Teach science, not belief
http://www.cavalierdaily.com/CVArticle.asp?ID=22140&pid=1249
In his letter ("The facts of intelligent design," Feb. 4), Casey Chalk
shows how easy it is to fall victim to the pseudoscience of intelligent
design. While it has gained recent popularity in some circles, this
belief has been refuted by most of the scientific community in a vast
number of past and present scientific works that support evolution or
dismiss the claims of intelligent design.
Chalk claims that in his Jan. 31 column "Unintelligent design" Anthony
***** "misrepresents intelligent design as a movement of Christian
fundamentalists designed to debunk Darwinism. He hasn't done his
homework." However, it is Chalk who has not done his homework.
Dembski
http://news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Dembski&sa=N&tab=gn
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Dembski&sa=N&tab=nw
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Dembski&sa=N&tab=wd&cat=gwd%2FTop
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Dembski&safe=images&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=100&hl=en
.
|
