am (I'm 27) and they don't know
about Watergate, and I do. Some people actually thought it was
something that a Democrat did; that "-gate" is a suffix attached to
anything that a Democrat does that is scandalous... such as "Filegate"
or "Cigargate" not knowing that the suffix -gate actually originated
with Watergate.
Good for you. So many don't even care about the history of their own
country. I remember a recent poll where a majority couldn't even place
the American Civil War in the last half of the nineteenth century.
Amerrikin Edjewkayshinnul Sistim at it's fynist...
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 02:27:52 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <sNcoe.1958$yS2.1867@trnddc07>,
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
What's sad is that people older than I am (I'm 27) and they don't know
about Watergate, and I do. Some people actually thought it was
something that a Democrat did; that "-gate" is a suffix attached to
anything that a Democrat does that is scandalous... such as "Filegate"
or "Cigargate" not knowing that the suffix -gate actually originated
with Watergate.
Good for you. So many don't even care about the history of their own
country. I remember a recent poll where a majority couldn't even place
the American Civil War in the last half of the nineteenth century.
*slaps forehead, slowly pulls down his face in exasperation*
I also recall that a majority cannot point to their own state on a map
of the United States, if the state lines were not drawn...
Reminds me of Jaywalking:
Jay: "Who is this?" *holds up a picture of Barbara Bush (wife of Bush 41)*
Man: "Uhhh... Hillary Clinton?"
Amerrikin Edjewkayshinnul Sistim at it's fynist...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 07:14:52 AM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:YPxoe.6070$J73.3101@trnddc05:
johac wrote:
In article <sNcoe.1958$yS2.1867@trnddc07>,
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with
a number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the
people in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm
starting to feel old.
What's sad is that people older than I am (I'm 27) and they don't
know about Watergate, and I do. Some people actually thought it was
something that a Democrat did; that "-gate" is a suffix attached to
anything that a Democrat does that is scandalous... such as
"Filegate" or "Cigargate" not knowing that the suffix -gate actually
originated with Watergate.
Good for you. So many don't even care about the history of their own
country. I remember a recent poll where a majority couldn't even
place the American Civil War in the last half of the nineteenth
century.
*slaps forehead, slowly pulls down his face in exasperation*
I also recall that a majority cannot point to their own state on a map
of the United States, if the state lines were not drawn...
Reminds me of Jaywalking:
Jay: "Who is this?" *holds up a picture of Barbara Bush (wife of Bush
41)* Man: "Uhhh... Hillary Clinton?"
You realize of course that you don't get shown on Jaywalking if you get
the answers right.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Deeo Throat and Whining Republican Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 10:53:58 PM |
|
|
In article <YPxoe.6070$J73.3101@trnddc05>,
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <sNcoe.1958$yS2.1867@trnddc07>,
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <3e-dnYipR-5etDzfRVn-3Q@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
They never changed. They just got worse.
Sad but true.
http://zeppscommentaries.com/History/deepthroat.htm
I made a comment about Watergate at work yesterday and was met with a
number of blank stares. Then I realized that likely half of the people
in my company hadn't even been born when it happened. I'm starting to
feel old.
What's sad is that people older than I am (I'm 27) and they don't know
about Watergate, and I do. Some people actually thought it was
something that a Democrat did; that "-gate" is a suffix attached to
anything that a Democrat does that is scandalous... such as "Filegate"
or "Cigargate" not knowing that the suffix -gate actually originated
with Watergate.
Good for you. So many don't even care about the history of their own
country. I remember a recent poll where a majority couldn't even place
the American Civil War in the last half of the nineteenth century.
*slaps forehead, slowly pulls down his face in exasperation*
I also recall that a majority cannot point to their own state on a map
of the United States, if the state lines were not drawn...
I recall a poll taken some time ago, I can't recall the exact figure,
but a fair percentage couldn't even find their own country on the map.
In recent poll on science, 255 of those who responded didn't know that
the Earth revolved around the Sun.
Reminds me of Jaywalking:
Jay: "Who is this?" *holds up a picture of Barbara Bush (wife of Bush 41)*
Man: "Uhhh... Hillary Clinton?"
Heh! I've heard it said that she bears a strong resemblance to George
Washington.
Amerrikin Edjewkayshinnul Sistim at it's fynist...
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 06:06:05 AM |
|
|
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 11:58:19 AM |
|
|
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
BDK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 01:14:48 PM |
|
|
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 07:42:41 PM |
|
|
In article <1117908890.9255323ad0507053b50198df310d92ed@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
Nice try, but it's still not anywhere close to the same thing. Nixon was
an active participant in the watergate cover up, it's on tape starting a
few days after the burglary, so there isn't any doubt he's guilty. Not
only that, he's on tape plotting all kinds of other illegal stuff
including OTHER break ins! One of his "advisers" somehow kept him from
going ahead with that stuff, but he was already bad enough.
Clinton lied about a BJ. In a lawsuit that should never have been
allowed to go forward. Even if he flashed Paula Jones (yuck), it's
hardly worth all the crap that happend. Of course, whitewater wasn't
anything much, so they HAD to do something to him.
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
Like comparing a match to a tanker full of gas in BTU potential.
I still would like to know how Paula was able to afford a new Mercedes
SUV AND a high buck car before Clinton gave her a dime. That's on tape
too. Hmmmm.
BDK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 06:44:38 AM |
|
|
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117908890.9255323ad0507053b50198df310d92ed@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
Nice try, but it's still not anywhere close to the same thing. Nixon
was an active participant in the watergate cover up, it's on tape
starting a few days after the burglary, so there isn't any doubt he's
guilty. Not only that, he's on tape plotting all kinds of other
illegal stuff including OTHER break ins! One of his "advisers" somehow
kept him from going ahead with that stuff, but he was already bad
enough.
Clinton lied about a BJ. In a lawsuit that should never have been
allowed to go forward. Even if he flashed Paula Jones (yuck), it's
hardly worth all the crap that happend. Of course, whitewater wasn't
anything much, so they HAD to do something to him.
Whitewater was *big*, they just couldn't pin it on the Clintons.
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
Like comparing a match to a tanker full of gas in BTU potential.
I still would like to know how Paula was able to afford a new Mercedes
SUV AND a high buck car before Clinton gave her a dime. That's on tape
too. Hmmmm.
Yawn.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 11:51:57 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through; in the other,
the president was countenancing felonies in the interest of
sabotaging the political opposition, and subsequently obstructing
investigation and destroying evidence.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 12:08:16 PM |
|
|
(Cary Kittrell) wrote in news:d81uvd$rnh$1
@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm continually amazed
at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
in the other,
the president was countenancing felonies in the interest of
sabotaging the political opposition, and subsequently obstructing
investigation and destroying evidence.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 12:14:03 PM |
|
|
In article <1118077698.4bb2887ec84af3285446a218b798caa9@teranews> Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in news:d81uvd$rnh$1
@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm continually amazed
at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
You brought up Linda Tripp, so I assumed that you are contrasting
Watergate with Monicagate.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 12:48:57 PM |
|
|
(Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8208r$aq9$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118077698.4bb2887ec84af3285446a218b798caa9@teranews>
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
(Cary Kittrell) wrote in news:d81uvd$rnh$1
@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a
Presidential secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt
basically got lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm continually
amazed at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
You brought up Linda Tripp, so I assumed that you are contrasting
Watergate with Monicagate.
I'm contrasting Tripp's treatment with Felt's.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 02:48:24 PM |
|
|
In article <1118080137.70af8daefd280d54a47a94d12d0d3295@teranews> Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8208r$aq9$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118077698.4bb2887ec84af3285446a218b798caa9@teranews>
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in news:d81uvd$rnh$1
@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a
Presidential secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt
basically got lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm continually
amazed at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
You brought up Linda Tripp, so I assumed that you are contrasting
Watergate with Monicagate.
I'm contrasting Tripp's treatment with Felt's.
As was I. What Linda Tripp did was to broadcast girl-talk stories
Monica had confided in her; what Monica participated in was in
no way sexual harassment.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 08:08:36 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:d829a8$80u$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <1118080137.70af8daefd280d54a47a94d12d0d3295@teranews> Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8208r$aq9$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118077698.4bb2887ec84af3285446a218b798caa9@teranews>
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in news:d81uvd$rnh$1
@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a
Presidential secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt
basically got lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm continually
amazed at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
You brought up Linda Tripp, so I assumed that you are contrasting
Watergate with Monicagate.
I'm contrasting Tripp's treatment with Felt's.
As was I. What Linda Tripp did was to broadcast girl-talk stories
Monica had confided in her; what Monica participated in was in
no way sexual harassment.
What Linda did was to illegally record private conversations
between herself and Monica Lewinsky without Monica's
knowledge. This is not the behavior of a 'friend'. Tripp should
have gotten a prison term for this. Her Republicans financial
supporters saw to it that she got away with her crime. Of
course, when they didn't need her anymore, they dumped her.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 10:23:53 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in
news:DLSdnQwvHMYabjnfRVn-hQ@comcast.com:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:d829a8$80u$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <1118080137.70af8daefd280d54a47a94d12d0d3295@teranews>
Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d8208r$aq9$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <1118077698.4bb2887ec84af3285446a218b798caa9@teranews>
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:d81uvd$rnh$1 @onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a
Presidential secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while
Felt basically got lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully
proportionate to the difference between the two situations: in
one case someone's private sexual pecadillos were being pawed
through;
Sexual harrassment is *not* a private peccadillo. I'm
continually amazed at how that little fact gets whitewatered.
You brought up Linda Tripp, so I assumed that you are contrasting
Watergate with Monicagate.
I'm contrasting Tripp's treatment with Felt's.
As was I. What Linda Tripp did was to broadcast girl-talk stories
Monica had confided in her; what Monica participated in was in
no way sexual harassment.
What Linda did was to illegally record private conversations
between herself and Monica Lewinsky without Monica's
knowledge. This is not the behavior of a 'friend'. Tripp should
have gotten a prison term for this. Her Republicans financial
supporters saw to it that she got away with her crime. Of
course, when they didn't need her anymore, they dumped her.
Which only proves my point. Felt broke all sorts of laws *and* his oath
to the FBI by revealing information about an ongoing investigation. He
too should have gone to jail, no matter that his information brought
down a President who deserved what he got.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 12:02:40 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:51:57 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through; in the other,
the president was countenancing felonies in the interest of
sabotaging the political opposition, and subsequently obstructing
investigation and destroying evidence.
But he was a Rebublican so it was OK.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
06 Jun 2005 12:12:05 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
news:ec09a1d742s296u6fhe129gnlm9ajf9p69@4ax.com:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:51:57 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> writes:
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
An understandable reaction, I think, and one fully proportionate
to the difference between the two situations: in one case someone's
private sexual pecadillos were being pawed through; in the other,
the president was countenancing felonies in the interest of
sabotaging the political opposition, and subsequently obstructing
investigation and destroying evidence.
But he was a Rebublican so it was OK.
Who said that it was OK?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 10:30:29 AM |
|
|
In article <1117971878.48f196d2a68ed39451e2b8b8ed7b711c@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0c148a6cf9db5498990c@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117908890.9255323ad0507053b50198df310d92ed@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
Nice try, but it's still not anywhere close to the same thing. Nixon
was an active participant in the watergate cover up, it's on tape
starting a few days after the burglary, so there isn't any doubt he's
guilty. Not only that, he's on tape plotting all kinds of other
illegal stuff including OTHER break ins! One of his "advisers" somehow
kept him from going ahead with that stuff, but he was already bad
enough.
Clinton lied about a BJ. In a lawsuit that should never have been
allowed to go forward. Even if he flashed Paula Jones (yuck), it's
hardly worth all the crap that happend. Of course, whitewater wasn't
anything much, so they HAD to do something to him.
Whitewater was *big*, they just couldn't pin it on the Clintons.
And you think these two things are equal?? LOL
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
Like comparing a match to a tanker full of gas in BTU potential.
I still would like to know how Paula was able to afford a new Mercedes
SUV AND a high buck car before Clinton gave her a dime. That's on tape
too. Hmmmm.
Yawn.
Yawn yourself. If you can't see the difference, ok, I guess that
explains your strange affection for Bush..
BDK
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 06:10:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 11:44:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
The whole point is that Tripp's "crime" was to expose a Presidential
secret, and she got vilified to the *max* while Felt basically got
lionized, even as an anonymous source.
Linda was vilified for pretending to be a friend to Lewinski, wearing
a wire while pumping her as a friend and recording her private phone
conversations while pretending to be her friend.
Pretty low even for a republican.
Giving a ***** in no way attempted to change the out come of an
election. It is only the republican fascination with other peoples
sexual experiences that fueled the "Scandal"
Jesus doesn't want you to suck that sweetheart!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 04:58:01 PM |
|
|
In article <1117908890.9255323ad0507053b50198df310d92ed@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was clearly
consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement, hostile
workplace environment, or interfering with professional/educational
performance. It was also not initiated by clinton but by lewinsky. Not
all sex between an employer and an employee is sexual harassment as you
seem to think. If repugs thought they could make charges of sexual
harassment stick then they would have tried it, rather than merely
resorting to "perjury".
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 06:13:47 AM |
|
|
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself. Clinton did
commit sexual harrassment.
quibbler wrote:
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was clearly
consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement, hostile workplace
environment, or interfering with professional/educational performance. It was
also not initiated by clinton but by lewinsky. Not all sex between an
employer and an employee is sexual harassment as you seem to think. If repugs
thought they could make charges of sexual harassment stick then they would
have tried it, rather than merely resorting to "perjury".
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Kathleen Wiley's evidence involved sexual harassment not the consensual sex
he was not having with "that woman".
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
"As Benjamin Franklin left the State House in Philadelphia
on the closing day of the Constitutional Convention, a woman
asked him what kind of government the statesmen had given America.
Franklin replied: 'A republic, Madame, if you can keep it.'
http://www.boingboing.net/images/Purple-USA.jpg
http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 03:04:45 PM |
|
|
In article <BEC856AA.672FB%chenault@mindspring.com>,
chenault@mindspring.com says...
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself. Clinton did
commit sexual harrassment.
quibbler wrote:
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was clearly
consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement, hostile workplace
environment, or interfering with professional/educational performance. It was
also not initiated by clinton but by lewinsky. Not all sex between an
employer and an employee is sexual harassment as you seem to think. If repugs
thought they could make charges of sexual harassment stick then they would
have tried it, rather than merely resorting to "perjury".
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Kathleen Wiley's evidence involved sexual harassment
The evidence was apparently so good that he was never charged in the
matter. Next.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 07:22:10 PM |
|
|
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was clearly
consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement, hostile workplace
environment, or interfering with professional/educational performance. It
was also not initiated by clinton but by lewinsky. Not all sex between an
employer and an employee is sexual harassment as you seem to think. If
repugs thought they could make charges of sexual harassment stick then they
would have tried it, rather than merely resorting to "perjury".
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Kathleen Wiley's evidence involved sexual harassment
quibbler wrote:
The evidence was apparently so good that he was never charged in the matter.
Next.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
It wasn't necessary. He had plenty charged against him already.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
"As Benjamin Franklin left the State House in Philadelphia
on the closing day of the Constitutional Convention, a woman
asked him what kind of government the statesmen had given America.
Franklin replied: 'A republic, Madame, if you can keep it.'
http://www.boingboing.net/images/Purple-USA.jpg
http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
05 Jun 2005 04:16:18 PM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0d08cbb9f4f8bb9896f8@news.readfreenews.net:
In article <BEC856AA.672FB%chenault@mindspring.com>,
chenault@mindspring.com says...
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
quibbler wrote:
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was
clearly consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement,
hostile workplace environment, or interfering with
professional/educational performance. It was also not initiated by
clinton but by lewinsky. Not all sex between an employer and an
employee is sexual harassment as you seem to think. If repugs
thought they could make charges of sexual harassment stick then
they would have tried it, rather than merely resorting to
"perjury".
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Kathleen Wiley's evidence involved sexual harassment
The evidence was apparently so good that he was never charged in the
matter. Next.
Can I quote you on that the next time the so-called "evidence" for
Bush's so-called "crimes" is mentioned?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Linda Tripp and Blatant Democrat Hypocrites |
04 Jun 2005 07:18:27 PM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0bd1d575465a959896ef@news.readfreenews.net:
In article <1117908890.9255323ad0507053b50198df310d92ed@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
BDK <kingratatatboy@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1d0ba7b7ec266e78989909@news.buckeye-express.com:
In article <1117883166.3bacbaeb962b1ffc0bcbdac4c0e3e026@teranews>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050602-120508-5913r.htm
Fred, the fact that the writer and, apparently you, don't see the
difference...is kind of scary.
It's like comparing a 747 to a hummingbird.
True, Nixon didn't commit the Watergate burglaries himself.
Clinton did commit sexual harrassment.
You obviously don't know much about sexual harassment. This was
clearly consensual sex and it did not result in job advancement,
hostile workplace environment, or interfering with
professional/educational performance. It was also not initiated by
clinton but by lewinsky.
It wasn't about Lewinsky. It was about Paula Jones.
Not all sex between an employer and an
employee is sexual harassment as you seem to think. If repugs thought
they could make charges of sexual harassment stick then they would
have tried it, rather than merely resorting to "perjury".
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Even if the grass is greener on the other side,
they still have to cut it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
AA MEDIA: Johnson RESCHEDULED ("Deep Throat") for Wednesday, 6/1/ MSNBC
Re: Re : Slit the traitor's throat
Mark Felt Assigned to Uncover "Deep Throat"
The pope had tubes rammed down his throat before.
Re: NOMINATION: Bill Baker trained by Anyone with a penis for the Deep throat and Jizz Slurping Award
Re: this *real* deep throat revealed...
Right Wing Hypocrites Up In Arms Over Learning Deep Throat's Identity
Re: Pathetic small fish goes for granny's throat! WHAT A MAN!!!!!
| OT: Deep Throat would have deep throated Karl Rove
Re: this *real* deep throat revealed...
Why Conservatives are Desperate to Denounce Felt/Deep Throat as a 'Traitor!'
Re: this *real* deep throat revealed...
Love Bumps And Love Patches Of The Mouth, Lips, Cheeks, Breasts, Back, Bumbies, Legs, Groins, And Other Places In Women And Men, Bumby Fucking Men And Women And Throat Toggling (Stuffing Dicks Down Throats) Men And Women For Love Parties, Ascension a
Force Your ***** Down My Throat and Blow Your Load!
So, Little ***** Unemployed Chickenhawk Draft Dodger Duke, Should We Shove that Crow Down Your Throat Or Up Your *****?
|
|
|
