| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Average Joe" |
| Date: |
11 Jan 2004 11:26:08 PM |
| Object: |
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble!
The Party Of Ideas
November 20, 2003
The Brilliant & Beautiful Ann Coulter
(Attn. Liberals: Insert your usual vicious, left-wing, hate-filled
personal attacks HERE if unable to refute the article... as Usual!)
WITH ECONOMIC growth and name recognition of the average democRATic
presidential candidate both running at about 7 percent, the democRATs
are in trouble. Unable to rouse more than the Saddam-supporting left
with their kooky foreign-policy ideas, the democRATs had been counting
on a lousy economy.
It turns out that, given a choice between "shock and awe" and "run and
hide," the American people prefer the former. Now that the Bush tax
cuts have already started to kick in and boost the economy, it was
beginning to look as if the Treason Lobby would have nothing to run
on.
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker. Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
At least when Gephardt exploits a family tragedy, he doesn't expect
praise for not exploiting a family tragedy. John Edwards injects his
son's fatal car accident into his campaign by demanding that everyone
notice how he refuses to inject his son's fatal car accident into his
campaign.
Edwards has talked about his son's death in a 1996 car accident on
"Good Morning America," in dozens of profiles and in his new book.
("It was and is the most important fact of my life.") His 1998 Senate
campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he
founded in honor of his son, titled "The Wade Edwards Learning Lab."
He wears his son's Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going
to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a
little too "on the nose."
If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't
you have to take down all those "Ask me about my son's death in a
horrific car accident" bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician
who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal
record for partisan political advantage. I absolutely refuse to
mention the name of my dearly beloved and recently departed son killed
horribly in a car accident, which affected me deeply, to score cheap
political points.
I wouldn't want John Edwards to be president, but I think even Karl
Rove would be willing to stipulate that the death of a son is a
terrible thing.
Howard Dean talks about his brother Charlie's murder at the hands of
North Vietnamese communists. Bizarrely, after working on the failed
George McGovern campaign, Charlie Dean went to Indochina in 1974 to
witness the ravages of the war he had opposed. Not long after he
arrived, the apparently ungrateful communists captured and killed him.
Hey fellas! I'm on your s-- CLUNK!
Howard Dean wears his brother's battered 1960s belt every day. (By
contrast, Ted Kennedy honors the memory of his deceased family members
with several belts every day.) Dean told Dan Rather about his
brother's death at some length on CBS News: "It gave me a sense that
you ought to live for the moment with people; that you really - you
really need to tell people you love them if you love them. It was
certainly the most awful thing that ever happened to our family. It
was terrible for my parents; it was even worse
for them than it was for us."
Dammit, if a man wants to be my president, I have a right to know
where he stands on the issue of when to tell the people you love that
you love them! Couldn't the democRATic Party go back to plagiarizing
British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock like Sen. Joe Biden, rather
than plagiarizing "Lifetime: TV for Women"? Do any men at all vote for
the democRATs anymore?
Carol Moseley Braun's personal tragedy is that she's being forced to
run for president even though it turns out the democRATs won't need
her to split the black vote anyway. Please, can I drop out now? Al
Sharpton is only polling at 2 percent. I hate this!
Sharpton is the counterpoint to his sob sisters in the democRATic
Party. Sharpton libeled innocent men in the Tawana Brawley case. He
inflamed angry mobs in Brooklyn's Crown Heights, leading to the murder
of Yankel Rosenbaum. He incited an anti-Semitic pogrom against a
Jewish-owned clothing store in Harlem, Freddy's, ending in a blaze of
bullets and fire that left several employees dead. So while the other
democRATs talk about their personal tragedies, Sharpton goes around
creating personal tragedies.
In addition to having a number of family deaths among them, the
democRATs' other big idea - too nuanced for a bumper sticker - is that
many of them have Jewish ancestry. There's Joe Lieberman: Always
Jewish. Wesley Clark: Found Out His Father Was Jewish in College. John
Kerry: Jewish Since He Began Presidential Fund-Raising. Howard Dean:
Married to a Jew. Al Sharpton: Circumcised. Even Hillary Clinton
claimed to have unearthed some evidence that she was a Jew - along
with the long lost evidence that she was a Yankees fan. And that, boys
and girls, is how the Jews survived thousands of years of persecution:
by being susceptible to pandering.
Clark said that when he discovered he was half-Jewish, he remembered
growing up in Arkansas and feeling "a certain kinship" with Jewish
families in the dry-goods business. (I, too, have always felt a
certain kinship with Calvin Trillin.)
The democRATs' urge to assert a Jewish heritage is designed to
disguise the fact that the democRATs would allow the state of Israel
to perish as Palestinian suicide bombers slaughter Jewish women and
children. Their
humble-origins claptrap is designed to disguise the fact that liberals
think ordinary people are racist scum. Their perverse desire to
discuss the deaths and near-deaths of their children is designed to
disguise the fact that they support the killing of more than a million
unborn children every year. (Oh, by the way, what did their milkman
and millworker fathers think about abortion?)
If the democRATs start extolling you - get a gun.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, selfish, intolerant,
bigoted and racist.
.
|
|
| User: "Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 06:18:56 PM |
|
|
(Average Joe) wrote in message news:<86dd0c43.0401112126.5e319370@posting.google.com>...
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble!
The Party Of Ideas
November 20, 2003
The Brilliant & Beautiful Ann Coulter
(Attn. Liberals: Insert your usual vicious, left-wing, hate-filled
personal attacks HERE if unable to refute the article... as Usual!)
WITH ECONOMIC growth and name recognition of the average democRATic
presidential candidate both running at about 7 percent,
Actually, growth for fourth quarter expected to be something between
3-4%, and it doesn't appear growth will be much better for the
remander of the year. Which is to say unless you can convince large
numbers of folks that it isn't worth their time to look for a job,
unemployment looks stable or increasing.
But it was nice that over a four year period you folks generated one
quarter of growth, even if it cost you 100 billion and a thirty year
war.
the democRATs
are in trouble.
But Ann Coulter, who writes nonsense footnotes for her books, isn't in
trouble. And the Cheney-Lay administration, all of which is liable to
war crime prosecution, and which has been lying on EVERY topic at
EVERY opportunity, it's NOT in trouble. Wait until we get an
independent prosecutor, and you can send your letters of support to:
The International War Crimes Tribunal, The Hague, Nederland.
Unable to rouse more than the Saddam-supporting left
with their kooky foreign-policy ideas,
That would stand at about 48% of the population, but with another year
of this moronic and fruitless war.......
the democRATs had been counting
on a lousy economy.
You have it wrong. We've HAD a lousy economy for three years now. We
had a tax-cut-for-the-rich-to-sop-up-the-surplus (!!!) in 2000, a
tax-cut-for-the-rich-to-stimulate-the-economy of 2001, a
tax-cut-for-the-rich-to-stimulate-the-economy of 2002, and finally a
tax-cut-for-the-rich-to-stimulate-the-economy of 2003 with a
Democratic child benefit section. This, plus a war plus pumping up
the deficit...similar to Ronnie Raygun's economics....It may look
good, but ask George Bush Senior how his single term turned out, and
why.
It turns out that, given a choice between "shock and awe" and "run and
hide," the American people prefer the former.
How about the option "Look at your problems and come to a rational
longterm solution?" Oh, guess that's not an option. President Cheney
doesn't need a long term option, he's getting rich NOW.
Now that the Bush tax
cuts have already started to kick in and boost the economy,
And it only took three years and four tax cuts, and only the last one
seemed to have much effect. Wonder why? Could it be the
tax-cuts-for-the-rich of 2001 and 2002 had no stimulous? Did anyone
suggest that cutting taxes for the rich contains no stimulous? Some
folks did, but not Ann Coulter.
And if 3% growth is what you folks will settle for, I should tell you
that that rate of growth will not decrease unemployment in the US.
Quite the contrary.
But since Ms. Coulter's job is writing 500 word essays for $250 for
publication in Mr. Scaife's rags (no one else will employ her for
obvious reasons), well, we think Ann has reached her full potential.
it was
beginning to look as if the Treason Lobby would have nothing to run
on.
But of course, Ann is a wonderfully civil person and fully in favor of
a "new tone" as Georgie says, and would never resort to ridiculous
moronic name calling, especially since if we'd followed the advice of
the "treason lobby" we'd be 100 billion richer, our economy would be
in better shape, and we'd be safer internationally.
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
***** Cheney's daughter is gay. She used to head the RNC outreach to
gay folks, but the RNC decided they didn't need to reach out to gay
folks, and now she no longer has a job.
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker.
It's unfortunately true. Psychopaths are often quite charismatic and
their ideas are tailored to the simplicity of their audience. I can
understand Ms Coulter's confusion. She understands the simple and
mistaken and partisan, she just isn't interested in policy. I think
the critical thing is, can she or her friends kill someone.
Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
I think what Ms Coulter is saying is that the Democrats have nine
candidates, each of which is better than the Republican single
candidate, a known liar and moron who really should be shipped off to
the Hague for trial.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
At least when Gephardt exploits a family tragedy, he doesn't expect
praise for not exploiting a family tragedy. John Edwards injects his
son's fatal car accident into his campaign by demanding that everyone
notice how he refuses to inject his son's fatal car accident into his
campaign.
Edwards has talked about his son's death in a 1996 car accident on
"Good Morning America," in dozens of profiles and in his new book.
("It was and is the most important fact of my life.") His 1998 Senate
campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he
founded in honor of his son, titled "The Wade Edwards Learning Lab."
He wears his son's Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going
to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a
little too "on the nose."
If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't
you have to take down all those "Ask me about my son's death in a
horrific car accident" bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician
who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal
record for partisan political advantage. I absolutely refuse to
mention the name of my dearly beloved and recently departed son killed
horribly in a car accident, which affected me deeply, to score cheap
political points.
Sort of like Georgie-Boy laughing and joking about the 157 folks he
executed, several retarded and several innocent of any crime, and
joking about it. Here the ever so empathetic and sensitive Ms.
Coulter makes what appear to be jokes (difficult to tell) about the
personal misfortunes of others. Whatta lady!!
Too bad she can't discuss the three years of lies, to the entire
American public, to the entire international community, for the
priviledge of killing several tens of thousands of Iraqies, half under
the age of ten. And the wonderful outcome of the war, which will be
(in five years you can see it), a ten or twelve trillion bill and a
hostile Islamic Republic. Oh! And a vastly increased Al Qaida.
I wouldn't want John Edwards to be president, but I think even Karl
Rove would be willing to stipulate that the death of a son is a
terrible thing.
Except she just made jokes about it.
Howard Dean talks about his brother Charlie's murder at the hands of
North Vietnamese communists. Bizarrely, after working on the failed
George McGovern campaign, Charlie Dean went to Indochina in 1974 to
witness the ravages of the war he had opposed. Not long after he
arrived, the apparently ungrateful communists captured and killed him.
Hey fellas! I'm on your s-- CLUNK!
Ann fails to mention that they killed 55,000 Americans and almost 2
million Vietnamese in the war she so ardently supported and for
what!?! What did we get out of that war, if I may ask? Hey! She
didn't have to fight it, and for that matter, neither did other
supporters of killing Vietnamese including the heroic ***** Cheney, the
heroic Georgie-Boy AWOL Bush Junior, Perle, Wolfowitz, or Rumsfeld.
And they thought the war was jest fahn. And so would you, if you were
very very rich.
Howard Dean wears his brother's battered 1960s belt every day. (By
contrast, Ted Kennedy honors the memory of his deceased family members
with several belts every day.) Dean told Dan Rather about his
brother's death at some length on CBS News: "It gave me a sense that
you ought to live for the moment with people; that you really - you
really need to tell people you love them if you love them. It was
certainly the most awful thing that ever happened to our family. It
was terrible for my parents; it was even worse
for them than it was for us."
Dammit, if a man wants to be my president, I have a right to know
where he stands on the issue of when to tell the people you love that
you love them! Couldn't the democRATic Party go back to plagiarizing
British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock like Sen. Joe Biden, rather
than plagiarizing "Lifetime: TV for Women"? Do any men at all vote for
the democRATs anymore?
This one does, unless the Green candidate looks better. I recall
seeing Ann on some rightwing cable show (MSNBC? At least as far to
the right as Faux News) talking about "girly men" in the Democratic
Party. I think this woman has truly achieved her full potential,
actually, writing 500 word essays at $250 per for Mr. Scaife and
having her work reprinted by dittoheads in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
Carol Moseley Braun's personal tragedy is that she's being forced to
run for president even though it turns out the democRATs won't need
her to split the black vote anyway. Please, can I drop out now? Al
Sharpton is only polling at 2 percent. I hate this!
Sharpton is the counterpoint to his sob sisters in the democRATic
Party. Sharpton libeled innocent men in the Tawana Brawley case. He
inflamed angry mobs in Brooklyn's Crown Heights, leading to the murder
of Yankel Rosenbaum. He incited an anti-Semitic pogrom against a
Jewish-owned clothing store in Harlem, Freddy's, ending in a blaze of
bullets and fire that left several employees dead. So while the other
democRATs talk about their personal tragedies, Sharpton goes around
creating personal tragedies.
In addition to having a number of family deaths among them, the
democRATs' other big idea - too nuanced for a bumper sticker - is that
many of them have Jewish ancestry. There's Joe Lieberman: Always
Jewish. Wesley Clark: Found Out His Father Was Jewish in College. John
Kerry: Jewish Since He Began Presidential Fund-Raising. Howard Dean:
Married to a Jew. Al Sharpton: Circumcised. Even Hillary Clinton
claimed to have unearthed some evidence that she was a Jew - along
with the long lost evidence that she was a Yankees fan. And that, boys
and girls, is how the Jews survived thousands of years of persecution:
by being susceptible to pandering.
Clark said that when he discovered he was half-Jewish, he remembered
growing up in Arkansas and feeling "a certain kinship" with Jewish
families in the dry-goods business. (I, too, have always felt a
certain kinship with Calvin Trillin.)
The democRATs' urge to assert a Jewish heritage is designed to
disguise the fact that the democRATs would allow the state of Israel
to perish as Palestinian suicide bombers slaughter Jewish women and
children.
Actually, the Israelis have chosen to be the puppet representatives of
the US oil industry in the middle east, and they live the life
appropriate to that role. And this is the role Ms Coulter offers us,
a life like that of the average Israeli. Namely, a constant target of
everyone with a bomb and a grudge.
Of course, we must never examine this issue rationally, we might not
be able to assert our right to solve our problems by killing tens of
thousands of people. We should just run our ugly stupid mouth.
You may have noticed, but like Rush, Ann never seems to discuss
Republican bills or initiatives. I'd love to hear her defense of the
secret energy policy document, which IS our ONLY foreign policy
document, and which guarantees thirty years of war, and dependence on
Mr. Cheney's friends, followed by ecological and economic collapse.
But why should Ms Coulter discuss failed and moronic policies, all
clearly in the interest of folks living off their interest, dividends
and rent, when she can insult people far more active, far better
educated, and far nicer than she is?
Their
humble-origins claptrap is designed to disguise the fact that liberals
think ordinary people are racist scum.
I'm an ordinary person, and I think Ann Coulter is scum. She's what's
called a hack.
Their perverse desire to
discuss the deaths and near-deaths of their children is designed to
disguise the fact that they support the killing of more than a million
unborn children every year.
We should go back to 50,000 deaths a year in back alley abortions.
The interesting thing about Republicans is that they're against
abortions, but refuse to recognize that abortions are going to take
place anyway, always have, always will. They just want to inject a
little "justice" into the process by imposing their religion on
everyone (see Coulter's moronic column that Pat Robertson doesn't
impose his, uh, "morality" on everyone else) and making sure a certain
percentage of women die.
She's a wonderful example of feminism.
(Oh, by the way, what did their milkman
and millworker fathers think about abortion?)
If the democRATs start extolling you - get a gun.
What a nasty piece of human offal. I can certainly understand why
partisan psychopaths like yourselves would get off on her work. It's
political pornography.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jack Nichols" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
13 Jan 2004 12:20:58 PM |
|
|
According to the media, Howard Dean is the epitome of the Democratic
activist -he has mobilized the peace movement and he has single-handedly
managed to control the Internet -a delusion which is extremely serious,
compared to past efforts to ridicule a Democrat through the silly suggestion
that Al Gore invented the Internet. Howard Dean's media profile is an
absolute joke and it is safe to say that the only thing that his "peace
activist" Internet savvy profile inspires --on the count of three now --one,
two three...gag!
Reality:
Howard Dean is the biggest con artist in American history since Richard
Nixon. He has promised to take the government out of the hands of special
interest groups and give it back to ordinary voters, yet Howard Dean has
also indicated that it is futile to try to reform the health care system
because Congress will not let him do it. Anybody who takes this idiot
seriously should be in therapy. Clearly, if Howard Dean cannot even reform
the health care system what makes him think that he is in a position to take
the government out of the hands of special interest groups? Perhaps, Howard
Dean ought to define what he means by special interest groups because if he
continues to dole out silly rhetoric through both sides of the mouth, George
Bush will ask him to be his running mate, and ***** Cheney will finally be
able to retire.
First and foremost, the notion that Howard Dean is a peace activist is
absolutely fraudulent. To be sure, Howard Dean publicly opposed attacking
Iraq to set him apart from fellow Democratic, but this feigned opposition
has been repeatedly contradicted by the war hawk that Dean has conveniently
repressed, for the sake of political expediency. Despite the popular
misrepresentation that Howard Dean is a peace activist who opposes war, Dean
even endorsed the Bush doctrine of preemptive war, saying that he would not
rule out using military force to disarm either North Korea or Iran, and that
makes him the biggest warmonger of all. In fact, Howard Dean is as crafty as
Richard Nixon was. Have all the so called, peace activists forgotten Richard
Nixon, the crafty warmonger who wrote The Real Peace to claim John Lennon's
"constituency" after he was assassinated. To be sure, Lennon was not even an
American, but he was the face of the peace movement, and Richard Nixon, the
former master of the hostile takeover, believed that real peace was about
waging and winning wars.
If you are a peace activist and you think that Howard Dean is your man,
watch your back. Like Nixon before him, Howard Dean understands the
distraction that peace advocates can potentially impose, and he thinks he
has discovered a way to hijack their political influence. In particular,
Senator John Kerry is the Democrat with a balanced view about war and peace,
and Howard Dean's effort to create the impression that he is in fact the
architect of the real peace reflects the very same, manifest delusion that
preoccupied Richard Nixon. If you want to know who the real Howard Dean is,
you have to compare his record to that of John Kerry, and then you will
clearly understand the difference between a Democrat and a crafty, political
opportunist.
Who is the real, Howard Dean? The real Howard Dean is best understood
through his regressive and draconian view of the criminal justice system. As
Governor, he underfunded public defense, and poured money into state's
attorneys, police, and corrections. Dean managed to fill the prisons, not
because crime increased, but because the public was treated like it was
always wrong and the state was always right. Howard Dean is one of those
arrogant extremists who thinks that he has the right to be judge, jury and
executioner, and the climate he creates is best described by famed Attorney,
Gerry Spense, who speaks from experience when he says;
"There is a presumption of innocence, not a presumption of guilt, and
everybody in this country has lost his presumption of innocence and goes
into the courtroom, presumed guilty. People who do not have first hand
experience with the justice system might be surprised to note that the
problem appears to be so widespread that anybody who is oblivious to the
fact that miscarriages of justice are very common, is promoting the myth
rather than the reality. The average American in this country cannot get a
fair trial. Ninety-seven per cent of the people charged eventually get
convicted --now that is a frightening statistic. And I will tell you that a
fair trial in this country is the biggest myth that's been laid out on the
American people since the beginning of time."
Howard Dean espouses the philosophy that the government is always right and
ordinary people are always wrong and he is so extreme that he even thinks
that George Bush is a moderate. To use own words, Howard Dean said that, "in
his soul" Bush is a moderate, and that is not at all surprising, because "in
his soul" Howard Dean is John Ashcroft.
Clearly, the campaign of this would-be tyrant who thinks that he is entitled
to control the Democratic Party because the Internet can easily be used to
launder the money of special interest groups, has peaked and is about to
crash. The Iowa caucus is just one week away, and although the conventional
wisdom claims that Howard Dean is still the front-runner, it is only a
matter of time...
Indeed, Howard Dean does not have very much to say lately because he is too
busy trying to deflect one gaffe after another, and the temper of this
wanabe dictator is beginning to show. "I'm a little tired of the 'gotcha'
politics of this campaign," Dean fumed on CNN as his campaign went into full
defense mode, and this is just the beginning. If he is tired now, how does
he expect to survive a race against George Bush? Needless to say, when the
Democrats discover the real Howard Dean, he will not have to, because John
Kerry and John Edwards will re-inherit the votes that belong to them.
As Governor, Howard Dean endorsed the National Governors Association policy
opposing the Kyoto Protocol and recommending that the United States "not
sign or ratify any agreement that would result in serious harm to the US
economy." For environmentalists, EP, under Dean's leadership, came to mean
"Expedite Permits", rather than Environmental Protection and business
leaders were impressed with the way Dean went to bat for them against
Vermont's stringent environmental regulations. Why is Al Gore supporting
this guy?
Dean is supposed to be so popular that he has allegedly raised over $40
million, and the average donation, it is frequently pointed out, is well
under $100. The zeal to create the impression that everybody except Howard
Dean is influenced by special interests, is absolutely preposterous. Special
interest groups are not morons, they use the Internet to direct money to the
candidate of their choice, and they are better at it than anybody else
because they let their money do all the talking. The claim that the people
who are funding Dean's campaign do not expect anything in return, is an
obscene fraud. Howard Dean's entire campaign is based on well orchestrated
lies, distortions and deceptions and they are clearly too deliberate to fail
to betray the pattern and the conduct of lobbyists who spend millions of
dollars, to distort the truth. The claim that Howard Dean's campaign is
driven by grass-root supporters is clearly a desperate fraud, and the
exuberant enthusiasm of those who have taken the bait, is based on the
failure to recognize the real Howard Dean.
According to popular misconception, Howard Dean has used the Internet to
prove that the Republican and Democratic parties are no longer the most
effective ways to organize like-minded people to achieve political ends.
Clearly, the suggestion that Howard Dean has single-handedly upstaged the
Democratic Party is the wet dream of crafty political operatives who have
generated the perception that Howard Dean is essentially a third-party
candidate who has used Internet technology to achieve a takeover of the
Democratic Party. But perception is not reality. Like Richard Nixon, who
collected million dollar, cash donations in brown paper bags to bribe
eyewitnesses who were in a position to expose corruption, Howard Dean should
not brag about the size of his war chest, because if all of his fans are
correct, then the Internet has the power to take away that which it has so
generously granted --the false perception that Howard Dean is John Kerry and
John Edwards, rolled into a single candidate. Howard Dean claims that he is
the only distinct candidate when John Edwards is the only Democratic
candidate who has not spend his entire adult life in politics and John Kerry
is the Democrat with the progressive record that Howard Dean is trying to
hijack, through his so called ability to upstage the Democratic party.
The media loves to promote the wonderful delusion that Howard Dean has used
the Internet to create his own party, his own hierarchy, his own lists, his
own money, and his own organization, but that does not make any sense at
all, Indeed, if that were true, Howard Dean would not even need the
Democratic Party, he could simply use all his so called Internet resources
to run as an Independent.
Howard Dean is on his way out because he has used the resume of Senator John
Kerry to create the false perception that he deserves to be the Democratic
front-runner, and that is clearly counterproductive because a hostile
takeover demands more complicity than Howard Dean has managed to secure.
Gore and Bradley are not enough.
Make no mistake about it, the Internet is not Dr. Frankenstein. The
Republican and the Democratic parties still dominate and the Internet is
merely the docile recipient of Republican and Democratic resources. If the
Republicans, who are always obsessed by the effort to control the media,
think that Dean's hostile takeover of the Democratic party will enhance
George Bush's re-election prospects, they are correct. If they have filled
Dean's head with the fantasy that he can use the Internet to subvert the
will of the entire Democratic party, the arrogance is understood. But a
democracy is not about creating your own party, it's about joining or
leading the party, and Howard Dean is not even a player, in either capacity.
While governor of Vermont, Howard Dean accepted personal pay from special
interests at least five times for speeches and also received at least
$60,000 in checks and pledges from insurers who benefited from a state tax
break,
In 1993, the two insurers sent the governor a gift, described only as a
"package" after Dean met with them to discuss a bill that would provide new
tax breaks and Dean signed the bill into law later that year. Is this the
guy who uses the Internet, to by-pass special interest groups, or are
special interest groups financing dean's campaign?
Despite the fact that Howard Dean spent 2 years trying to manipulate the
people of Iowa, the Des Moines Register endorsed John Edwards and three
other Iowa newspapers endorsed Massachusetts Senator John Kerry. Al Gore was
successfully conned into thinking that Howard Dean is a Democrat like John
Kerry and John Edwards, but the people of Iowa are evidently beginning to
appreciate the difference.
http://www.geocities.com/bobeshope/kerry.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bloom,Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
14 Jan 2004 11:54:15 AM |
|
|
(Jack Nichols) wrote in message news:<2de1f58e.0401131020.7ba30525@posting.google.com>...
According to the media, Howard Dean is the epitome of the Democratic
activist -he has mobilized the peace movement and he has single-handedly
managed to control the Internet -a delusion which is extremely serious,
compared to past efforts to ridicule a Democrat through the silly suggestion
that Al Gore invented the Internet. Howard Dean's media profile is an
absolute joke and it is safe to say that the only thing that his "peace
activist" Internet savvy profile inspires --on the count of three now --one,
two three...gag!
Reality:
Howard Dean is the biggest con artist in American history since Richard
Nixon. He has promised to take the government out of the hands of special
interest groups and give it back to ordinary voters, yet Howard Dean has
also indicated that it is futile to try to reform the health care system
because Congress will not let him do it. Anybody who takes this idiot
seriously should be in therapy. Clearly, if Howard Dean cannot even reform
the health care system what makes him think that he is in a position to take
the government out of the hands of special interest groups? Perhaps, Howard
Dean ought to define what he means by special interest groups because if he
continues to dole out silly rhetoric through both sides of the mouth, George
Bush will ask him to be his running mate, and ***** Cheney will finally be
able to retire.
A silly and inchoate first paragraph. It would appear that Pres.
Clinton and Pres Cheney have also been unable to successfully reform
the health care system (that is, make it universally available,
probably through a single payer structure), so I'm not sure what the
writer's point is. And I think it's a little PREMATURE to suggest a
weakness in re: special interest groups when none has been shown.
Actually, the point is to change the balance of "special interests"
away from oil and international finance, and more towards workers,
seniors, children, etc.
Of course, THOSE special interests are...everyone.
First and foremost, the notion that Howard Dean is a peace activist is
absolutely fraudulent. To be sure, Howard Dean publicly opposed attacking
Iraq to set him apart from fellow Democratic, but this feigned opposition
has been repeatedly contradicted by the war hawk that Dean has conveniently
repressed, for the sake of political expediency. Despite the popular
misrepresentation that Howard Dean is a peace activist who opposes war, Dean
even endorsed the Bush doctrine of preemptive war, saying that he would not
rule out using military force to disarm either North Korea or Iran, and that
makes him the biggest warmonger of all. In fact, Howard Dean is as crafty as
Richard Nixon was. Have all the so called, peace activists forgotten Richard
Nixon, the crafty warmonger who wrote The Real Peace to claim John Lennon's
"constituency" after he was assassinated. To be sure, Lennon was not even an
American, but he was the face of the peace movement, and Richard Nixon, the
former master of the hostile takeover, believed that real peace was about
waging and winning wars.
Ah, Richard Nixon "claimed" John Lennon's "constituency" after his
assassination? What world was this on? Who was John Lennon's
"constituency" and wasn't Nixon already long since forced into a
resignation by the time Lennon had been shot?
Well, I had planned to look over and answer the rest of this
foolishness, but I'm having real second thoughts now.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 01:53:11 PM |
|
|
(Average Joe) wrote in message news:<86dd0c43.0401112126.5e319370@posting.google.com>...
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble!
The Party Of Ideas
November 20, 2003
The Brilliant & Beautiful Ann Coulter
(Attn. Liberals: Insert your usual vicious, left-wing, hate-filled
personal attacks HERE if unable to refute the article... as Usual!)
WITH ECONOMIC growth and name recognition of the average democRATic
presidential candidate both running at about 7 percent, the democRATs
are in trouble. Unable to rouse more than the Saddam-supporting left
with their kooky foreign-policy ideas, the democRATs had been counting
on a lousy economy.
It turns out that, given a choice between "shock and awe" and "run and
hide," the American people prefer the former. Now that the Bush tax
cuts have already started to kick in and boost the economy, it was
beginning to look as if the Treason Lobby would have nothing to run
on.
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker. Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
At least when Gephardt exploits a family tragedy, he doesn't expect
praise for not exploiting a family tragedy. John Edwards injects his
son's fatal car accident into his campaign by demanding that everyone
notice how he refuses to inject his son's fatal car accident into his
campaign.
Edwards has talked about his son's death in a 1996 car accident on
"Good Morning America," in dozens of profiles and in his new book.
("It was and is the most important fact of my life.") His 1998 Senate
campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he
founded in honor of his son, titled "The Wade Edwards Learning Lab."
He wears his son's Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going
to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a
little too "on the nose."
If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't
you have to take down all those "Ask me about my son's death in a
horrific car accident" bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician
who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal
record for partisan political advantage. I absolutely refuse to
mention the name of my dearly beloved and recently departed son killed
horribly in a car accident, which affected me deeply, to score cheap
political points.
I wouldn't want John Edwards to be president, but I think even Karl
Rove would be willing to stipulate that the death of a son is a
terrible thing.
Howard Dean talks about his brother Charlie's murder at the hands of
North Vietnamese communists. Bizarrely, after working on the failed
George McGovern campaign, Charlie Dean went to Indochina in 1974 to
witness the ravages of the war he had opposed. Not long after he
arrived, the apparently ungrateful communists captured and killed him.
Hey fellas! I'm on your s-- CLUNK!
Howard Dean wears his brother's battered 1960s belt every day. (By
contrast, Ted Kennedy honors the memory of his deceased family members
with several belts every day.) Dean told Dan Rather about his
brother's death at some length on CBS News: "It gave me a sense that
you ought to live for the moment with people; that you really - you
really need to tell people you love them if you love them. It was
certainly the most awful thing that ever happened to our family. It
was terrible for my parents; it was even worse
for them than it was for us."
Dammit, if a man wants to be my president, I have a right to know
where he stands on the issue of when to tell the people you love that
you love them! Couldn't the democRATic Party go back to plagiarizing
British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock like Sen. Joe Biden, rather
than plagiarizing "Lifetime: TV for Women"? Do any men at all vote for
the democRATs anymore?
Carol Moseley Braun's personal tragedy is that she's being forced to
run for president even though it turns out the democRATs won't need
her to split the black vote anyway. Please, can I drop out now? Al
Sharpton is only polling at 2 percent. I hate this!
Sharpton is the counterpoint to his sob sisters in the democRATic
Party. Sharpton libeled innocent men in the Tawana Brawley case. He
inflamed angry mobs in Brooklyn's Crown Heights, leading to the murder
of Yankel Rosenbaum. He incited an anti-Semitic pogrom against a
Jewish-owned clothing store in Harlem, Freddy's, ending in a blaze of
bullets and fire that left several employees dead. So while the other
democRATs talk about their personal tragedies, Sharpton goes around
creating personal tragedies.
In addition to having a number of family deaths among them, the
democRATs' other big idea - too nuanced for a bumper sticker - is that
many of them have Jewish ancestry. There's Joe Lieberman: Always
Jewish. Wesley Clark: Found Out His Father Was Jewish in College. John
Kerry: Jewish Since He Began Presidential Fund-Raising. Howard Dean:
Married to a Jew. Al Sharpton: Circumcised. Even Hillary Clinton
claimed to have unearthed some evidence that she was a Jew - along
with the long lost evidence that she was a Yankees fan. And that, boys
and girls, is how the Jews survived thousands of years of persecution:
by being susceptible to pandering.
Clark said that when he discovered he was half-Jewish, he remembered
growing up in Arkansas and feeling "a certain kinship" with Jewish
families in the dry-goods business. (I, too, have always felt a
certain kinship with Calvin Trillin.)
The democRATs' urge to assert a Jewish heritage is designed to
disguise the fact that the democRATs would allow the state of Israel
to perish as Palestinian suicide bombers slaughter Jewish women and
children. Their
humble-origins claptrap is designed to disguise the fact that liberals
think ordinary people are racist scum. Their perverse desire to
discuss the deaths and near-deaths of their children is designed to
disguise the fact that they support the killing of more than a million
unborn children every year. (Oh, by the way, what did their milkman
and millworker fathers think about abortion?)
If the democRATs start extolling you - get a gun.
Haven't you learnt the lessons of promoting Confederate and Bible Belt
fundamentalist agenda on the Union?
Fugitive Slave Act
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=18510aff.0401051315.1c99c7e8%40posting.google.com
Jefferson Davis
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=18510aff.0312140744.7ef3ef9a%40posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greg" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 08:12:39 AM |
|
|
Boy Joe, that O'Neill thing must have hit you hard. Little upset are we? We
can see by your post.
"Average Joe" <above_average_joe_3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:86dd0c43.0401112126.5e319370@posting.google.com...
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble!
The Party Of Ideas
November 20, 2003
The Brilliant & Beautiful Ann Coulter
(Attn. Liberals: Insert your usual vicious, left-wing, hate-filled
personal attacks HERE if unable to refute the article... as Usual!)
WITH ECONOMIC growth and name recognition of the average democRATic
presidential candidate both running at about 7 percent, the democRATs
are in trouble. Unable to rouse more than the Saddam-supporting left
with their kooky foreign-policy ideas, the democRATs had been counting
on a lousy economy.
It turns out that, given a choice between "shock and awe" and "run and
hide," the American people prefer the former. Now that the Bush tax
cuts have already started to kick in and boost the economy, it was
beginning to look as if the Treason Lobby would have nothing to run
on.
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker. Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
At least when Gephardt exploits a family tragedy, he doesn't expect
praise for not exploiting a family tragedy. John Edwards injects his
son's fatal car accident into his campaign by demanding that everyone
notice how he refuses to inject his son's fatal car accident into his
campaign.
Edwards has talked about his son's death in a 1996 car accident on
"Good Morning America," in dozens of profiles and in his new book.
("It was and is the most important fact of my life.") His 1998 Senate
campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he
founded in honor of his son, titled "The Wade Edwards Learning Lab."
He wears his son's Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going
to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a
little too "on the nose."
If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't
you have to take down all those "Ask me about my son's death in a
horrific car accident" bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician
who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal
record for partisan political advantage. I absolutely refuse to
mention the name of my dearly beloved and recently departed son killed
horribly in a car accident, which affected me deeply, to score cheap
political points.
I wouldn't want John Edwards to be president, but I think even Karl
Rove would be willing to stipulate that the death of a son is a
terrible thing.
Howard Dean talks about his brother Charlie's murder at the hands of
North Vietnamese communists. Bizarrely, after working on the failed
George McGovern campaign, Charlie Dean went to Indochina in 1974 to
witness the ravages of the war he had opposed. Not long after he
arrived, the apparently ungrateful communists captured and killed him.
Hey fellas! I'm on your s-- CLUNK!
Howard Dean wears his brother's battered 1960s belt every day. (By
contrast, Ted Kennedy honors the memory of his deceased family members
with several belts every day.) Dean told Dan Rather about his
brother's death at some length on CBS News: "It gave me a sense that
you ought to live for the moment with people; that you really - you
really need to tell people you love them if you love them. It was
certainly the most awful thing that ever happened to our family. It
was terrible for my parents; it was even worse
for them than it was for us."
Dammit, if a man wants to be my president, I have a right to know
where he stands on the issue of when to tell the people you love that
you love them! Couldn't the democRATic Party go back to plagiarizing
British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock like Sen. Joe Biden, rather
than plagiarizing "Lifetime: TV for Women"? Do any men at all vote for
the democRATs anymore?
Carol Moseley Braun's personal tragedy is that she's being forced to
run for president even though it turns out the democRATs won't need
her to split the black vote anyway. Please, can I drop out now? Al
Sharpton is only polling at 2 percent. I hate this!
Sharpton is the counterpoint to his sob sisters in the democRATic
Party. Sharpton libeled innocent men in the Tawana Brawley case. He
inflamed angry mobs in Brooklyn's Crown Heights, leading to the murder
of Yankel Rosenbaum. He incited an anti-Semitic pogrom against a
Jewish-owned clothing store in Harlem, Freddy's, ending in a blaze of
bullets and fire that left several employees dead. So while the other
democRATs talk about their personal tragedies, Sharpton goes around
creating personal tragedies.
In addition to having a number of family deaths among them, the
democRATs' other big idea - too nuanced for a bumper sticker - is that
many of them have Jewish ancestry. There's Joe Lieberman: Always
Jewish. Wesley Clark: Found Out His Father Was Jewish in College. John
Kerry: Jewish Since He Began Presidential Fund-Raising. Howard Dean:
Married to a Jew. Al Sharpton: Circumcised. Even Hillary Clinton
claimed to have unearthed some evidence that she was a Jew - along
with the long lost evidence that she was a Yankees fan. And that, boys
and girls, is how the Jews survived thousands of years of persecution:
by being susceptible to pandering.
Clark said that when he discovered he was half-Jewish, he remembered
growing up in Arkansas and feeling "a certain kinship" with Jewish
families in the dry-goods business. (I, too, have always felt a
certain kinship with Calvin Trillin.)
The democRATs' urge to assert a Jewish heritage is designed to
disguise the fact that the democRATs would allow the state of Israel
to perish as Palestinian suicide bombers slaughter Jewish women and
children. Their
humble-origins claptrap is designed to disguise the fact that liberals
think ordinary people are racist scum. Their perverse desire to
discuss the deaths and near-deaths of their children is designed to
disguise the fact that they support the killing of more than a million
unborn children every year. (Oh, by the way, what did their milkman
and millworker fathers think about abortion?)
If the democRATs start extolling you - get a gun.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, selfish, intolerant,
bigoted and racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SharptonOnARoll!" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 10:28:57 AM |
|
|
"Greg" <grag.g@surferie.net> wrote in message
news:1005atphpr6gma1@corp.supernews.com...
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker. Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
The Democrats are sooooooo cooooool at playing "Weep On Demand"! I think
they must practice for hours each day over at DNC Headquarters or something.
Remember the filmclip that Rush Limbaugh used to run on his TV show of Billy
Clinton, at the Ron Brown funeral? Walking along, chatting gaily, until
Billy noticed the cameras were running. Suddenly, without missing a beat or
a step, Billy was seemingly able to make a cute little tear run down his
check, right on cue, for the camera. Or he tried to make it LOOK that way,
as he reached up and pretended to wipe the tear away for the obliging
cameraman.
Sure, Clinton was especially good and practically a World Class master at
playing "Weep On Demand", but some of the other Demmie candidates these days
are pretty proficient at it too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Captain kozmic" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 12:42:15 PM |
|
|
In article <dXzMb.33262$nt4.66297@attbi_s51>, "SharptonOnARoll!"
<BlackManUprising@DemocratNationalCommittee.com> wrote:
"Greg" <grag.g@surferie.net> wrote in message
news:1005atphpr6gma1@corp.supernews.com...
But the democRATs have discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns
out that several of them have had a death in the family. Not only
that, but many democRATs have cracker-barrel humble origins stories
and a Jew or lesbian in the family. ***** Gephardt's campaign platform
is that his father was a milkman, his son almost died and his daughter
is a lesbian. Vote for me!
So don't say the democRATs aren't the party of ideas. As they keep
reminding us, their ideas are just too darn complex to fit on a bumper
sticker. Consequently, the democRATs can't tell us their ideas until
after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is
to stage a "Queen for a Day" extravaganza - which has special
resonance in the case of the democRATs.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992
democRATic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring
political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a
car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his
sister's long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point
that Gore's family members had to fear any more runs for higher
office.
In the current campaign, Gephardt has taken to spinning out a long,
pitiful tale of his son's near-death three decades ago. If a lingering
family medical tragedy is the main qualification for becoming a
democRATic presidential candidate, what's Michael Schiavo waiting for?
At dozens of campaign stops, Mrs. Gephardt weeps anew as her husband
tells the same gut-wrenching story over and over again. The relevance
of his son's illness to Gephardt's run for the presidency is this: It
inspired Gephardt's call for national health insurance. With his wife
softly weeping in the background, he intones, "I get it."
The Democrats are sooooooo cooooool at playing "Weep On Demand"! I think
they must practice for hours each day over at DNC Headquarters or something.
Remember the filmclip that Rush Limbaugh used to run on his TV show of Billy
Clinton, at the Ron Brown funeral? Walking along, chatting gaily, until
Billy noticed the cameras were running. Suddenly, without missing a beat or
a step, Billy was seemingly able to make a cute little tear run down his
check, right on cue, for the camera. Or he tried to make it LOOK that way,
as he reached up and pretended to wipe the tear away for the obliging
cameraman.
Sure, Clinton was especially good and practically a World Class master at
playing "Weep On Demand", but some of the other Demmie candidates these days
are pretty proficient at it too!
Good one bub! But I am certain Limbaugh will too be weeping when he is in
jail. Oh yea, the fat one will be buns up as a big bad inmate is fucking
his fat ***** calling him his ***** *****!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 09:43:43 AM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 11 Jan 2004 21:26:08 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Average Joe) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism
democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble!
alt.fan.j-garofalo, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.congress,
alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Please stop posting your political rantings to alt.atheism.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: democRATs in BIG BIG Trouble! |
12 Jan 2004 10:02:49 AM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:n4g5009blos6tojprr1kk2iibbet4kfr9h@4ax.com...
Please stop posting your political rantings to alt.atheism.
Please stop posting your idiotic replies everywhere else.
--
-My Real Name
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
